Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An Amateur Asian porn site. That is relatively rare these days.
- Over 500 models (see cons).
- I like their sites Trike Patrol and Tuk-Tuk Patrol. Those also feature John Tron who is on ASD as well.
- Some of the Asian models are very attractive.
- Kind of updates "daily", an example of kind of, the March 30th update is a 30 second video of John Tron talking and standing in an airport terminal, I guess. The screenshot that I clicked on showed a very pretty Asian woman in tight jean shorts but she's not in the video.
Cons:
Cons will be explained in the bottom line:
- The navigation is very bad. You have three search options: alphabetical, country and date of release.
- The value is very low. $40 for no downloads, not even the photos.
- The photo quality is 1600 long end at best. That was barely acceptable in 2007.
- The blogs, the master guides, have not updated since 2015.
- Non-Asian models. It's an Amateur Asian site! I can see American and European amateurs all over the internet.
- The price. It's the only website on the internet that is $40 with no downloads.
- The ads. Seriously? 12 ads in the right margin and 3 are moving? For a $40 a month website?
- The Flight Club, a rewards system, definitely see Bottom Line.
- The camerawork in doggystyle.
- Some of John's own comments to members make you wonder how "unique" he is.
- Their own sites Trike Patrol and Tuk-Tuk Patrol have nearly as much "sex" content with downloads and are cheaper.
- A lot of cleaning up needs to be done on the site.
Bottom Line:
I considered saving this for my 350th review. I have both welcome emails to verify I am a full, paying member on the site. Seemed too easy to just jump in and pummel the site. The truth is I wanted to like this site. I once read something by John Tron about his frustration with Americanized women and I could relate. I have read other things by him about his love of Asian women.
I expected this site to have problems with me. The no downloads is a problem since I am a collector but would someone really try to sell a site for $40 a month, no downloads and not deliver with a very unique experience? I took that risk. They set the precedent with the price and no downloads.
The content reminds me a little of Amateur Allure. It's formulaic. Some of the models are really pretty. There is an indifferent part for me but could be a positive or negative to others. Most scenes end in a creampie. I'm indifferent to both the creampie and facial. I do want to note before the creampie, some of the videos skip a little. Looks to be edited. It isn't my connection. I'm on gig internet.
The streaming videos look good if you go full-screen. If you don't go full-screen you will have at least one moving ad and five more ads beside the video player. There are also 6 moving ads below the video player.
I watched several of the non-sex videos, a few funny moments, but nothing special. The photos look like they could be good until you click one and see it's lost in 2007. They are 1200 to 1600 long end depending on the orientation of the photo. You also can't download the photos.
In a comparison, I watched 2 of their "sample" videos on free porn hub, a tube site, they allow the content to be there. I only had to see 2 ads beside the video player on free porn hub. The videos are shorter (9-12 minutes) on porn hub but it's because they edited out most of the bouncy camera parts.
Each doggystyle section is similar to mounting a camera on a mountain bike and riding it down the mountain. They also use a fixed camera for doggystyle. This gives you the unique experience of only seeing the woman's side boob, side butt and John's side gut.
The blogs haven't updated since 2015. The product reviews by John haven't updated but once in the last year and one of the newest reviews is an external hard drive. Something you won't need on this site.
One of John's replies to a member that asked if he was going to bring the model back ... "asking every day. Her husband seems to be the problem". The site's tagline is, "Conquering Asia: One slanted pussy at a time."
Member reviews have long been based on "value" meaning price/what you keep from the site. That is $40/0. Look at that, I found the unique part about the site! It's the only site on the internet charging $40 for what is equal to a glorified tube site, except it has more ads than a tube site.
I started the review saying the site set the precedent. It is what happens when you insist on playing by different rules than other competitors. I'm not talking about mainstream porn, either. I'm talking about Trike Patrol and Tuk-Tuk Patrol. They have downloads and are $10 cheaper.
I believe ASD jacked their price up to get people like me to think "they must be doing something really special on this site to charge $40 for no downloads." I would have been much happier with a month of Trike Patrol.
I'll end with the Flight Club. They reward you points for things like being a member (+100), for logging in (+10) which pays them for all those ad views, commenting (+10) probably reloads the ads. You can "buy" scenes for 600 to 2000 points. Oh and for writing "informative articles" about Hot Asians and Porn (+400). I'm wondering if I get those points for my review? I noticed at least one "member" (the 99) review here has the same review all over the internet. A note on the price, the 2013 TBP reviews said the price was $29.95. How many sites have increased their price from 2013 to 2019? Upon canceling, Vendo offered me a "please stay" discount of $19.95 a month.
I used the same scale I have used for 12 years and on 349 reviews to write this review. I rarely list all deductions or additions since there usually aren't this many. I will not argue or debate with their webmaster but he is welcome to comment. Here are the additions and subtractions.
-20 for no video downloads.
-20 for the price shifting/overall value.
-10 for the non-Asian models.
-10 for poor photo quality and no photo downloads.
-10 for the ads, the not updated blogs.
-10 for a rewards system that awards members for shilling the site and clears their points as soon as they cancel, even if they still have membership left.
That's 100-80 = 20
+35 for the pretty amateur Asian models and the non-doggystyle believable sex.
+3 because I don't like odd numbers.
Of note: I have taken -20 for poor photos and no photo downloads before. I knew I couldn't add enough points to make up enough to get it to 50 points.
100-80+38 = 58.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Kiara Mia is a very pretty solo model who is hard to find content of.
- If you try to leave the site after taking the tour you are offered a lower price of $19.75.
- Some pictures have extremely high resolutions, some go near 6000 long end.
- Site is fast
- 13 similar solo sites included in membership
Cons:
- Where to start? First of all the site has no downloads to speak of. You can't download the videos and though some of the picture sets have a download link, it doesn't work.
- Really old style of updates, including up to 10 parts/updates for ONE photoset. Videos are also updated this way and can be streamed.
- From looking at two of the bonus sites, Isis Taylor, Nina Mercedez, those sites also offer no downloads.
- To ask $30 for this group of poor sites with very low quantity counts is borderline criminal. Honestly, I don't even like this model anymore. That's how disgusted this site made me.
- Speaking of criminal, some of the videos and picture sets are from Brazzers and Aziani. I'm sure they have rights to use those, but I already had those videos from Brazzers and Aziani.
- Archived webcam shows are poor. One includes Kiara fully dressed until the last 2 minutes, just sitting and talking. I joined a porn site not a "tell me about your GD life site".
Bottom Line:
I probably could have went on with cons for another 1000 characters or so. I am not kidding when I say this or exaggerating, I cancelled my membership with this site within 9 minutes of joining it, according to my ccbill receipts. I got burnt on some solo sites a few months ago. Made myself write, "I will not fall for those solo sites anymore" 500 times, then fell for it again.
There is a little good. I tell you though, you're going to have to work to get the good. The good is you can use a legal bulk image software downloader to download all the photos in each set.
Every set that has a "download this set in zip" link gives me a 403 Forbidden message when I click it, so using the bulk downloader was the only choice since I'm not going to go back to 1998 and do right click save as on each photo.
Most of the pictures are 1500x1000, but I would say 15-20% are in the 3500x6000 range. The reason I had been drawn to this model was a set I saw on Reality Kings that had her in it for about 1-2 minutes. It was one of those sets that has 15-20 women in it. She really stood out in that video and I had been looking for content of her ever since seeing it. I did a few sets on Brazzers, but haven't had much luck anywhere else.
So these pictures, despite being a pain in the ass to download, are pretty rare. There also are a lot of pictures. The thing is, there isn't a lot of sets. For those that were around porn sites in the early 2000s, you'll know this practice that this group of sites practices.
Here's what you see when you join. There are 20 photo sets per page and there are 15 pages. That's 300 photo sets. Right? Or roughly. Hell, lets say 250 photo sets.
Looking on my hard drive, there are roughly 50 photo sets. These include sets as small as 15 photos of Kiara at a gay/lesbian celebration. I don't have 50, my count is 37, but I grouped most of the candid ones into one folder so I'm giving them a boost when I say 50. I can tell you that there are roughly 4,000 photos. You can do the math. They have 250 or so photo sets listed, 4,000 pictures, there's roughly 15-25 photos in each set. Now for the fun part. You'll find photos that went with a set updated in late 2009, in the late 2010 updates and have to drop them into the right folder.
I can't support that. It's misleading, it's 2012, piece photo sets together over 7-8 updates is a hassle and a cheap way to boost the content count. This wouldn't have been so bad if the videos weren't done the same way, but they are. This gets worse too. Besides only allowing streaming, they release a video in parts, 2-5 on some, then they release the "full" video as a new update.
This site's earliest content is dated 8-3-2009. That means this site is nearly 2.5 years old. It has roughly 40-50 photo sets and around 20 full videos. Based on this pace, the site has been up for 129 weeks, thanks date duration calculator and has roughly 60-70 full scenes or photo sets.
I can't tell you how pitiful that is and it's still updating too. They list their updates now as 3-4 times a week, but they are tiny pieces of full sets of photos or tiny pieces of videos. Plus you have to go through the hassle of using an image downloader and can't download the movies.
On the blog, Kiara has posted one time that I see. On her twitter which is linked to the site, she mostly brags about how much money she is making. That didn't help my perception of her. Oh and lets go back to late 90s, early 2000s again, she has a wish list too of all the things you are welcome to buy her and send her. There's something to be said about models who are satisfied with people willing to pay money to look at them naked.
Technically, the photos are good to excellent. Nice resolutions, colors, settings and poses. The videos vary in streaming quality since some do come from other sites. Some look to be 720p, maybe, others look to be in the 480p range.
The webcam shows are still active, I think. There was one in the last month, but there was a full 6 month lull in these also in the archived section. Sadly, the best ones are the ones of her just talking. The others are webcam recordings of photo shoots. That's exciting, huh? Lets watch photo or video shoots from a blurry camera across on the other side of the room!
Not to worry to the webmaster or Kiara, I'm not making fun of you all. I'm obviously the dumbass here. I will enjoy the pictures though after 6 hours of loading a bulk downloader. Oh and on that, a few of the newer sets have broken image links, so you can't even use the bulk downloader on those. I gave the site 5 points for having a nice looking site and a rare model. That is how my recommendation for this site will work.
If, like me, you just have to have those 4,000 pictures of her and don't mind the hassle of the image downloader then you might not feel too ripped off. Otherwise, unless you just like throwing money down the drain, don't join this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Good TBP price of $19.99
- Very good clear movies 720 x 480
- Great work on the photos that they do have. Some of the best pictures I've ever seen of Anetta Keys.
- 100% exclusive
- What models they do have are some of the best, Anetta, Sandy, Sandra etc..
Cons:
- False advertising of models, only 27 not 72
- Pic resolution is 1024 at the high end
- Watermark goes from bottom of foot to knee on standing model
- Movies are split into parts
- This is a strange one, the security code, though showing up, tells me I'm wrong 3-4 times before it lets me sign in.
Bottom Line:
You can also read my comment for more about the false advertising. This site has it all, expect someone running it the way it should be ran. The content they do have is very good. They have 6 or so sets of Anetta Keys, and each set would rank a 9-10 in my book. Good poses, nice lighting, colors are a little warm, but it isn't nothing that bad.
Videos are crisp, excellent size 720 x 540, though the split scenes are a little dated for a newer site. Which it is obvious that was done so they can advertise more than 300 movies, when really it is under 100. What I thought was funny, on TBP it says the discount is $19.99, which is down from $39.99, but if you go to their join page it says join for $29.99.
Looks like they lied to TBP too about what their regular price is to make it look like a bigger value. This company is the same one the runs K-sites, and those K-sites have a very bad reputation, from having Sandra Shine to walk out on them because they were keep asking for more from her to for some reason, not including this site in their network.
I feel a little ripped off, but the Anetta Keys material will keep me from bashing too hard on here. I would hope though that others will not be fooled by the 72 models they show as, "OUR models", according to the unabridged law dictionary, "Our - referring to possessing or had possessed"
Last, they also have in the soon section, Crissy Moran, who has been retired for awhile now. Big down thumbs, not recommended!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Harriet Sugarcookie, one of the cutest, most playful and most believable Asian amateur models.
- She has a British accent and she's Asian!
- Mostly amateur content and you will believe that.
- Harriet or someone's personality shows on the site. They have blogs, news, video games, not safe for work sections, a magazine layout of their favorite recent articles and so on. It looks like everything but a porn site.
- Right at 50 models including Harriet, only a handful of pros like Aletta Ocean and Tiffany Doll.
- It's going in pros but 342 total scenes made me wonder.
- Bills through Epoch or Paypal, your choice
Cons:
- Every review I have read of this site talks about the downloadable videos. Those are gone. I paid $5 more than the regular price thinking it was for the downloadable versions but it's not.
- Every review talks about the photo sets. There are no photo sets anymore.
- The only option is to stream in a clunky 720p player that has to buffer every 30 seconds even though I'm on a 1GB connection.
- The December 2017 review on TBP lists 337+ scenes, there are 342 as of 4/20/2019, that's recycling.
- Used to have 2 updates per week, now it has 2 updates per month and it's recycled content.
- While the blog and magazine has some interesting articles you could find most of those with basic google searches.
- I wasted $20. Notice the amount I paid is different than the two prices TBP lists, so something strange is going on with Sugarcookie. I joined through TBP too.
- The hardcore scenes are not very good.
Bottom Line:
Harriet Sugarcookie is one of those rare combinations of sexy but geeky. I would guess Harriet Sugarcookie is not her real name but then again I don't remember the last time I heard an Asian person talking with a British accent.
I thought I had found the porn world's best kept secret when I found this site. I could be wrong on the "mostly" amateur models. I only recognize a few and I was wrong when I thought I had found one of the porn world's best kept secrets.
What you get here is a site that looks like anything other than a porn site. I had to go through a whole process just to figure out how to join it. The tabs include "Magazine", "News", "Trending", "More" and "Porn". Magazine is a collection of articles like "The 10 Sexiest Girls on Game of Thrones" and the news is articles like, "Where to buy sex shop clothes that aren't trashy". The articles are mostly interesting if for no other reason, something different to read and think about. These are authored by the same person and they update every few days.
Oh yeah, I joined a porn site. I was feeling good about the numbers considering it's an amateur site.
There are 214 hardcore videos
64 solo videos
64 lesbian videos
That is 342 total videos. The 2017 TBP review and facts update lists 337+. It also was updating 2 times a week in 2017. Which means there should be at least 500 videos by now. I understand that these solo sites can be hit or miss and the models and owners of the sites often have disagreements but someone is still updating the site like it is updating. There are 2 new updates in April 2019 and 9 in 2019. That tells me there is some recycling.
Rabbit's Review site shows member's area pages where there was a download button below each video and social media bar, now the download button is gone and there's a second social media bar.
This is type of site I normally wouldn't even review but because I was being curious again and found nothing but 2017 reviews talking about how good this site is, I thought I should review it and warn others.
All the reviews I've seen also talk about 100+ photo sets. I haven't found 1 photo set. The closest I've found to photo sets are in the magazine "girls" section and each entry focuses on an Instagram girl. I don't see those as sets since they are random pictures.
The really bad part is Harriet is a great amateur model. The streaming videos show very realistic sex which means the hardcore is as boring as watching your neighbors have sex but the solo and girl/girl content is very good. You definitely won't feel like the girl/girl content is scripted. It's very playful and cutesy to start and then they get downright dirty.
I'm guessing I'm late to the party. The oldest content is 2014, so it is not a newer site.
You can see by some of the titles that the content would be interesting to most porn fans:
Harriet's first ever anal toys
Harriet's first ever dual penetration with toys
Harriet's first time getting off with the showerhead.
Harriet's first on camera blowjob.
It's the very type of content solo fans look for. Everything is kind of screwed up from the recycling, so I really can't tell what is newer and what is older other than Harriet's own changes in how she looks.
It also takes away from whatever the blogs and news added since I don't know if those are just recycled too.
The most confusing part, I joined through TBP and it shows a $15 streaming price and a 2nd price at $25. I have to think that's the download version price and it's what I joined except they only charged me $20.
Hopefully, others will see my review before spending their money on it. That streaming player is the worst I've seen and there are comments on nearly every video that are complaining about it. It buffers about every 20-30 seconds.
They do have a porn deals section with reviews of the sites they are offering discounts on and nearly half are rated lower than 4 out of 5 stars.
My thinking is Harriet is the writer and she is using her real name. She talks about in the Babes Network review how she wishes she could model for Babes.
Breaking down the negatives comes up with a bad problem.
-20 no downloads
-20 no photos, or downloads of photos
-20 for recycling
-20 for the streaming video player being terrible
-20 for whatever the hell happened to the price
-17 for 5 updates since 2017
For a total of -17
I'm going to give it a cute and playful +69 for the Harriet content for a final score of 52.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
