Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of my all-time favorite networks.
- Very good download speeds.
- The archive on this network is huge.
- Does mostly have softer content, even in the b/g content. You'll find a few rough scenes here and there.
- The biggest collection of the infamous Euro stars from 2003-2009, known as the "No Take Dick Six". They'll be in the BL.
- I will say the newer scenes are getting better.
- High quality all-around the network.
- Navigation is good for a network.
- One of the last networks to have picture sets with every scene and they're really photo sets, not screencaps from the videos.
Cons:
- Update schedule is below average, much like 21Sextreme (the sister site), I expect a network of 21 sites to have at least 1 update per day across the whole network but so far in June, there are 17 updates in 19 days.
- The amount of sites that are no longer updating. Some are understandable like Sweet Sophie Moone (retired) but there are way too many not updating, will list in BL.
- Those damned picture captchas, no, I won't click on the storefront. Becoming harder to cancel too. I had to know my username, my password, the email address and click a captcha. I store my user/pass in my browser so I rarely know those.
Bottom Line:
I once called this one of the greatest networks ever. I have a still crush on the models known as "The Don't Take Dick Six" and they were all updating back then with new content. Now, you're going to be lucky to find many sites that are updating on this network. Here's the list of sites that aren't updating and haven't updated in more than a few months:
My single-biggest frustration here is I like softcore content, I like lesbian content, solo content, all of which 21 Sextury made their name with. Of the still updating sites, we have: Asshole Fever, Deepthroat Frenzy, DP Fanatics, Footsie Babes*, Gapeland, Lez Cuties* and Pix and Video*. The ones with asterisks are softcore, traditional 21 Sextury content.
The positive if there is one, I lost all of my 21 Sextury content so I'm back to get the no take dick six content. They are:
Sandy from Club Sandy, Eve Angel, Sandra Shine, Mia Stone, Sophie Moone and Anetta Keys. They do have one of Eve with a man and maybe one of Sandra and Sandy had some close encounters but for the most part, these 6 women either shot with each other or solo. A few others kind of came along too, Zafira, Peaches and Eufrat.
Times change but so does my review score. There's so little here for me once I collect all my lost content, I might have to let it go over into a second month since my ISP is teasing me with 200Mbps and I feel stuck at 100Mbps.
I really don't have a problem with hardcore scenes, anal, I think it all has its place but when 90% of the sites that are updating on the internet are doing anal, hardcore, why would 21 Sextury, once a leader in porn -- start following? I also gave 21 Sextreme a fairly low score coming from me and my score here might not show how I really feel. I'm taking into consideration that there's a lot of porn users out there who haven't ever been a member. They'll love the archives. I only do because Microsoft gave me bad advice on backing up a computer.
The quality is very good. The newest videos have 8 download options from 180p to 1080p. The newer picture sets are hitting around 5000 on the long end and are downloadable. The new models and scenes are fairly impressive. I've noticed Alyssia Kent as a very attractive new model for them but just being honest, she has 4 scenes and all 4 are boy/girl hardcore. Is it too much to ask for a solo scene of her? I know that fans used to get very frustrated with the no take dick six for not doing hardcore but did we really need to go to the opposite pole to make everyone happy? And again, if Brazzers started only posting solo scenes, it would cause an outrage. It's why I do rate DDF quite a bit higher than 21Sextury. The newest scene on Lez Cuties is very good but overall, the newer content is letdown by a followed path from scene to scene.
Despite my ranting, I would still recommend it to those who haven't tried it. Those who haven't tried it will have so much variety to go through but those of us who have been here since 2007, well, we're pretty much watching an old favorite die off. I haven't been on 21 Naturals in awhile. It now comes with 21 Naturals, 21 Foot Art and here you go, 21 Erotic Anal. I think they should combine the three networks, Sextury, Sextreme and Naturals.
At least it will be fun for newer members. I should have put this in the cons too but for those going to the archive (pre-2010), most of those scenes have 720p but some only have 480p.
Let's wrap it up with some numbers:
The 21 Sextury Network has around 18,000 scenes (pictures and video with each scene). I say around because I think they're counting 21 Sextreme and 21 Naturals in that number but there's no way to tell. They also have 4,000 models but that does include males and women who have to be from 21 Sextreme.
Hopefully, you'll read through this before seeing "recommended".
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I once rated Club Sandy a 99. I feel like me giving it an 82 is a generous nod to nostalgia.
- The site is still updating, but only twice a month. It used to update daily.
- The included network access still makes this a good join for the TBP price. BL will go into this since I'm in a year long subscription.
- If you are a collector of certain models there are plenty here with large archives of content.
- Lots of remastering of old scenes. I consider it a pro since I've seen scenes as old as 2007 that are remastered into 1080p.
- Lots of compilation videos. Those could be a con for some, but they are pretty good for discovering models you might not have realized you like.
- Good download speeds, very consistent.
- Picture sets, downloadable as zips, still come with each scene, but they could make it a little easier to find them.
Cons:
- Two updates per month. I'll never understand the point of having a network that kills off your best-known sites.
- Navigation is best described as clunky. It's worst described as what the hell are they thinking?
- Content split between three networks. And they've removed their previous token system that at least allowed you to join the other networks to get that one or two rare scene you can't find on your hard drive.
- Where's the creativity 21 Sextury used to have?
Bottom Line:
I've been hanging onto year-long subscriptions to 21 Sextury and DDF Network for 9-10 months. These two networks have been longtime staples in my porn rotation. The complete dropoff of Club Sandy is a disappointment for me, but not all is lost. I'll try to stick to the good parts then add the bad parts to explain the disappointment.
If you've never been a member here and don't know much about Euro models, then this is a great place to start. The star of Club Sandy, Sandy, has always been and still is one of the prettiest, most erotic European women I've ever seen in porn. The site and network is loaded with her content. Including compilations, Sandy is featured in over 500 scenes. Blue Angel, Eve Angel, Zafira, you name them, they too have 100+ scenes on here.
That's where a problem comes up. The big Euro models were mostly from the mid to late 2000s. Following their departures, they've yet to develop many major stars. So, joining this site and network is more of an archival join. I would like to say the newer content (2013 forward) has some great content, but most of it just comes off as cookie-cutter hardcore porn. My point here is if you've been a member before and still have the content on a hard drive, I'm not for sure there's much reason to join.
The remasters aren't listed as remasters so you have to look for them. One I really liked was an early Blue Angel scene from 2007 that has been remastered into 1080p resolution with 6000+ bitrate, it looks very good. My one problem with the remastered videos is there's no in-between. You can either download the old version, which was 540p or jump all the way to 1080p. I almost always prefer the 720p videos, but the remasters don't have that option.
You really can't complain about the quality here, but you can complain about the newer videos being just like the one released earlier in the month and those are just like the two released last month, this goes on for several years. On top of that, you have the three network split of content. The way they've handled the splitting of their network should be used to show why you shouldn't start changing how things work.
Where I know I'm being too hard on them is the lack of Sandy content, I think she retired a few years ago. Maybe the length of my membership has made me feel like there's just not enough to keep me interested without the "old" models?
Back to the positive:
While they used to be known for removing some scenes, it now looks like they've added all of them back. Including the very rare Eve Angel hardcore b/g scene in a bathroom from early in her career. I've also noticed some older Sophie Moone scenes I hadn't seen in years. Biggest problem here is you have to know what you're looking for so that could be frustrating for new members who don't know about the older models.
I still believe it's worth joining since you do get access to the 21 Sextury network, but I really don't think it's (the network) is even coming close to the DDF network these days.
The good news is the newer content is all shot with the 1080p option. The bad news is a large percentage of the new content is anal/hardcore/boy-girl. As soon as I can re-review the network as a whole, I will and don't see it rating much over an 85 as a whole. Lots of good older content here, some in poorer quality, but still featuring some of the best models in the world.
To end, I think if you're new to the network it's definitely worth a join ... for a month. I wouldn't recommend the year subscription to anyone as I don't think the newer content is even close as good as the older content. Also recommended to collectors, especially if you don't have the remastered older videos. Just make sure the videos you're looking for didn't get sent to 21 Sextreme or else you'll need to join it too.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A nice alternative for when you've viewed every model on Met-Art.
- Owned by Met-Art, has similarly high production values as Met-Art's other sites.
- Update schedule is straightforward. Updates daily. You get 1 video a week and 6 photo sets per week.
- Videos have 1080p option (since early 2007) and photos are close to 6000 on the long end and have been for five years. Prior to that they were still over 4000 on the long end.
- 320 models with most having multiple scenes/videos/photo sets.
- Has always been a little more risky than Met-Art has been, though Met-Art is similar to Errotica Archives now in terms of what all they show.
- Quite a few girls you don't see on many sites, which led to me joining it since they had 3 models I've collected for nearly 10 years.
- I'm going to say it's exclusive content, but the archive in the name bothers me since this site is owned by Met-Art. I don't recognize any of the sets.
Cons:
- I had a love/hate relationship with Met-Art for many years and I kind of feel the same way about Errotica Archives. They have the models, the high technical quality, then I open a photo set and everything feels bland.
- Videos that tease masturbation by ... masturbating. I like tease as much as anyone does, but if you're going to be fully nude, legs spread, touching yourself, just keep going instead of rolling over into another sexual position only to repeat the above "tease".
- Site kind of feels like a knock-off of Met-Art or an extension, which I think it used to be offered in a bundle with Met-Art years ago.
- Navigation needs a "photos" tab. It has a "top photos" tab which shows me the highest rated or most popular photos, but doesn't line all the photo sets up for me. Videos/films has its own tab, so I don't get why there's not a photo tab.
Bottom Line:
These type of sites are always hard for me to review. Naked, beautiful women. Showing everything they have. Only to disappear like an oasis. Gives new meaning to came and gone.
This site does nearly everything right. Consistent updates, high technical quality videos and photos in zip downloads. Price is good with the PU discount. But I've seen it all before. The main draw for me was the content of models Veronica Fasterova (Verunka on this site), Dominika A/Dominika C (Dominika on this site) and Chiara. Errotica Archives has over 40 photo sets and videos of these 3 models who I've collected for 5+ years each.
Beyond those three there was some interest, but most of the content is fairly predictable and tame. There are sets with more than one girl in them, but somehow they have figured out a way to take 75-100 photos without the models doing anything remotely sexual. The videos show the model masturbating, starting to get into it only to quickly change positions and start this same pattern again.
I was more open to these types of sets a few years ago, but I just don't get much out of them these days.
I do think the site is very good at what it does. Young, slim, nude models frolicking in the park. Running around naked prior to the filming even starting since most sets start with the model completely nude. Which is a no-no with me. Technically, the site is a 90, but in terms of entertainment for me it's maybe an 80 ... and that's a maybe. I went with 82 since it is a good site, but it would be higher for anyone who likes artsy, pretty pictures.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Very high quality, niche heavy site.
- High percentage of pretty models.
- Lots of download options (on newer scenes), newer videos go up to 1280x720 resolution. Newer photo sets top out at 1600 high end and come zipped.
- Navigation is a little harder than it should be at first. Once you figure it out, it's very easy.
- Could be a con, setting is the same in every scene. Though the room is actually quite pretty and easy on the eyes with its colors.
- Could also be a con. Every scene is of a firm, young woman being massaged then sex. Could be a con for those who bore easily.
Cons:
- I was a little frustrated with the video options. There are some videos with multiple quality options, others with just one, including some newer ones that only have the "ultra HD" option which is usually near 1 GB in size. Also have scenes that are showing unusual resolutions. Will further in BL.
- Nearly every model is slim. I put this because I know there are others who at least like some variety in model shape and size.
- Site is pretty small since "bonus" sites only allowed me to stream.
- Biggest con for me is that the site/scenes lacks much personality. In a one month membership, I did download 27 models, but according to their folder stats, all were done on 3 separate days and what is "hard" about it?
Bottom Line:
I'm approaching this review similar to how I did Teen Mega World. Outside of a few exceptions, nearly all the models here are slim. I know it's probably implied by the 18 in the name of the site, but then again, there's not a lot of "hard" sex here so you get my point. It looks like from the set ratings the more built models are very popular with members. So it surprises me they don't try to get more built models in.
I don't have too much of a problem with formulaic, but the content here is very formulaic, to the point of most of the scenes being predictable right down to the point of being able to guess (within a few minutes) when the massage stops and the sex starts. As with any site with young models, this leads to the model needing to elevate the scene which as we know can be a problem. Some seem really bored. I don't like porn where the male becomes a major part of the dialogue, but neither the male or female do much talking. Not for sure if they're going for a voyeur feel for the viewer, which is possible since the newer scenes have added a "shower" video of each model washing off after the scene. I think it would be even better if they focused on the stripping of the model instead of trying to make the model look nervous and cautious. That's the idea, maybe a scene or two of the model seducing the masseuse into doing more than a massage? Seems like the storylines with this niche are nearly unlimited, woman mad at boyfriend/husband goes to get massage and ends up cheating, seduction, etc...
For some, I would think the biggest complaint is that there isn't anything here that made me think "That's really hard sex". Maybe I should stay away from the Kink sites, but on a 10 scale, I would rate the hardness of these scenes at 5 or below.
The good parts, the models are all very pretty. They are mostly firm and end up oiled, which is always a good thing. I shouldn't say there are only slim models, since I did find 27 attractive enough to download and keep, but the curvier models really do stand out here like Isis Taylor.
I didn't notice the video quality differences until after my membership ran out. The majority of these scenes I have are 1000x564 resolution. Not that I mind that since I prefer 1280x720 max, for hard drive space, but I don't remember if that odd resolution is listed as the highest option. The options can be confusing. Some of the newer videos only have a ultra high video option. For those looking to save hard drive space or who have a slow internet connection those may be a pain to download.
The picture sets seem to follow suit in being confusing. The 1024 zips contain pictures that top out at 1500 long end.
There is one other complaint that I didn't consider a con since it's one that may not bother others and normally doesn't me. This site only updates once per week. They have quite a bit of older scenes that are 640x380 and that's the top resolution available. I understand this type of porn is probably expensive to make, but as others have mentioned Massage Creep does it while offering a full network of other sites to go with it. I also think Brazzers has gotten in on the massage scenes plus they have an entire network too. Why not remaster those older scenes, maybe 1-2 a week to help beef up the "one" update per week? And like a lot of sites, it seems some of the best scenes are only available in the lowest quality.
I did join the site through a promo or probably wouldn't have taken a chance on it. At the current price, I don't see myself returning to it. The varying score applies here too. If you like slim models, massage, add 5 points to the score. If not, subtract 5 points since I was okay with it and kind of in the middle. I like the oily massages.
Overall though, I wasn't that impressed with the content because of the scene to scene sameness which goes beyond formulaic. Most of the models look similar too. So beyond, talk, act apprehensive, fall to the seduction of the massage, have sex, you also get models who are similar build. In a way it reminds me of Amateur Allure where you had the feeling you were watching a guy live out his fantasies by posing as a porn site instead of creating porn people would want to see.
I still would recommend it for one month since the content is exclusive. I just wouldn't have high expectations unless you do prefer slimmer models. This number puts things in perspective. When I was on the site there was 226 models (June 2012). I have 27 model folders from it, so I only downloaded around 12% of the models. I would give more information on the bonus sites, but I only saw stream options for those and didn't fool with them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Roughly 2/3 of content is not included with Pacino's Adventures.
- Picked up as cross-sell trial with Pacino's Adventures for $4.95 for 3 days, full access.
- May be a couple off, but showing 93 photo sets, 94 videos.
- Weekly update, don't know if these are just sets Pacino has stashed or not.
- Pics are zipped and are 1200 long end on about 60% of pic sets and 1600 long end on the other 40%.
- Covers basic sex niches, solo, girl/girl, boy/girl and girl/girl/girl.
- Bonus sites are hit or miss, same bonus sites as Pacino's Adventures. La Zona Modelos is an above average bonus site and surprising to me, Pam Spice is a bonus site, surprising since she is my favorite of the Pacino models.
- Video quality has some variance and not really for sure the rhyme or reason to it since some of the older videos are 1440 high end in res, while some of the newer are only 720 high end.
- Over 10,000 pictures of Tania, full site is 38.2 GB.
Cons:
- Guessing the tech staff thought it would be easier to start the name of each video with ts, for Tania Spice, then the name of the video. The videos that are more than one part, occasionally two parts, are not in order since ts are the first two letters in every video filename.
- Can't say I would join this site for $29.95, really nice as a trial when combined with monthly sub to Pacino's Adventures.
- Pacino is big on the outfits, costumes, only problem is, all of his models use the same outfits, costumes, themes so there is a chance for redundancy which is a shame since his models are very good at tease/strip.
- Just not big enough to be a standalone site, should be included in with the bonus sites on Pacino's Adventures
Bottom Line:
I have mixed emotions on all of Pacino's sites. This one doesn't change that. I like the technical quality, wish the pictures were a little bigger, but they are at least at a minimum 1200 long end and are zipped. Considering the varying tech quality of the videos not being based on date of release, it is probably safe to say he shoots or shot the solo models he has, maybe for a year, then they left and he's just slowly releasing the content.
It's interesting how a video released 5 weeks ago is 720 long end, while one released last year was 1440 long end. It's not so much a criticism as it is a heads up, maybe positively or negatively depending on taste, to potential members since the model, in this case Tania, doesn't look much older in her newest set as she did in her oldest set.
The girls with solo sites working with Pacino are also quite different. Tania is one of the more hardcore models he has. She does everything including anal. At first, when I first saw her back on Pacino's Adventures, I wasn't for sure if I would be that much into her because of the braces on her teeth. However, considering the fact that many of these models come from impoverished countries, I can see the other side that says her family probably couldn't afford braces when she was younger.
In terms of personality, she's almost as playful at Gigi Spice. Really pretty hair, no matter which color and as Spencer said in the TBP review, she has a great set of natural boobs. As would be expected, she also has a nice full butt as well. Tania does speak some English in a few of the videos. I don't think she's as much into the girl/girl scenes as Gigi, but she's very good at solo and also in the boy/girl scenes with Pacino.
The settings/themes vary from the expected schoolgirl to baseball player to football player to bathtub to police officer to taxi driver to the unexpected road construction crew worker. So much variation in fact, I think you could put most of Pacino's sites into a costume type genre which is why I wish there was more focus and higher resolution on the pictures.
Like with his other sites Pacino doesn't get in the way like most males in porn. He's rarely heard and if he is, it's not with words like "bitch" or the typical male porn star stereotype. He's rather laid-back and seems to have a calming effect on the models.
Overall, it's a good site, for the $5/3 days cross sell with Pacino's Adventures, it's an excellent deal. However, since it is still a standalone site at $30/month, it's not recommended as a join by itself. Which leads me back to the mixed emotions I started with. If you're joining Pacino's Adventures, the flagship site and get the offer for Tania's solo site, I do recommend it. It took me a day to download the videos and pictures from it and considering her attractiveness, she's very collectible and has several solo sets that end in dripping orgasms.
As trial with PA, recommended
As standalone, not recommended
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- About as much content as you will find on one site
- $9.95 TBP price!
- WMV files are a decent 480 on high end, with Divx files coming in a little higher at 540, WMV have 1000 bitrate, Divx have 2000.
- Many old stars that you can't find anywhere else, over a dozen b/g clips of Adrianne Sage as example
- Has nearly 900 clips that are exclusive to their network, plus over 2,000 non-exclusive DVDs
- Has screenshots for all videos and also has a picture section that has more well known models who do not do videos
Cons:
- First, this is the same site I received months ago when I signed up for CFNM Exposed, believe it was under the name Ultimate Sex Pass. There are problems here.
- No zips for the pictures and you can't even use a download manager to get the pictures.
- Good luck on the exclusive videos. For example, CFNM Exposed has 33 clips, well, 17 you can download, the other 16 you can only stream, when you try to download it says, "Unable to load file"
- Those damn updates where they give you one clip from a DVD one day, then you get the next a month later.
- Login screen is a hassle, half the time the security code doesn't even show up clear enough to type in.
Bottom Line:
Talk about a site that doesn't know what it wants to be. This is a site that I had known as Ultimate Sex Pass. With some added features, they have the Cumisha Jones collection here now, and they have the Stracy Stone collection here as well, and those two alone were worth the 10 bucks for me.
After that, bring some Tylenol, you are going to need it. First, every clip you click on to download, it starts loading it to stream. You have to click pause, then go down to the download link. Then about 1/5th of all clips I tried to download said, "Unable to load" and let me download an invalid .html file.
Things can get better or worse depending on your patience. There is A LOT here to like. I love the "older" stars of the late 90s that they have here. They also have some stars that you rarely see on the well known DVD sites like Adrianne Sage. The navigation isn't bad. They have a "view all pornstars" link that takes you to a model index that works just as expected. They have their exclusive sites at the bottom of the main page, you just click and go, and some of these are really good, like the "At Work" series.
Then there is the bad, some of those really great looking models on those exclusive sites, their movies give you the, "Unable to load" message.
With a little time and work this site could challenge the big boys! As it is now, it is worth a month, you are sure to find some model you forgot about. I recommend for one month, and only hope they work out the kinks!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Big network (18 sites), focusing more on Euro models than American, which is unusual for networks, especially ones based in the United States.
- Video quality on the sites is above average, 640 on high end with 1300 bitrate.
- Almost all video sets have picture sets as well, highest resolution that I have seen on the pictures is 1080, no zips either.
- Total amount of content is not bad at all, around 500 videos 600 videos total and give a take or a few, 600 picture sets.
- Download speed is right at average for me
Cons:
- Same complaint I have with most networks, all of the content could be put on one site with a category for each niche.
- Navigation is not too bad, but I would call it clunky and cumbersome. Kind of like a 55 year old pornstar.
- The pictures though a positive since you can check out what happens in the video before downloading, is it really that hard to put these files in a zip?
- Price could be too high for some, it doesn't compare with the big boys in the Euro porn market, the price is similar, but you do get some content here that those big boys don't have.
- I know they can't help it, but the name game shows up. Lora Craft listed as Jasmine? I wish the sites and models would get together and fix this problem, just call her Laura or Lara, but why Jasmine?
Bottom Line:
This is one of those sites that you really like one minute, then cuss it the next minute. There is some content on here that you won't see elsewhere. Lora Craft's masturbation scene on Euro Fuck Toys is pretty amazing. Lora is one of the best performers when she "is on" and she is on in this one.
The problem I was having happened when I realized the girls are going by odd names. It didn't help that the navigation was already clunky, now I have to take stabs in the dark at who is who. Maybe this is why they made a network of sites that have 30 or so sets per each one, instead of sticking them all on one site? That does make it easier to go through 30 to find the ones you are looking for.
There are plenty of positives to work with here. The overall quality of the videos, nice resolution and good bitrate, especially seeing that I think this network just opened recently. Which leads to a questionable negative, I don't know if this content is exclusive. I haven't seen any of it, if that helps and I love Euro porn.
Some of the sites have themes that they stick with, like Honey Bun Babes, which is probably my favorite of the network with women with ample hind-endage having honey poured all over their butts before having sex. They do seem to be trying hard to at least produce content that matches the name of each site.
Now we come to the hard part, is it worth the money? I think so, but I love Euro models, if you love Euros, then a one month membership is recommended!
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- A lot of videos that I haven't seen on other sites
- Great trial, that I allowed to rebill for full price since I found enough content that I wanted
- Always like DVD sites that have photos as well, though the photo sets are not in connection to the videos...strange.
- Site is giving me great DL speeds, maybe my highest yet, 1,400 kb/sec with 10M connection
- Video quality is 640 on high end
Cons:
- "Classic" videos are from the mid-80s to 90s, not that I mind since I don't care for much porn released before 1990, but could bother some.
- While there are some nice videos that I haven't seen, a good portion, probably 75% is available on other sites.
- Pictures while nice are virtually useless, are not from videos and no zip downloads, plus widely available.
- Navigation is hit or miss, no in between here.
Bottom Line:
I never joined this site because of the name. It sounded too cliche. The site came off as a budget bin porn store, but I'm glad to say that I was wrong.
The site is a movie site that sells itself as having high res photos, I've yet to see the high res photos and since we have no set standard for what is high res, I guess it is okay to advertise them that way. The preview could be better, but with a $3 full trial available, I took the chance on it and the 3 bucks. I found enough content to just go ahead and plan to let it rebill for a month.
The quality of the video is what has become the standard these days at 640 on high end 1000k bitrate. The selection is very good as there where several models who I haven't seen on the bigger, more well known DVD sites. I noticed ApocTom's review that talked about Tera being on here and she was a selling point for me. I do question their overall advertising with the word "exclusive" being used 3 times on the join page. A picture of Aria Giovanni on the front page, though they have nothing that I found except a picture set that is widely available, even for free on TGP sites.
The video numbers may be a little bloated as well. They don't have nearly 3,000 full length DVDs, instead, nearly 3,000 video scenes. While I still was happy since I was able to get plenty of clips I hadn't been able to get on other sites, it may not be enough to justify that $30 price. In the end, I was happy, but will only recommend the trial for others.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Last one of the sites in the Orgy Max network that I will review and probably the best.
- As is the norm for this network, 640 on high end for videos and they have a ton of these on this site, over 1,000 video clips
- Ok, I didn't know what WAM is. I still don't! This is a food fight fetish site, will explain BL
- Pictures are zipped, but are not as big as the other sites on the network, 1200 max
- Bathing/shower fetish, big deal to some!
Cons:
- Price is too high individually or as a whole network.
- Some of these videos on this site aren't as clear as the other sites, could be juice on the camera!
- This food fetish is a turn-off for me, not my thing at all
- Really can't tell who is sexy and who isn't because they are covered with food
Bottom Line:
I take it this is the most popular site on the network. I didn't join the network for this site though. I will review it since I know there are people with all kinds of fetishes.
What you get here is a room full of young women, look to be 18-21.
The videos are still not bad at all. The specs are the same, but I believe it is the whole food fight that is making the video look blurry. The girls splatter pies on each other, then lick it off. They dump pudding on each other, then lick it off, lots of touching, mud wrestling. And another fetish that is in this site is clothing, latex suits, uniforms and clothing that I don't understand, maybe it is a European thing?
I personally didn't like the site, but I can see it being a great site for those who have these aforementioned fetishes. You will see a little of everything here including bathing, seriously bathing, not fingering while bathing, but women bathing each other. Still, I can't give it a great score, because the content isn't up my alley. I don't like seeing women soaked with pudding. If you do, then you have no reason to look for another site. This is the one to join! Gooey, messy, mud wrestling, pouring pudding on each other, throwing pies at each other. It is a real fetish freak's dream come true.
Overall, I can't recommend any of the sites in this network unless you have a fetish for the content. Some of this is just a little strange for me. I'm more here for the beauty, not the pudding soaked panties.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Just going to start with this thought, don’t come to this site looking for bondage and anything rough. I thought that might be the way they would take it, but they don’t, and it is a pro that they didn’t.
- This is a site that shows the line for needing updates or not needing updates. It has only 56 scenes and no updates for a few years. It doesn’t need the updates. The scenes are very similar and don’t even really grasp a theme. The scenes are good.
- Over the top acting, I’m going to start giving bonus points for that. It really fits this niche. Especially for those expecting harsh punishment.
- High quality videos and photo downloads.
- CCBill as biller.
- Comes with Nubiles Porn network and it almost always has a promo.
Cons:
- If you’re wanting punishment, you’re going to get punished. The punishment on this site is light spanking. Making the teen suck the guy’s dick while her mom is cooking dinner in the background. That’s good porn. I am not being sarcastic. I really like this type of porn.
- I don’t think the scenes are good enough to keep the site going and that makes it hard to call not updating a con. I think the scenes are good enough as part of a network. This gives you a little something different. Some people will not like that this is not more hardcore.
Bottom Line:
There was no doubt in my mind that Charles Dera was going to be in some of these scenes. He seems to be cast for this role. He’s the goofy looking guy with the animated expressions. He catches his stepdaughter in his liquor cabinet. She just happened to be wearing a little skirt. He pulls her over his knee and starts spanking. As much as I want to make fun of Charles Dera, he is good at this type of lighthearted porn. I would even say he is one of the defining members of the not taking ourselves too seriously porn group.
I know the first time I looked at this site I was expecting it to be a little more hardcore. I wasn’t for sure since it is Nubiles. It has the Nubiles feel to it. It’s playful. This is a niche that would get very old to me if it was more hardcore. The models are so cute and pretty, I don’t know that I could stomach watching someone punish them. Maybe I’m onto something there? These are still Nubiles-type models. You also get Nubiles quality. The 56 scenes can all be downloaded in 1080p, 720p, 540p, 360p and 270p. The photos are very good with 6000 long end resolution on the highest download option.
Even though I don’t think they do anything to live up to the title of the site, they do enough to make it a good site. I have seen so many of the scene previews on porn ads. That’s a good sign. Something in a still picture is good enough to remember. One scene for those into bondage, this is what you’re going to get, it's The Pussy Bandit scene. That’s the name of it. The teen is texting with her pastel-colored comforter on her bed and two stuffed animals. The Pussy Bandit shows up. He uses pastel pink rope and material to shackle her. It’s easy to see they are not trying to make this Kink Lite. The scenes do work. She Needs A Spanking with Blair Williams is one of my favorites. She is giving Charles Dera a blowjob while her mom is in the background in the kitchen. It’s one of those fetishes that I am sure has crossed a few minds.
Something I like and maybe others would too. There is a section in nearly each scene where the model is supposed to be chatting or texting her boyfriend. She sends nude selfies and that’s a fetish too. It’s more on the softer side of fetishes. I have talked about my fetishes are very tame to most people. I do like this porn. One more scene that needs to be mentioned, Insert This. It has some good masturbation starting out. As the scene progresses, the younger woman goes to the living room and is inserting uncooked hot dogs in her pussy. She gets caught and nearly lets the hot dog go. See it for what they’re trying to sell it as not what your mind tells you when you read, “Bad Teens Punished”. They are selling a soft, fun, silly, playful, youthful, curious version of hardcore sex. It’s good. I wouldn’t go any further than good. There’s not going to be any enemas or prolapse or anything that looks like it shouldn’t have made its way into a porn scene.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Milf betrayal porn that’s good.
- Large site with 711 scenes and 2 updates per month.
- Well-known models which could be a pro or con depending on your view.
- If you join through PU’s links, downloads are included in the price.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max)
- No 4K they do have 1080p.
Cons:
- A lot of the scenes have a similar feel to them which is normal with a narrow niche like this one.
- ProBiller can be hard to deal with but I didn’t have any problems with them this time.
Bottom Line:
As much as this site tries to be a reality site about wives that aren’t getting enough sex from their husbands, the scenes don’t do a real good job of making you believe that’s what’s happening. It could be that’s to be expected from a site this size too. You get hit or miss performances that largely depend on the model.
The scenes vary in their setup. Some try to show the “wife” as talking to her husband and telling him she’s going to make a video showing how she needs to be fucked. Other videos just leave out the entire husband part and have the female model saying she’s happy to be back again. The scenes are mostly hardcore but some could qualify as heartcore with the female becoming more passionate about finally being with someone who can satisfy her. It is very similar to all MILF sites I have been on. They do have top-tier models here and there’s not much to complain about when it comes to looks.
Joining through PU gets you full downloads included in the price and their download options are acceptable. They have no 4K video but do have 480p, 720p and 1080p. Each scene also includes a downloadable photo set but I wouldn’t call them anything more than average in quality.
They have nearly every MILF you could name on this site. There are implants, heavy makeup on some, tattoos and the feeling is they are just producing the same scene with different models. It’s a good site for MILF fans though and anyone who collects the featured models. With 711 scenes and 2 new scenes added per month you’re sure to find a few you like.
I will compliment them on ProBiller being a lot easier to work with than usual. I simply sent them an email with my login info, email address and asked them to cancel my account. They sent me a cancellation confirmation the next morning without any hassle. I would recommend it for MILF fans and hardcore fans. There’s not much creative going on here. Most of the newer scenes the guy just walks into the camera view after the brief setup and has nothing but a towel on. If you’re looking for a story you’re not going to find much here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the rare networks of solo sites, also has around 10 regular but small porn studios and sites included.
- The biggest appeal here is to collectors or collecting types. There are 60 solo model "sites". Details in bottom line.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of max)
- A lot of content with nearly 3,000 videos and 2,500 photo sets.
- The updates are hard to follow but according to the future releases, tomorrow, 7/8/19 there will be 16 videos and 13 photo sets released. See bottom line.
- Navigation is simple to use with a clean interface and easy to use and understand menus.
- I am going by what the site says and also referring back to the previous TBP review, this content is exclusive to Puba. There are some models I have never seen before so I can't guarantee that but there's reason to believe it is exclusive.
- The lowest "hi" videos I have found are 720p, so that's not bad. Some could be lower but I have not seen them.
Cons:
- The only scenes with dates on them are the ones going to be released in the next month. Nothing else is dated.
- I have downloaded a couple of photo sets that will not unzip and say files are damaged or corrupted. See bottom line for possible fix.
- The numbers, reasoning ability and mathematical logic says there might be some recycling, see bottom line.
Bottom Line:
No matter what my score is or whatever I find in the recycling possibility, this is still an inexpensive site for you to add to your collections of certain models.
In the April, 2017 TBP update of facts there are 2,000+ plus videos listed in the facts. As of July, 2019 there are 2,824 videos listed according to Puba's own numbers. They are releasing 16 videos tomorrow. The other days of the upcoming week have 5 listed for each day. Even if I cut way short of those numbers and just say 20 videos per month, that would be over 1,000 videos in one year. Comparing their numbers with TBP's 2017 numbers there are at most 800 new videos in the last 2 years.
The point I made at the beginning of this review isn't to be lost in all of this. This is still a site with a lot of exclusive content of 60 different models. There is no way I am going to go through and list all of them.
The ones I was most interested are: Skin Diamond, Charley Chase, London Keyes, Mia Lelani, Nicole Aniston and Jayden Cole. Of those, the one with the lowest amount of total content on here is Mia Lelani with 39 photo sets and 28 videos. Skin has 54 photo sets and 35 videos. Nicole has 47 photo sets and 76 videos. It's a lot of exclusive content for single models.
Which is the first question you have to ask yourself. Are there any models on Puba you really like? I will mention this here as it fits here and goes back to one of the cons. The photo sets are rare for some of these models. I do not have a lot of photo sets of Nicole Aniston or Skin Diamond (most I have are from her pre-hardcore days). The zip files were showing up as broken or corrupted. It had something to do with me left-clicking to download. I right clicked "save as" the zips and they unzip fine and are above average photos, especially of the ones that do not do a lot of photo sets.
The studio sites might be of interest to some. I remember having scenes from a Ty Endicott POV DVD, here on Puba they have 63 Ty Endicott scenes. They have one called Czech Hotties with 130 videos on it.
The solo model scenes are either vanilla hardcore scenes with guys, JOI (jerk off instruction) solo or with another model or solo. Most of these models are not known for their solo scenes, so those are relatively unique for some of the more prolific hardcore models.
There are other models I know of but do not usually collect like Keisha Grey, she has one of the lower content counts with 19 videos, 18 photo sets. The highest looks to be Jayden Cole with 76 videos and 71 photo sets. These "sites" remind me of the old solo sites with the word "Club" in front of the model's name.
The navigation works well for this type of site. They took the keep it simple, stupid, method of navigation. There's a menu on the left, you click it and have choices of videos, photos, sites and coming soon.
The easiest way to navigate the site is to go to "sites" and pick the models you like. Each "site" of a model opens with photos, videos options. It's as simple as that.
The content I like best are the Skin Diamond photo sets. I have liked her since the very first set I saw of her way back on ATK Exotics when she looked one day over 18. Her photo sets on here include several cosplay sets including Dr. Who, Star Wars, a nerdy teacher, a schoolgirl and a very odd bathtub zombie/abused looking set with blood, black eyes, fully nude in a tub.
The biggest deduction is like another recent review. The videos and photos are split into parts. Skin as fully dressed Jedi in one, Skin stripping as a Jedi in the next. I have said it before when a site does something to make me question their motive, usually more is looked into and uncovered. If the separate sets of photos had 200 pictures in each it would maybe be understandable but the dressed Jedi set has only 51 pictures while the stripping/nude Jedi has around 200.
There is a similar use of the videos as well. There are three of Nicole Aniston and another model giving you jerk off instruction. It looks like the three were made on the same day in different outfits.
Overall, if you're a collector of any of these models it is still a good deal if you get a promo. The content isn't going to make you think you have found something unique in porn but you will at least get some new photos and/or videos to add to your collection. It's a painless, smooth site to use so you won't have to struggle through pages of unneeded clicking and scrolling either.
There are ads but most are not bothersome. They have them in a row in 3 places as you scroll down the homepage. There are no ads once you are inside a specific site, just on the homepage.
I'm not for sure if it has much for returning members. I would think one month would be enough to get any of the models you collect and there probably wouldn't be enough future content to come back for. Good enough for one month if you are a fan of any of the models or for someone looking for some new favorite models.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A newer (very small) site from the Team Skeet group but it does not come with a Team Skeet membership.
- Unique twist on Asian porn, has an authentic wacky Asian porn side to it.
- Vina Sky scenes, there's the next big "little" model. Very reminiscent of Veronica Rodriguez, except Asian.
- Video and picture technical quality is very high but no 4K.
- Excellent production values, it seems when Team Skeet launches these individual sites they do so with much more creative content.
- Very easy to navigate thanks to the small amount of content. Even beyond that, this looks like a "new" site and not because of the amount of content. The layout is clean and everything is explained.
- Download speeds are very good (80% or more of max download speed).
- Epoch is the biller. Also has Paypal option but I can't get Paypal to work with a Visa card.
Cons:
- It wouldn't be a Team Skeet site if the first page you see after joining didn't include 90% ads.
- You won't believe this, well, maybe you will. When you click home after joining "Little Asians" it takes you to the Team Skeet home where you have no access to anything except Little Asians. I like the people at Team Skeet but Little Asians doesn't even try to be a different site. It tells me to unlock Team Skeet Premium to get everything.
- Here is the number ... 13 total scenes in 4 months and only 3 updates so far this month (April 2019).
- Most likely will end up on the Team Skeet network in a few months like Black Valley Girls did.
Bottom Line:
There's really no way to write a very long review on this site. I will start it off with a big compliment, it's the first time in a long time that I downloaded 100% of the scenes from a site. It only has 13 scenes but the percentage is still 100%.
This is one of those sites that lives up to its name. The models are all Asians and they are little. I like the quirkiness of the scenes. The Kawaii Kitties scene has both female models starting out acting like cats, complete with little costumes. They break something, both crawl up the steps and hide in the closet until the man comes in and goes looking for the "bad kitties". One scene has the guy ordering a Hajakuru doll. It arrives, it's a "real" Hajakuru doll. Somehow, the model/doll never makes a noise in the whole scene and never shows an emotion.
There is a definite weirdness or quirkiness to this content.
That and the technical quality is what saves this site. Oh and Vina Sky. One of the smallest pornstars I have ever seen at 5' 83 pounds with 32AA boobs. She has the same energy and charisma as Veronica Rodriguez when she first started. And she has 2 scenes on here.
Since the site is newer (January 2019), it is hard to punish them too much for amount of content but it is worth noting there were 6 scenes in January, 2 in February, 2 in March and 3 in April. There is no update schedule and at their current pace they will have maybe 40 scenes in their first year.
They have photos and screencaps with downloads as well. The videos go up to 1080p and have 360p, 480p, 576p, 720p as well. On the videos these are extremely high quality and because there are stories or themes to the movies they are longer than typical porn. The file sizes on the 1080p go as high as 4GB each. Even the 720p go over 2GB.
All but one scene are male/female or male/female/female. There is one lesbian scene.
The biggest complaint you're going to find here is that this is not a true standalone site. The members area is at members (dot) teamskeet (dot com) (slash) littleasians. And that clicking "home" page sending me to Team Skeet instead of Little Asians is just a little annoying.
I am tempted to click to unlock the premium membership which opens up all their sites but I really don't want to risk the potential cost. They have upwards of 15 sites they are selling as individual sites plus the Team Skeet network that has over 20 sites on it. I'll mention this here, several months ago, I joined what I thought was Black Valley Girls but it was instead a membership to Team Skeet which didn't include Black Valley Girls. They now include Black Valley Girls in the Team Skeet membership.
I really believe they have potential. Their site Family Strokes is another of those with excellent production values and creativity. This Little Asians site is very good. It's just not very realistic to expect people to join all of the sites, especially with so many of them only including 1 site membership. I don't know how feasible it would be to release all their sites in one network but it would sure interest me if they did it.
If you like Asian models and like the quirkiness of Asian porn, this is a good site but if you're like me, you can download the whole site in less than an hour. That is really my only complaint. The ads aren't even a problem once you get beyond that first splash screen when you join.
I might be being a little nice with the score but the only place I see a need for improvement is in the quantity. Those into Japanese pop culture will probably laugh a little at the little jingle/tune at the beginning of each movie. It sounds like it is straight out of the old video game Space Channel 5.
Recommended for those that like little and/or Asian models but keep a hold on your expectations in the quantity department.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The one site in this group of sites that doesn't focus on one main model, instead focusing on point of view style hardcore scenes.
- Quality is really good. Scenes are in standard HD quality 1280x720, three downloadable options, WMV, AVI and FLV.
- Wasn't expecting photo sets, but they have a photo set with every scene and these photo sets are not just screencaps, if they are, they've got a trick camera! The pictures are good quality as well, up to 2300 long end resolution and come zipped.
- Updates regularly, averages out to once a week with a video and photo set. I do think the content is exclusive too.
- Simple navigation of clicking "scenes" then just going through them.
- For a POV site, the cameraman does a pretty good job of filming. I didn't get seasick.
- Comes with four solo model sites with the Jessica Jaymes one being the best of the sites.
Cons:
- Not a lot bad here, the site isn't real big, but they are updating. When Spencer reviewed it for the TBP review, he listed 26 scenes, they are now up to 47.
- Probably a little sharing with the Jessica Jaymes site, there are sets here that have Jessica in them and those also appear on her site.
- If you're not careful you will miss the photo sets since they are listed as "HD gallery" on each scene. Not really a con, but thought I would mention it in case anyone joins and misses the photos.
Bottom Line:
This is a bonus site that comes with four other solo model sites. In trying to be fair, I've reviewed each of those since they didn't have any current active reviews on them. Three of the solo sites are okay if you're a fan of the model, nothing spectacular though. Jessica Jaymes solo site is very good. As a whole, this group of sites is recommended and especially recommended for fans of Jessica.
This site First Class POV is good. The models are top-tier, from Tiffany Brookes to Brandy Aniston to Annie Cruz to an old favorite London Keyes to one of my all-time favorites Mariah Milano.
The quality here is also very good, all 47 scenes are shot in 1280x720. Looking at the update schedule, they have averaged right at one scene (picture set and video) per week. The site's first update was on 9/26/10, the newest update is 9/15/11 and there are 47 scenes, so there were a few that were a day or two off, but weekly seems to be the standard they are going for now.
Some of the content is shared within the group of sites, but I'm going to estimate it's at 10% or less.
It's hard to find much fault in a site that has HD videos and nearly 2500 long end zipped photo sets. It's even harder to find fault if you're a fan of the solo models they have, making this a really nice bonus site.
I should mention that my download speeds on all these sites has been very high. The POV content ranges from some just being blowjobs, others being full sex and the filming is better than the average POV scene.
Overall, it's a good POV site that just needs some growth in amount of content to match its very good quality of videos and photos. Recommended as a bonus site to those solo model sites, but wouldn't just recommend it to POV only fans since you would be paying $30 for 47 scenes.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that offers very realistic lesbian sex
- Not for sure, but I had never seen these models. If I have, I didn't recognize them, so it definitely brings new amateur models
- Navigation is good, which is important since I don't know these models and had to sift through them to find the ones that interested me
- Movie quality is good enough at 640 high end, 2000 bitrate
- Pictures are high resolution and zipped, though see the cons
Cons:
- To be blunt, there are more than a few not attractive models here. Will explain in Bottom Line
- I didn't get very good DL speeds, though it wasn't terrible about 100 kb/s lower than what I'm used to getting
- Sorry to those who like hairy women, it is a con to me, some of these girls look like they have Sasquatch in a leg headlock, major turn-off for me, but if you like that this is a pro
- Most of the picture sets didn't interest me, so having the high res, zips, wasn't really a factor. Relax, I'm going to explain in the BL
- Price seemed a little high at $25
Bottom Line:
My annual "lets try a real amateur site" attempt. Ok, if you like only real amateurs this is a very good site. If you like hairy women, this is a good site. If you like glamour girls, this is not a good site.
I won't knock the quality since it is very good, navigation is very good and you can tell that a lot of hard work is put into this site.
On the good news, some of these girls are beautiful. You get a nice blend of body shapes and sizes and I really liked that about the site. The sex, whether b/g or g/g is very believable and let me repeat, there are some very pretty girls here. Especially if you like redheads, which I do.
Then there is the bad side. Some of these girls are unshaven. I'm not a shaven beaver freak, my favorite model is Eve Angel and she almost always has pubic hair.
Some of these girls are not very good looking either, not in an ugly way, but it is like some of them just rolled out of bed, no make-up, flat hair types. Let me put it this way, some of these women in my guess are real lesbians, not the lipstick kind either.
Having said that, that is just my preferences showing. I can applaud this site for staying true to their niche and if you are into very regular girls blended with the occasional knockout, you will like this site better than I did. Quality is fine all around too. Just not my cup of tea overall. So, I will recommend it for those who like the unshaven natural types, real lesbian fans, but can't recommend it for glam fans.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Almost exclusively Filipina site
- Good job of showing the small size of the women
- The models are amateurs and range from really cute to very pretty
- Download speeds are good (80% my max)
- For the niche (Filipina), this is a large site, but there’s a problem (see cons)
- Good download quality on videos, but no downloads on photosets
Cons:
- Let’s start with the most obvious con. From the best I can tell, this site is recycling and has been for a while (Bottom line will explain)
- The very good pictures are brought down by no zip downloads
- It should include access to their Thai site, Tuk-Tuk Patrol, but does not
Bottom Line:
I admittedly have history with the owners of this site and Tuk-Tuk Patrol. They also own Asian Sex Diary. That’s why I’m going to explain the accusation of recycling. I’m not trying to be negative towards the owners of the site. I’m simply giving everyone reading this a head’s up.
I last reviewed Trike Patrol on 10-12-2019. I noted that there was “just under 500 models and just under 500 videos” directly from my review. As of 8-6-2023, there are nearly 200 less models and nearly 200 less videos than there was 4 years ago. Because I believe in being fair, I will say it’s possible some of their content was removed. I do remember their site representative talking about the legalities of porn in the Philippines and it’s why they used some censoring.
So yeah, it is possible, they are updating with new content, and just lost a lot of their content to removal, but either way, the site is just a shadow of its former self. It is showing new updates about once per week. There’s really no way for me to verify these are recycled or are not new, but even if they really are updating, the size of their site has decreased greatly and that was one of the strong points of the site.
It is true it’s hard to film porn in the Philippines and it’s hard to find attractive amateur models. Having the nearly 500 scenes and nearly 500 models made it a real treasure find for those into Filipina women. Losing nearly 200 models and 200 scenes has to be seen as a major deduction.
It also magnifies problems like having no zip downloads for photosets. I have to think if someone is a fan of this site, they would like to have the photosets in a zip download. These are very rare Filipina amateurs.
I was going to also review their site Tuk-Tuk Patrol, but don’t see a reason in writing two separate reviews. Tuk-Tuk is their Thai site and its numbers haven’t changed much in 4 years. That does help at least defend the side saying Trike is not recycling, except Tuk-Tuk doesn’t have dates on their content. Which is the opposite of Trike Patrol with its newest scene showing as August 4th, 2023.
I can and will still recommend the sites. You can join both sites for under $20 now for both of them combined. At that price, if you have never been a member, you are looking at a combined 500ish scenes of amateur Thai and Filipina models. The downloads are also high quality with 1080p downloads and you’re just not going to find content like this.
It's a hard place to be in as a reviewer. The possibility of recycling is a very big deal on a site like this one. If they included Tuk-Tuk Patrol with Trike for $10 a month, I wouldn’t have as much to complain about. As it is, it’s a questionable business tactic and while I still will recommend it, I also will recommend to be careful.
It's very good porn (the action) with cute and sexy Filipinas and Thai women. If you’re new to the sites all the content will be new to you, and you won’t know about the removed scenes. I do think it would make most Filipina fans happy.
One last and extremely important pro is they use Epoch through Paypal to sign-up and cancel. That at least should give you peace of mind.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- this looks like a network I should know better than to join.
- I probably should have listened to the side telling me not to join, but by joining, I was able to find some of the best porn I have seen.
- The Porn Nerd Network comes with 22 sites that follow no rhyme or reason to why they are on the same network.
- You also get Aggressive Pass which is a network TBP doesn’t do business with anymore. It adds about 1,000 videos to the whole package.
- As this review goes on, you will get to see just how important one model or site can be to how much a person likes a network.
- Download speeds are good (80% my max), there is a reported download limit, but I haven’t hit it.
- CCBill is the payment processor and was the biggest reason I was willing to take a risk on this network.
Cons:
- The truth is the majority of this network is bargain-bin quality, but not all and there’s some hidden treasures on here. Oh give me time to get to what sold me on it.
- No photoset downloads. I had to break out the dusty but trusty image downloader extension for my browser and downloaded some photos.
- If you’re not sold on this network by the same way I was, you probably won’t like the network.
Bottom Line:
a lot of talk without any resolve. I will get the guilty site out of the way to begin this review. It’s Chubby Blondy. Go ahead, go look, chubby in 2011 looked a lot different than it does in 2023. That’s an all-natural, gorgeous, nerdy, sexy Italian woman and Chubby Blondy is her site.
I can’t believe how much views have changed. She looks normal size for 2023. Her site has around 100 videos and I downloaded all of them. I also downloaded the 50ish or so photosets they had using a browser extension. Those videos and photos were more enough to justify the one month purchase of this network. If you’re attracted to Chubby Blondy, you won’t be disappointed with her videos.
The rest of the network was hit or miss with me. Sites that I at least checked out and even downloaded some videos from include Voyeur of Paris, it’s good, and it’s what the name says. That’s a rarely touched upon niche. There’s The Art of Handjobs and it’s good enough for an often overlooked genre in porn.
Every site had at least a handful of scenes worth downloading. I still will have doubts about recommending it. That is unless you are as attracted to Chubby Blondy as I am.
The big picture makes this all clearer. The quality is not that good, even though some of the sites have 1080p downloads. There are no photo zips on any of the sites. A lot of the sites look like someone took 4-5 DVDs and ripped the scenes to their website and called it a website. There is an unconfirmed download limit and just an honest opinion, I have not downloaded anything from the Aggressive Pass.
I feel like I’m so experienced in pornsites that I’m looking over some major flaws just because I really like one model on the network. I will add this to put that in perspective.
If I was reviewing just Curvy Blondy, it would be an 84. Most of the content on it is from 2011. I think 84 is generous for a site that has multiple problems on it. The network, without Curvy Blondy, would score a 72-75. That too would be generous. I’m going with an 80 overall. I’m not for sure how long Curvy Blondy will keep my attention, but I currently see her content as some of the hottest I have.
This is me telling you not to join this network unless you have the same attraction to Curvy Blondy. None of the other sites are good enough to warrant joining a network for.
I’ve talked myself into saying don’t join it unless you are as attracted to Curvy Blondy as I am.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large site that focuses on mainly young female models and something of a theme with “school” with schoolgirl outfits being common.
- The scene count has to be looked at from different angles. There are interview videos mixed in that are from the New Sensations DVDs. The count is 403 with no set update schedule but was updated 3 times this past month (February 2022).
- High quality video downloads and photosets.
- Models are all attractive and pros. The theme of young is captured well.
- Very fast download speeds (90% of max)
- The site looks good and works well. I’m not for sure that’s the best pro a site can have (see bottom line)
Cons:
- I knew the male talent would eventually wear on me and sure enough, it happened. I will have to explain that in the bottom line.
- This site is a good example of how you get into my skepticism. There are interview videos, posted as updates, from their DVDs which is a way to advertise their VOD site. See the bottom line.
Bottom Line:
This site is not bad, but it has made me reconsider my New Sensations network review score. This site’s only real connections to school are the outfits. Most of the scenes are in a house and on a couch or bed. There’s very little effort to make this a school fetish or anything more than a young female fetish site. You can’t really go wrong with that. It has been working for 70 years. I was expecting a little more story and playfulness from the models. Even silly acting. There could be some scenes that have that. I’m not going to watch all of them to verify it. I can see that most of these scenes are common porn. Guy with a young, cute or pretty female. In my early days of reviewing, I once said, a site is only as good as its models look. I still think that’s true. They do good on that part. The outfits look good. It just starts falling into the feeling of I’ve seen this before. I don’t know how much age plays into that being a problem.
When one of my biggest pros and compliments is the site looks good and works well, that’s probably not a good thing. I shouldn’t even be noticing those things. It’s like the gold-plated strip club. People said the strippers weren’t that good but where else could you sit at a gold table and watch women strip? I think you would eventually get over the gold table part. I mentioned bringing my skepticism. That’s not something I like to do. I do have a long history with this network. What I see is a site that has the right idea and the right setup. That is an old feeling I had years ago on New Sensations. I’m not going to call it bait and switch. They’re not doing anything terrible or in bad practice. They’re doing what they know works. This site shows it more than the others. I hadn’t seen this site before this membership. The oldest scene was posted in 2012. I believe my last membership here was 2010. As impressed with some of the movie previews, as I am, I open those to find out it’s an interview. That gives me flashbacks to renting porn DVDs with a beautiful model on the cover. You would get to the end of the DVD and the model on the cover wasn’t in any scenes. The interviews have some “value” but where’s there’s value there’s taking away from. You can see how cute and nice some of these models are. Others are just saying they are only in it for the sex and money.
The site is big enough, it probably should be bigger, considering it has been around nearly 10 years. The updates are not even close to following a schedule. In February 2022, there were 3 new scenes. In January 2022, there was 1. Before January 2022, there are months with 0 updates. If they can keep up 2-4 scenes per month that’s acceptable. It has around 405 scenes counting interviews. I used “around” mainly because the last oldest scenes are really the two newest scenes. I don’t know how that happens. They do offer 4K on the newer videos. The pictures are a highlight. It’s just because they know to include 15-20 of the model by herself before switching to screencaps. You can download those in a zip.
The male talent gets too much camera time. If it was a site about the couple being sexy. I could understand it. It’s a site about Fresh Outta High School. The use of the male is questionable to begin with. This was the problem I had with New Sensations in the past. I don’t remember which old Porn User said it, “We’re not paying to see Igor talk or look at him”. That’s the feeling. If you have to include a man in a schoolgirl site, keep him out of view as much as possible. This is probably the toughest con. They’re made me wonder how good their DVDs are. Good for their marketing team but it’s based on a lot of these scenes on the site are filler scenes on DVDs. Every porn DVD ever released had filler scenes. That’s what you’re getting on this site. You’re going to have to join their VOD site and pay $6-$20 to buy or rent one DVD. That’s how you enter my skepticism. You’ve showed me you are making higher grade porn and the price shows it. You can get this whole network for $10-$20. I got it for $10 back around the holidays. I can see that you can’t even buy one of their VOD DVDs for $20. It has 4-6 scenes on it.
It could be better overall, and I think for someone newer to porn it’s a good value. There are plenty of pretty models on this site and you get the network access included. The problem is going to be, I may not be back for another 12 years. I think an 80 is fair. It has everything it needs (quality, pretty models). Nothing extra, no bells and whistles. It will get you by. The best way to wrap this up is these are the same type scenes you would see on Videobox. I’m not going to drop the network’s score. I know that other people haven’t been a member of New Sensations going on 15 years. I used to join this network 2-3 times a year.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's another take on taboo porn.
- Decent acting and stories.
- Pretty models across the site and network.
- Videos and pictures can be downloaded in high quality.
- 120 scenes with no updates since spring 2021.
- Comes with access to New Sensations network.
- Very good download speeds (90% of my max)
Cons:
- I have said it before about sites like Pure Taboo. They don't really do anything to convince you this is taboo or as they spell it tabu. Maybe that's why they spelled it wrong?
- No updates since May 2021.
- It's the letdown site for me. I've been impressed with everything new on New Sensations, this one probably should end.
Bottom Line:
After my surprise with the New Sensations network, I was really looking forward to checking this site out. A long time ago, one of the first porn cassettes I ever saw was of Taboo porn. Memory is not that good. I remember that it was supposed to be a real brother and sister. I'm not telling my age when I viewed it. I found it under my uncle's mattress. Maybe I could give porn companies a heads up? No taboo porn since that one convinced me of any taboo happening.
This is the run of the mill in 2022. It's mostly stepfamily porn which other sites have done better and do better. I believe one of the biggest criticisms against the niche should be, "I saw them a scene that they weren't related in!" That is the problem with shooting this style of porn with pro models. There's a laugh in it for me. One of the scenes, the male and female had a scene together in 2014. I'm wondering if that is what introduced the younger female to her future stepdad. I once said this and made our late administrator Khan laugh, he said endlessly. They need to make this porn like the old Mystery Science Theater shows.
Have a few perverts watching and making comments like, "I bet you don't do that to her mom." This style of porn is made for humor. The sites that are best at it are adding humor. These scenes try to take themselves a little too seriously and I will add they do not list "step" on all the scenes.
The sex in the scenes is not bad. The acting is not bad. You will know most of the males. The females are mainly pros. Maybe all are? I don't recognize some of them.
One thing the site is going for it is the quality. I even think they reach overkill. The 4K videos have two download options, one is 16000 bitrate, the other is 25000. They don't have that many 4K. The 1080p is very clear and it can be downloaded in 12000 bitrate or 9000. The pictures do look to be screen captures from the videos but they do still keep enough of those focused on the female. I didn't see a reason to put this as con. The newest scene on Tabu Tales is watermarked as FamilyXXX which is another site on New Sensations. I don't know if they decided to switch to it.
There doesn't seem to be any limits on downloads. I do believe as others have talked about the older/younger porn needs better casting. I only need to mention the newest scene. I know that porn actresses sometimes fudge on their age. The scene has London Rose in it as the stepmother. According to the internet, she is 33. Her stepson in the scene is Tommy Pistol who is 45. It's possible but I believe that is the problem with this niche of porn. I guess they could say Tommy's 72 year old dad married this younger woman.
The scene tries to show Tommy as more of a bratty, slacker and he has lines like, "Are you going to tell my dad?" Just turn it to humor and silliness. Even that scene has good sex in it. It's a tradeoff, there's nothing believable as far as the story goes. But professional models have good sex on camera.
The site is relatively small at 120 scenes, but you do get the full New Sensations network with it. This site would not work as a standalone site.
It's a good site to checkout if you join New Sensations. It's not a good enough site to make you join New Sensations.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network of solo sites and megasites? Is that the right word?
- They advertise 72 sites. My first experience with Puba was just focused on their solo sites.
- Their numbers say 3,433 videos, 2,755 photosets.
- They have a coming soon section and the update they show is listed for today.
- Very fast download speeds (90% of my max)
- I’m going to list this as a pro and a mention to read the bottom line, a lot of mainstream pornstars have solo sites on this network. They do advertise that their videos are exclusive.
Cons:
- As minimal as you can get on navigation features. There’s a search box if you know what you’re searching for.
- No model list, though if you click on a model’s name it will show you all the scenes they have of that model.
- No dates on the scenes. One continuously moving ad.
Bottom Line:
I reviewed Staxxx, it’s owned by the same people as this site, and I was able to get a deal to join both for under $10. Puba, several years ago, was building some momentum. I know when Skin Diamond first started being recognized as a model, Puba has a Skin Diamond solo site. Another model I remember Charley Chase. They have a solo site of her. Christy Mack, Abigail Mac and a total of near 60 different models that they have solo sites of. Most of those models are known models. One thing I know I was bothered by, and this gave me a chance to see if they still do it. They take a photo set and split it into multiple parts to jack up their photoset numbers. Anyone that has been reviewing porn as long as I have, that’s one of those things that irritates me. I even mentioned in the review of Skin Diamond’s solo site from Puba’s network. She has a Dr. Who photoset. Skin was and still is, in my opinion, a unique looking model. Puba has 45 of the photos in one Dr. Who set and 166 in another Dr. Who set. She has on the same outfit. The only thing that has changed is the background. I’ve said it before, when you do things like that, you just ask for a reviewer to look deeper into what else you may be getting away with. I don’t look that deeply into anymore. I do have compliments for their photosets.
The around 60 solo sites are still the main part of the network. They have added sites like, “1 Girl, 1 Camera” and “My Doll Parts”. It’s hard to be negative about a site that costs $5 a month. If you haven’t joined it and like one or more of the solo model sites they have. You get your money’s worth on one of those sites. Some of those solo sites have as many as 100+ videos and 100+ photosets. Going back to the mid-2000s, that would be an acceptable-sized premium solo site. And you get near 60 of those.
One of the sites they have that I was interested in checking out is Ty Endicott. He had a POV scene with Micah Moore that was one of my favorite scenes. It shows the age of some of the scenes. Most of the Ty Endicott videos featured smoking fetish. I don’t think the Micah Moore scene I was looking for had smoking in it, unless you counted her bubble butt with her knee high socks bouncing up and down. You can also notice on Ty Endicott scenes, nearly half, maybe more than half, of the models have a tramp-stamp tattoo. The most positive thing I can say about this network, besides the price, is the solo model content. Several of these models are known for hardcore. Puba does have some solo scenes of them and some showering scenes. What I described as megasites, are like their site Czech Hotties, it has 131 scenes. Those are just sites that look like a back catalog of a DVD series. You probably won’t see the same model in more than one scene on that site. We used to call those megasites for the large amount of models, as the opposite of solo model sites.
They do have 1080, 720 HD downloads, some of the older scenes only has 540 and 480. I watched a 540p video the other day and my friend said, “What kind of television did that fit on?” We’re getting old. Get rid of that 540p and it’s 4:3 ratio. The photosets have zip downloads. I said it was Staxxx, there’s no reason to change my tune on this one. You will get $5 worth of porn out of the site. If you like those solo models you will easily get $5. They have added some newer solo models too. I didn’t even recognize Leya Falcon. I’m used to her being pancaked between 3 guys. She has some photos on here of her cosplaying as Harley Quinn. She’s using the name Whorely Quinn. See, what I said wasn’t offensive about her being pancaked between 3 men. She is quite attractive by herself. She makes a good Harley Quinn. Just like with Staxxx you have to send an email to cancel. They do respond quickly. I would compare this experience to eating a handful of cheese puffs when you’re starving. Recommended for those that like solo model porn and check the list to see how many if any of the solo sites that have a featured model you like.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Interracial, high-quality porn, that could use a new casting director.
- Good sized site with 266 scenes but it’s only updating once per month.
- The video quality is very good and there’s not a lot of drop in quality in the older scenes.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max).
- Easy site to join and cancel, good sorting features but those can be confusing (see bottom line).
- If you like hardcore with as much story as “Where the Wild Things Are” this is a good site.
Cons:
- Jax Slayher, easily the most annoying male talent in porn today. I don’t get that. I don’t think anyone pays to look at the back of someone’s hand. I will try to see if the navigation will tell me how many scenes he’s in. He completely ruins the scenes.
- The site is big enough to overcome the small amount of updates but it doesn’t have a lot of personality to the site.
Bottom Line:
(uploaded wrongly as All Black X, corrected and fixed both)
This is another of the X Empire sites. It’s not a bad site at all. I do have an admitted problem with the male talent named Jax Slayher. The rest of the guys on this site do their jobs well. This Jax Slayher guy, he is this generation’s Lee Stone, not with a broken dick. Stone liked to step on the model’s face. Slayher likes to cover the faces with his hand. I don’t know if he’s uncoordinated and needs to balance. Look at the model list, he is in 23 scenes so you can subtract those from the 266. The worst part is, they seem to cast him with the female models I really like, like Ember Snow. I do believe it’s because most of the scenes are cookie-cutter. I don’t think they even think about the casting. They probably flip a coin or maybe they have literal pissing contests to see who gets to be in the scenes with the prettiest models.
The cookie-cutter concept to these scenes makes it where the big selling point is the female model. I said it before and will always believe this, the most important part of a porn scene that’s not a fetish, is whether you’re attracted to the model. That can overcome a lot. The scenes follow a similar script. The scenes are almost all in the same house or a house that looks the same. They have a couch that appears in more scenes than any of the models. I don’t know if I need to explain the script. But here goes: Starts out with some touching, a little kissing, and by 2:30 she’s sucking his dick. She will spend 4-6 minutes gagging on the guy’s dick. It just skips him giving her oral. And jumps to somehow, anal with fingers in the pussy by the 8 minute mark. The anal lasts for 22 more minutes and the scene is over. Outside of the fingers in the pussy, he didn’t even have pussy sex with her. I’m trying to make a point. If you’re going to make cookie-cutter porn at least use every part. What if a person doesn’t like anal? It’s not an anal site. It wouldn’t hurt for 4-5 minutes of that anal sex to be pussy sex. This is what I call clinical porn. Since someone once asked what I meant by clinical, the definition for it is, “Efficient and unemotional, coldly detached.” Perfect explanation for what some of these scenes are. The scenes are recorded to get the scenes over so they can record another. There’s no feeling of connection. It’s not all of the scenes but all of the scenes do follow a script. If the first sex is pussy sex, there’s not going to be anal. They have taken the cookie-cutter approach and made it even more narrow.
It’s a shame because the technical quality is so high. The newer scenes have from 160p to 4K download options. The oldest scenes have from 160p to 1080p download options.
The photo set are good enough at 2000 long end with downloadable zips and a focus on the clothed model for the first 30-50 pictures. That’s why I say it’s a shame to just zoom through the scenes.
The navigation is very good but as mentioned it can be confusing. The reason is they have a section called “Partner Scenes”. These are sites that they have licensed content from other sites that Gamma is partnered with including Team Skeet, Joymii and SexArt to name a few. The problem with that is most of those sites have better production in their scenes. The results of the category searches include the partner scenes.
I don’t think that would be as big of deal if I could figure where the rest of the scenes are that these sites are supposed to have on them. This site says it has 511 scenes. When I click on it, it has 266. All their sites are like that. There’s plenty to work on here. You get some of the top female models in the world. Have very good technical quality. Is it that hard to count the scenes? Or hire someone to say, “You know what, the last 200 scenes we filmed followed the exact pattern.” This network as a whole is good but it wears on you to the point that when you’re nearing the end of your subscription you’re glad.
The attractive women for the win again. That’s your selling point here. Check the model list before joining and make sure there are models you like and hope they’re not in a scene with Jax Slayher.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The biggest of the mini-networks from the Porn Doe family of sites.
- 17 sites are included, I will list them in the bottom line.
- As was the case on all these mini-networks, the download speed is usually good or about 75% of my max, other times (not frequent) the download speed just drops off and crashes.
- If you have $50 to spend, the all network pass they have is a good deal.
- The standalone price for Lets Doe It at $15 is also a good deal.
- Segpay is the biller and in my opinion, they have surpassed CCBill and Epoch.
Cons:
- The biggest con is going to be the 100 download limit per month. With this being the biggest of the Porn Doe mini-networks, it has around 2,000 scenes, that 100 limit is very low.
- The dropout in download speed is frustrating. It happens maybe once every 3 downloads. They’re already limiting your total downloads so they drop in download speed just kind of rubs you the wrong way.
- This is going to be a common one on these Porn Doe mini-networks, they used to include all 46 of their sites on one network. Now they have it split up into 5 mini-networks you have to join separately and pay for separately.
Bottom Line:
This is a line from the pros section of my March 2019 review of Lets Doe It, “43 sites by my current 3/11/2019 count with a placard in place for "Dirty Cosplay" coming soon.” Lets Doe It now has 17-18 sites. I felt like they rebranded their network from Porn Doe to Lets Doe It with the thinking that people wouldn’t realize it was the same network just with all those sites split up into multiple networks. I’m not even going to judge them for it or say they did it for the money. I am going to say it hurts the score of each of these mini-networks since the change hurt the overall value. You used to get 43 sites for $30. Now you have to join the different mini-networks for $15 each. Once you have joined 3 of those you’re paying more than Porn Doe was and there are still 20 or more sites you’re not getting.
Lets Doe It is the biggest of these mini-networks. It’s probably the only one that really qualifies as a network in terms of size with nearly 2,000 scenes. I will go ahead and list the sites included, their number of scenes and if they are still updating.
The White Boxxx has 289 scenes and is still updating.
A Girl Knows has 183 scenes and is still updating.
Her Limit has 126 scenes and is still updating.
Horny Hostel has 45 scenes and is still updating.
Xchimera has 35 scenes and is still updating.
Scam Angels has 50 scenes and stopped updating in 2019.
Bitches Abroad has 100 scenes stopped updating in 2018.
Porno Acadamie has 35 scenes and stopped updating in 2018.
Bums Bus has 134 scenes and stopped updating in 2018.
XXX Shades has 124 scenes and stopped updating in 2018.
Doe Projects has 36 scenes and stopped updating in 2019.
Relaxxxed has 130 scenes and stopped updating in 2018.
Kinky In-Laws has 30 scenes and stopped updating in 2017.
My Naughty Album has 70 scenes and stopped updating in 2018.
Bums Buero has 52 scenes and stopped updating in 2017.
Quest for Orgasm has 80 scenes and stopped updating in 2018.
Bums Besuch has 27 scenes and stopped updating in 2018.
I hope that’s useful to someone and it shows my problem with splitting all their sites up into these mini-networks. This one has 6 sites that are updating and 12 that are not updating. I know a few of our members here like The White Boxxx but it reminds me a lot of the heartcore porn that I’m not really into. The models on this mini-network are mostly European and Eastern European. There are a few Latina/Hispanic models but not a lot.
The scenes are of above average quality in production values. The technical quality is good but there are no 4K scenes that I have seen. They do offer the two main HD resolutions and a couple of mobile options. It’s not bad but this was such a strong network before they split it up. This site is a good defense for splitting it up. I don’t think I would spend much time on the sites on this mini-network. Which means I could skip joining it and just join the ones I do like.
It could be better even as a mini-network. The navigation is only so-so and it signs me out every 10 minutes. If you’re looking deep into a site and it signs you out, you are automatically signed back in but you are taken back to the first page. I could see fans of the Eastern European models (Russian especially), liking this mini-network. It’s just around average for me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Another of the sites from the unlisted Long Time Pass network.
- This also looks like an amateur site except it has better camerawork than Asian GF Videos.
- 870 scenes, these scenes are mostly longer than Asian GFs, one is 45 minutes and most are 10-20 minutes.
- Tags are accurate
- Biller is Epoch
Cons:
- Video quality is poor, the highest I've found was 360p. It almost feels like these were made to be watched on a phone.
- Dates are all over the place and no update schedule.
- Too many ads, including my most hated ads, the moving ones.
- No search options, no model list, just tags that you can only find by watching videos and clicking the tags it has listed.
- More so than Asian GFs, this one seems to have even more potential but it's either going to take a very patient person or someone that likes just scanning through hundreds of scenes or that doesn't mind poor video quality to really appreciate the site.
Bottom Line:
I'm scoring this site a little higher than Asian GFs, just because the camerawork is better. The scenes are also longer and you get some better views. I do think the 80 is generous and could be subjective in the sense that I like the amateur feel of this site.
The network this comes with also includes a site called Asian Creampies and its content looks to be from the free tube site Porn Maki.
The content on JapBox looks like more user-submitted videos but with good camerawork. The models themselves are almost are very attractive and similar to the other site I reviewed from this network the user scores are almost all 90-100% liked or voted up thumb. I think this site and network as a whole would be very hard to review any other way besides subjective. The technical quality is poor, the download speeds are poor, there are no pictures but the action is very good to me.
A lot of these videos remind me of a random guy with his Asian girlfriend after a few too many drinks. She decides to get a little wild and he turns his camera on.
The longer scenes also help out here. I still think you might could find these scenes or similar on free tube sites and in similar quality.
There's also the part about being uncensored. With POV close-ups this could be a big deal to those into Japanese porn but that dislike the censoring and have wondered what is hiding behind those mosaics.
I will add that the scenes I have watched, I double the screen size in VLC, which moves them up to the 480p range and I don't notice any drop-off in quality. I don't know enough about encoding but maybe that's an advantage. The file sizes are small but are still watchable without too much fuzziness.
Most of the talking in the scenes is in Japanese, which I don't understand at all and there are no subtitles.
It's really hard to recommend this network or its sites unless you want to see Asian amateurs in low quality video. I'm sure there are some out there that like low quality since it definitely makes it seem authentic on the amateur side of things.
I also noticed some of the videos say at the very first of them, "Originally shown on amaland". I do know that amaland is a user-submitted girlfriend site.
Try it at your own risk. I liked quite a few scenes even with the poor quality videos but I seriously doubt it will interest most porn collectors.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's a public nudity/sex site that has a network with it but some of it doesn't work.
- There are 183 scenes with no dates and no update schedule.
- Has that real public feel to it. They're mostly in the woods and under drainage corridors.
- Good high-end video quality at 1080p with 8000 bitrate, but the next option down drops all the way to 480p.
- Six sites included with membership, maybe.
- Paypal/Epoch is biller.
- Good looking women, a lot of public sites look like they found the models while searching for a place to film.
Cons:
- The extra sites don't work. I had 6 tell me my login is wrong and one was warned by Firefox as having an expired certificate.
- As mentioned in the pros, the high end video is 1080p, the next step down is 480p.
- Most of the other sites "included" aren't ones I would be interested in, one is a knockoff of Bang Bros Bang Bus called Take Van.
Bottom Line:
I joined this site after seeing a preview for it on a tube site.
My main feeling without going into anything specific is if you like outdoors sex it might be worth a join just for these public scenes.
I really don't know how public these scenes are, but they are outdoors. I am guessing this is filmed somewhere in Europe. And I don't recognize any of these models, these all look like amateurs.
Some of the scenes are shot on a beach but I don't see anyone around. Others are shot at what looks like the backyard of a house near a pool. I think if you use a little imagination they do enough to at least make it seem like it's in public.
The camerawork, which is something I don't talk about a lot, could be improved. At times, it feels like the cameraman is laying on his side trying to get a better view and it gives a bad view of the action.
Having said that, this is still a site with nearly 200 scenes of outdoor amateur sex and if you're into any kind of exhibitionism/public/outdoor, you know there's not a lot of this content available these days. One of the parts I've liked best about the scenes I've watched is the energy from the women. Which makes me believe even more so that this is an amateur site. I wouldn't rate any of the women over an 8 but wouldn't rate any of them under a 5.
The big question is what's going on with the network? This is supposed to be a full network. Each of their videos starts with this "WWMAMM" and it has a button to view all their sites. The network itself is called MMPNetwork, but I can't even sign in the hub. The other sites they show are the Melone Challenge, POVBitch, TakeVan, FakeShooting, ShootYourself and Teeny Playground. My login works on zero of them.
One thing that surprised me is some of the scenes are fairly hardcore, including slaps that leave hand prints on the model's faces. One scene was almost too hardcore for me to make it through as two guys took turns holding the woman, slapping her and what I assume is cussing her, I don't have a clue what they're saying.
That could be a turnoff for the exhibitionism fans since exhibitionism is usually about focusing on the woman.
It's frustrating overall, some of the content it really good, some of it looks like it shouldn't have been released and none of the network sites let me sign in. It's hard to believe a site would go through the trouble of getting Paypal/Epoch as a biller then turn around and have this much going wrong with the network. Take a look at the preview before joining. If it doesn't improve or if I can't get access into any of the other sites, I'll probably come back and adjust the score down a little. TBP lists a 10 video per day download limit, I downloaded 57 and didn't hit any limit. I hate to sound cynical but seeing that nothing else works right on the network, maybe it broke their download limit too! I'm giving it a decent score for the good exhibitionism scenes but could easily see knocking 10 points off of it if things don't improve. I've been a member for two weeks, so I'll update the review in a few weeks to see if they've worked the kinks out or if they're not giving any bonus sites.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Rocco, the original Italian Stallion, the man that every woman in porn wanted to do with a scene with, a once true legend.
- Over 2,100 videos dating back to 2008 with new updates coming in every 2-3 days.
- Decent navigation, has the same familiar struggle with other sites merged into Adult Time, it's not as easy to navigate as it used to be.
- Newer videos have 9 download options from 180p to 4K and there are photo sets that are downloadable.
- Download speeds are good at 75% of my max.
- Very pretty female stars.
Cons:
- To counter my first pro, Rocco is now a true legend in his own mind, he spits on the women, he slaps them. It's a con because I can't stand him in his scenes over the last 8 years.
- The navigation removes categories. You're mostly going to sign in and start scrolling. There are tags, but those tags take you to any site on Adult Time not just Rocco's.
- The older (much better to watch) scenes are available in only 240p and 480p.
- Only goes back to 2008, Rocco returned from a retirement in 2008-09 and after a few years of being his old self, he become the arrogant jerk he is now.
Bottom Line:
One of the first scenes I watched with Rocco in it was with Vanessa Del Rio. Those that remember Vanessa Del Rio know she was one of the most dominant female performers of that era. Rocco had her under his thumb. His was kissing her, he was touching her and pulling that wild side out of her to make her submissive to him. I also remember seeing him do the same to Raylene of the same time period, who is still filming.
When he returned to porn it was like he was a different person. The passion, the seduction of the women, turned into slaps, spitting, causing them to gag on his dick and just acted like a dick.
This site while containing over 2,100 videos is not a full representation of his career. The first few years of content on here show sort of a middle ground. After those, you get the dick Rocco version.
Technical quality is good with 180 to 4K and 7 options in-between on the newer videos. His new series Rocco's Intimate Casting almost hints at a return to the old, more intimate Rocco, then he slaps a woman and makes her nearly puke from shoving his dick down her throat.
The photo sets are okay. They do let you download them but most of them are small 30-50 photos and poor quality.
The newer scenes at least feature other men besides Rocco as most of the women are reason enough to watch the scenes.
The scenes with Rocco feature his favorite move, the foot on the face position. Show control and domination, but why cover a pretty woman's face with your ugly foot?
The older content does at least have some scenes where Rocco hadn't entered his mid-life crisis and you see the passionate side the women loved.
It's overall an okay site. It's hard to score sites with this high technical quality content low but if you don't like watching the person in the scene it doesn't really matter how great the quality it.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
