Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A bit of a strange site with straightforward sex.
- Close to 170 models and most look like amateurs to me. There are some pros, including an old favorite, Misty Stone.
- CCBill is the biller
- Huge difference in looks from model to model, could even be a con for some.
- 310 scenes as of 9/3/2019, roughly 290 photo sets that can be downloaded.
- All of the scenes I've watched start with the model dressed.
- Updates twice per week.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of max)
- I like the personality of the site/content.
Cons:
- This site is just different. There are implants, tattoos, what look to be ass implants, then there are some really pretty girl next door types.
- Too many BTS interviews for a site with only 310 videos (they are included in that count).
- I might catch a little flak for saying this but some of these women look like their prime passed before Amazon had Prime.
- Possibly recycling
Bottom Line:
I joined this site after seeing a couple of their handjob/pussyjob/cameltoe slide videos on a promo tube site.
I like those scenes. The site really has a good personality. The scenes don't feel like cookie cutter porn. It's not an all amateur site. There are quite a few porn stars on it. Some of them have changed so much you might not recognize them. One that comes to mind, Kiara Mia. If she has anymore plastic surgery she's going to have to start having skin implants.
That's not meant as harsh as it sounds. She was a gorgeous model when she was younger and it's like she had one bad plastic surgery and couldn't stop.
They have a good blend of niches covered here. As mentioned in the beginning, those handjobs turning into cameltoe slides were the big draw for me. Eva Notty and Daisy Ducati are two of the other ones I knew and they have handjob scenes.
The biggest complaint for me isn't listed in the cons. This feels like an incomplete site. It feels like it should be in a network. If it had another site or double the amount of content it would be easier to recommend it.
I mentioned possibly recycling, at least comment on PU mentions it and when I look at the content I see this:
The oldest scenes are from March 2013. They update twice per week. That would be 104 updates per year. They have been updating for 6.5 years. That would be around 700 scenes. They have 310.
I'm not punishing them for it but am letting it be known.
It doesn't hurt in the quality department. The oldest scenes have 1080p, the newer scenes add 720p, 480p and 360p. The photo sets are very large in amount of pictures, some with as many 500 and most are videocaps.
One of their strengths is the variation in content. They have transsexual, straight, women using dildos on men, cosplay, and that's just not a blend you see on a lot of sites.
About the women, I think this could be the big attraction or big turn-off for some. There are some listed as GILFs (grannies), lots of implants, lots of tattoos and a lot of the women act like they've been in porn since John Holmes days.
I am happy enough with the membership. I downloaded all of the handjob, potential cameltoe slide videos (73 of those). The cosplay ones always interest me, but their costume designer must have came from the 70s too and there are 3 cosplay scenes on the whole site. It might be worth checking out just to see vintage Captain America. The costume looks like a pair of Captain America pajamas I had when I was a kid.
Don't take that as negative either. As mentioned, I like the personality of the site, it doesn't take itself very seriously and has a playful side to it. I think an 80 is a good score for it. The handjob content made it for me. I didn't download anything else.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that is going to be very hard to review as a whole, massive network of young, teen, hairy, shaven and some just beautiful models.
- You get access to ATK Galleria, Premium, Exotics, Natural and Hairy, Petites and Archive. If you like them all you better set aside some time.
- I try to join sites through PU's links but I had a promo for ATK Network for $49. That's my max that I would pay for a site/network.
- This will be explained further, I am counting 10+ updates per day across the network.
- Download speeds are very good (between 80-90% of max)
- Navigation is not terrible, if you have been an ATK member before it will make the navigation better for you.
- ATK's photos are the focus for me. Their videos are okay to good but the photos are better.
- They have most mainstream niches covered on the network.
- Signup through CCBill
- Could be a lot better with some fixes. Even 15 or more points better!
Cons:
- I don't mean to offend anyone that likes hairy models but that hairy site is a waste for me.
- No access to Aunt Judy's or ATK Girlfriends. Maybe Aunt Judy's is understandable but why no ATK Girlfriends?
- Patience is a good thing. Time is too. You're going to need both to bounce back and forth between websites.
- The regular price $99.95 is way too much, $49.95 is better but I don't know that I will join again at that promo price either. I would say $34.95.
Bottom Line:
Maybe the most frustrating review I have posted ever. There's no way I was going to join ATK's network for $79 or $99. I had a promo they sent me about 6 months ago for $49. Since I hadn't joined Exotics, Premium, Petites or Galleria in nearly a year, I decided it would be worth joining the network to catch up on the content I've missed.
I considered Archives to be a site I wouldn't need to check since I have a lot of the older ATK content. I knew I wouldn't be downloading anything from Natural & Hairy. The first thing you will notice about the network is it's not a network. You are buying a membership to the six sites. You have to sign in on each. ATK is a massive site/network. Some of these sites have been around for as long as I've been buying internet porn.
I decided to look for a specific Eve Angel scene from ATK Premium. I first opened the "movies" tab. It shows Premium only having movies back to 2014. The Eve scene I was looking for was probably 2009. I clicked on the models list and there's Eve (Eva on here). There are 16 pages of her content. No dates. Two videos, two photosets per page. That's a lot of clicking. I bounced around from site to site having to sign in on each. I thought I would check Archives out, it says the current content in the archive is from 2001-2006. Then it shows newest updates in the Archive as 2019.
Stop it. This is not funny. This is a regularly priced $99 per month network!
I can fix it. Put all the content on one site. Call it Amateur Teen Kingdom! If you find a model you like, this is what you will have to do to find all of her content:
Find her on Galleria, download her content, login to Petites, find her in the model list, download her content, login to Archives, find her in the model list, download her content, login to Exotics, find her in the model list, download her content, login to Premium,find her in the model list, download her content. Yes, I know that's repetitive and redundant but when you do that for 10 models, you start to feel repetitive and redundant.
Put it all on one site and go with a $34.95 price. This reminds me very much of when the "All Only" network launched years ago with 5-6 premium sites in it for $34.95.
The content is good but trying to dig through 6 sites in 30 days? I would rather join one and have 30 days to go through it.
I don't think I realized that until halfway through my membership. I have downloaded all the Exotics content that I wanted/has been added since my last membership. I will be lucky to finish another site before the membership expires.
The ATK sites offer something rather unique these days. It's a professionally filmed amateur site. No, they're not all amateurs but when you see the models you will think it's from their amateur days. There's little to no glam here. Makeup is at a minimum. Premium, to the best of my knowledge, is the only site that offers "no implants". These sets will make your most favorite glamorous porn star look like the cute girl that just moved in next door to you. It's a major selling point. Their photos are much better than their videos. Premium has some good videos but overall, the ATK photos stand out.
The amount of updates is impressive. I'm just estimating at 10+ per day, across the network. Exotics alone has 3 to 4 updates per day as does Petites. And I get the part about Archives "updating" as they add old content but where is that old content? Is it being removed from the regular sites? If so, it shouldn't be an "update".
The video resolution on the newer scenes goes up to 4K. Photos are very good quality and downloadable.
I looked around for content from Fred the Photographer but don't see any new content filmed by him. He was always one of my favorites.
This is another thought about improving not just the ATK sites but any site that specializes in photos. Has there ever been a thought about combining all of a model's photosets into 1 zip? There are models on here with dozens of photosets at 10 - 50 MB. It takes 1 second to download those sets.
The frustration comes from knowing I would have been happier and it wouldn't have cost much more to join each site on a monthly membership. As it looks right now, I might get two of the sites caught up on my downloading. Those sites could have been joined for $17.95 each.
My preferred order of the ATK sites: Petites, Exotics, Premium, Galleria, Archive, Natural and Hairy.
Still don't get why Girlfriends isn't included as this is the ATK network and it's an ATK site. Seems like a missed opportunity to get ATK fans hooked on another site.
My score is leaving major room for improvement. Petites and Exotics could easily score 90 on their own. Maybe I will review one of those as a standalone and show how my frustration goes away when away from the six site package.
I would recommend any of the ATK sites if you're into the niche they cover. I just can't recommend this high-priced package of sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of those networks that's large, has high quality but seems to be doing everything possible to make their customers upset.
- Unlike a lot of complaints, I have no problems with the speed of Team Skeet, I'm actually downloading from it faster than any site I've been on in the last month (got a speed upgrade from IP).
- It's an overall good deal for what you pay.
- Lots of high technical quality throughout the network.
- Has my favorite amateur Latina site (Oye Loca).
- A very niche heavy network that often times looks like they just changed the scenery and called it something new. If your imagination works good that's even more of a pro.
- Navigation is very good if you can avoid the ads. Hate to see a good navigating network be pulled down by its site layout.
- Updates daily and shows 39 sites but...
Cons:
- You don't get all 39 of the sites and 7 more of the sites that you do get are no longer updating plus 10 of the others are updating at most once per month. Kind of puts a hit on that 39 number.
- I said, in a review of Vivid, can they possibly find anymore room for ads? Yes, Vivid, join Team Skeet, they have figured out how to take up a whole screen with ads except for one small box that takes me to Team Skeet.
- I joined through an advertisement they sent me for Black Valley Girls. Somehow, I didn't receive access to Black Valley Girls. Seems it's an add-on upgrade. To say I'm a little annoyed would be an understatement.
Bottom Line:
I was mainly intending to review Oye Loca as I think it's the best amateur Latina site on the internet but after signing up for Black Valley Girls and finding out I have to pay again to have it, I'm re-reviewing Team Skeet. A network that I've been a big supporter of since before it was a network.
I can only imagine the salary they're paying the programmer who figured out how to squeeze ads onto 95% of a home screen. My feeling towards Team Skeet hasn't changed when it comes to their content. I'm still a perv for those Innocent High scenes, love every Oya Loca update ever posted and they had me hooked with the mention of Black Valley Girls. I like most of their content though I don't care for the rough sites. It's kind of tiring to watch a 6' 220 man slam a 4'10" 87 pound woman around. Don't care if she's okay with it. It's boring. Maybe flip the script and let a 6' 200 pound woman have her way with a 5'5' 110 pound man? Where's the intrigue and mystery in those scenes? I'd even question the male talent's physical strength since they only pick those tiny models up.
Enough on that rant and to another one. Black Valley Girls. Being a native of Southern California, I am very aware of the girls from the San Fernando Valley. They used to tease and arouse us LA guys with their "Like, totally, gnarly, bitchin-rad, gag me with like a totally bent spoon". The idea of black Valley Girls is very intriguing to me. Most that I knew were either the kid of a hippie or when the Chicano boom came in as the farms grew. One day they would be normal. The next day, "Uh, like, duh, totally duh". It was magic! If you was going to be rough with a woman they were the ones! Save us all if women realize annoying a man can be a way to sexually attract him.
But no access to Black Valley Girls. That's along with the other upgrade sites too. It's like a whole new network. They update daily also. You know how I know? Because they list their updates with the Team Skeet updates, so practically every other update is one you can't have without paying more. I'm not even against this upgrade-style. I am against advertising something to me then switching it. For what it's worth, Black Valley Girls only has 17 scenes. And I'm not close to convinced that they have real black valley girls. That would be enough to make me consider moving back.
So, their network score took a bit of a hit since my last review. The amount of ads are terrible. I'm guessing my computer is able to process everything faster than some computers, so I don't see the performance dip but I certainly can see how it could happen. I mean really Team Skeet, your ads make Bang Bros look like saints.
There's good here and I still do plan on reviewing Oye Loca by itself. I've joined a lot of Latina sites over the years. For me, Oye Loca and Pacino's Adventures were the best for amateur Latina models. And both have a lot of silly fun in their hunting of Latina models. I'm not for sure how many more times I can stop myself from laughing when I see a stray chicken go running by. But Oye Loca, at this point, is updating once a month.
That's a regular theme for most of the sites that have been around for awhile. I do wonder if that's going to pick at my OCDC. You have these newer sites that are updating a lot more per site. I even joined one of their upgrade sites, Family Strokes, by itself a few months ago and it was a very good site.
I'll at least give them credit for keeping their content at high technical levels and not charging extra for 1080p.
Still, there was always so much potential with this network and most of that potential has been replaced with ads and email promos that change what you get when you sign up. I took 10 points off my score for taking advantage of my need for Black Valley Girls and for making me put my glasses on to be able to find Team Skeet in the seas of ads.
I'm going to defend that to a point because they at least do have the decency to give you a filter to see just "my content" so it doesn't mix the upgrade updates in with your updates but I'm betting a lot of people miss that filter.
I'll also say they have some new sites that are included with a Team Skeet membership that are good, the TeenJOI one has a lot of potential but only has 2 scenes on it so far. That's Teen Jack Off Instructors. I'll wrap up with a definitive list of what's not included.
Not included: Black Valley Girls, PervMom, Shoplyfter, Daughter Swap, Submissived, Dad Crush, BFFs, Family Strokes and Sis Loves Me.
I could be wrong but I think you have to pay separate for each of those. Only a couple of them even have 100 scenes and a few like Black Valley Girls and PervMom have less than 20.
Seriously guys, I'm into my middle-age years, finding "perv" moms isn't hard. It's a shock they aren't paying you all. It's still a good network for a change of pace from the frantic network wars we are seeing but they have to clean their act up or that score isn't changing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Not only one of the first sites/networks I ever joined, but was at one time, my favorite.
- Enough content to keep anyone busy, easily one of the largest sites on the internet.
- The models. Especially if you like glam models.
- Once easy to use navigation is now more complicated by the "network" concept, but it's still usable and works well once you figure it out.
- Download speeds are average.
Cons:
- Joining and canceling is typical MindGeek nonsense. They moved pre-checked sales lower down the screen and replaced them with what you're paying today, so it takes a scroll to see the pre-checked ones. Canceling doesn't send a receipt email.
- Those "average" download speeds have dropped as low as 50% below my average at times, but have also been as high as 50% higher than my average at other times.
- The site/network no longer has any character or uniqueness to it, something it used to be known for.
- Costs extra to download
Bottom Line:
There was a time when I would join Twistys for one year and be completely satisfied with it. I joined this time on 4/29/2017 and can say, I haven't been on the site since 5/10.
The content isn't really the problem. Very pretty models. It's just that it's no different than what you're going to find anywhere else or for that matter, on a DVD site. It's easy to blame the dropoff of Twistys on MindGeek now owning it, but that's not the only problem.
The quality, if you pay extra for downloads, is very good. There's HD videos dating back 7-8 years, photos are zipped, technically it's as good as it always was.
The insistence of making it a network is silly. I know that the old owner Shap tried the network concept, but never pushed it the way it's being pushed now. The old style was as simple as clicking on a "site" which the name told the genre of. Now, the scenes are dropped into a hub and you have to trust their judgement of what is Hard, Lesbian, Solo, hopefully the love of networks will try to navigate its way out of that mess and get lost.
I still think it's a good site, especially for new or newer members. The older content, 2007-2011, is very good, maybe not the highest technical quality, but there was more oomph to the content. If you like interviews, the old interviews on here are some of the best. If you like solo, the older solo videos are as good as anyone's. It's that newer content that's a problem.
Guy walks in, girl gets naked, sex, scene over. If I can find any positives about the newer content it is in some of the solo scenes. The hardcore scenes feel like Brazzers Light. I really don't think the newer good solo scenes are that much better, I think it all depends on the models.
Also, if you're a past fan of Twisty's pictures, they're still good. Somehow, they didn't mess with the lighting/coolness Twisty's pictures are known for and that includes newer picture sets as well.
If you're new to Twistys or just going back to get some old favorites, you'll like it well enough, but if you're a longtime member and have a hard drive stash of the old content, I don't recommend it, not even for a month.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The biggest porn DVD site on the internet and one of the cheapest when joining through Porn Users at $12/month.
- Five full DVD updates per day.
- Their definition of HD includes anything 720p or higher resolution. Based on it, roughly 25% of their DVDs are HD quality.
- What tags they have are actually pretty good
- Premium channels are the big draw for me. Will detail them below in bottom line.
- If you like late 90s, early 2000s porn, a Videobox membership combined with the Vivid channel is probably the best buy in porn.
- Download speeds can vary, but are usually consistent. The variances happen at certain times each day and sometimes it's actually faster, other times way slower.
- My download manager works well (free download manager), but I limit how many files it downloads to 20 at a time so not to risk download links timing-out.
- A generally easy to use site, easy to cancel, unless you do something I do, then canceling can be frustrating. Explanation in bottom line.
Cons:
- Back years ago, I was convinced that VB was steadily trying to improve their site. Not so anymore. I think they have settled into a mass porn site and have no intentions of making themselves any worse or any better.
- Video quality is inconsistent. They'll have a "HD" scene that is 720p with a 1,500 bitrate. While also calling a 720p scene with an 8,000 bitrate "HD". I could just call this being sloppy and careless since it's what it is.
- Pricing is good unless you want the premium channels and join them early in your Videobox membership. See bottom line.
- Loads of newly added DVDs that are full of scenes already on the site under different names. Gives the impression of recycling content, but I think they're just ... sloppy and careless. I have one Eva Angelina scene, four different times and none are the same length. I don't even know who to blame for those, the producers milking a scene or Videobox bloating their numbers.
Bottom Line:
This was at one time one of my favorite sites. I still think it's an excellent site for new members and for those who like that late 90s, early 2000s era porn. Their newer DVDs are good, but the majority fall into the cookie-cutter porn genre, seen one you've seen them all type of porn. That's where the premium channels come in. These are the premium channels with their prices if you add them on the first day of your Videobox subscription: Evil Angel $15 - You can get a full subscription to Evil Angel for the same price using the PU discount, it's a much better deal. Reality Kings $15 - Roughly the same price as you can get from PU, and it's a better deal than the add-on channel.
Kink $35 - Pretty unique channel, it's sort of a best of or compilation of Kink's various sites, it's a great addition, but I hold off until the prorated price brings the cost below $10.
Soft On Demand $35 - Typical Japanese site with mostly censored/blurred pubic areas. It's okay, join it for the last week of your VB subscription if you're interested in Japanese porn. Elegant Angel $15 - It's a good deal if you like Elegant Angel, but I've never joined it.
Club Tranny $15 - Maybe a good buy for those interested in this genre. Vivid $15 - Great add-on, to my knowledge it's the biggest collection of downloadable Vivid DVDs on the internet. Vivid's site didn't have downloads when I was last a member on it (about 9 months ago), so this is a really good deal if you like Vivid.
I admit, I'm a cheapskate when it comes to Videobox. I wait until half of my Videobox subscription is over then join Vivid. This gives you a prorated price of $7.50. I then join Kink when there's less than a week left on my Videobox subscription which gets the price below $10. This is the problem with this method:
If you cancel your main Videobox subscription then decide to add say Vivid or Kink or both or any of the other add-on channels, it reopens your Videobox subscription. Or better said, it cancels out your cancellation of Videobox. It goes like this: Videobox canceled on 11/22/2015, membership lasts until 12/3/2015. Vivid channel added on 11/29/2015 Videobox renews on 12/3/2015.
I would be complaining more about that, but I don't think it's an attempt to rip-off customers as much as it is ... sloppy and careless. You just have to go back and cancel Videobox each time you add a new channel if added after your initial cancellation.
Overall, Videobox has little to offer me anymore except being the gateway to those premium channels. For a new member, I think it's a great place to start your porn collection. The quality can vary greatly even if it says a scene is HD, you really don't know what the quality is until you download it. You can kind of guess by looking at file size, but they don't list bitrates on any of their scenes.
The search engine has become all but useless. Even going directly to your favorite stars pages can be misleading. I've thought I'd downloaded every scene for a model only to see 2-3 scenes listed in the recommended scenes that aren't listed with the model. The premium channels cause a problem here too since the search results will give you results all across Videobox and all their premium channels. This is one that has bothered me for years. If you search "Taylor Hayes", a late 90s, early 2000s superstar model, she will be listed in dozens of scenes, but most are on the Vivid channel.
They do offer a package of 5 premium channels for an extra $50 a month, which is certainly cheaper than their current rates on those channels, but it's still pretty costly.
Downloading from the site is no longer as easy as it used to be. I use free download manager. With it, I can click and drag a link into it. Each time I do it on Videobox it says, "Select preference". I hate to be an ass, but didn't I select my preference when I clicked the format I wanted to drag to my download manager?
While Videobox is still one of the better values in porn, it's also becoming one of the more frustrating and annoying sites in porn as well. There's also the problem with videos playing while you're trying to load your download manager and you rarely have taken the time to mute those videos so expect everyone in your house to wonder who's having sex.
You could do far worse than Videobox, but it's time for Videobox to give up its crown as the best porn DVD site. I also have a membership to Videosz and will review it soon. Videobox might be depending too much on their premium channels to deliver non-mainstream porn.
I joined for one main reason. I couldn't find my Videobox external hard drive following a move. I downloaded my favorite scenes, most of which were on Vivid and added a 100 GB or so of Kink content. My current Videobox folder is smaller than those and it's why I rated it 80. If you're new to VB then add 10 points to the score. Recommended for new members and those who have lost their favorite scenes.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Met Art going hardcore, kind of, maybe.
- As would be expected, the pictures are excellent quality, but there are some sets with excessive blur, also happens on Met sometimes.
- The videos are romantic takes on sex. Not for sure if I should have put that in the cons or pros. Will further in BL.
- The models are all attractive and especially so if you like the slimmer build models.
- Very good DL speeds.
- Original themed series scenes.
- Navigation is good, but I'm going to guess it's just because the site isn't that big yet. I expect this navigation will be a real pain in the ass in a few years.
- Videos and picture sets combined have at least 1 update per day on average.
Cons:
- Careful what you wish for. Normal sex doesn't always translate into erotic.
- I honestly have trouble keeping up with, figuring out the different series'. Will further this too in BL.
- 2 months as a member and I will be keeping 4 videos and all of the photo sets. Pretty much the same pattern I have on Met-Art.
- Model variety would be a major plus. Pretty, white and slim is good, but it sure gets repetitive.
- Passion is "eh" believable.
Bottom Line:
I was one of the ones with very high expectations on this site and was lucky enough to get the first promo they sent out which gave 2 months access for $19.95. I don't feel ripped off at all, but as my previous comment said, I don't get it.
It's probably the last thing Met-Art wants to hear, but I prefer the photos to videos on Sex Art. I'm going to try and break the site down into sections so it's clear.
They have your basic video scenes. Just like Met, they give each scene a name so this can be a bit confusing when you add in the scenes that make up a series.
There are 60 of these as of 9/14/2012. The types of scenes:
Boy/girl: 18
Girl/girl or all girl: 23
The rest are solo.
My first problem. As you can see, the boy/girl group is the smallest of the three. When I hear hardcore, I still consider it boy/girl. Second problem, some of this goes into a realm of artsy that I couldn't imagine being interested in. The two examples off the top of my head, a man and woman full body-painted like tigers, having sex in a jungle themed room. One with the women in "chrome" from head to toe. You lost me at nude sex covered with paint and chrome.
Second group of scenes are in the series "Girls Love Sex". And just to keep it under some theme, there are 20 scenes in each season. Yep seasons. Like a television show. They have finished season 1 and 2, but season 3 hasn't started. So there are 40 scenes here. Now don't expect these to be much about sex. It's different models talking, some teasing and very light masturbation. Most of these scenes are less than 5 minutes.
Problem here? Watched 10 and swore to never download one again. These remind me more of Behind the Scenes sets on other sites, just repackaged as it might be porn.
Should be noted, August season is listed as "coming soon August". It's mid-September and there's nothing new.
Third group is Kamikaze Love, which is a full movie or a continuous series, hell I don't know, but I do know it says "New episodes every week" but there hasn't been a new scene added in this section since July.
This is a problem to me because I've got two sections of scenes that aren't updating, so I don't know if they just tanked the ideas or what. Either way the Girls Love Sex and Kamikaze Love are both disappointing to me.
So back to the main section of scenes. These scenes are okay. If you like the softer hardcore, you might be into these, but it's all a little too lovey dovey for my taste in porn. I'm all for passion and cutting back on the abusive scenes, but most of this just jumped to the opposite pole of the abusive porn.
The pictures, just like with Met-Art, are the best part. You get three sizes of zips to choose from. I'm basing these numbers off the newest photo set added, 1024x683 (small) 2048x1365 (medium) and 5616x3714 (large).
The videos are HD with decent bitrate and are relatively short in duration, so the files at least aren't huge. The ones I have watched are nice and clear.
It just seems to be trying to be too many different things. Like the old saying, jack of all trades, master of none. I thought for sure there was going to be something kinky in the Girls Love Sex series since some of the titles go into bondage subjects, but it was just the model talking about bondage.
I was expecting something groundbreaking, but I hate saying this, two women or three women being passionate with each other isn't new. The top Euro sites (21Sextury, DDF, Viv Thomas, Sapphic Erotica) have been filming passionate girl/girl scenes and solo scenes for years. This leaves Sex Art with less than 20 of the more rare, but not unheard of passionate boy/girl scenes. These scenes make up 1/5 of their current total videos. Is it possible that Met overhyped this site and built too high of expectations? Sure.
I have 4 close female friends, who are open to porn, but they say they despise the very hardcore scenes on many sites. After watching a few of the scenes from Sex Art, they all, not one, but all four said something to the effect of "It's too soft". I was just making sure I wasn't being a pig. A few of the scenes are really good.
I have no idea why the solo scenes are on here. The models on here aren't noted as top solo models, though Malena Morgan does a good job in her scenes. I don't know, maybe they should consider older female models? I don't remember 18-22 year old girls being very sensual. I also think they could work on the male talent. The most recent male is so effeminate, I had to look at the pictures to make sure it wasn't another girl/girl scene. You're not reinventing the wheel by having obviously sensitive, passionate people have sensitive, passionate sex.
I'll try it again in a year or two and give the 80 as a benefit of the doubt since it's Met, but also notice the numbers, the amount of no longer updating sections and decide if the photos and small amount of boy/girl scenes are enough to warrant a subscription.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that is only about nude photos, no videos here and most of the photos are non-sexual poses. The selling point for me to join was that I liked several of the models and the price is right at $9.95 per month.
- Really nice pictures, I like the lighting, they also come zipped.
- I personally didn't have any problems with navigation and thought it was very easy to use. It's one of those sites where you start at A on the model index, click A, scan through those models, go to B, and so on.
- If you are interested in photography, I would say this site would be a nice place to start. It's very artsy.
Cons:
- Well, if you're coming here to find anything that doesn't require some imagination to enjoy from a sexual standpoint, you're out of luck.
- This is actually a con based on the sister site Goddess Nudes, the photos could be bigger, most of what I have downloaded top out at 1999 long end. I've not scanned through all of them, but the majority have been around the 2000 long end range.
- There's not much tease or strip here. The model I was most interested in, Zulfija, doesn't have a clothed picture on the site!
- I personally think Goddess Nudes, ran by the same company, is a better site if you at least want some sexuality in the photos and the photos are bigger, plus it's only $4.95 a month.
Bottom Line:
I don't think I can write much more about this site than the pros/cons cover.
This site has been around a long time. The content to me is softer than what I consider softcore. This can be a problem since most of the models start out a set already nude, but never really show anything more than they do in the 1st picture of the set. I do respect that this is the style of site Domai is, but I just can't get that excited over looking at sexy, naked women staring off into space.
There are bright spots here though. The quality of the photos are very good, lots of natural lighting in the outdoor shots, good price, daily updates and if you like using your imagination, this site will really let you do that.
It has been said before so I won't go into it too deeply. There are no videos.
One other thing that is probably just me being used to larger photo sets, the photo sets I have downloaded seem to average between 40-60 photos.
On the positive side because I am going to recommend this site to those looking for softer content, artistic content. The choice of models is very good. I will add that there are some sets that have photos topping out at 3000 long end. If there are others that are bigger, I haven't found them.
There is a package deal to join both Domai and the sister site Goddess Nudes, but the offer I received was for $44.95 for both for 3 months. I just joined Domai for $9.95/mo. then joined Goddess Nudes for $4.95/mo. which equals out to the same price as the multi-month option.
I really can't suggest anything to change except the size of the photos. I'm sure they have established a fanbase that loves this style of nude photos and respect that. As I said in the cons, I would recommend Goddess Nudes over it in a head to head comparison just because the photos are a little more sexual and have higher resolutions. Makes a nice pairing of sites for $15 too.
So, if you're not wanting videos, not wanting anything real sexual and are just looking for some nice quality nude photography, I would recommend it based on the low price. If you're looking for anything more than very soft softcore, I wouldn't recommend it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Blue Angel has seemingly came a long way from her earliest shoots. A beautiful blonde with a great personality.
- 78 scenes as of July 20, 2010. (scene breakdown in BL)
- Exclusive content, but not completely exclusive from the other 21st Sextury sites. At a quick glance, roughly 10 of the 78 scenes are available on Club Sandy as well. Though most are just backstage sets.
- Pictures are zipped, the maximum size continues to be 1280x852 or vice versa. Eventually this size photos will become a con. The zips and nice photography keep them here for now.
- The oldest 22 videos on the site have a "high" option to download that is 1280x720, the other 56 videos have the "ultra high" option that is 1920x1080 with 8000 bitrate. Will go into this more in BL.
- Nice mixture of solo, g/g and b/g content.
- Navigation is quite simple since there are only 3 pages of content.
- Probably the best place to start at if you want to collect Blue Angel content.
- Fast downloads, 95% of max DL speed
Cons:
- To start with, the site only updates once a week. In the last few months, every other new update is a backstage or "fun" set, so if you only join for a month, you're only get probably 2 actual porn updates in a month though a few of the fun ones are tease, so if you're into the tease sets those could be positives.
- The overlapping content with Club Sandy. Some isn't that noticeable since they are the backstage sets like, "Blue Angel and Sandy cooking" and you may not have even noticed those on Club Sandy, but a few are easily noticeable like the 3 part Sex Bunnies set that has been on Club Sandy for awhile now.
- Backstage and fun sets either have no pictures or 20-30. For some reason, I've always liked backstage and fun photos more than videos.
Bottom Line:
Since this site doesn't have a member review, I thought I would throw one in. First, Blue Angel is one of the better "newer" models. She reminds me very much of a mixture of Sandy from Club Sandy and maybe a touch of Sophie Moone with more of a kinky, hardcore side. To me, there is a lot of appeal there since she looks quite innocent until you see her fisting herself or sticking a huge dildo up her butt or having a threesome with two guys.
I understand the ideal 21st Sextury has here with this site, but honestly, they could just remove the content of all their models, slap each on a main page up and say they have 900 solo sites. The content in this site is not any different than Blue Angel's content on the other 21st Sextury sites.
Here are some breakdowns that I found interesting.
Boy/Girl sets - 7 including two b/b/g sets
Girl/Girl sets - 20 including several with more than 2 girls.
Solo - 22 sets
Fun/backstage - 29
In the site's defense, a couple of the "fun" videos are solo sets of Blue Angel, listed as "private sex tapes" that are her masturbating without all the gloss and glam. A few are also sexually playful with other female models and I really like the tease videos. Especially the one showing her flexibility in skin-tight white pants. Oh and interesting note if you've ever been to California or lived in California. She has one backstage set at Los Angeles' restaurant Madeo, which I think most people who have been to California have been to at least once. Also a set with Sandy in San Diego. My only real problem with these backstage/fun sets is that some of them are more focused on Sandy than Blue Angel. No offense meant to Sandy, but if it's on Blue Angel's site, I expect her to be the focus.
The technical quality of the videos is very good. These are the options for the newest 56 videos.
H.264 (low) 640x360
WMV & H.264 (medium) 960x540
WMV & H.264 (high) 1280x720
WMV & H.264 (ultra high) 1920x1080
No joke, the low H.264 is not bad at all if you're pressed for hard drive space. The ultra high is crystal clear and most are well over 1.0 GB for each full scene.
The oldest 22 sets have the H.264 low option and the medium and high options are only available in WMV.
I do think they need to consider upping the size of the pictures. They've made big steps with their video technical quality, but the picture resolution is the same as it was 4 years ago.
The site is good, but it could not stand on its own, in my opinion. It's very similar in that sense to Twisty's Anette Dawn site. It works nice as a bonus site, but unless you're a huge Blue Angel fan, it just wouldn't cut it. I would like to see them do more with her, especially in the really glam sets like the one titled "A Lonely Afternoon". She's really a gorgeous woman in that set. She also has good energy in all of her sets and seems to enjoy the action, bordering on nympho in the b/b/g sets. Wouldn't recommend it as a standalone site, but it's good as a bonus site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The solo site of Rachel Aziani, includes access to the Aziani network for a reasonable price.
- Rachel really comes off as genuine, a sweet, very attractive "older" woman with a great body.
- Videos are excellent quality but this quality also will show up in the cons, 1280 high end with up to 8000 bitrates.
- Pictures are decent quality, I do like their style of photography, very glam, very pretty sets, but there is a con here as well.
- Download speeds can reach about 95% of my max, and like the above, there is a con here too.
- Bonus sites are really good, I actually prefer Aziani.com to this site and you get free access to it with a subscription. It is a multi-model site that addresses at least one of the cons of this site and has some models like Georgia Jones that are not of the big breasted variety.
- Rocker/Sybian/Machine videos, these are the best videos off of the network, in my opinion. Absolutely loved the Eva Angelina Rocker video.
Cons:
- First con might not be a con to some and that is that the quality of the videos is so high that the files are HUGE for what you get. Will expand on this in BL.
- Second, Rachel's solo site does not offer zip files and some sets on Aziani.com also do not offer zips, this to me is unacceptable for a site that does most everything else RIGHT.
- Third, connection problems, I went through about 2 hours of "cannot load" pages earlier this morning. Download speeds will shoot skyhigh one minute then drop to 1/6th the speed in the matter of minutes.
Bottom Line:
The cons and further explanation.
The video size of some of the newer videos on this network are too big. A few examples, a newer Rachel solo video, believe it was Rachel206, it is 1280 high end with a 7600 bitrate, it is 11 minutes and nearly 400 megs! I don't think that is quite as bad though as a Julie Michel video on Aziani.com, it is 1280 high end with an 8000 bitrate and is over 450 MBs, BUT is only 8 minutes long! A half a gig for an 8 minute video is just too much.
I appreciate the high quality and the fast bitrates, but I'm sure those file sizes could be cut in half and ran at 4000 bitrate and be just as smooth to the naked eye.
As much as I like Rachel, not having zips for her photo sets really stops me from even looking at the photo sets. Maybe scale back those videos and use the money saved to zip the photo sets?
The other con is the biggest one to me. I had countless connection problems and as a comment I posted about 6 weeks ago told, I also and STILL do get security warnings on this site. It fixes for a few days then the security warnings are back that a page is trying to install something on my computer. The page is a pop-under ad that the site uses. That is uncalled for, I think it is bad enough to rip your visitors off, but trying to install junk on a paying members computer is just not good business.
Get past those cons and you have an excellent network of sites. Rachel has developed into one of the more entertaining and enjoyable performers on the internet. She has a big pretty, warm smile and big boobs, though I'm not a big boob fan, she has nice boobs to be that big.
The star of the network is the Rocker videos, this is a sex machine that the women sit on and you can't help but chuckle a little at some of them. Georgia Jones' expressions while using it was worth joining to see! Eva Angelina did everything she could to wear the Rocker out, but the Rocker won and left Eva giggling.
Those are original to me, they also have Sybian, but these Rocker videos are the first I've seen.
Model selection is great. Not only the lovely Rachel, but you have those mentioned above, plus a personal favorite in Carmel Moore, Renee Perez and dozens of other top level, mostly American models.
As a fan of mostly Euro glam, I can still say that this network is my favorite "mostly" American network. The girls all seem relaxed and have fun. Rachel's hardcore sets are with her husband Buzz, who is also a big part of the site and you are getting real sex between them, not the cookie cutter sex on most DVD sites.
With all this praise though, those cons, especially the no zips and connection/pop-under ads problems are really dragging this network down. Give us zips and fix whatever the problem is with the connection and this solo site is a 90 by itself! The network itself, is a 92-94, but I'm knocking off 10 points for the no zips and connection problems. Still recommended, mainly for Aziani.com and the Rachel videos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The mature site by the same folks that run Nubiles, women range in age from 29 to 50. Would say the average age is right around 40.
- Newer movies come in at 1280 high end, 3500 bitrate, older ones still a good 640 high end 1500 bitrate.
- Picture sets come in small are large zips, large are 1600x2400 or vice versa, excellent quality on those.
- Very good DL speeds, about 98% of my max speed
- Navigation is simple, though it can look cluttered.
- Daily updates, plus one new model per week.
Cons:
- Price could be a factor for some, as of 1/31/09 there are 60 models total.
- Will go into the cluttered look in BL
- Not for sure if they really hit the "mature" niche since probably 20 or so of the models are late 20s/early 30s. Not a problem for me as it was that late 20s/early 30s group they have that interested me the most.
Bottom Line:
Reviewing this site is kind of hard. It is going to be a great site if they keep updating like they are right now. But as of today, the amount of content will keep from rating it as high as it will be in maybe 6 months, so keep that in mind if you are reading this.
It is one of those sites that has "tremendous upside". I would go as far as saying it can at least catch their teen site Nubiles, maybe even surpass it. They do have a forum also that the webmaster posts on, takes feedback/criticism, etc...
I noticed one thread in their forum was by the Webmaster, and he was talking about he couldn't understand why anyone would say their navigation was confusing. Believe was a TBP review that said it in the first place. The navigation to me once on a model's page is cluttered. Maybe some horizontal lines to separate sets? It has all the separate parts to the movie files, one I'm looking at right now has 8 parts, then just below those 8 links are the full scene links. All content of each model is on one page, so if the model has 3 videos as the one I'm looking at now has (Teya) there are a total of 33 video links for 3 videos.
Do understand though that they have full scene downloads too, but with all the parts for people with slow connections, that does look a bit confusing, little box around each movie's links maybe would work.
That is really the only complaint about it that I can feel justified in talking about since they are daily updating, that collection will grow nicely over the months.
Quality is very good, some of the older movies have a 640x480 1500 bitrate as the highest option. The newer ones have 1280x720 3500 bitrate option.
The picture quality is just as good with 2400 high end, full zips, easy to navigate, click and download zips. Here are the numbers for January 2009 in updates to give you an idea of how their schedule works.
In January 2009: 20 new videos and 19 new picture sets. So that is a major positive for a newer site like this one.
Model wise, my main reason for joining was the Cameron Cruz/Mona Lisa content as she is one of my favorite models. There are more that I ended up really liking, like Vannah Sterling, Dorothy Black, Nicole Moore, Megan, and also opened my mind enough to check out the over 40 yrs old models like Berkley, Fallon and was very pleased with those as well. I would say there was only maybe 2-3 models that I didn't even look at, so the vast majority were attractive.
Considering that I rarely go for models much over 30, this was a risky site for me to join. I'm happy I did though, this will become a site that I will go back to in the future months. I also like that "new model per week" feature too. You kind of get the anticipation factor there to be sure to check out who the next new model is. All of the content is 100% exclusive from what I can tell and with the very good quality this is definitely a site that I will recommend for all, especially for those into the more mature models!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Belladonna has to be the only female pornstar that I actually enjoy seeing her eye shadow run, and this is her site.
- Video quality is pretty good, 500 range high end with solid 1600 bitrates.
- A lot of picture sets, around 300, but most are vidcaps and none have zip files, but you can use a DL manager to download the pictures in bulk to make your own zips.
- The 100 or so DVDs not only feature Belladonna, but plenty of either great pornstars like Rebecca Linares. Plenty of booty on this site!
- Downloads are faster than average.
Cons:
- Price it too high, even the trial price is too high at $20 for 7 days! I just did the monthly option for $35.
- Navigation is frustrating to say the least. See next con for further explanation.
- Upsells to buy DVDs that aren't on the site and some that are on other sites, the navigation is poor enough that you WILL click, "Buy DVD" on accident at least once and end up on some other site. One page the download option will be first, next page, buy DVD is first, no wonder I have OCDC issues!
- I can't say this for sure, but I think you can get some of these DVDs on VB, and the other DVD sites, though there are some I've never seen.
- Everything could be improved, better video quality, picture quality and zip files.
Bottom Line:
Let me start with my own description of Belladonna. I believe she is a Latina, really nice big butt, has all kinds of tattoos, kind of a gothic look going there with the black hair and she isn't going to win any "prettiest" of most feminine contests, even against other hardcore porn models. This woman is pretty dirty and wild. Which is why I like her. I usually like my dainty Euro models that look like they could fit on the stage of a fashion show, but Belladonna is my other choice in porn models.
For once, a woman that actually spits on the guy that smacks her, then tells him that she is going to ride the "hide off your balls". Think twice about smacking her, huh? She is sloppy in her sex, slobbering, drooling, sorry Drooler, and she gags herself while giving blowjobs. No need to force her head down on it, she is already doing it! She likes anal, vaginal, oral, girls, guys, groups, and you know what? She is damn believable.
I would call her a kinky version of Eva Angelina. One of my favorite clips, she says, "Pay? I'm not here to be paid, I'm here to wear your ass out".
I personally find her attractive, tattoos and all, it fits her image.
If this sounds like your kind of pornstar, then you should at least look up her DVDs on DVD sites. This site makes it easier for you with over 100 DVDs that feature her.
Oh and the funny quotes, she tells one woman in a girl/girl scene, "I thought you were a REAL lesbian?" when the girl is screaming and pulling her hair.
Ok, she is the selling point, 100%. The quality here is below average with barely 500 high end videos, with a good 1600 bitrate. The pictures at best are 1200 high end, no zips, so it means you are going to have to at least use a download manager if you want those.
The navigation is pretty bad, if you hate upsells, this site might just push you over the edge. It is filled with them. There is little by the way of a search engine. It is a lot of scroll, click, find scenes, click download, not buy or watch, then start over to find another scene.
But, I don't think these negative kill the site simply because I think Belladonna would enjoy watching us face this frustration! She is a great performer, though she has aged some lately and is gaining some weight, she still fits that prototype of a nice thick Latina that you always wanted to try out. Her site gets a recommendation from me simply because of her and her high enthusiasm in her scenes. Like I said, very believable.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A spiraling, confusing, full of content site that does have some exclusive content
- You get 12 other sites that are based around solo models, some good, some okay, some just bad.
- Over 800 videos, 640 high end
- Updates coming at you from every angle, they must have an automated, automatic updater, every time I look up it has updated. Picture sets just as an estimate are upwards of 2,000.
- From a rough count, over 1,000 models
- Zips for pictures
Cons:
- Is it navigation problems or am I just confused by all the updates? I see something I like, go back and can't find it.
- Don't ask for help, the customer service must be on vacation
- As with any site this large and with this many models, there will be some unattractive models.
- Price is a bit high, but I get the feeling if I can figure the site out, I could get my money's worth.
- Picture resolution is all over the charts, 640 on one set, 1280 on the next, it just feels like a cheap site, outdated, maybe if they spent more time updating the quality instead of the updates!
Bottom Line:
You ever join a site and 10 minutes into the membership, you think, "Hmph"? This site I would guess is an older site that has been around based on the comments, though I was not familiar with it until joining.
Let me start by saying they have some really hard to find exclusive content on here. They do give zips, which is great and I seem to be one of the few that figured out how to get the movies, but I can't figure the picture sets out.
I've said it before, we shouldn't have to work when joining a site, but this site will make you do just that. I had this site on my list of to join sites because I had seen some Eve Angel pictures on a TGP site that had the teenflood brand on them.
In that sense, the site is good for collectors, nearly every well known Euro model has exclusive hard to find sets here, and usually when a find a site has these "treasures" to a collector, you don't get zips, they have them and the downloads are fast.
The videos are good from what I have seen, mostly masturbation, dildos, fingers and vibrators oh my type of masturbation. Most of this content does look older, which can be a bonus since you will find some rare content of today's popular models when they first started out in the business.
Problems, why did that link not take me where it took me the last time I clicked it? I said that at least 10 times the first night on the site. I also had a login problem the second day, sent email to the customer support, they didn't answer, but my login was fixed the next day. Not for sure what happened there, but at least they fixed it.
Then there are these bonus sites, I only found one of the solo model sites worth fooling with Teen Larissa, "intellectual, brunette" ah hell, you sold me there. These solo sites are hardly anything to write home about or separate reviews for that matter. None of these have zips and the videos, far and few between, are late 90s quality at best.
I feel a little torn here in recommending this site. I obviously found more to like here than the other PU reviewers, but I'm odd. If you collect porn, especially Euro's big 4 models, Sandra Shine, Eve Angel, Sophie Moone and Aneta Keys, you can get some exclusive content here, but be warned. One of the Eve sets, though the pictures are exclusive look very much like a set I have from Twistys, I'm guessing these are the alternate takes from the ones Twistys has.
Video fans, I can't recommend it. A lot of the videos are models I've never heard of, and the quality seems to vary from video to video from average to poor.
Only recommending it for porn collectors like myself to pick up those rare sets of your favorite models. It is in no way shape or form a groundbreaking site, so no recommend for your everyday average porn fan. There are dozens of sites that have similar content, better quality and much better navigation.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- 12 Site network for $29.95
- Most of the sites are updating and most are fairly big, will have the exacts in the BL.
- Video quality seems to be a network standard of very good 720 high end, 2000+ bitrate, except for a couple, will explain
- Though not high res the pictures are in zip downloads
- Navigation for a network is pretty good
- A few standout sites like Jules Jordan and Jenna Haze, though the Haze site isn't as high quality in the videos
Cons:
- Makes you feel like that it could be better than it is.
- Video quality on most of the sites is very good, but then you get to the Jenna Haze site and video are only 440 high end with pretty bad 700 bitrates
- Some of the sites could be put together, example, Cum in Her Face, Sperm Swallowers and Blow Banged
- Price is too high at $30 a month
Bottom Line:
This network had been on my to join list for awhile.
Between the 11 sites, it advertises 12, but only count 11. The videos total around 800. Which is a pretty large amount of content.
The bad news for me, I was expecting the Jenna Haze content to be 2000 bitrate, 720 high end videos, instead it is the lowest quality site of the network with 440 high end, 700 bitrate. The other sites are 720 high end with 2000 bitrate. Damn it.
The Jules Jordan site is very good and I would rate it the highest of the network. The women are very attractive.
I just don't think this is so much a network as it is a video site that happens to have low resolution, some as low as 640 high end PHOTOS in zip packs.
As a video site it still is pretty good, the amount as mentioned, the quality is above average except on the Jenna Haze content. Raise the quality on the Jenna content and the network's value goes way up. I will add to the TBP review that some of the Jenna content is exclusive. She is one of my favorites and I have a couple of hundred scenes of her and they have a few here I hadn't seen, but that doesn't make the network as a whole that great.
Comparable to Videobox, DVD Box and those other DVD sites, the extra $15 a month really hurts this site considering you feel like you paid $15 more for small pictures.
I will recommend it for those like me that are looking for something new, just don't expected to be blown away. Overall, it is an average video site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Goth heavy site that doesn't go too far overboard with the extreme/1,000 piercings with 212 tattoos look.
- Best reason to join is the bonus sites you get with it. You get over 30 21 Sextury sites with it!
- Pictures on this site are your normal 21st Sextury quality, but not huge resolution, still they do have zips and they are one of the better photography studios when it comes to being a big company.
- Every set has a video and picture set, around 40 of each.
- Some of the higher tier models that you wouldn't expect on a niche site like this, Simony Diamond and Zafira were two that surprised me being on here.
- I see improvement in the 21st Sextury sites stability, good download speed and has yet to be down.
Cons:
- These cons will only apply to this site, some of the costumes are a little too far out there for my taste. Examples, a third fake eye on the forehead?
- Video quality still needs to be improved, videos are topping out at 450 high end, pretty good 1,200 bitrate.
- Just sort of a warning for those considering this site, some of it is pretty extreme, gagging, gaping, etc..
- Biggest fault right now is that it just doesn't have a lot of content and at that, most of the content is very similar.
Bottom Line:
I joined this site after one of the 21st Sextury webmaster/reps answered a comment I left about the bonus sites.
To kind of backwards, let me say that I am on my second month of subscription and might even let it go for a 3rd month. Mandy is Kinky isn't anything that great, slightly above average, mainly because I like the models they have and have something of a goth/geeky fetish.
This site is not for you if you are into glamour only, as it does go into the dark underworld of near violent sex. I wouldn't really call it a BDSM site, but there is plenty of choking, gagging, gaping orifices and so on.
I've always been a fan of 21st Sextury picture sets, though the resolution could be a little higher, I have always thought they really capture the models in good sexy poses and I usually like their color schemes. Though most of the color on this site is black and silver.
The videos are very hardcore. I'm talking eye shadow dripping down the faces of the girls, 2 on 1, so this is not for those looking for a site like Club Sandy.
The star of this site is Mandy Bright, who is a quite attractive model in her own right. Having said that, some of the zany costumes were a little much for me to enjoy. I really have no desire to see an alien woman having sex. Kind of felt like an episode of Futurama gone wrong.
If I was just recommending this site alone, I doubt that I would recommend it, but as a whole, with the more than 30 bonus sites, I recommend giving it a try!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A video site that I had on hold for over a year, finally joined, and my review title should be, "eh"
- Quality is not bad, with newest videos coming at 640 high end, 1000 bitrate, but that isn't that great either.
- Good news is, some of these videos will not be found on any of the other video sites, so that does add some value to this one.
- Very fast download speeds at over 1,100 kb/s
- I joined for a month, but they do have a 3 day trial that gives full access. Monthly TBP price is pretty good for what equals 30% exclusive content.
Cons:
- Lets start with the idea to put picture sets on video site, the pictures are tiny 800 high end and have no zips, so just do away with those, unless they are being used to tout models that they don't have videos for.
- Older videos are pretty poor quality, almost to the point that my computer stutters through them.
- Bad thing is, most of the exclusive videos are the older ones.
- I didn't care for their preview, and that was why it had taken me so long to join. It shows the models they have, then when you click on one to see which movies they have of each model, it bounces you to the join page.
Bottom Line:
I do want to add something here, that I found no DRM on these videos.
Overall, this site reminds me of a videobox knockoff, at twice the price. I just didn't find that much here that I haven't seen on other sites, unless I went back to the older videos which are so poor quality that you get motion sickness watching them.
I really wanted to like this site since they did have a few videos I have been looking for, including a couple of old Mia Stone scenes that I have never seen, one, where she has red hair and looks all of 18.
Having said that, I pretty much paid $20 for maybe 12 scenes that I will keep. I still don't know why they had the picture section. It is like they up and decided to add pictures, then had second thoughts about it. I would like to see a video site that adds picture sets, full ones, with zips!
The video quality tops out at 640 high end with barely average 1000 bitrate. The older videos chug along at 500 bitrate. It kind of has an old Kung Fu movie quality to those clips, since their lips move but the words have already been said.
Download speeds were very good, which only makes the bad quality sting more.
I still can see a few reasons to join. They do have a few rare scenes that you won't find anywhere else, at least, not without DRM. The DRM issue with this site has been fixed, as I didn't find one video with DRM, but when you join a site about videos, the quality should be very important IMO. Barely recommended for collectors only!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site I had never heard of nor seen, exclusive content of some of Europe's biggest stars
- Movies are 720 on high end
- Price isn't bad at $19.95, but it is only a 1 month join
- Somewhat amateur style site with several major pro models, back when they were just getting going in their careers
- A collectors dream come true, if you have ever seen a photo of your favorite model and can't figure out where to get it, check here.
- Full preview that shows one picture from each set of each model they have
Cons:
- Hasn't updated in over 2 years
- Small amount of content overall, main members page says 12,000 pictures, 52 movies
- Pictures are not high res, 1240 is the highest I have seen and no downloadable zips, so you get to click and save as.
- Site has no value once you have been a member. You can download the entire site in a few days, even the pictures that you have to pick and choose and save as
Bottom Line:
A few years ago, when I first started collecting Eve Angel content, there was a set of pictures that had her in blue cotton panties, laying on the bed on her stomach, butt lifted slightly and the panties riding up on her. I have looked everywhere for that set. I found a search portal that had models on it, and there was that picture again. This time, I wrote the watermark's name down and it was this site that I am reviewing.
They have 6 sets of Eve, a few are g/g, but most importantly that one set in the blue cotton panties. The quality of the pictures, the lighting, the colors, is very nice, the resolution is on the small side, most are around 1000 high end, but all are exclusive.
They also have Anetta Keys as "Sunny", those sets are really great as well. There are also some models that I have never seen before that are really gorgeous.
This looks like a site that could have been incredible. It looks like they were only up for a year or so, though their copyright is updated to 2008. Check that preview out and if any of those models are ones you collect, it is a definite join. I have thousands of pictures of Eve and Anetta, but had none of these.
You can tell that the girls were younger than current pictures you see of them, both Eve and Anetta have those innocent smiles. If you are a collector, check the preview out. I recommend it for collectors of any of the models they have and those looking to see today's pros back when they were still newcomers!
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Was recommened by a Sex Psychologist friend, highly erotic site
- Nearly 800 videos, res is good over 600 on high end, but bitrate is a bit jumpy at 700k on my machine.
- Videos are downloadable in full scenes
- Real women, not models, most are average to above average in looks which is important (will explain)
- Definitely real, probably the most realistic porn site on the internet that I have seen
Cons:
- No photos
- Very little nudity (will explain in BL)
- Average girls can become boring to look at, especially for $30 a month
- Borders on mind-numbingly repititive, get the feeling of seen one, seen them all.
- Sometimes tries to become very artsy with the settings, lighting, example white lace wrapped around the women in a very dark room.
Bottom Line:
A Sex Psychologist, or Therapist for you Politically Correct types that believe the Sex Organs have not a brain of their own, recommended this site to me as a highly erotic site.
The first thing you should know is that the majority of these videos do not show much more than breasts and some don't even show that. Instead, the focus is on the woman's face as she masturbates. The moans are excellent if you like to hear the moaning, racing breathing patterns, this is erotic. But the effect wore off very fast for me. After 3 videos I was saying, "Come on camera, move down".
The women look to range in age from 18 to probably mid-30s. Most are pretty enough or cute enough. But lets face it, not all pretty women make the most desirable faces during masturbation and especially in orgasm. If I could ever recommend anything to the webmaster it would be to make the last 30 seconds more of a full body shot even if at a distance. The body shaking, full body orgasms are not on here since you can't see the whole body. In my opinion this detracts a great deal from the erotic nature of the videos.
Video quality is about all there is to comment on, the resolution is very good, but that bitrate on a high end computer is stuttering a little. Which you can imagine hurts the erotic nature as well. This isn't Eve Angel or Sophie Moone quality masturbation, but it does have a place for those who maybe want to see something different and original. Recommended for those people only!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lots of models that I haven't seen before, plus some familiar faces, for a nice blend of old with the new
- Photo quality is nice at over 1500 on high end, but I do get some blurriness
- Videos in full scenes, about the only pro with those
- Amount of picture sets is impressive, around 2,500 sets and those come in zip files
- No scrolling image viewing is interesting, if not strange (see cons and BL)
Cons:
- Videos aren't hardly worth downloading, poor quality and mostly boring videos that are almost all following a formula/sequence
- That no scrolling image viewing is strange, I can't figure out how to keep it working, so I end up not using it.
- Price is too high, $19.95 would be about right
- As with any site that advertises amateur content, you are going to get some models that aren't very good looking
- No sex beyond masturbation
Bottom Line:
I had heard almost all good things about this site. While I do agree that the photos look nice and for the most part are crisp and clear. There are some that are blurry right where I want them to be crisp and clear at.
The navigation is very easy to use, though not knowing these models, left me with spending an afternoon and clicking on each to see what each one looked like. Lots of blondes, and I'm not really into blondes, but that is minor. The downloads are easy, whether movie or zip picture files. Download speeds are going about average for me when compared to other sites.
I just don't see this site as one that I'm going to rush back to. The no scroll picture viewing is gimmicky at best. I went as far as hooking up my old monitor which is a 800x600 just to see how it works. My current monitor is 1600 on the high end, so I wouldn't need the no scroll viewing. The picture tries to fit itself to your screen size. Haven't I been able to do this while using Firefox for years?
If I'm not using that right, I would like it to be explained. The models range from very sexy to just plain average girls. I'm at the point that I want to see very sexy, so a lot of these models were just skipped over. The easiest way to sum it up is that it is a nice site and probably was a great one at one time, but it is just a little above average now. I might come back in a year and try it again. Recommended for 1 month at most, and there are still several similar sites I prefer.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Fetish Network included, this site is sort of the headliner site.
- Movies are pretty good quality 640 on high end, around 1400 speed.
- If you have an exhibitionist or voyeur side this one is for you!
- Pictues were a surprise, over 1200 on high end even on old sets and are zipped
- Download speeds are just above average in the USA
Cons:
- The price! This network costs 39.95 Euros, I didn't realize there was a big difference in the Euro and Dollar, it ended up around $55 for the network for one month.
- This site itself has a great idea, but they may overuse the male stripper parts.
- The download speeds are inconsistent, going from 900 kb/s on one video to 400 kb/s on the next to 1200 kb/s on the next.
- Not enough actual sex going on.
Bottom Line:
I had seen the previews of this site for the better part of a year. My wife loves exhibitionism and voyeuristic material, and I do to a point as well. The video we had watched as previews were all action-filled 30 second clips. So, I decided to just join the entire network, instead of just one site.
The basis for this site is that there are women, usually what you would call average looking, and they are at an all male strip club. Male strippers tease them until an orgy breaks out.
Now for the problem, some of the videos are just the male strippers dancing around naked. Now this is no use to me. I'm not talking about 5 minutes, but 15-20 minutes of men dancing around while stripping. Not good.
It does get better, there are paid women there to get the women turned on. The paid women grab the male strippers and start giving them a blowjob in front of other women, who then decide to try it for themselves. This part of the video is great. Some of these women seriously blush, they look away and laugh too.
The quality is very good, videos look good and so do the pictures. There is one problem though, you have 12 male strippers having sex at one time. There is always this one really sexy woman having sex, but the cameraman is trying to get all 12 in the video. Other than that, this site is pretty good. I can't say I recommend it unless you are really into the group sex. Navigation is plain, scroll, click, download. If you like group sex, it is one of the best!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Possibly the biggest updates on the internet, 5 photo sets per day AND 4 new videos per day
- Has one of the most helpful forum and webmaster that I have talked to.
- Huge amount of videos and pictures...see cons
- Has solo, b/g, g/g so it isn't as softcore as I thought it would be
- Site navigation is well above average
Cons:
- Pictures and videos are more in the quanity over quality group. Not that either looks bad, but they could be better, especially the videos.
- One very strange name usage for one model. Anetta Keys goes by Linda on here, I was a member for a week before finding her content.
- Some of the content is on other similar "niche" sites
- For some reason I am not getting good download speeds. On 10M connection, I get 600 kbp/s. Average for me is 900-1000.
Bottom Line:
I kind of feel bad giving this site "just" an 80, but some of the best content, I already have in higher quality. I loved the Anetta content once I found it under the name Linda P, Paul has 20 sets of Anetta.
The videos are starting to look bad with more and more sites seeing 640 x 480 as the norm, this one is still in the 300ish x 200ish days. It is definitely a site that focuses more on quanity than quality. I don't mean that as a bad thing, since this site would score 10 points higher if I didn't already have most of the best content on here.
The women for the most part are pretty. One thing that I didn't like about the site is the over-emphasis on "young" women. I would guess that 50% of the pic sets has the obligatory pinky between the teeth pose and I've had a problem with other sites because of this as well.
The pictures are a little above average in size, but they could maybe drop a picture set update set and get these pictures up to 2000 on the high end. The content is good overall. Though for once I found myself not following the members' reviews on the movies. I felt like I was out of place on this site.
My recommendation will come if either of these things are true for you. You are into the very cute, young models style of posing or you like one of the models on the site. Paul has an excellent preview that reminds me of Teen Dreams' preview. Check to see if there are any of your favorites, if either of these holds true for you then I recommend!
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Massive amount of content, I guarantee you that you won't see everything in a month!
- Very high quality photographs, resolutiuon ranges from 3800 to 4300 on the high end.
- Videos are now HD quality 1280x720
- Price isn't bad for all the content you get, would have expected it to be $39.99
- Many models on here that you just won't see anywhere else
Cons:
- Videos are boring, massively boring in some cases.
- As with any site of this size, there will be some models that aren't that good looking.
- You ready for this? Every girl that spreads her legs has a bush big enough that you can't see pink, the shaven ones don't spread their legs
- With all this content, this is hard to say, but I get bored after a few weeks.
Bottom Line:
I've been a member on Met-Art off and on now for 3 years. Some months I just want to look at a glamourous/beautiful/artsy nude picture, problem is those months only come about 1 time a year. Met-Art does the artsy nudity as good as anyone, probably better than anyone, but they don't give me more!
One of the biggest reasons that I join this site is to show my wife that I too, can enjoy the natural curves of a woman while shrouded in a curtain, with Beethoven music playing in the background. I said enjoy, kind of like I can enjoy plain brocoli.
I'm not trying to be harsh here, but there are so many sexy women on this site it makes you sick to see them never laying down and wrapping their ankles around their neck. I know it isn't supposed to show that, but to get a higher score from me, they are going to have to show more. High quality all around on this site. It is a beautiful site even, but I don't like being teased and Met-Art leaves me feeling teased.
Overall, the site is a total class act, it has huge pictures, HD video, pics are downloadable in zips and you also get an archive of material that dates back to 1999. Maybe I am just a male chauvinistic pig, but this is porn damn it! It is a walk along frustration avenue for me. If you can look at a nude woman without her spreading at least one time, and if you think women just posing like statues is sexy, then join it. I highly recommend it for those people. If you need more, I don't recommend it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Almost 400 models, most are big name models, Aria Giovanni as an example.
- WMV are pretty good quality 2M speed with 640x480 resolution
- I still haven't figured out the update schedule, but it is updated often, and you get several new sets in each update
- Navigation is pretty nice for me, I like things to be kept basic, and this site seems to live by keeping the navigation simple to understand.
- TBP price of $19.99 is great
Cons:
- Why oh why, beautiful models, beautiful scenery, it is all beautiful, then I find out no high res pics.
- I've not tested what TBP is reporting, but here is their warning if you missed it, it says that when you cancel your membership, you lose the rest of your subscription to the site.
- Content borders on ultra-softcore
- Segmented videos
Bottom Line:
That one con is a big one for me. I sometimes have to fly across country on a one day's notice. Since my wife and I have no children she goes with me, we have no way while gone to cancel a membership. So, if I think there is a chance we won't be back within a week of the renewal, I go ahead and cancel. I would be highly ticked off to pay for 30 days, only to get 17 because I canceled on the 17th day.
Overall, the site has some really beautiful content, Aria's content is as good as I have seen of her. Still, lack of high resolution pics is a no-no in 2007. Yeah I know, I can open it in a viewer and zoom in. The videos are good enough looking to get by without a complaint, but the actual content on said videos is mostly glam/softcore. There is plenty of masturbation, but you all know what I'm talking about. Some of the top glam models masturbate like they are afraid they are going to tear something.
I had heard from others that Mac & Bumble had dropped off some, and I would agree. It is still a good site with some exclusive content. As you can see, low resolution pics, segmented videos, point to a site that is living in 2001.
Come on guys, you all have a reputation to uphold. At least get those pics up near 2000 on the high end, and start making full clips available. If not, Mac & Bumble is going to end up in the bargain bin of porn sites and that would be a shame, I recommend it for a month, but I don't know if I will be back for awhile.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Some of Europe's best models in hardcore action, including Veronica Venoza, Anetta Keys (very rare) and Lucky (also rare).
- Videos are pretty good quality, 640x360 with solid bitrate 1.5k.
- Has one site bonus content, DSHandjobs, which is small but has good handjob content on it.
- Fast downloads, very basic site design which to me is good because it isn't confusing.
- Great site for collectors of their favorite models, who rarely do hardcore
Cons:
- Well, either the guy isn't very good looking or something. The women for the most part aren't really into him in the scenes.
- Scenes have little variety, makes you think of high school when you knew your parents would be home soon and you just skip all forms of foreplay and go as fast as possible. Most ov the videos are under 15 minutes.
- I think I got fooled, I could have sworn on my first visit it said that I would get DSHandjobs and Dr Hardcore as well. No Dr. Hardcore
Bottom Line:
I ran out of room in the cons section. The videos are segmented on older clips, which really takes away when combined with the lower quality. I can't stand downloading segments that are under 10 megs each. The other part, I am about 90% sure that Dr. Hardcore was advertised as a bonus site, maybe it was a limited time offer, either way, I didn't get it too. The DSHandjobs is actually quite good if you like handjob clips. The women come off as more interested in the handjob clips.
The higher score comes simply from me being a collector of a couple of the models, meaning I was able to get some content that I have been looking for. I love seeing Anetta Keys in anything more than masturbation or g/g and he has her. Also Lucky rarely had done hardcore, but he has her.
The sex is just not real believable. You feel like these women are looking at the camera and saying to you, the viewer "I'm only doing this for the money". which also makes you think, "If I had as much money as this guy, I could have uninterested sex with these models too!"
Sarcasm aside, the guy that runs the site is very cordial if you send him an email. I feel bad saying this, but you almost start to feel sorry for him. Poor guy pays for sex with these models who wouldn't even talk to him if not for the money, and here I am criticizing him and his site. Overall though, if you are a collector, check his preview, shows all models. It is recommended if you are a collector of any of his models.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- DVD quality videos
- Tons of pictures, over 2,000 sets
- Comes as a bundle of sites with Glamour Models Gone Bad, Crissy Moran, Natalia Cruze and Lonnie Waters.
- Considering the $24.95 price, the sites combined make for a seriously great value
- Has some older content that most haven't seen before of now famous starlets
Cons:
- Some of these girls aren't amateurs, not for sure if the content was created before they became professionals or not.
- Not much difference from video to video, positions are similar, even the sequence of positions.
Bottom Line:
Let me start off by saying that Crissy Moran's site and Glamour Models Gone Bad are good enough together for $24.95, that does not mean the company should stop offering these others though!
I had posted awhile back about searching DVD sites for Eva Angelina and Nautica Thorn content, as I like curvy women. There is Nautica content on here, and it is very good. Really, you don't see a lot of Nautica pictures since she is more known for her videos, so these were a nice surprise.
I also recognized Pavlina, who I've seen on many Euro sites and another nice surprise, a Hispanic model named Ramona. She has been on FTV as well, really pretty, nice hips and butt. It was good to see some hardcore of her. Each of the sites that come together in this package, have decent to above average navigation, though you wonder how long these sites have been up without an update to the look of the sites. I add that simply because if I wasn't a TBP user, and just happened upon the site, it would look outdated.
The content is fairly repetitive, but then again, as I have said before, it isn't like there are that many positions or settings that we can expect. I'm really nitpicking here because the site really does feel like a "bonus" site since I would have joined for Crissy's site and Glamour Models Gone Bad, I guess you could say this site is just the gravy on top of my steak.
Good site, I recommend joining through Crissy's site and enjoying all the bonus content!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, the best handjob site on the internet
- It comes with a pretty big network, over 60 other sites, will explain in bottom line.
- Around 165 full length handjob clips, some as long as 20 minutes. Downloadable in full scenes.
- Trial is $7.99 and is full access for 3 days, download manageers are allowed and you get very fast download speeds. I peaked at 900 kb/s with a 10M connection.
- A few of the other network sites are worth looking into as well
Cons:
- The very best video clips they have are average quality at best 400x320.
- Not really a con, but most of the network sites are useless, as most of the content is fetish based.
- Not exclusive content, but I can say that skilfullhands has many clips I have never seen before.
Bottom Line:
Ok, I'm not a big handjob fan myself, not even a big blowjob fan, at least not in movies. But my wife, like many women, enjoy seeing a woman playing with a man. This site has several videos that my wife really likes. I've downloaded the handjobs 19 and all of those from Videobox, but these do seem more thought out. You get teasing, one is an older very attractive woman catching her neighbor playing with himself, so she shows him how it is supposed to be done.
I've been on Tugjobs with the Ox Pass, but they are too strict, "No sucking" can be heard in some of them. This site allows sucking and the guys to touch the girls as well. Most of the women are average looking or above. Plus, one of the network sites is "Jerk It Baby" which has 50 more handjob clips. So, instead of searching them on Videobox, you can get over 200 right here between these two.
Even if I get nothing else from the network, I still get my money's worth using the trial at $8 which is 1/3 the price of one handjob DVD that only has 12 clips on it.
If you can't get the trial to come up when joining, click on the "secondary billing" section, it brings up Segpay, which is where the trial is. I cancelled it minutes after signing up and received a cancellation notice 20 minutes later. If you like handjobs, this is a great trial join. I've downloaded 80 or so clips already in the download manager. Recommended for handjob fans. Network review will be separate and not as high as this site scored.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
