| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
976
|
Lora Craft
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Vegas Ken:
The special discount has been corrected!
I just double checked it here and it was working fine. If you are having issues at this point, it may be an issue with the cookies in your internet browser. Go into the tool section of your browser, and delete the cookies. Then link to the site again from PU or TBP. You should now see the special pricing.
Take care!
Vegas Ken
|
06-18-07 09:42am
|
Reply
977
|
Lora Craft
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Vegas Ken:
Hey Porn Users!
This is Vegas Ken, The Webmaster Relations person here at PU. I will contact the site owner to get this issue corrected. I will post a message once I have confirmation that the issue is resolved.
If you ever have an issue with the special pricing, please feel free to contact us at support(at)pornusers.com and I will get right on it for you.
Thanks for your support of us here at PU & TBP!!!
Vegas Ken
|
06-18-07 09:35am
|
Reply
978
|
Lora Craft
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from shakta:
Hi,
thanks for letting us know! There's a misconfiguration with the billers, we will fix this small glitch ASAP and you'll be able to sign up for the discounted rate.
Drop us an email after signing up and I'll add an extra 2 weeks to your membership for free for letting us know.
Thanks!
|
06-03-07 01:00pm
|
Reply
979
|
Lora Craft
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from roseman:
LOL, once again ... a woman can make a man crazy about her :-)
|
06-03-07 10:03am
|
Reply
980
|
Louis De Mirabert
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Jeeeez.....Drooler. I almost forgot about this site.
But apart from your point here - in which I quite agree - I have not considered getting back.
I had my trouble with the owner about billing - and even got thrown out for my critisme. I understand from jd1961 that they changed their billing-systemt to CCBill - well, that might be an improvement...
|
09-01-07 08:44am
|
Reply
981
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
This VIP, or Premium og whatever is bad politics for websites with webmasters who are a little too smart: You get some extras if you just pay a couple of bucks more...
Pier 999 had it (when they were active - are these buys on the deroute?) and now LSG.
It's just a way to get more money out of members/customers.
I really dislike it.
|
02-11-08 11:30am
|
Reply
982
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yeah, maybe this is a start of new undermining of this good PU.
As I stated concerning this LSG- "hoax-offer": IF i'd get such a free access, I would stand down (is that the right frase?) from making any review/comments on the site in question.
But it does not seem to be necessary, because I think most of these sites are doing scams - even with us PU's.
It's good to warn about this and I certainly agree on the the question of credibility here at PU.
And maybe we all should publish if we get an offer like that - and take it.
|
09-02-07 08:57am
|
Reply
983
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from DivBZero:
Thankyou for your review.
The content here is pretty good and very much as described. However this site uses one of my pet hates.
They start their picture sets 001.jpg, 002,jpg etc. Which means if you download any of the images, management becomes a nightmare, because the third time you download 046.jpg, can you remember to call it 046a or 046b 046c etc, and when you come back to a site after a week, how can you remember how far back you got. There's no clue in 046d.jpg !
Anyway, there you are apart from image compression this site is rather good. Drooler thankyou for your review
|
05-13-07 03:19pm
|
Reply
984
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Jay G:
I enjoyed your review and really like to hear your information. No it's not "being petty," For those of us who join 1 or 2 new sites every month, the petty things are really annoyinbg when they distract from the enjoyment of the web-site. Thanks for the info. I look forward to your reviews.
|
05-13-07 12:55pm
|
Reply
985
|
Lusted
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Great....thanks!
BTW - let's keep our hopes up for the Eufrat TBP-review - soon.....
|
12-16-09 12:34pm
|
Reply
986
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(Drooler's Reply)
The email also mention HiDef video, but I do not know if that includes images or not. It is nice to see that at least some attempt is being made.
|
11-28-09 09:40am
|
Reply
987
|
Marina Mendoza
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
I'm not getting a popup using Opera.
|
01-18-08 01:07pm
|
Reply
988
|
Matrix Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from atrapat:
Try Matrix HD instead. The site has the same look but the join page works. I read somewhere some time ago that they were planning to make Matrix HD their consumer site instead of Matrix Nudes.
|
06-20-09 05:19am
|
Reply
989
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
I always compare the webmasters to the guy at Babelicious. He appreciates the paying customer.
|
09-22-07 07:22pm
|
Reply
990
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
You can see his reply to "Ragingbuddhist" right here at PU. I don't need to be giving my money to someone who treats the paying customer like sh1t.This old school porn business attitude of "you'll take it and like it" is pathetic. It's no wonder that porn sites are so hit and miss.
|
09-22-07 06:39pm
|
Reply
991
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Wauw - Drooler is sharpening his pen! (again)
What a reply!
|
09-22-07 01:01pm
|
Reply
992
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from DigglerFL:
(Drooler's Reply)
Ok, well I "ass"ume he shot digitally, and he used a 1024 save-size or maybe just used a 1 megapixel camera. SLR multi-megapixel cams were mega-bucks until recently. I doubt he shoots with film or a point and shoot.
|
09-22-07 11:41am
|
Reply
993
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from DigglerFL:
(Drooler's Reply)
what I meant, is that you can't convert 1024 pixel photos to 1600 without stretching them. You can't add detail. So its just not a reasonable expectation. He'd have to reshoot.
|
09-22-07 10:23am
|
Reply
994
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from DigglerFL:
how can he "re-publish" in 1600px? Do you want bigger, blurry pixelated photos?
|
09-22-07 08:26am
|
Reply
995
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
Drooler has a point.
But I'm not so surprised by the outstanding difference in points.
This is in many ways a difficult site - some really good looking girls - and some strange navigation and some boring videos.
I've been there twice and both times was quite disapointed with the site.
I don't think I'll be back for some time
|
08-16-07 10:42am
|
Reply
996
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Boobs4ever:
Nice comment Drooler! Im surprised as you are. Myself Im very care full about wich sites I join, A site that always have had a good Reputation what I know of is Matts Models.
I would really like to see a review from you ore someone else that has been active reviewer here awhile (like you) when the most reviews are from new members ore from members like me that does write that many reviews atm.
|
07-19-07 03:51am
|
Reply
997
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Andreas:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hello Drooler,
thank you for your statement.
First let me the point that it's nearly impossible to hit anybodies taste with every release.
1. We have a lot of visitors, who exactly welcome this absence of ligtht. They say it has more imaginative power compared to a fully exposed girl. Unless these proponents we keep the level for this kind of sets to a minimum. The rare amount of sets like that shouldn't be a problem at all?
2. Is this something you only realised on MCN or is this a general problem. I have already passed this to our QA. We will discuss this for future prevention.
3. We have to check ourselves if the accumulation of "distanced" sets has been accumulated over the last periods. I personally agree with you, that distanced girls have a another kind of attraction that does not appeal to anybody.
Just to clear it out, in case of approval we will definetly change it real soon again.
Anybody is free to contact me in case of additional suggestions, questions, critics or praise. ;)
Have a nice day
Andreas
|
08-30-09 11:39pm
|
Reply
998
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Andreas:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hello Drooler,
thank you for you comment but to give us the opportunity for improvement we need your critics at a constructive level.
1. Connectivity issuees
MC-Nudes have a support team ready for service. In case of trouble you should contact them first, before spreading rumors that aren't proofed.
We have to check several details like your browser, connectivity, location and so on, to see wher the problem truly occurs.
It's pretty hard to solve something we don't know about and our support team never got any mails or informations about it yet.
2. Can you send a mail to gridcom@mc-nudes.com too explain the "distance" you see on different sets. Please provide examples to get an idea of what exactly distracts you.
3. How about forwarding additional ideas for improvement, we can't handle your critics about, navigation, speed and so on without any further details.
Thanks in advance
Andreas
|
08-30-09 01:06pm
|
Reply
999
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Oh, yes....PUs and webmasters/owners of MC Nudes.
Read Droolers reply and then think about the last line:
'If the models don't seem to give a shit, why should the user?'
|
08-29-09 02:42pm
|
Reply
1000
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Mayvary:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hi Drooler,
I'll take over int he meantime :D my account will stay long enough to create an overall new review next month (old experires then :D)
Cya around
may
|
01-11-08 03:41am
|
