| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1001
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Mayvary:
Hey Drooler,
mcn did not standardized their image sizes! They still offer and going to release more up to 5000 px galleries ... so you must hit them up in the middle of making the last tweaks to the site :D
Cya
Mayvary
|
01-09-08 04:40am
|
Reply
1002
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
Wow, I can't believe it I actually coined a phrase! I've been avoiding this site and now you confirm my suspicions.
|
01-01-08 05:18pm
|
Reply
1003
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
Hey again
Rather cool design - it looks great....
Still I'm more on the 78 from your review concerning content. I don't know what it is, but apart from the fine models some things are still missing to make this a great site.
Maybe it lacks some real sensuallity, some sexier ways in photos and videos - even some of the Playboy videos - and photos for that matter - are more sexy than MCN.
|
01-01-08 03:16pm
|
Reply
1004
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from jd1961:
I've never been a member. When I click on their preview page, I'm getting error messages. Is the site working at the moment? Happy New Year!
|
12-31-07 04:20pm
|
Reply
1005
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
Anyone can do it if they want to take the time. They're not geniuses, they just load data they share with other hackers. They find the combinations, and the website usually shuts it down in a day. But really, I don't even worry about it, I would just get another password. One time though I noticed a whole bunch of "favorites" in my folder at a side that I didn't put there, so I alerted the site and got a new pass.
|
12-26-07 02:40pm
|
Reply
1006
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
No, they have computer generated usernames and passwords. They count on people using the same username over and over to make it easier. Then they let the software do the work. It's not a result of someone hijacking....that would be for your banking records LOL! I just make a notepad for my use/pass, and keep it on my desktop. The only computer a website hacker is going to break into is the website's. But that is very time consuming. They have software where they feed in massive lists of use/pass.
|
12-26-07 11:24am
|
Reply
1007
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from jd1961:
I wouldn't worry about security too much, these sites are hacked on a daily basis. Remember to try to use different USERNAMES, the hackers use usernames to generate passwords.
|
12-26-07 09:57am
|
Reply
1008
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Drooler's Reply)
Open a browser window.
Paste into the address bar the following: metartx.com/
This brings up a metartx page for visitors.
The page has thumbnails of this week's videos and photo sets.
However, if you click on any of the thumbnails, instead of getting a short video or sample gallery, you are re-directed to the Metartx signup page.
My guess is that the visitor page is very elementary, and just has the introductory page with a few thumbnails, that leads to the join page.
Maybe in the future they will expand the visitor page with actual sample videos and sample galleries.
But unless one of the Metart staff lists the content statistics of Metartx in a reply on the comments section or blog, I don't know how you will determine what the contents of Metartx are.
And since the join prices of Metartx are very high, I think it will be expensive to join, without having a clear idea of what you are paying for.
|
05-12-16 08:49pm
|
Reply
1009
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Capn:
(Drooler's Reply)
Indeed there is a market for it.
Unfortunately few if any cater for it fully clothed to full nude. :0(
|
05-11-15 04:30pm
|
Reply
1010
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(Drooler's Reply)
Problem with most of the sites you have listed, Drooler, is that they stop at teasing (especially the "Only" sites) without the full nudity we want to end up with, unless they have changed during the past 6 months.
|
05-02-15 11:39am
|
Reply
1011
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from tangub:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks for the reply Drooler, much appreciated.
|
02-15-12 04:12am
|
Reply
1012
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from lk2fireone:
(Drooler's Reply)
What you say convinces me, once again, that beauty (or sex appeal) is in the eye of the beholder. I downloaded the farm girl photo set of Barbara at Errotica and then deleted it after viewing, because I just didn't like it.
I'm trying to be a little picky. Because even though Hard Drive storage is so cheap, I'm filling up these external hard drives with photo sets and videos I will probably never look at twice.
|
09-10-11 03:29am
|
Reply
1013
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(Drooler's Reply)
I really liked Barbara Ds first photoset, but I found her other photosets to be much less appealing. It continually amazes me how a single model can look extremely attractive in one photoset, and so much less so in other photosets. You might expect this variation due to different photographers shooting the same model. But even the same photographer can make a model have a large difference in how attractively she is presented.
Anyhow, I agree that the new naming convention at Metart is more descriptive. But like Drooler states, the older system was far easier to use, in the sense the identifying section, e.g. SRT_141, was easy to list and keep track of. I am still trying to figure out how to keep a record of these long file names for a photoset.
|
09-09-11 09:14am
|
Reply
1014
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
I see your point. It really does look like a (much) younger version of Cybil Shepard. But Barbara D's breasts look they've had some aftermarket enhancements. Don't think Cybil had any adjustments made.
|
09-08-11 09:31am
|
Reply
1015
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Jayz:
Quick Update: MetArt Developers have confirmed this to be a bug and it will be fixed shortly. Thanks for your help in pointing this out, Drooler.
-JC
|
01-03-11 02:06pm
|
Reply
1016
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Jayz:
Hi Drooler,
My name is JC and I represent MetArt on PU/TBP. Thank you for your comment and your suggestion: The ability to change the default photo viewing resolution w/in the gallery pages. This has been passed up to MetArt developers.
Best,
JC
|
01-02-11 04:12pm
|
Reply
1017
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I think the site design and ease of use at Metart is among the best of the glamor photo sites.
But the best thing about Metart is the huge number of lovely models, which keeps increasing almost every day. There are a huge number of photosets which do a good job of displaying those adorable girls.
|
12-30-10 01:50am
|
Reply
1018
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from nutcrackr:
(Drooler's Reply)
Are you seeing this latest stuff Drooler? A set just released today.
Pure A - Accept (Majoly) is a prime example of the crap I am a disliking. Her face looks like a plasticine doll and her skin has no definition because somebody has taken out the blur brush and gone crazy.
I mean I've even noticed some other artists doing similar stuff now on Met-Art to varying degrees. RYLSKY has taken the wonderful face of Loreen and decided her smooth skin wasn't smooth enough by itself and applied a very agressive filter over some of the close shots.
Is this fakeness appealing to anybody? I registered to these sites to see some genuine beauty and they insist on photoshopping a lot of models. :(
|
10-01-09 06:07am
|
Reply
1019
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from lk2fireone:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler, I wouldn't mind reading one of your reviews on Met-art. You usually manage to come up with something worthwhile to say.
Mbaya posted a couple of days ago that "The reviewers I respect the most are Exotics and Gcode. I feel their reviews are simply awe inspiring and wish I could write as well. The two reviewers I find most helpful as their tastes are similar to mine are Drooler and Denner."
I would put Drooler and Toadsith at the top of my list for the reviewers I respect the most. Though some other PU members come close.
|
07-09-09 07:59am
|
Reply
1020
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Worm:
(Drooler's Reply)
My comment is for people who dont know its a softcore site. I said if you like soft porn its very good... but if you want hardcore like me then it can be weak.
|
02-09-09 06:01am
|
Reply
1021
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks, bro - guess you were my best bet here....and yes, it was..
|
12-20-08 06:55am
|
Reply
1022
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from hondaman:
(Drooler's Reply)
I see that you mentioned the model Natasha that she models on other sites. I notice that some models on MET pose elsewhere under the same or diffrent names. Yet some it looks like they only pose for MET Jenya D comes to mind she did pose on one other site Kate Fey but from what I hear that site no longer updates but there have been several sets with Jenya D in recent mounths.(I assume this is her real name as she is from the Ukraine and Katie Fey is clearly a fake name) I wonder if if MET contracts some models this may be the case as I do notice that most of the top 10 ranked MET models either only appear on MEt or they appear very rarely on other sites. Natasha is certinly one of my favorite girls on MET.
|
11-26-08 03:05pm
|
Reply
1023
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Mr Fountain:
(Drooler's Reply)
I joined a few days ago after a four month absence and was really happy with how beautifull the sets are shot..just some of the most stunning and beautiful models and beautifully photographed sets i've seen...lots of the recent sets beginning clothed and ending with plenty of nude pics.also beutiful locals and richly decorated sets.. I may look into Met model or their other sister sites errotica archives as well.. there are bargains if you join under multi memberships..and join multi sites at once..but wow my breath was really taken by all those beautiful models and sets..I was online for three hours the first night..Ive been a member on and off before for about three years.. but I am glad with what they are now..Met art is a really potent site.. I'm just going through almost every pic of all the new sets...though the old ones are great too..they hsve captured me and I will rebill this time even though I like to change to try new sites each month..
|
11-06-08 03:46pm
|
Reply
1024
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Love the models, the quantity of content and the superior quality of the photos and the photography.
My one and onlt beef with Met-Art is that they view videos as a toss in, not a feature. Watchiong a model's photo session on video, the ptimary theme of most of their videos,is boring.
The few videos that are actual productions are quite well done but there are so few of them that a video fan like me tends to want to move on.
|
11-03-08 08:41am
|
Reply
1025
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yup, Drooler - you got to try to bargain, all the way. And as long as it works - it's time well used. And especially if you're/were a little pissed off by that currency-policy.........
|
09-27-08 03:53am
|
