Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of a Japanese/Asian network that seems to have flown under the radar.
- This site has 1,721 videos just on it, it also has 4 other sites with it.
- Seems to be 100% amateur, almost looks like user-submitted.
- Some of the scenes are very good, very realistic and even some public scenes.
- Epoch is the biller.
- No censoring.
Cons:
- Download speeds are poor (about 25% my max) but it doesn't really matter.
- The video quality! These videos look like they were shot on a flip-phone from 2007. The highest quality video I've found on this specific site is 320p. There are even 240p videos. I have downloaded over 100 scenes and none were over 100MB.
- I don't know if they're updating and the dates don't help, the newest listed scene is 2016, later in the pages of 1,721 videos there are some from 2019.
- No model list, no model names.
- Scene length varies from 1 minute to 15 minutes. Some are just say a cumshot.
- The biggest con here is probably that this could be a very good site.
Bottom Line:
I stumbled up on this network which is listed as the Long Time Pass. How much more better can you get than using the classic saying from the Full Metal Jacket movie where the soldiers meet a prostitute and the American soldier asks what he can get for $10 and the Asian prostitute says, "Me love you long time." Which then became a sample used in the 2 Live Crew song, "Me So Horny".
Most of the scenes here look like they were recorded during the Vietnam War. The scenes are not unwatchable. They're blurry but they have so much potential it kind of makes it all the more worse.
I wouldn't believe for 1 second that this is a professional studio or anything more than someone's collection of user-submitted porn. Some of the women are very attractive. The action in some of the scenes blows away the pro sites but there's so many problems it makes the site itself almost unusable.
Here's your navigation features: Tags. That's it. There are no photos, there are no categories and there is the ability to click on the other sites in the network to check those out too. There are ads too.
I wouldn't even disagree with this part. The majority of the videos I have watched, I would click the up thumb on how good they were, poor video quality or not. Most of the videos have 90-100% up thumbs. The ones that have low user scores are usually overweight/BBW Asians which is fairly rare in porn.
It's a complete mess but it's not hard to use. There just isn't much to help you find the content. The tags do seem to be accurate. Like "Thai" or "Handjob". That video quality one is going to hurt the most with most potential members. It's also usually one camera. There was one really good scene of an American man with two Thai young women. The camera looks to be on one side of the hotel room and the bed is on the other side of the room. You see the one Thai young woman riding him and another Thai woman comes in and sits on his face.
I feel like I'm being generous with the score in some ways and in other ways, I feel like I'm being unfair. The action itself is really good. The review I posted before this one was talking about 480p not being that bad. This site is worse than 480p.
I'm going to review the other site that comes with the network. One of the sites that comes with it is called Yellow Spinners and it's not listed here at TBP and the network as mentioned is called Long Time Pass. It also has Asian Creampies which I didn't check to see if it's listed and it also has the other one I'm going to review called Jap Box.
I joined it through an ad on another Asian site. As my score shows, I am not going to write this site, Asian GF Videos off as terrible. There's a lot of POV so you get better camera angles. It's just this is very much an amateur site in the truest and maybe worst sense.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Interesting and unique site with real amateurs.
- Good mixture of body types from the female models, you also get a good blend of looks, they look like girls and women next door.
- Epoch through Paypal was the biller on mine.
- Cute look to the site, colors are easy on the eyes but see cons.
- Large amount of content for an amateur site but see cons.
- Some very good solo scenes.
- Most of it is believable as people having sex not just performing for the camera.
- Good download speeds (75-80% of my max)
Cons:
- Pricing is strange, there is a $15 option if you join for 3 months and pay $45 total, otherwise it's $35 for 1 month.
- The navigation should have been focused on more than the visual appeal. I will explain in BL.
- This is a con of all amateur sites, some of the women are not attractive to me.
- This will also be in the bottom line, their numbers include interview videos that introduce you to those in the videos. Those will then have a part 2 with the sex in them. I would say it about any site that does that, it pads those video numbers to split them up.
Bottom Line:
I was first introduced to Ersties by my girlfriend back in December 2018. She was very shy about porn. She is a female-positive blogger. She showed me Ersties and said, "This is nice porn". She only got away with that because of her cute accent. I read a lot of the very positive reviews and thought I would try it.
First things first, there is no $15 option unless you join for 3 months and pay $45. It is $35 a month. The site has a nice layout and color scheme. It kind of reminds me of a coloring book. Pretty, soft colors and little people doodles. You also can make your own cartoon avatar. Don't join it for that, you can search Google and do it for free.
I'm going to start with they have some really good solo scenes. The models are all over the place in looks. They have excellent video quality. You can download from 160p up to 1080p on all of the videos. There are some very attractive models. I really like the photos and they can be downloaded in zips. This is where my odd sides shows. Most of the pictures are tease and with some clothes on. I've been this way for a long time. I like seeing women in clothes in everyday situations. I would go as far as saying these are some of my favorite photo sets.
If they just had a solo site with these solo videos and photos, I would say this is a very good site.
That's where everything goes all to hell. Things that should have annoyed me with even the solo videos but had not, started annoying me. I picked two scenes out to show my biggest problem with this site.
I will start with Nina. Very pretty model, her pictures are really good. In the videos we have Nina part 1, it is 10 minutes of Nina talking. Then there is Nina 2 and it is just 2 minutes of Nina showing her tattoo. In Nina 3 she talks some more and takes her clothes off. In Nina 4 she finally masturbates. These stand out for a reason. Videos 1-3 have a total running time of about 22 minutes. Why are those split up? Many years ago, sites like Brazzers and Ox Pass (Bang Bros) split scenes up to get higher video count numbers. I said it was bullshit then and I will say it now.
The next scene is Sofia and Tay in Deflowered. I thought Tay was going to pop Sofia's cherry. He is the virgin. Kind of. Sort of. If it doesn't count that in his 14 minute interview he tells that he attends sex parties with men. And has much sexual experience. Besides that, this scene has Interview with Sofia, Interview with Tay, Sofia and Tay in action 1, Sofia and Tay in action 2, Post sex interview with Sofia and Tay. Five videos for 1 scene.
This problem gets worse. The navigation gives you 131 pages of 10 scenes each and the interviews are included in those. There is a model list but I personally did not know any of these models by name. The only sorting you can do in updates and models is most recent and alphabetical. They have this other tab called "Video search". There are maybe 40 tags. If the tags are accurate there is far more solo content on here than lesbian and boy/girl. I have seen this site advertised as "couples porn". According to their tags they have 59 boy/girl scenes, keeping in mind, most of those will have 1-3 action scenes. So, 20-30 boy/girl scenes. They have 535 tagged as solo. They have 296 tagged as pussy licking. I'm guessing the other 500 are interviews. I'm not exaggerating.
There are 131 pages x 10 per page, that's roughly 1,310 videos and those I listed the tags for only make up about 800. If the interviews were more interesting maybe I could see some of those being of use. We all are tough on sites that have too many interviews. I am going to just share the beginning of one of the interviews:
"What is your name, where are from and how old are you? What do you like about Berlin?" The one model answered that with, "I feel freedom in Berlin, like I have never felt before." Just stop.
It's like porn sites don't realize the problem isn't the person answering the questions. It's the robotic, repetitive questions that are the problems. Now I'm interested in what else they asked. You are welcome for the laugh you get from this. I skipped forward in the interview and the next question was, "What did you do before this?" The one said, "I want to get into the circus school." The other said, "I have tried different things, as well a lot with animals." Those are from the subtitles. I'm not touching it.
Like I said, it has good solo content and I will try to download as many of the photo sets as possible. Those interviews are not moving porn forward. ATK had interviews like these 15 years ago. The boy/girl scenes are not good. The lesbian scenes are okay and that is about it. The navigation really needs work. One of their pinned scenes is a woman with 4 men. The interview lasts 17 minutes. The sex of 4 men taking turns with her lasts 22 minutes.
The photos, video quality and solo content saves this site. I squeaked it 5 more points up to a 75.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I'm pretty sure it's the biggest porn site on the internet and if not, it's close.
- Depending on your tastes, I find most of the new DVD porn to be similar to what you find on the big networks.
- They've cleaned up a lot of navigation and site issues but more issues have showed up.
- The standard membership gives you a lot of value, especially if you're new to porn.
- Download speeds are very good, going right at 80% and up of my max DL speed.
- Most of the new(er) DVDs are in 1080p resolution.
- Still updating with 5 DVDs per day (average of 20 scenes).
- The biggest pro in my opinion is the opportunity to rack up a huge collection of your favorite stars.
- More genres than they realize they have. I believe the only thing you won't find here is gay male porn.
- Easy to join and cancel with their onsite cancellation process.
Cons:
- The search is back to being broken but not really broken, it's just they now include all their scenes from their add-on channels in your search results.
- I used to not think too much of this but it's becoming a big problem now ... way too many repeat scenes.
- If a person joined all the add-on channels Videobox has they would have upwards of $200 invested in a one month membership.
Bottom Line:
I thought the last time I reviewed Videobox would be the last time but at least one model has caught my attention who I've been collecting scenes of and VB has a large amount of scenes of her. It's also the easiest place to add to your niche interests like handjobs and some CFNM too.
What do you get for updating your porn site with 5 DVDs per day for years? A mess. Videobox currently shows 19,748 DVDs and that's 106,244 scenes. The dilemma you'll find yourself in is there's no doubt you can find something you'll like or maybe even a lot that you like but you will spend a whole lot of time trying to find it all and a lot of frustration.
My current example: I once saw a CFNM scene that featured this unnamed model, the other 2 models were named in it but this other one played the role of the sweet, shy, innocent girl who just watched. I thought she looked familiar but I don't join a lot of sites with the newest models on them. I then found out she's Dillon Harper who is one of the most popular models in porn. Anyway, I looked around for content of her and Videobox says it has 48 scenes of her.
So, I joined a few weeks ago and sure enough, they have 48 scenes of her. That is if you have Videobox, their PornPros add-on channel ($15), their Reality Kings add-on channel (which is where I first saw her), their Evil Angel add-on channel ($15). It might not seem like that bad since you would think those individual studios would maybe only have 2-4 scenes max but here's how it breaks down:
PornPros Channel has 14 of her. Evil Angel Channel has 9 of her. Reality Kings Channel which cannot be joined any longer has 3 of her. Elegant Angel has 1.
So, of those 48 scenes, only 21 are available with a Videobox membership. It gets worse. Of those 21, 3 are the exact same scene listed as Natural Tits #23 scene 8, Don't Get Mad, I Fucked Your Dad #1 scene 2 and Young Freaks #3 scene 2. So, I'm down to 19 new scenes. There's two others that look like they've been doubled.
Meaning I went in thinking I was going to get 48 scenes of Dillon Harper but only got 15-16. As much as I want to keep complaining about this that's still a decent amount for the price but more so than that, it was so time-consuming and frustrating to sort through the scenes that weren't included with membership.
Videobox has and always has had every chance to be a dominant force in porn but the add-on channels are now dying off and they're still asking full price for them. I mean really, $35 a month for a Kink channel? You can join the Kink network for half of that and sometimes for a 1/3 of that and have access to thousands of more Kink scenes. It's not that I'm that bothered by the add-on channels as it is that their scenes are now mixed in the search results. Those add-ons have lowered the navigation of a site that already struggled in navigation.
There are positives including the amount of HD DVDs. They're showing having around 5,500 HD DVDs, that's almost 30,000 HD scenes ... but, those damned add-on channels content are included in those numbers.
I have been frustrated by their insistence to cater to their mainstream porn audience and that's still a problem. They added 10 "handjob" DVDs in 2017 but 4 of those are cumshot compilations that just happen to have handjobs in them. So, they averaged a handjob DVD per 2 months. The same 2 months that saw a total of 300 DVDs added. I think it all shows contentment on their behalf. Videosz made a run at them but they're now struggling and Videobox just sits there with their manipulated numbers to make them look even bigger than they are. Which is something they don't even need to do.
Despite all this negative and frustration, if you know who you're looking for, you can still get more content of them here than almost anywhere else. Here's a few examples:
Tanner Mayes 56 scenes, Alexis Texas 189 scenes, Sophie Dee 164 scenes, Bree Olson 59 scenes, Tori Black 113 scenes, Naomi Russell 134 scenes, Sunny Lane 49 scenes, and Nautica Thorn 165 scenes.
I used those because those are ones I had either deleted or lost and needed to get back. That's a lot of porn. But nearly each one had Evil Angel scenes in their scenes and if you're into the newer models most have Porn Pros Channel scenes in their scenes.
I even found a model who I haven't seen hardly no content of Priva, a Thai model and they have 19 scenes of her but 2 are Evil Angel, which is where I think I first saw her.
What I think is sad is that I can sit here and see all this potential but I know Videobox has been around for nearly 20 years and I have to think if they've not reached their potential after that long, they're not likely going to. I think it would take shutting the site down for a few months and doing major clean-ups to make a positive change even possible. As it is, I join it and have a list ready of who I'm looking for. Still recommended but only for those with patience and who are new to porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network almost exclusively dedicated to handjobs.
- There's probably more handjob content on this network than any other site or network, I'll get to that and the numbers in the bottom line.
- Download speeds are good.
- Eight sites are included in the network, but probably should just be combined into one site.
- Had some problems with this network when I tried joining their "full access" trial, so I came back as a full member and the problems are at least fixed.
Cons:
- Underwhelming. I think that word sums up the network as a whole. A lot of the models have no business being called models. The navigation is very bad. It requires a login for each of the 8 sites, despite having a network hub page. The video quality ranges from average to terrible.
- Just a note on this, back several months ago, I joined this network on a trial subscription. It originally worked as a "full trial", but after downloading 12-15 videos, it started booting me off the site. As mentioned in the pros, I didn't have these problems once I joined as a full member, but anyone considering the trial should be aware.
- Well, eventually you find a good scene, if you figure out how to find the scenes.
Bottom Line:
You might find this hard to believe, but I'm having trouble counting the number of scenes on the network simply because there's no way for me to find them. I kid you not, if you go to the homepage, this is what you're going to find:
Three mentions of new sites added to the network.
Latest prize giveaway
Two newest "Bonus Sites" which are also listed above in the "new sites" links.
A top 10 Most Popular Scenes list
A top 10 Top Rated Scenes list
The 5 latest updates
If you go to say the Club Tug site and login you are presented with the same page from above except it now has the top 10s from just Club Tug and last 5 updates from Club Tug. Eventually, you'll click on "updates" and find a scroll-a-thon through the scenes on the site. There's no filter, no way to search, but there is at least a model tab to find models you like.
I don't know whether this is sad or even real, but you receive a pop-up letter from the webmaster explaining how they offer the best customer service and feel free to email him.
Here's some numbers I have found:
Roughly 600 videos across the network. The newer videos are 1280x720, but a lot drop into the 480p range. There's no real way to know how new any of these scenes are. There's a date, but no year. Looks like they update 10 times a month, which is a respectable number.
I was pretty rough on their models in the cons, but it's true. I understand the concept of beauty if in the eye of the beholder, but there's some terribly bad looking women on this site.
Which is where I will shift gears a little. There's some well-known models here as well. There's quite a few pretty models. And as said, the newer videos are 720p quality. The newer sites, TeasePOV, Mean Massage, and Petite 18 are all good overall. Tug Job itself has plenty of good scenes on it. So, it's not all negative.
I think they could move all of the "sites" onto one site, put a decent basic search engine on it and they'd have an above-average site. As it is, you better have a good mouse with a good scroll wheel and some patience. There's good content here you won't find anywhere else or at least I've not seen before.
Quite a few of the scenes go into plots similar to CFNM sites. The Mean Massage site goes into femdom and cum-controlling. Some of it covers fairly rare content, but you'll have to find it. For me, one month was more than enough. I wouldn't pay the full price for this network. There's just too many headaches and cussing my monitor for full price. Maybe they'll get it cleaned up some with a new interface? Until then, I can't recommend it except for those who love handjobs.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network of very varied genres.
- You're sure to find some genre you like, handjobs, hardcore, trannies, midgets, hairy women, older women, older men with young women, solo girls, wet and messy (WAM).
- Technical quality is questionable, but the downloads work good and the navigation is good, so I'm listing it as a pro.
- A lot of the picture sets come in downloadable zips.
- The problems others have had with this network's billing seem to be fixed. I canceled with no problems.
- Quite a bit of the content is exclusive, but they do use their own content on more than one site. For example, Lori Anderson's My Sex Life has a handjob section in it. The network has a handjob site that is mostly the Lori Anderson handjob videos.
- $9.95 TBP/PU price
Cons:
- Ads, there's an ad at the top of every page that offers a free one day subscription to another site. If I remember the small print it then rebills at $39.99 after one day. You have to avoid clicking it. Then when you go to leave the site and get your mouse pointer up to the url box of your browser, another ad pops up for Jim Slip's site. It's a bit annoying.
- The site design isn't that bad, it has a hub page that has all available sites which can be accessed with one click, but every site works differently and there's no uniformity between the sites.
- I'll go over the mix of genres this network has in it, but I'm really surprised by the extreme differences.
- It's hard to say on the exclusive part. Most or all of it looks exclusive to me, but there's fudging. The site "Teen Photos" comes off as a purely amateur site, then right there on the first page is the forever cute Addison Rose. The advertising of this site in particular comes off as self shot.
Bottom Line:
This is one of my lowest scores I've given in a long time. For those that don't know, I very rarely go below a 70. I try to keep my scoring range in 71-100. My apologies on that part since I can't figure out the difference between a 50 and a 70. By giving this network a 75, I'm saying it's not that good, but if you're interested in the content they have it could be worth a one month join especially with the great TBP/PU price of $9.95.
I'll start with my single biggest complaint. I can't tell you how I dislike sites/networks that don't put dates on their content. It's for multiple reasons. One, if you date your content, it makes it easier to tell when you started putting higher quality videos on the network. It shows if you're still updating. It gives us an idea if the content is just old content being used as archival fill.
That's my feeling with this network. I really don't remember all these sites being in the same network. I've looked at Tampa Swingers before, but don't remember it being in a network this large. Same with Lori Anderson's My Sex Life site. It looks like these are sites that have all stopped updating and were put together as a large collection.
There's nothing wrong with that. There are good things here. The network works well as long as you dodge the ads. I'm betting those ads are the kind that sign you up just from clicking on them. One sits roughly 1 inch above the "see all updates" button.
I'm going to start with Lori Anderson's My Sex Life. Lori has been around for a long time. Her cam schedule on her site still has her listed as active. Freeones has her listed as active since 2004. Most of the content on here looks to be from 2004-2008, basing it on the picture quality and video quality. The videos are 480p. The pictures are 1280 long end and a little blurry. She comments on one of them and says something about her pussy in picture #24 being the cleanest pussy ever. You can't even see it because of blur. She also doubles as one of those models that shouldn't write their own blogs/comments. She explains in one of the sets that she washes her pussy twice a day with a shower massager and never goes to bed without washing it again. Seriously, this is porn, turn me on, don't tell me about your hygiene regimen.
From looking at the other sites, I've not seen a video over 480p. I have seen a few that do have dates on their updates, but can tell you some are wrong. On Teen Girl Photos, a site that's not half-bad, they have picture sets of Addison Rose listed as 2012 that are from 2007-2008, how do I know? I've been collecting her content since 2007 and have sets that look identical to the ones listed as 2012 from 2007. This site is advertised similarly to those "My GF" sites, "Teen Amateur Self-Shot" sites, but like those sites, very little of the advertised content can even be found. Still, it's not terrible especially if you collect any of those models. I think most of that content appeared on Twistys, Teen Dreams, back years ago.
Then there's the unusual, but appreciated mix of genres of sites. If they had a CFNM site I would say they have all genres covered. So there can be a positive there. You might find a few gems you haven't seen before. That's another positive, the network works really well. You're taken to a home page hub that lists each of the sites included in your membership. You can get to each one by clicking them and you don't have to sign in again.
As soon as I start saying positives, a negative comes up, for some reason, after about 30 minutes on the network, it stops recognizing me as a member and gives an unauthorized message when I click on a set/scene. I hit refresh, it recognizes me as a member and pops its tricky ad up in the middle of the page again. Get that off there.
Whether to recommend this network is where I'm most torn. I won't be joining it again and will only keep a small folder of content from it. But if one of those genres or more than one is something you enjoy, you might like it. Just be warned about those silly ads, the fact that you have to refresh it every 20 minutes or so and that I'm going to take a guess and say there's no new content on this network and hasn't been since 2013 or so. There's a handful of scenes that say 2015, but I don't see it in the technical quality of those. So, look at the content and decide if those varied genres would be enough. I think it's the only thing this network really has going for it.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Another of the sites in the Orgy Max network, of fetish sites.
- Movies are 640 on high end and 1400+ speed
- Pictures are high resolution and zipped
- Very believable content, true amateur feel to it
- Getting better speeds on this one than the others, almost 1400 kb/s on a 10 M connection
Cons:
- Hey, I saw that guy on the other sites! Same men from their other sites are on this one too.
- Price is a major issue with this network and even as standalone sites, this is a cheaper one by itself, but it will still set you back 30+ in dollars
- Sets are very similar, kind of a "Seen one, seen them all" feel.
- Have no idea what they are saying, not even for sure what language they are speaking. I speak and understand English, Spanish, Portugese and Italian, but have no clue on here!
Bottom Line:
I had forgot to review this network and its sites, so I will do this one too since it is one of the more popular sites in the network.
The basis, bunch of guys go to a college party or just a party with nothing but women. Give them women beer until they get naked and have a big orgy. Sounds just like college in the USA! We've been doing this stuff for years here.
One thing I want to add here is that I do like that the men in these videos do not push these women around or try to force them to swallow. They hug the women after having sex with them. They seem to be very geniune and fun-loving men, though I would think so, getting sex from 5 college women per night will make you fun-loving.
This one is a little more organized than Party Hardcore, but I'm now wondering if that is a good thing. This site's sex seems very planned. The girls though do look like that it up to them whether they have sex or not. Some of the sex is very mechanical, which I think is with the paid women. Other parts is very wild. You will see this plain average girl suddenly jump on one of the guys and give him the riding of the century! Which is where the believability of the site comes into play.
Still, unless you love a good drunk room full of girls, I can't recommend it for the price. You actually get pissed at the guys in it for not picking the one really hot woman you notice. It is probably no different than any other orgy site, except the high price. Good content, but not this high.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Can get with Sandra Shine's solo site for $39.95
- Pics are high res 1200-1600, could be better though
- Movies are nice quality 750 on high end
- It has tons of potential since it is owned by Sandra Shine. Maybe this is what Club Sandy looked like years ago?
- Downloads are at very good speeds, I'm getting about 20% over my average speed.
Cons:
- Tiny site as of right now, you get about 40 combined sets, 20 or so pic sets, 20 or so videos.
- Unless combining with Sandra's solo site, there is no way it is worth $25
- Pics and movies come in zip files, kind of frustrating on the videos.
- Other sites such as 1byday and the 21st Sextury sites have similar content, but have 100 times more of it.
Bottom Line:
I was really happy to see this site opening. I received one of those, "Come back and join" emails to Sandra's site that let me join Cruising Girls as well for a special price of $29.99, which is only $5 for Cruising Girls. The regular combo deal is $39.95 for those two.
Overall, the site is a lot like Sandra's solo site. It doesn't work well with Firefox browser, so keep an IE browser for it. The quality on everything is very good to great. The model selection is as expected, Eve, Sandra, Peaches, so no complaints there. I even seen Tera Bond, who I hadn't seen any new material of in awhile. I'm not for sure if this content is exclusive, as a member of most of the Euro sites, I can honestly say that I had none of this material. So, it was exclusive for me.
The site will be very good in the future if they keep it going. I would like to see bigger pictures. I bought myself a new monitor that has higher resolution than these pictures. The videos are nice, not quite HD level, but well above average. I really enjoy Sandra's material, she seems to be more into these sites since she has a vested interest in both.
To my surprise, she has returned 2 emails I sent and was quite nice in both, including sending a picture in an email of her in California. Can't believe I missed that! It is hard to review her negatively, she seems to be working hard to make these sites work, but unless you get a combo pack with her solo site, Cruising Girls can't be recommended by itself.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- If you're looking for mature amateur content in high quanities, this is a great site
- You get the $14.95 discount thru TBP
- Creampie fans will love this site
- Has a high value for interracial fans as well
- Pictures though not hi resolution are available in zip files and look pretty good
Cons:
- Videos highest quality is barely average, 512x384, and are only available in segments
- No offense is meant, but unless you like mature models, you probably won't like Cathy, though many of the women who appear on the site with her are quite young and attractive.
- The videos seem to follow a laid-out formula, becomes boring after awhile
- Cathy's inconsistency in her own performance (will explain in BL)
- Older videos really need to be improved
Bottom Line:
I came away from this site with a mixed bag of feelings. Cathy loves sex, no doubt about that, but you kind of feel like she has bored herself with so much sex. The site becomes a contradiction of itself. Her almost uncontrollable desire for sex in the older videos is only hampered by the low quality videos, while her newer videos that are average quality, she doesn't seem to have near the energy or enthusiasm.
Several of the other women in her newer videos are full of energy and really outshine Cathy, which again makes the site a contradiction of itself. As Cathy's Craving doesn't look to be any stronger than the girls on her site.
The video quality on the newer clips is "doable" at full screen it looks blurry, but is still watchable without too many problems. The next contradiction in the site is that Cathy is an amateur. This site has been online for 9 years. I know that there aren't any real pornstars in this, but when you do something for 9 years, you are hardly an amateur, no matter what the field.
Still, if you are into mature/interracial, very hardcore sex, I would recommend it. I don't think Cathy is much more than average looking, but most mature models are just average looking.
If you are into younger models, I would tell you to take the tour and decide for yourself if the other models in her videos are worth joining the site for, those other models were the reason that I joined. Overall though, to the average porn fan, not recommended!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very intriguing site with close to 400 models.
- Has bonus sites, Honey School and Honey Index, which is a fast access portal to the models.
- Has feeds to other sites, looks to be over 20 or so
- Some older picture sets that I have not seen anywhere, as old as 2000.
- Quality of pics is decent, while videos are well above average
Cons:
- Horrible navigation, you can tell it's a New Sensations site.
- Most of the content can be found on other sites, especially pictures in much bigger resolutions
- Site feels incomplete, like the tech guys went home and forgot to finish it
- The major one for me, all videos that I found were cut into sections, 3-7 sections.
Bottom Line:
I liked a lot of things about this site. It is unusual when you find one part of the navigation to be perfect, only to find that it is horribly flawed. As you probably know I am an Eve Angel fan, so I went straight to her section, 1 video that I had never seen, but it was cut into 4 parts. The pictures of her included many that I have seen and maybe 5 sets that I hadn't. Most of the ones I hadn't were older sets back when Eve was nearing skinny levels.
On the other hand, I found many pictures of Sandra Shine that I hadn't seen before. See what I mean? For every good thing, there was a bad thing. Which is why it feels incomplete. The videos are fine quality in the 700x500 range, the pics are not near as good, I saw a few nearing 2,000, but many were under 1,000.
I don't like the way the actual Hungarian Honey's part is just pictures, then you click on "videos" and it takes you to that section. I would rather click on the model and have her videos and pics together. They are advertising 300-400 movies, maybe I'm missing them or just haven't went through them enough. Most of the movies don't list who the models are, instead, a catchy title like, "Two hot girls in the rain".
The only word I can come up with is incomplete. It's not a bad site by any means, the content is nice, but I keep waiting for this magic button to pop up and say, "Click here". I can recommend it only if you have never been on a Euro site. Otherwise, take the trial for $9.99, fully featured trial.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 13 solo models network, I went for Victoria Valens, a Mexican jalepeno of a model!
- I don't know if my timing was right or if they have changed policy, but I was able to get the whole network for $24.95, by joining through Victoria's site. Though the TBP price states $39.95 for the network, and even now, I have the network coming up at $34.95. Either way, I must have been lucky or maybe they are using different prices on different days?
- Some of the other models besides Victoria are very attractive as well, all amateurs.
- Pictures do come in zips on each of the sites.
- Download speeds are above average, believe they are based out here on the west coast of US.
Cons:
- I personally didn't care for some of the models, one named Echoe Matthews, reminds me of what will happen if Sandra Shine lets herself go, go see for yourself if you don't believe me!
- Overall quality is below average, pictures are 1200 at tops, some are only 1000.
- Videos are terrible quality for 2008, how about 320 high end with below 1000 bitrates?
- Going from site to site can be a little frustrating, since I kept going to the wrong site because I forgot which girl was named what, thumbnails please!
- Very little hardcore to speak of
Bottom Line:
Victoria Valens is the biggest reason to join. She is a Mexican amateur model that I would be willing to bet will one day be the next Daisy Marie or Jenaveve Jolie. She has a very innocent, girl next door quality to her and she is far from perfect. With a little more weight in the hips than her body should hold, but that is how I like the Hispanic models.
Out of the other 13 sites on this network, I will give a score from 1-10, with 5 being average of each model. Parker's Panties a 5, Echoe Matthews a 4, Hailee Jordan a cute Anette Dawn lookalike gets a 7, Candi Malone a 6, Claudia Nichols a 6, Danni Chase a 7, I Dream of Janie an 8 on body, 5 on face, Lainey Moore a 3, Mandy Wright a 3, Sarah Dreaming a 5, Skye Mcallister a 5, Suzy Stevens an 8 and Victoria Valens a 9.
Guess which two they have the least content of, Suzy Stevens and Victoria Valens of course!
What really frustrated me is the inconsistency from site to site, some had full movie scene downloads, others had split files, and they count each of those split ones as a whole scene.
As you can see from my above breakdown of the models, in the end, the average of those models would be at best average.
The video quality is just terrible and for the most part are a waste, 320 high end. Picture quality isn't much better, but do come in zips.
Victoria and Suzy are worth joining for their pictures if you like them, but overall, I wouldn't recommend this network, especially at the higher price that TBP shows.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Some incredibly flexible models
- Vid quality is decent but could be better, at most 500 on high end. Does have decent 1000+ bitrate
- The old fetish has kind of been satisfied, what was it that I saw up those cheerleaders skirts, if that was ever a fetish for you, this does a good job on it.
- Women are very free with their bodies, fists, dildos, all while wrapping their legs around their neck.
- Has something of an erotic artsy feel in a good way.
Cons:
- Let me get this out first, this site is not only featuring incredibly flexible women, it is also incredibly boring.
- Overpriced for amount of content, should be $14.95, instead it is $34.95.
- Videos are grainy in full screen
- Pics are useless, they take up about 1/4th of my monitor screen, below 1000 on the high end.
- Very repetitive sets
Bottom Line:
These women are real gymnast/ballet dancers/contortionists. The erotic side of this site is very high. You almost feel like you are watching these women stretch, get themselves turned on, then masturbating for you to watch. The only problem and is something I should have listed in the cons is that a good portion of these models do wear masks or half masks, which takes the fantasy of watching an unknowing woman away.
I used to get samples on TGP sites from Perfect Flex, and often thought, "I bet the site shows much more" I was wrong. They do masturbate and even fist, but I'm telling you if you are like me you are going to start feeling like, "Well, they are just doing that for the money". While I agree most models are, at least make me think that isn't true.
I believe most of the models are probably from Russia, very pretty women, if you like toned and fit women. The navigation is about as good as I would expect since I don't believe any of these models are actual porn stars. If you've ever seen the model, Veronika Simon's body, that is the bodies these models have. It still comes off as boring. I really don't have any major complaints except with the price. Videos could be better, pics definitely need to be better, but I could deal with both if they lowered the price and got the models more into what they are doing. Recommended only for those people who have a fetish of a nude woman stretching. Just keep in mind, they all do the same poses, it is just a dull site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The extreme side of 21 Sextury, a network with 16 sites, the TBP review only lists 13.
- A little bit of everything from transsexual to lots of older with younger, will break it down in BL.
- Very good download speeds.
- Technical quality is high with 1080p option dating back to the 2010 range. Pictures are also of high quality and downloadable. The last few years pictures are over 5000 long end.
- Not for sure what the regular price is but I used the TBP very good discount of $9.95.
- Not nearly as many models as 21 Sextury but still 1,225 but that does include males too.
- I feel like a broken record on this one, has some very rare scenes of Euro models from the mid-2000s, yes, I had another hard drive problem and need to get those back.
- Navigation is very good for a network.
Cons:
- There's going to be content here that's not for everyone. This can vary from the actions to the models. Which is exactly what I think 21 Sextury was going for with this network. Different is good to me but a lot of people won't like it.
- I feel petty even saying this but their network lists updates for the entire network, there is a sidebar that lists all the sites available but maybe if the scenes had their site name under the preview photo?
- 13 updates in 30 days (May 2018) isn't very good for a network of 16 sites.
- Zoliboy hasn't updated since March 31, 2018, that was my favorite site on this network.
- Only 4 of the 16 sites are updating and a lot of the content on the sites not updating is from pre-2010.
Bottom Line:
21 Sextreme is different. There's transsexuals, 60-70 year old men with 18-22 year old women, 50-70 year old women with younger men, there's fisting, there's gynecology, domination, pissing and one of my old favorites, zoliboy. If you find yourself getting bored with the same content over and over you'll probably like this network.
This different style of porn isn't always for me. My porn interests seem to be from extreme to the other. My ideal porn is a pretty woman stripping her clothes off and masturbating. I rarely get tired of that but when I do, I just blame the model and find a different model. The varied content here is all captured in high quality videos and pictures. They're receiving a bonus 5 points just for having such high quality photosets on what is largely a video site.
I haven't noticed any 4k videos but there's 8 years of videos with 1080p option. I'm still happy with the 720p. Both the videos and pictures are easily distinguishable as 21 Sextury because of their warm colors and lighting.
Here's a list of the sites included. I'll list the active and updating first:
Grandpa's Fuck Teens (every other week) Lusty Grandmas (no set schedule, 7 updates in May)
Old Young, Lesbian Love (every other week) Teach Me Fisting (every other week)
That's it. Zoliboy was updated last on March 31, 2018, so maybe it's just taking a few months off but otherwise, nearly all the sites on this network have stopped updating. I think this shows the lack of updates better than anything, in May 2018, as of the 29th of May, there are 13 updates for May and that's across 16 sites.
Maybe isn't my place to say this but I think it's time to start including these sites with the 21 Sextury network or merging it with 21 Naturals.
The even worse part about these sites that aren't updating is the majority haven't been updated since 2010, meaning, much poorer video quality.
The good, at least for me, is the old content (mostly on Zoliboy) that included the top Euro "softcore" models from the mid-2000s. I had an accidental hard drive erase that deleted all of my 21Sextury, 21Sextreme content which included a very large collection of Eve Angel content. Also Anetta Keys too.
I don't know if I'm right or not and it probably doesn't matter but some of these sites look old DVD content. Also is worth mentioning that not all of the content is exclusive anymore as I've seen some of the 21Sextury content on Bang.com.
If you like old/young porn they seem to be focused on that niche right now but other than that or if you're a dumbass like me and deleted and entire hard drive and need to get some of your favorite content back, there really isn't much going on in this network. I don't know what has happened and do also have a membership to 21 Sextury network but haven't started looking at it to see if it is also dropping off this much. I didn't think I would ever see the day that 21Sextury was only putting out 13 updates in 30 days on an entire network.
The final score is generous since they at least kept the old content that I accidentally deleted and for the high quality photosets. Not for sure I want pictures of a 19 year old woman getting pounded by a grandpa but can't beat the technical quality. If you've never been a member and like the variety then I would recommend it for a month. If you've been here before and downloaded most of what you want, I can't say you're going to find much new.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Capri Cavalli, one of the prettier porn stars and she's just behind Aleska Diamond in the prettiest eyes in porn for me.
- This is some sort of re-launch or new launch. It should be noted that the name is different than the TBP listing has, it's now XXXCapri not Club Capri Cavalli.
- Videos are nice quality 1280x720, except for a few of the older ones, which is where this site can be very confusing.
- Pictures are in the 2000 long end range and are zipped.
- Navigation continues to be a strong plus on this site especially with what I think is the web 2.0 software.
- Comes with four other sites
Cons:
- The site is updating, I was very frustrated with this group of sites when I did the Regan review and said I thought they were recycling. Maybe their webmaster could chime in and say if these new updates are newly shot. Capri is pretty enough and young enough that it's really hard to tell, will continue in BL.
- At this point, it's a very small site, 26 videos, 19 photo sets.
- Doesn't look like there will be any new webcam videos
- Re-launch as a different site is going to cause some confusion, hopefully I can help that confusion out in the bottom line
Bottom Line:
This is a very hard site to review. Two main reasons, it was known as Club Capri Cavalli, now it's XXXCapri. I don't know if that needs to be changed in the TBP listing.
Next problem and why there is going to be confusion. When listed as Club Capri Cavalli in Duke's review for TBP, the site had 69 videos and 83 photo sets.
Not anymore. The site has 19 photo sets and 26 videos as XXXCapri. Similar to the situation with the Regan site, I'm not for sure if there's a legal problem that happened there, but I do want to clear that up before anyone joins it expecting quite a bit more content than there is.
What content is here is very good. Seems to be a trend with the models on this group of sites to be good dirty talkers. Capri is no exception, which again leads me to preferring her solo videos over the girl/girl, boy/girl. The content by genre.
19 Photo Sets
6 solo
4 group
5 girl/girl
4 boy/girl
26 Videos
8 solo
3 group
5 boy/girl
7 girl/girl
3 old webcam with Jessica
As I said in the cons, the site is now updating. It's not quite making a weekly update, but it's pretty close. August 7, 2011, seems to have been the date that it switched to the name and since then there have been 3 photo updates, 3 video updates on August 15, August 25 and September 5th. I'm not going to use the recycle word, but would like to know if these new updates are actually new updates or just old sets with the new watermark logo on them. I don't think it's going to change my score much either way since an update every 10 dates isn't going to fill the site very fast.
I look at it the same way as the Regan and Tanya site, if you're a fan of Capri, it might be worth joining just for what looks to be mostly exclusive content.
However, if you are a fan of the other models, the group itself as a whole is very good and would be recommended.
I'm hoping if nothing else with this review that I can warn Capri fans ahead of time that there isn't near as much content as there was when the site was listed under the Club Capri Cavalli name, it will save them some frustration, like the frustration I had with the Regan site and in turn save the webmaster the frustration of seeing their sites get slammed by reviews expecting more.
If the updates are new and the content is still being shot then I would add about 5 points to the score.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Do you miss seeing porn that has actors and actresses you've never heard of? If so, this site is for you.
- Cheap in price $8.99 per month, no gimmicks.
- Updates faster than any site I've ever seen, not for sure about their claim of 10 new DVDs per day, but the number of total DVDs, on the main page, has gone up nearly 200 since I joined about 3 weeks ago.
- Download speeds, surprisingly, aren't bad, slightly below average, but for $9 a month, what more can you expect?
- Though they don't talk about being exclusive, I have no idea where you could find most of these besides the bargain bin, but that isn't always a bad thing. You will find a few scenes here and there that may interest you.
Cons:
- Besides being cheap priced, it is cheap everything else as well.
- Quality is nearing bad levels, 440 high end max, 840 is the fastest bitrate I've seen.
- Can't keep up with updates, which include videos that automatically screm, "Don't download me" like the series from Holland that looks like it was recorded between 1965-1975
- A whole lot of sifting through DVDs that most wouldn't want. You know that you aren't getting newer higher quality videos when you search Eva Angelina and get 0 results.
- A few broken links and connections as well
Bottom Line:
When I join a site under $10, there aren't many, but I know that when it is under $10, that I'm probably going to end up frustrated beyond all ends.
I'm trying to think of the most positive way to go about this. Lets say you go to an adult video store and they have a bag filled with DVDs for $9. That has to be how this site filled its inventory.
I still don't think that is a big negative, since I know some people like the older porn, complete with the soundtracks intact.
The quality though is pretty bad. The bigger your monitor the worse it looks. I decided to do a few checks on a few of my favorite newer models and here is what I found.
Eva Angelina 0 scenes, Daisy Marie 0 scenes, Jenaveve Jolie 0 scenes, hell they have to have an Audrey Hollander scene, right? Wrong. For the content they have, they do have a decent search system that lets you search by series. Since it is highly unlikely that you will know any of these models by name.
Let me add that I don't think the search feature that you type what you are looking for, really works. I tried a few names that I had seen in their videos, and those didn't show up either. They do have some interesting Holland exhibitionism videos though and they have over 200 DVDs just of Latin porn, so I'm guessing if I had the patience and time that I could find something good there, though the quality would still be bad.
Kind of hard to decide here. If you're on a budget, a $9 per month budget on porn, then try it out. Like I said, patience and time are the keys with this site. Neither of which, I have much of. I did find a few Ice La Fox scenes, so there is a positive.
I just can't recommend it to anyone with the means to join one of the more well-known DVD sites. The exception is for those who may like older porn or the "classic" genre of porn. For those, the $9 is worth a shot at finding a few DVDs that you might enjoy.
For me, I won't be back. They also use Netbilling, which requires patience as well since they never sent me an email with my payment details or how to cancel instructions. Only for those looking for low quality hidden treasures.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Skilfulhands is a very good handjob site on this network, strap on bangers is a pretty good one too.
- The trial is full access and the site allows you to use download managers.
- You get over 60 sites with the network
- Has plenty of odd fetish sites and several mature sites as well
- Very good download speeds, some sites are updating
Cons:
- Where to start? You have to sign in on every site, that is over 60 times if you check out each site
- Most of the sites are overlapping in material, with as many as 3 mature sites that could easily be put on one site.
- Payment can be confusing, go through Segpay to get the trial
Bottom Line:
There are some updates, but my guess is that this network is nearing the end. The navigation is probably the worst I have seen. No model names that I can find, instead, you just scroll through pages of thumbnails. Finding pictures is even a task on here. Some sites say, "Galleria" which is where I would expect pictures to be, but then the pictures end up in the link titled, "Pics".
It is also home to the much unusual, Midget Orgies. You got mature, chunky angels, shemales doing women, women doing men (strap on), shemales doing straight males and well, you get the picture. Each of these has their own site. I'm actually rating it higher than TBP did for Skilfulhands.com. Really fast servers, probably because there aren't a lot of members.
Sexy Nubiles looks promising, but I honestly became tired of scrolling the pages. The other 60 or so sites, bleh at best.
Now for the biggest complaint. Why do sites have a problem with finding someone to spell or proofread for them? I kid you not, one model named Britney, her name is misspelled on 3 straight clips, "Brintey", "Briney" and "Britny" come on people, at least make it look professional. Misspellings are all across this network, every page.
Overall, the trial is recommended for the price of $7.95. You are sure to get your money worth at that price, but not a nickel more.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Artistic site that might just grow on you.
- Check out the model list, I don't know these models but there are some really pretty models on this site.
- Updates every week, it's a little confusing and will need explained further in the bottom line.
- Dark trance like music in the videos, I usually don't like music in a video but there's no masturbation. Kind of like having your own private stripper.
Cons:
- The model list got me to join it, that's where it all went downhill.
- Standard membership was $7.95, VIP was $9.95, I joined VIP, once inside, there's another upgrade needed to download called Ultimate. I didn't upgrade to it.
- Navigation is about as useful as a map to another country than the one you're lost in.
- It did let me, the VIP member, download "low" quality photosets in a file my computer doesn't recognize. I'm sure it can be renamed to a zip, but this is why I didn't upgrade to ultimate. I could tell this site is poorly designed and poorly maintained.
- The "music" videos aren't music videos, they are a picture of a model with music playing in the background.
Bottom Line:
I saw this site's model list and joined. I saw the navigation, the gimmicky pricing, the photo downloads that don't work and realized I had paid $10 to look at some pretty women for a month.
You all will have to bear with me. This site is one of the most confusing I've ever been on.
Here's the choices, releases (updates), models (best part), music (models dancing to music), votes (you pick one of four models to be released next), backstage (BTS type videos), interviews, virtual reality (takes you to the VR version of this site which you have to join, but there are VR videos on the non-VR version too).
Sound confusing? The standard video for each model has the model stripping down to fully nude (most scenes), there's not masturbation but these show more than an R rated movie does. Some of the videos are very good, they are too short though (5 minutes on average). It's kind of like being a member on Zishy, the models look like they're trying to cover everything, but a little slip happens here and there.
Can't download those without upgrading to Ultimate. I wish someone would slap these sites on the forehead and say, "You offered basic and VIP during sign-up. Why didn't you offer ultimate and why would you offer two options with neither having downloads?" From what I read on the TBP review it's a cheap upgrade but I'm tired of fooling with the nonsense on this site. The music videos are included in the standard membership. When I see music videos on a porn site I think it's going to be a model dancing around to music. It's not, it's a still picture and is the background music from whatever scene matches up with it.
I thought I could at least salvage this membership with photosets of these very pretty models. It says I can download low quality or upgrade to ultimate to download high quality OR pay $2.99 to download ONE photoset.
The gimmicky feel is furthered by them having a VR site. On this non-VR version of the site they have VR videos too. I don't watch VR so those are a waste too.
On the videos, if you don't want to upgrade to ultimate you can pay $4.99 per video to download each video. Of a woman rolling around naked for 5 minutes.
They treat their interviews and backstage videos like those are the real treats here. The interviews are nearly 20 minutes long and I suffered through one to see if maybe there was something special about the interviews. It's a Russian model that talks about loving cocktails, going out with friends, having friends close to her and having colorful dreams everyday about having lots of money. I should be getting paid to watch those.
Where I think the real tragedy is here is how attractive the models are and they have up to 4K on the videos. It looks like a very expensive studio with top-tier models and top-tier equipment just threw together a bunch of scenes of women rolling around naked while a dark trance type music plays in the background. I'm not even saying they should have masturbation. It walks a line between classy and snotty. Most of its time is spent on the snotty side.
I'm being very nice with my score just because of how pretty the models are. I find the site nearly unusable. I think if they offered the site at one price, added downloads and focused on that it would be 10 or more points higher.
They have a little over 100 models. The positives I can find in the videos is they use slow motion as the models butts move in front of the camera, it's good and gives good views but after a few of them it becomes dull and boring.
One last warning that I knew wouldn't fit in the cons. Be very careful on the join page. It is set to 6 month membership at a very low price ($6.99 a month for VIP). I just happened to see my total price as $41.99 and backed out, there's a tab to switch it to 1 month.
The update schedule shows a new scene/model per week, then it says a new interview is released every two weeks, photo sets are released whenever they feel like it and backstage videos don't seem to have a schedule.
Hopefully, they will stop trying to use 3 different forms of membership or else I think they're making a complete waste of those very pretty models.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A VR Cosplay site with some really great models on it.
- Supports 7 different VR devices
- Updates weekly
- High technical quality for a VR site.
- Very good job on costumes
- Download speed is just okay at 60% of my max download speed.
- Lots of potential but...
Cons:
- I expected stories, settings but most of what you're paying for here are models in costumes.
- I thought since regular porn sites have VR scenes, a VR site would have regular files for those watching on a PC/monitor/laptop, they do kind of but the content is hard to watch on a regular PC/laptop.
- The streaming player crashes if you watch 3 or more scenes without closing your browser. Requiring a ctl-alt-del to close your browser.
- I did have a PS4 VR headset which is supported and it did nothing but make me motion sick.
- No pictures to download
Bottom Line:
Maybe this is the point where porn fans become divided? I'm glad I got this site on a promo or I would have been more upset with it.
I downloaded multiple versions of the videos on this site.
There is a fisheye effect no matter which way the video plays. Using my PC/monitor the mouse's scroll wheel was allowing me to zoom in and out. Which is hit or miss since most of my zoom in scrolls were shooting me right by the action.
Years ago, a model named Eve Angel caused me to join many sites trying to collect every video she made. A model I think reminds me of Eve in current porn is Apolonia Lapiedra. She has a scene on this site and it was a factor in me joining. I can't even watch her scene. I've downloaded all 7 versions, over 30GB total for all 7 but all of the files split the videos in half and put the scene on the right 15 inches of my screen and the scene on the left 15 inches of my screen.
There are no pictures to download. You have Apolonia Lapiedra in a Pocahontas outfit but no pictures to download?
There are positives here especially if you're a gamer. Fallout, The Witcher, Bioshock, Red Dead Redemption, just to name a few, all have models dressed like characters from those games. The Fallout one to show what I mean about setting and stories. The model is wearing the typical vault outfit. She's wandering around where a picnic bench and chair is turned upside down. It looks like my back deck after a bad storm. She tells the man with the camera she needs water and food. He holds his hand out and does the money motion with his fingers. Sex starts. Those that don't know Fallout it is a game set in post-apocalypse United States, so flipped over picnic table doesn't exactly fit a major WWIII situation that started Fallout.
It seems like if you hire these models that really do a good job of looking like the characters you would spend more time making the scene a little more authentic. Here ... she runs up with her vault outfit tore half off and says a deathclaw attacked her and the male talent is a raider who then takes advantage of her in her scared state. It looked like a regular porn scene with a fan of Fallout showing up. I don't expect great acting or anything like that but I've been around people that are serious in cosplay. They follow a theme.
I know I'm scoring it low for the inability to watch it in a normal way but there is as big of a deduction for the poor production values and lack of pictures.
The potential I see is like with the Eva Berger scene playing Sansa from Game of Thrones. Honestly, I thought it was Melisandre the Red Woman but after I looked she can pass as a Sansa look-alike. I think my eyes were still messed up from trying to watch the scene.
There's a decent amount of content with nearly 130 scenes. I do think they gave up on coming up with parody names. One of the first ones is one of the best names, Grand Theft Swallow. Some of the content is based on much older series like the Betty and Veronica scene. I had to look that up to see it is from Archie comics.
I tried watching two scenes on my nephew's PS4 VR headset and couldn't make it 3 minutes before I felt nauseated. In my defense, I have poor vision in one of my eyes. It gets worse in peripheral vision. I just don't think having to use a VR headset will ever appeal to me.
Maybe this will help others that have seen VR sites they have considering joining.
These are the video types:
Vive/Oculus 5K (newer videos have 5K)
Vive/Oculus
Oculus Go
Playstation VR
Samsung Gear VR
Daydream View
Mobile HQ
Mobile LQ
I thought those Mobile versions would be "regular" versions but they're not. To show the file sizes, those listed above range from 1.8GB to 8.3GB.
They even have Daphne and Velma from Scooby Doo and it looks really good. The costumes, the colors, the women look believably like the characters.
The main thing you are going to see in these videos is a very POV-style of porn. The scenes have Binaural Sound and all that means to me is, you're going to hear obnoxious models screaming "Ohhhhh yes!" very loudly.
This seems like such a good niche. Their Tomb Raider model looks near perfect. But it really is unwatchable for me. I remember when maybe it was Give Me Pink that had the weird fisheye camera and you couldn't watch it without feeling motion sick.
Even if I say it has major potential, it still has no pictures and hardly no stories or proper settings for the characters. It looks like I talked my girlfriend into being a video game character for a night. I do wonder if it is that it will appeal to younger porn fans that are just into the very look of the model. There we go, I've been looking for that word, it feels very shallow. I give it a 70 for the models and costumes. That's it. I don't like anything else about this site. Oh and it has some bonus content that is not VR. I came for cosplay not regular porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Solo site of porn model Tanya James, comes with access to four bonus sites.
- Tanya is a very good solo performer. I wasn't that familiar with her until receiving this as a bonus site.
- Videos are 1280x720, this covers all the videos on the site too, though some of the 1280x720 earlier videos are downloadable as flv files only.
- Photos are in the 2000 long end range, also come zipped.
- All the sites in this group of sites have what I would call nearly unmatched navigation. For once, sites decided to make everything simple and it works perfectly.
- Near max download speeds
Cons:
- By far the biggest con, no more updates, not for sure if Tanya retired or not, but the last update was in April 2011.
- Add the no more updates con to the fact that the site only has 32 photo sets, 31 videos and you can really understand the problem with no more updates.
- One thing I really liked about both the Regan and Jessica sites in this group were the webcam archive videos, doesn't look like Tanya did any of these and that's a shame because she seems to be a good dirty talker.
Bottom Line:
A hard to site to grade. If it were still updating weekly, I would probably go low 80s with the score because Tanya is a very good performer. Some of her solo videos on here are as good as any solo videos I've seen. She's very believable.
If you're not familiar with Tanya, she could fill some niches, tall, long legs, she's listed at 5'10" in heels, she looks to be pushing 6'2", some of the longest legs I've seen in porn and it took me several looks to decide that her boobs are fake. Maybe I'm wrong though, but I do believe they are, either way, very good boob job if they are fake.
In one way, I think it's disturbing that I've found myself giving points for great navigation, but so many sites these days are cluttered, confusing, misleading ads here and there that it's a breath of fresh air to see a site...that just works how it's supposed to.
This is what you're going to get from this site.
32 photo sets
6 boy/girl
5 girl/girl
18 solo
3 group
31 videos
8 boy/girl
3 girl/girl
16 solo
4 group
I wouldn't completely dismiss this site though. Tanya pulls off the blonde one set, brunette in the next set very well, the long legs, the dirty talking, she's very good. I much preferred the solo videos which is a plus since there are more of those and it looks like boy/girl, girl/girl videos of her are pretty easy to find on DVD sites.
Having a HD option for all the videos is also a plus, though some might not like the flv videos since those require a different media player that windows media player, I recommend VLC media player on those.
This is how I'm going to approach recommending it. If you're just a fan of Tanya and not the other models on here, then I could maybe recommend it. Not being real familiar with her content, I still believe this content is exclusive, so it may be enough if you are a collector of her content, especially with the solo videos being pretty rare from looking at her catalog of content on DVD sites.
As a whole, if you like Jessica Jaymes, Regan Reese, Capri, not for sure what Capri's (Cavalli?) last name is now since it has changed and like POV porn, there is one of those included too, then it's easily recommended. Jessica's site really pulls these others up if you are a fan of hers, making these other sites nice bonus sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 13 site network for $19.95
- Several of the sites are very good, The Boss XXX, Latin Booty Girls, Bit Tits and Curvy Asses were my favorites.
- There are video caps, so you can preview before downloading, but no pictures that I have found
- Download speed above average, getting 1000kb/s on 10M connection
- Nice diverse content from Arab to Latina to interracial
Cons:
- No pictures, so I can't comment much about those, the vid caps are ok to look at
- Video quality is below average 320 on high end
- Navigation is something next to driving a 1968 car without power steering, it just seems clunky
- Site names are misleading, Cum Brushers? Human Toilet Bowls? These names have nothing to do with the content for you really twisted fetish types
- Content becomes very boring as does the sites
Bottom Line:
Everything started out fine when I joined. The videos could be improved or better be improved or else they are going to fall way behind. No pictures is frustrating these days, since most networks are now including pictures.
The Boss XXX is a great site. I really enjoyed nearly all of the movies on it. I also liked the Latin Booty Girls and Big Tits and Curvy Asses, moreso for the curvy asses. Having said that, this is another network that could just throw all their material onto one site and save us the trouble of having to go from site to site trying to find the content we are looking for.
This is why I mentioned the misleading names. Cum Brushers is a boneheaded attempt to show women brushing their teeth with cum. Why not just call it swallowing? Human toilet bowl would imply that someone is about to get really messy, but that isn't it. They have the woman parade around a toilet bowl, then treat her like shit. I think I'm burnt out on the abuse sites, and this one doesn't help matters.
I'm putting that as a warning to those reading this. There are several sites on here that involve spitting, writing on the girls faces and your typical Lee Stone type garbage.
Movie quality is below average throughout the network, when you look at HD specs that most sites are offering, you see a 1240, the high end on these is a 340.
Because of this and the abuse factor, I can't recommend it based on my experience with it. If you like abuse, you may enjoy it.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Flashing looks to be 100% real and in locations that I have seen in person.
- Some of the girls are really cute, some are pretty, some are average.
- Models walk up to strangers and talk to them while flashing.
- Everything is average quality or better, pics and vids
Cons:
- There really isn't a whole lot to see on here
- Extreme softcore, very little touching, just quick flash, stop, start over.
- Person videoing talks through the whole thing
- 3rd party content wasn't interesting either
Bottom Line:
I've always been intrigued by exhibitionism and voyeurism, and had saw some samples from this site. I was expecting much more. The samples I saw were the most hardcore parts of the site, and those were even tame. I only downloaded maybe 4 of the girls' videos and pictures, but have never went back to them since downloading them. I would rate it lower, but it does say public flash, not public sex or public masturbation. It just left a lot to be desired for me. If they added maybe 1-2 more clips furthering the tease, then it would rate higher.
My best way to describe my feelings towards the site would be to say I feel like I was in a gym with nothing but women and I walked into the dressing room only to get the door slammed in my face at the last minute!
Definitely need more content and more skin for me and more touching. To put it plainly, it is a very vanilla site. Not recommended if you are wanting more than just basic flashing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The once multi-site, full of potential network is now one site.
- A lot of content, close to 3,300 scenes, includes a video, photos and screencaps. All can be downloaded.
- Download speeds are average (65% of my max)
- There is good content on here if you can find it.
Cons:
- What in the name of Ron Jeremy happened to this network? They took their network sites and just put them all on one site. The tour did not tell me about this change.
- There's no navigation! You have two choices, "scenes" and "girls". There's no way to find the content that used to be on a network site. There's no "categories" choice.
- All the way across the top of the page is a list of their other 12 sites. You can join them all for $69.95 if you upgrade to platinum access.
- Only one update per week.
- Dickery in the model searches, Dickery is defined as, "Doing something that makes you a dick." Will explain in BL.
- They use 25x25 icons to tell you which scenes are Porn Pros scenes or if the scene is on one of their other sites. If you've never tried to make out a 25x25 icon, keep it that way, you would need a magnifying glass to see them.
Bottom Line:
I joined Porn Pros as a fan of their past work. I once gave them an 88 right here on Porn Users. These were the guys that brought such sites as Massage Creep, Shady P.I, Flexible Positions, just to name a few of the unique sites they had in the past.
Now, there is Porn Pros. All the content from all the different network sites is in one location. It takes 3-5 seconds to load a page and I'm on Gigabyte internet.
The site offers navigation choices of "girls" and "scenes". Just to see how that works I picked out Jynx Maze from the girls section. They show 6 scenes for Jynx. In the "more scenes" section they show 3 more scenes of Jynx. Those are on their other sites. I'm not clicking one to find out if it charges me. I only figured out there is a tiny icon, maybe smaller than even 25x25 beside each scene that tells you which site it is from. The 6 scenes I see on Porn Pros are in there and I can see the tiny Porn Pros logo in the icon. I have no idea what icon is on the other 3 scenes.
The only good news is they have a lot of content and some of that content is good. If you know which model(s) you are looking for it might be okay but if you don't know who are you looking for you are in a for a long night of clicking. Not only do the pages take 3-5 seconds to load, some of the images still don't show up.
I'm using simple math to count these scenes. There are 24 scenes per page and 136 of those pages have 24 scenes on them. The first and last page are not filled up. 136x24 = 3,264. The other two pages have roughly 30 scenes on them combined so close to 3,300 scenes. There's very little else to be positive about.
This is the network that was known for going way overboard with the fake cum shooting dildos, they had a quirky side to their content, fairly unique but now unless you have the patience to click through 136 pages that take up to 5 seconds to load, you are going to have trouble finding much here worth your time.
For me, a hard drive crash from a few years ago wiped out my Porn Pros folder. I remember the models I had in it as they were the models I was collecting. The content is still here. Other than replacing lost content there isn't much to see here or I should say worth your time trying to find.
This is one of the few times I canceled a site just minutes after joining it.
I think this is worth mentioning. I joined the site through an email promo for $9.95. While canceling, Segpay offered me the site for $4.95 a month to stay as a member.
It makes me think what I felt while browsing the site is probably true. I think Porn Pros is ready to become some kind of new network with all their new sites combined into one package.
Now they have me curious about Exotic 4K, despite having no interest in 4K.
Dig around on the site you will find some good scenes and photos too but I can only recommend it to those that have been a member before and want to pick up scenes they have deleted or misplaced. This would be a major disaster for a person new to Porn Pros to try and go through.
Segpay is the biller and I had no problems signing up for the site or canceling. There was a pre-checked cross sale for Bang dot com. They really do push that upgrade to platinum for $69.95 too. I feel generous with the 65. It at least had the content I was looking for.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Regan Reese, one of the very few heavily tattooed models I really like. She's the big pro with this site for me.
- Comes with access to four other sites, Jessica Jaymes, XXX Capri, First Class POV and Tanya James.
- There are some nice quality photo sets of Regan, one goes up to 4000 long end on the pictures and all photo sets have zips.
- Video quality is okay at best, but I haven't seen much solo Regan so that's a pro since they have some solo videos.
- The other four bonus sites are pretty good sites. Especially if you like Jessica Jaymes as her site is still updating and has quite a bit of content.
- Webcam archive of Regan's webcam shows
- Surprised me, but there's been a new update listed as 8/7/11, maybe the cons will explain this since in the TBP stats, it hadn't been updating since 2009.
Cons:
- Going to need a lot of these, will fill the details in in the bottom line.
- Price, $29.95, bonus sites are good, but I joined for Regan's site and have to say $29.95 is about $24.95 too much.
- Photo content numbers have dropped drastically from the TBP stats update and even from Monty222's review in 2009.
- Video quality is not that bad if you don't mind downloading the flash video versions. The resolution is plenty good enough, it's an odd one on most 842 long end. Some are not that good and some drop down in the 468 long end area.
- Possibly removed and recycling content, TBP facts noted that no updates had came since 2009, with decreasing content count and new updates showing up in 2011, it's at least a reason to question if it's being recycled.
- No consistency at all, photo resolutions vary nearly from set to set, same with videos.
- Audio in webcam archive sets comes and goes, which is a big part of webcam sets, especially with a dirty talker like Regan.
Bottom Line:
(See my comment for updated information)
Regan Reese is the type of model I normally wouldn't be that interested in. While I've said many times that I don't mind tattoos or implants, she has a ton of tattoos and implants. Something about her though that I really liked on a few sets I got of her from Naughty America, maybe it's her curves, her lips. I just found her very attractive.
So I find this site of her. Read Monty222's expired review and combined it with the later updated TBP stats and was more than happy to pay the $30 to get, listed by TBP on 1-5-11 as 75 videos, 83 photo galleries. That's a good amount of content for one model plus the site comes with 4 bonus sites including at least one, Jessica Jaymes that is still updating and has nearly double the content Regan's was listed as having.
In Monty222's review he listed 29 videos and 51 photo sets, and the site was still updating at that time. I trust Monty222 and the TBP stats. The reason I am so trusting there is because this is what the site now has.
41 videos, 22 photo sets. Ahem. How does a site go from 51 photo sets in Monty222's review in 2009 to 83 photo sets in the January 2011 stats update from TBP to 22 in August 2011? I'm not going to accuse them of recycling content, but I think they're recycling.
The reason I think this is the TBP stats update in January 2011 says the site hadn't been updated since 12-2009. Lo and behold, there's a new picture set in August 2011. I'm sorry, but content amount dropping that much, no updates in a year, then new updates start showing up is usually a sign of a site that's removing old content then recycling it as new content. I've been here before with a few other sites.
How is the content that's there? It's good. I would have been very pleased with the content if the number hadn't dropped so much. I'm not real picky about video quality unless it's just impossible to watch. My focus has always been the quality of the model(s). You can give me 10 1920x1080 videos of models I'm not interested in and I'll trade them for 10 640x480 videos of models I am interested in.
The case here though is the content is just not there. Just put the content you removed back up and call it an archive bonus site instead of trying to fool new members into thinking they are getting new updates. I would imagine most people that join this network of solo models join for Jessica Jaymes since it's still updating and even has new webcam episodes. So this site of Regan's is probably just a nice bonus to it.
Where this gets worse. This site is really nice. The filenames are named by the title of the set on the site, how many times have I asked for that? It has probably the best navigation I've seen on a solo model site. It allows one click, by situation, finding of content. Makes it very easy for me to post exactly what is up.
Boy/Girl photosets: 1
Girl/Girl photosets: 6
Group photosets: 4
Solo photosets: 11
Total photosets: 22
Boy/Girl videos: 3
Girl/Girl videos: 4
Group videos: 8
Solo videos: 9
Webcam archive videos: 16
Total videos: 41
To put this in perspective, the total combined content of videos and pictures is 63. In January 2011, it was 158. Maybe someone is confused at the site and thought update meant taking sets down?
I normally will not post a review of a site that I would score below 70 since if it's below 70, it's not likely I'm going to be on it long enough to have a fair view of it. I don't need the time here. Took me 2 hours to download the whole site. The site folder is 7.6 GB. Content itself is very good to great even. If there was 158 total sets, I probably would have went into the mid-80s with my score. I don't care about if a site like this is updating or not. Give me the 158 sets without updates over 63 sets with recycled updates any day of the week.
On a positive note, they do offer three different video formats, wmv, mp4 and flv. In most cases, the FLV files are the highest quality, but I have noticed on the webcam videos the sound will suddenly just stop. I can see her lips moving, but hear nothing. These webcam videos, poor quality and all, are still very good.
Still, take this as a warning to others considering this site. In my 200+ reviews I've only scored one site lower than this one. The webmaster needs to put those other sets back up. If there's a legal reason then I could understand it, but we know it's not an age issue. Seeing that the content on all these sites is "exclusive" I can't see how it could be a copyright issue with possibly another site. It instead looks like the typical remove old, put it back as new, recycle move. If I'm wrong and those sets suddenly re-appear, I'll reconsider my score. Unless you're a huge Regan fan or fan of great navigation, I wouldn't recommend this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Hustler, in my mind, the greatest name in hardcore porn.
- Huge site/network. I've seen some content as far back as the 80s, including the legendary, "Deep Inside Vanessa Del Rio".
- Hustler magazine pictorials to look at or download.
- Updates once or twice per week with a full DVD, it varies, so there's no way to put a set number on it or set frequency.
- Beaver Hunt category! My favorite section of Hustler magazine.
- Good download speeds, roughly 70% of my max speed.
Cons:
- A couple of my pros are actually not what they claim to be. Trust me, I'll go into in the BL.
- Video quality is below average at best.
- I once rated this "network" an 80, in 2007, here on PU. My average score is an 85.
- I thought, based on many of the professional reviews, that Hustler had got their site together and improved it. I thought wrong and wonder why it scored so highly in professional reviews. Not looking at that can of worms with a can opener.
- It's not a network. It's a DVD site that puts content, based on category, into a separate category that they so happen to call a different site.
Bottom Line:
Back when I first discovered porn it was a random VHS tape belonging to my uncle. I later found a whole stack of Playboy magazines under his bed. I'm sure I liked them and thought I had found a gold mine. Then, one day, I found a Hustler magazine in his room. I used multiple loud adjectives as I looked through the pages. So much nakedness, girls with fingers stuck in places, it was far greater than anything I had seen before.
When I turned 18, I had been psyching myself up to go to the local gas station and buy a brand new copy of Hustler. It then became a monthly habit. The rush, as I've told a few times, was maybe even greater than the magazine. This made Hustler my absolute favorite name in hardcore porn. And like most men who bought Playboy or Penthouse, I also read every story in Hustler. The jokes were tasteless and hilarious. Then there was the "Beaver Hunt" section of the magazine. It had used-submitted photos in it. Hustler would then pick the best one and give them a money prize. It had the dirty stories in it. Some seriously interesting political stories.
So, a few weeks ago, I thought I would join Hustler's website. It had been 9 years since I joined it. From everything I've read it's improved greatly since then. I joined ... and reality hit, buyer's remorse hit and my first "bad" review in a long time is now being posted.
First, in the categories is "Beaver Hunt". I click on it, it's DVDs from the Barely Legal series. It's not a bad series. It's also not "Beaver Hunt". I was honestly expecting user-submitted photos.
I then clicked on "Magz". I'm going to get to view all the digital issues of all Hustler magazines, right? Wrong. They only go back to 2007. Now hell, if you can put 1986's Deep Inside Vanessa Del Rio DVD on here, you can damn sure put the old magazines on here. It gets worse. No Beaver Hunt in the magazines that I could access. No joke section. No articles. Instead, a handful of pictorials from each magazine with 12-15 photos from each pictorial.
I cleared my head and decided to make the most out of what was quickly becoming the most disappointing porn site I have joined in years. I downloaded a few videos featuring models I like. They were okay, but were a bit blurry/fuzzy. Now these are newer models (Nicole Aniston, Veronica Rodriguez), maybe not "newer", but newer than Vanessa Del Rio. I look at the properties on the videos and see 960x540 resolution. These were downloaded from the "super quality" link. I go back to the available sites and enter "Hustler HD". Download the newest video available, it's 960x540. What the hell? It says HD in the name! I admit, I don't follow the resolution wars of porn, I prefer 720p and consider it the lowest level of HD. So my standards aren't the problem here. I can't imagine what someone wanting 1080p or 4K would think of 960x540 being listed as HD.
Disappointment continued, I went through every site on their "network" and downloaded the newest video they have. Not a single one had a video over 960x540. I stand slightly corrected by myself. I just found one DVD with 720p scenes on it, it's of Asa Akira.
Here's my roundup at this point: Beaver Hunt "site" is not Beaver Hunt. It's Barely Legal DVDs.
The magazines aren't magazines. They are 4-5 pictorials from each magazine.
The high quality videos are below average 960x540 quality. Including the ones on the "site" Hustler HD.
But wait... there is a hustlermagazine site that says it has all of the magazines in digital form. How do I know? It's advertised on every page of this Hustler site. Now back to the layout. You enter the site into a sort of hub. It shows 19 available sites in the network. A few examples of the names, Beaver Hunt, Daddy Gets Lucky, Asian Fever, those sound like real standalone sites that are part of a network, but in reality, those three are in order ... Barely Legal series, the Daughter series of DVDs, (including Barely Legal again), Asian Fever is their commonly-known DVD series' Teen Thailand and random scenes taken from DVDs that feature Asian models.
The further I looked into this Hustler site I started noticing chances to "upgrade" my membership. There's a problem there, why would I upgrade something that hasn't been the least bit entertaining?
The site needs a complete overhaul. Advertising as Hustler with "magz" should include all magazines and every part of those magazines. Advertising HD video should result in HD video. Neither of those said on the membership join pages, "Must upgrade to receive HD video and full magazines". A new search engine would help. Surely there's some 720p videos on here, but I've yet to find them. A simple search engine with an HD filter would do. It receives a 60 simply because it works and has porn on it with many big name stars. I'm guessing the higher def videos are included in the upgraded membership, again, the upgraded membership is not mentioned or offered when you join. Not recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lana Lopez, one of the sexiest models I have ever seen.
- Photos vary in size, biggest resolution I saw was 2000 long end, the majority are 1200x1800 and come zipped.
- 24 webcam shows in the archive, but see cons, bottom line
- Photos are nice and crisp, Lana is an excellent poser and the photos here are worth way more than the videos.
Cons:
- Download limit on photo zips, 21 zips allowed per day. Will further in BL.
- I was pretty excited about the video section. No download limits, the first one I downloaded was HD quality. Then I noticed the videos were downloading in 1-2 minutes.
- Three upsell "zipsets", no joke, $17.95 each, each one has an "explicit" video and matching photo set. So if you want to three explicit videos, a subscription plus the zipsets will set you back around $70.
- It's not all exclusive, quite a few of the videos are from Holly Randall's site. Some of the pictures in candids are from car websites.
- The webcam videos, I thought for sure these would be the saving grace for this site. Then I watched them, they average 5 minutes in length, go to full nudity, but no masturbation. At least Lana has a good personality and is really cute in these, otherwise, they would be useless.
Bottom Line:
I probably would have gone a little easier on this site if they had included access to their other sites, but they don't.
Instead you get a site of one of the most underrated softcore models, Lana Lopez, that has just a little over 100 photo sets including candid sets, which are often not even close to being nude, questionable if they are even "porn". The pictures are good quality, very nice colors, settings and Lana as always really shines in them but these photo sets average maybe 35 photos in each.
When your pictures are the strong point of the site, I would hope for at least 75-100 photos per set.
The videos range in quality. One is HD, but it's licensed from another site. The videos that are exclusive to this site are videos of the photoshoots or very softcore/tease. And excuse me for saying this, but why can't the dumbass photographer get his head out from in front of the video camera? It's bad enough that his camera is flashing, making noises, but now I get to see the back of his head?
There are some good videos. Lana was very softcore for most of her career, there are some masturbation videos mixed in though these are in the minority. The quality is okay on the videos, most are standard DVD quality 640x480. At least her tease videos are sexy though and were able to get the photographer out of the frame.
Where I became most annoyed with this site was when I clicked "zipsets" at the top of the site, right in with the site's menu options like "pictures", "videos", "webcam" there is "zipsets".
Here you can buy 3 "explicit" videos and matching photo sets for $17.95 each. First of all, there are explicit videos on the site that are included in the membership price. Also, I know for a fact that Aziani has at least 2 very explicit videos of Lana. Why should I pay for 3 videos that should be included with the site? That's $55 for three videos. If this was supply and demand, I could maybe understand, but you are giving me explicit videos with membership. Why would I pay for something I'm already getting? If none of the videos included with the site were explicit, then I could maybe understand it.
The webcam archived videos. I really like these videos with any solo model who has a good personality. Lana has that and more. She's smiling a lot, laughing and teasing, but then she takes her clothes off, spins around a few times and that's the end of the video. It reminds me of those cam sites where you can see the model teasing, sometimes even nude, but if you want to see more you have to pay for a private show. That's exactly how these webcam videos are.
I really can't tell you when the site last updated. There are no dates, but the live webcam calender was last marked for Wednesday, November 19th, looking at my calender the last November 19th on a Wednesday was in 2008. So those haven't been updated in 3 years. The last diary entry was in August 2010 and says she did sets for Twistys and would be posting those sets on this site without the Twistys watermark, so there goes more of the exclusivity of the site.
It's a poor site overall. No updates. Lots of photoshoot videos which aren't very desirable since you see the photographer's head as much as Lana.
The photo sets are nice, but as mentioned above they are small photosets. It should be a bonus site to another site or include bonus sites at the $20 price.
I can only recommend this site if you are a huge fan of Lana and even then, you may still regret it. There just isn't much good with this site except Lana. Not even close to recommending for casual or even moderate Lana fans. There are other multi-model sites that have good content of her and won't try to get you to pay $55 for 3 explicit videos either.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Multi-stie network unlike most on the internet
- Features individual sites of some of the most popular internet models, Anneta Keys, Veronica Vanoza, Silvia Saint
- Movies are generally average or above quality, nice bitrates 2,000-3,000 range, worst res on the network is 440x360, from what I've seen, best is 640x480
- Scenes are available in one big file instead of piecing them together.
- Some hardcore sites on here as well!
Cons:
- Pics might as well not be here, no zip downloads, small resolution.
- Most of the individual model sites have in the range of 20 pic sets, 2-5 videos, you can get more of each of these models on sites like PixandVideo, 1byday.
- Did not notice any new updates if they are even updating.
Bottom Line:
This network has an interesting idea. Take the seductive Veronica Vanoza, the cute as can be Anetta Keys, the exotic Zdenka, and the ever popular Sylvia Saint, combine individual sites of each with hardcore (Czech Wives), masturbation (Chicks and Toys), hardcore blowjobs (Deep Throat Hell), MILFs (Fucking Hot Moms), cumshots (Jizz Hell) and two fetish sites (My Sexy Nurses and Stocking Foxes).
Sounds good? Not really. As a collector of Anetta Keys, I had seen all of the pictures and both (yep TWO whole videos) of her. The majority of the content on the individual sites is not exclusive. I'm not for sure if the other sites are exclusive since there is so much porn available. But the non-individual sites were all new to me.
I really like the idea they have here, though. I've always wondered why someone didn't start a group of individual models sites network. Then, I realized, 1byday, pixandvideo and many other sites from the same cloth are just that. The top models for me on this site are Anetta and Veronica, never was that big on Zdenka or Sylvia Saint. Both Anetta and Veronica have more content of 1byday than they have on these individual sites that are just about them.
Even if the content was exclusive, there is no option to download zips of the pictures so it wouldn't have mattered anyway. With little to no updates that I have noticed, there is little reason to stay on this site or to even think about recommending it. My first in a long time, not recommended!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
