| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1101
|
Nextdoor Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from messmer:
Thanks, Drooler. No wonder I love PU. You just saved me some money by bringing up the subject of intrusive watermarks. I try to steer clear of any site that isn't discrete with them. I like them small and tucked away on the bottom of the picture.
|
06-28-09 10:49am
|
Reply
1102
|
Nextdoor Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from OliverK:
Great input about the site!
We have tried to implement most of the items you mentioned. Here are a few of the most recent changes....
A) Completely new navigation system using icons and text below them.
B) Lots more nude models! Don't get me wrong we are still shooting tease but many more of the new girls eventually show it all.
C) We now list the last 6 updates in the members area and post the newest models right on the front page and well as that days update and a sample from that update.
D) We update 5 times a week with a New Model on every Monday!
E) The shoot with Amy Ried was one of her first full nude shoots. So little bit of history there.
F) Still 100% exclusive!
G) Images are 1600 pixels tall min.
H) The video section is growing every week higher quality camera gear has greatly improved our movies.
I) Bad news is we raised the prices to $24.95 but if you join for 90 days you get one month free so thats only $16.60!
Check out the site again a lot has changed and I would love to hear what we can do to make it even better.
Oliver Klozov
|
07-22-08 12:09am
|
Reply
1103
|
Nikki Benz
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks! Sometimes I wish I could be more succint, though :)
Ms. Benz is a favorite of mine too. The site had a trial membership in its previous incarnation but not now. I'll let some time pass so it builds up more exclusive content before joining again. We'll always have Brazzer's Network in the meantime.
|
08-05-08 02:03pm
|
Reply
1104
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Tom22:
I agree with you about not having enough light on the scene. I think they are really too dark, it's like going back to 1970's porn again. I didn't join the site, I just looked at their preview vids. Yep, they need to turn on the lights, no doubt.
|
12-26-09 01:29am
|
Reply
1105
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Jay G:
(Drooler's Reply)
"Virtual encounters"....exactly the right words!
|
05-02-09 11:43pm
|
Reply
1106
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
I sure agree with practically all in your very fine review, Drooler - well, no wonder...lol
They site has gone back to entirely softcore - again, yes that's probably for the better - some of those hc/bg scenes are not very good.
And one thing I didn't think about before is the props, as you call it (tried to google that word)- and yes, a little too much of pearls, flowers ect. - they really should try to leave that out..
AND I look forward to more scenes going indoor again - too many lately are in shot by or in some lake, in the sand or some wilderness - not too crazy about scenes like that...
|
05-02-09 02:30pm
|
Reply
1107
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Jay G:
Wow! Your point about the girls looking at YOU (into the camera) and not into the void is so true and so sexy. It's a wonder more photographers don't realize the power of beautiful eyes.
|
05-02-09 08:57am
|
Reply
1108
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Ze Droolah (That one made me laugh, when trying to pronounce it!)
No, bro - I did not notice - running right back to take a look...
Thanks for that update
Cheers!
|
12-19-08 04:51am
|
Reply
1109
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey, buddy....guess John, Poul or Ringo may have had some great times with Ukraine girls (even if it was a methaphor, what do we know)
And abolutly: It almost knocked me of my (do not remember the phrase) to watch her (Viktoriya) in a hc b/g video-scene (strange they do not make photosets here). She do not do bj in any of the hc-scenes (strange) - but the way she rides is just great.
Anyway, I think you can do with the quality of the photosets, after all - downloaded a few - and they are not bad.
BTW: Forgot something in my review:
A bit slow download - never got over 350 Mb/sec.
|
05-28-08 12:48pm
|
Reply
1110
|
Nubile Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from nubileart:
(Drooler's Reply)
I assumed the support email referring to Divx and audio only that we received within a few minutes of your PU post was from you. Obviously I was mistaken.
I will pass the other comments on to our team. Thanks for the feedback.
|
12-26-07 06:22am
|
Reply
1111
|
Nubile Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from nubileart:
-VERY softcore.
Yes Its, but we are moving towards some harder shots at our users request, keep an eye on future photo-sets.
-Not that many really appealing models.
I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder. We feature thin, physically fit girls next door. 95% of our girls ARE NOT professional models. These are real people that you might meet on the street, except they are not overweight and out of shape.
-Models almost never look back when their backs (butts) are to the camera
I will make the suggestion to the photographers
-Only ten videos; downloaded one and the DivX player told me it had no video track
We are adding videos as quickly as possible; You need the latest codec to view the video properly. There are two options available on the video support page (also help was supplied in the reply to the support email you sent.) Unfortunately the way windows is designed, you need the correct codec or compatible player. Both are available and easy to implement from the video pages.
-Several gallery pages have NO thumbs, but at least the zips work
You should have thumbs for all galleries. I will personally check this out.
-Can’t set “view all” as a constant preference for all galleries
I will make the suggestion to our developers.
Thanks for your feedback!
nubile-art staff
|
12-24-07 08:15pm
|
Reply
1112
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(Drooler's Reply)
Karupspc looks like it has way to many Euro models for my tastes, so I will say this about Nubiles: they have more American models than I was led to believe, and to me that is a plus.
|
07-07-09 04:09pm
|
Reply
1113
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from turboshaft:
Wish I had read this before I recently joined. Yes, they have beautiful models, many shot in HD and in professionally done photography, but all without the passion!
I know they have toys and some hardcore, but it is all so bland and boring to me. The sheer number of girls actually makes it worse, because they have applied this formulaic blandness on a mass scale. It seems like every single girl will engage in similar acts, poses, and even in bio responses.
I am going to wait at least another week before I do a review, but my hopes are not very high at this point. :(
|
07-07-09 12:33pm
|
Reply
1114
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from WeeWillyWinky:
That's truly a shame. I was planning on going back to Nubiles soon. I am so sick of the masturbation/dildo stuff, in fact it's one of the reasons I stayed away from PU for a while: I feel so out of the loop. For some reason, watching a girl masturbate does nothing for me. I know this is not the norm, but what can I say? It bores the shit out of me.
|
07-02-09 11:11pm
|
Reply
1115
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Nubiles Captain:
Sorry this has frustrated you. This is actually something we have been working on but you are not seeing the results yet because our content is shot so far ahead. Because of the amount of updates we do from 4-8 set updates a day we need to shoot much in advance to cover the time of production. Hit me up in a few months and I will show you that a lot of the new girls' content has non toy content for those who like that.
Thanks
Captain
|
07-02-09 08:02am
|
Reply
1116
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Drooler, bittersweet memories are part of life's lesson. There will always be the next great porn site with fabulous models to lust after. Remember to keep up the good fight, and help us discover those great softcore sites.
(But don't report too many at one time, because my porn dollars are severely limited.)
|
07-02-09 06:37am
|
Reply
1117
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Not being a big photo guy I totally forgot about that. FTV is way below average as a photo site vs. a video site.
But you and Denner tend to match my tastes so as I said to him, I'm going to switch over to Nubiles for a month to give it a go.
|
08-21-08 01:23pm
|
Reply
1118
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey, pal....
Thanks - a fresh input - something new. That's needed.
You know the feeling - well, I think you do after your former "drop-out" 'cause you were fed up, too.
Well, last night I got a - not new - but a rejoin of the french Explicit Art. Not the cheapest, but ok...
Man, here I found some fine updates of both solo and hc stuff in new quality and in much more erotic line than just "wham-bam-thank-you-mam".
I really enjoyed this renewed membership.
IntheCrack is not new to me, thank you anyway, but, man, haven't been there for a long time, so....
Thanks again - when you're feeling down and out (porn-site-wise, of course) it's great with friends and fellow PU's, like you, Drooler!!!!
|
03-06-08 10:22am
|
Reply
1119
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Nubiles Captain:
(Drooler's Reply)
I did take a look at those images and I see they are very hot. One thing I noticed is that those girls don't even do toys at all. Their limits stop at touches herself or explicit nude.
Did you see the first set of the new model Trish image trish-s1_0056.jpg or Loren in set 4 image loren_s4-0099.jpg. I was just trying to go through the recent girls and see sets without toys that had hot shots or at least I thought they were hot.
Do you think the sets should be all without toys or just more than there are now with toys? I find hot images both ways but thats just my taste and I know everyone is different. The hard thing is keeping everyone happy. For example there was a new review today posted here that says
-"Most models only strip"
-"The contents are too soft"
-"It would be nice to see some toy action"
but at the same time others don't want so much of this. Maybe its a good thing actually that I am getting both sides of the story because it shows the Nubiles has variety.
I just am trying to find the right balance to have both hardcore, toy and erotic posing for everyone.
|
02-10-08 08:49am
|
Reply
1120
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Nubiles Captain:
Can I ask what photoset you did like and if you don't mind. What you didn't like about some of the other recent ones so I can change those in the future?
|
02-09-08 10:01am
|
Reply
1121
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from daveboy:
(Drooler's Reply)
OK 50 was low. Maybe someone can notch it up by 10 to 60. I was very disappointed in the site and not a site I would rejoin.
|
02-09-08 09:10am
|
Reply
1122
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from daveboy:
(Drooler's Reply)
Sorry but the fact it's not on other sites means nothing to me, unless it's on every other single site. It's what the scene contains that gets me aroused and sadly a lot of the stuff on Nubiles is not that good. It's shot to a format, the girls are half hearted and it's faked badly. I might of seen all the wrong stuff but what I saw was not good. OK maybe 50 was a bit too low, I expected better. As for photo image quality who cares, if I want photo image quality I would be on Mac and Bumble, Twistys or Playboy. Nubiles is not by any means one of the worse on the Net. There are many worse and when I get a chance I will show you some more low scores. I am hard to please, Sapphic, Paul Markham Teens, Twistys, Alsscan and more are sites I loved. Sorry if we don't agree.
|
02-09-08 06:51am
|
Reply
1123
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from cblodg:
(Drooler's Reply)
my appologies for the late reply.
I believe that all are entitled to an opinion. My review is not fake, but an honest assessment of the site. Are there things wrong with it? Yes there are things that are wrong with the site. However, at the time of my review I really couldn't find anything.
But hind site is 100% biased.
thank you for the constructive criticism. I shall be more scrutinizing in the future.
|
09-14-07 05:30pm
|
Reply
1124
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
It might be a matter of taste. It might also be that the guys giving the highest marks just look at the pics where the models are nude and get off on their hot bods. It also varies on the various photo sets, but the more I see, the more common I find this issue to be. When I first joined, I was pretty delighted with the new sets that had just gone up. That's why I wait at least 1 month before I do a review, to see if that first blush of enthusiasm - or disappointment, as the case may be - turns into something else over a period of weeks.
I looked at a photo set of one of their new models, Penelope, the other day and she looked engaged from the start of the set. I looked at the newest photo set of her posted and in the early pics she looks like she feels ill - not something that fills me with sexual longing, that's for sure, though she's a damned hot girl.
|
09-09-07 02:12am
|
Reply
1125
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
Agree with Drooler - I like the site quite a lot. The content is great. But the navigation in general needs a lot of work. Especially the manoeuvre around the updates.
|
09-06-07 09:51am
|
