| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1126
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
And Nubiles is in no need of shilling. The new systemis working though.
|
08-31-07 02:27pm
|
Reply
1127
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Dean58:
(Drooler's Reply)
I Don't know nor do I care what your problem is. I put my opinion of the site and I was honest. I do not think that mocking a reviewer is all that constructive.I think you are a small person for that comment and you should think of a more mature reply next time you mock a reviewer
|
08-29-07 10:51pm
|
Reply
1128
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Nubiles Captain:
This is the owner of Nubiles. I want to thank every one for their comments, we use them to make the site better. For example, we saw the original comments from the Drooler about the navigation and that is why we changed them.
I am not yet convinced about going to a full 3000 px image size as even on a 1920 x 1200 monitor the large picture size takes up almost the entire screen. However I will keep this idea in mind.
Just this last month we added flash "you tube" style movies encoded at 1000 kb/s for instant watching. They are also in segments for viewing.
Thanks for your feedback.
|
08-23-07 09:50pm
|
Reply
1129
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
As Drooler is not a video-guy allow me to make a remark concerning Nubiles and video (although I made a review in May this year):
Video-wise Nubiles is living up to a very good standard. I've been a member since May and the updates and quality of videos are growing. New models keeps comming up and Nubiles even do more hardcore-videos with very cute/sexy teens.
This site keeps getting better and better if you're a fan of teen solo- og hardcore videos - and they continue having a mix of US and european girls.
|
08-19-07 06:38am
|
Reply
1130
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from PinkPanther:
Good review. I've been a member for the first time for approx 1 month. I agree with your score. I find this to be among the best teen sites out there - better than Teen Dreams, not as exciting as ALS Scan.
The volume is impressive, the quality is good, I really like the "future updates" feature, the webmaster certainly cares about the members opinions, as you can tell from his participation in the forum, and I like a lot of the models.
I'm not sure, at this point, if I'll extend my membership between my initial 120-day join period, but I may be back before too long.
|
08-17-07 09:34pm
|
Reply
1131
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yes, it helps a lot. I prefer video and softcore so this looks like a good site. I think I'll check it out.
Thanks.
|
08-17-07 07:43pm
|
Reply
1132
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Monahan:
Your review makes it sound like Nubiles is primarily a photo side with some video. Is that the correct impression?
|
08-17-07 05:25pm
|
Reply
1133
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from PinkPanther:
I just joined this site - I'm pretty delighted.
They must have fixed some of the things that you complained about here.
When I log in, I have future updates at the top, then the latest updates presented next - easy to find the latest updates, no mess with extra windows opening, no clutter that I see.
I'll give a detailed review after I've been a member for a couple of months, but I'm pretty excited and happy as s new member - really hot models shot really well - both pics and vids are really high in eroticism for my tastes. I love being able to search by articles of clothing such as "socks" or "panties" or "upskirts".
And - yea!!! No excessive photoshopping!
|
07-20-07 08:39pm
|
Reply
1134
|
Office Fantasy 2
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Capn:
(Drooler's Reply)
I reckon so! ;0)
|
03-19-10 06:52am
|
Reply
1135
|
Office Fantasy 2
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(Drooler's Reply)
Well, I wish the news were better...
Unfortunately, the pics aren't to current size expectations.
Typically 640x1070 portrait.
Better news on the galleries.
Currently there are 33 models & not really a duffer amongst them.
On average there are 4 sets of each model but a few have a lot more.
Cap'n.
|
03-18-10 05:07pm
|
Reply
1136
|
Oldje
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Jay G:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks. And, yes, I've had bad experience with McAfee, too. McAfee has a worse effect on program performance than most viruses.
|
03-02-09 05:13am
|
Reply
1137
|
Oldje
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Jay G:
Another very entertaining review. I've been tempted before, but never know how much it will cost since the billing is in euros and there's extre conversion charges on my credit cards when I buy in euros.
Do you know what the approximate cost is in dollars (including conversion fees)?
|
02-28-09 01:16pm
|
Reply
1138
|
Oldje
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from mbaya:
Sounds interesting to me. Do you get access to any of the other sites from the same people? How good is the WMV quality? Any statistics as to quality? How long are the videos? Since it is so expensive, how did that affect your evaluation? Thanks.
|
02-28-09 10:29am
|
Reply
1139
|
Oldje
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from troglodite:
(Drooler's Reply)
I can't see myself joining a site that uses realvideo format for their vids. I thought about this one a long time ago and passed on it for that very reason. I love Real as a company, but I don't like using realplayer for vids.
|
10-16-07 07:30pm
|
Reply
1140
|
One Girl a Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment from Drooler:
Consider this an extension of my comment. I just finished a second time as the subscriber. There were very little to no photo updates to the site since the last time I was paying for a month here, in May.
I've given it a rating of 60 for that reason. It certainly doesn't qualify as being in the 80's as a photography niche site now.
|
08-30-08 03:22am
|
Reply
1141
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(Drooler's Reply)
That is a good solution.
I usually just use notepad. ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-21-10 07:45am
|
Reply
1142
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(Drooler's Reply)
Aye...
I thought it needed to be added! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-21-10 06:42am
|
Reply
1143
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Capn:
Certainly not if you are in Europe!
If you live in Europe you get hammered by the CCBill rip you off 'service' ...sorry regional pricing!
Cap'n. :0(
|
03-21-10 03:09am
|
Reply
1144
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Wittyguy:
Sounds like these people stole an idea from the amusement park people on the whole fast tracking thing. Haven't heard of this on a porn site before. On one hand, it seems like an interesting little perk. On the other, you know the update is coming anyway so why pay for "earlier" access other than the free fast tracks you get. I guess it sounds more like an innocent gimmick to me than a porn paradigm shifter.
|
08-03-09 10:42am
|
Reply
1145
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from badandy400:
No "messy" food or bath goop! That sounds like a con to me. And it should be a con for you too. Just consider your name here, Drooler. It is only logical that someone named Drooler would like porn to get a little messy.
Seriously though, I am glad you mentioned that. Although you see it as a pro and I see it as a con it is still very useful information. We have seen too many bad trust votes thrown out because of tastes differences like we seem to share with messy food and bath goop when the reality is the information is good. So dont worry Drooler, I still trust your reviews despite the fact you do not like condiments with your porn.
|
08-02-09 12:32am
|
Reply
1146
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
You're right - the ability to see updates is something that all sites should decide. I was just quite disappointed in the quality of the updates of this site.
The only site from this company that I like is InFocus Girls - that site draws me back over and over again and is quite consistent with the high quality of its posts, for my tastes.
|
03-25-09 07:35pm
|
Reply
1147
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
In my experience, having very recently had a couple of days trial membership, giving visitors access to the recent updates wouldn't be all that enticing - some days there were no updates at all and the quality of the updates in 2008/2009 were clearly of lesser quality than the 2006/2007 material. That's never a good sign!
|
03-25-09 05:50pm
|
Reply
1148
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Davit:
(Drooler's Reply)
Well, Drooler old boy, you know what they say: 'Great minds' and all that!
|
03-08-08 02:52pm
|
Reply
1149
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from chrisg:
Hi,
Thanks for this helpful review of a site that I had not seen before. I am also devoted to the female bottom, and its useful to know in advance that ass worship is lacking.
Most guys I know adore female's asses and it amazes me that so many sites fail to concentrate on this feature!
|
07-23-07 06:56am
|
Reply
1150
|
Only Secretaries
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(Drooler's Reply)
Well basically, D.... If she starts off fully clothed & ends up full frontal naked, that would do me fine.
The smarter & primmer the outfit the better!
A natural look 'below decks' is always my preference! ;0)
|
01-08-10 07:45am
|
