| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1451
|
Bubble Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from nygiants03:
(Drooler's Reply)
theres so much content to go through. But I only see 5 models with over 3,000px right now including nice ones of Juli Bright. But it seems like just the very newest stuff has that px range. sorry I could not be of more help, bust im assuming if there is any more its not many.
|
06-10-07 05:44pm
|
Reply
1452
|
Bubble Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from nygiants03:
What is that all about???? you can view images full size.
|
06-10-07 05:21pm
|
Reply
1453
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from exotics4me:
Peaches too thick in the hips? I guess that is why Eve Angel hasn't been on there as well. I have considered joining a time or two, with Sophie and some of my other favorites, but I also see a lot of very slim models, which I'm not really into. Like Kat as example.
|
06-10-07 05:15pm
|
Reply
1454
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from AmyLusts4u:
I love ALS, but it is too bad that they only allow 4 weeks of videos to be viewed. The solo girl content is OK, but I prefer the girl-girl, and there are not that many in a 4 week time span for me to justify a $30/month price. ALS could be the best site on the web, if we had access to the video archives.
|
06-10-07 02:48pm
|
Reply
1455
|
Kathryn Lee
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Khan:
I've reported this to the TBP Editor. She'll check it and pull the listing if the site is gone.
Thanks for the heads up.
|
06-10-07 11:02am
|
Reply
1456
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from roseman:
DRM made me not to join this site. Pitty ...
|
06-08-07 08:32am
|
Reply
1457
|
Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from nygiants03:
(Drooler's Reply)
allright thanks for letting me know. I am a big fan of Rachel Aziani's site, so this site must be pretty good.
|
06-06-07 12:19pm
|
Reply
1458
|
Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from nygiants03:
The set up sort of looks like a smaller version of FTV girls except with more pornstars, is it similar? Also is this site run by Rachel Aziani or is there no relation?
|
06-06-07 06:35am
|
Reply
1459
|
Twilight Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from SnowDude:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler!
Thanks for the support and I'm not letting any detractors bother me too much. Everybody has their opinion and I'm sure we all have different niches that we like, but it's nice to be able to share what we think here and let people do what they will with it. At times that means disagreement. I think it works overall though and am glad PU is around. ;)
Good to hear from you; keep up the reviews!
-SD
|
06-05-07 03:20pm
|
Reply
1460
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from kingk:
(Drooler's Reply)
Great tip on Eurobabeindex.com !
Thanks, it's always a challenge to 'stay on top' of all the girls
|
06-05-07 02:22pm
|
Reply
1461
|
Sandra Shine Live
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler,
The ones I have downloaded so far are coming out at 800x1200. I don't know if there is an option for bigger, the site doesn't work with Firefox, so I'm plugging away with IE7, which I'm not real familiar with, but a straight right click, save as, is giving me 800x1200, but I've only downloaded 5 sets as of right now.
A side note, a little frustration set in on the site tonight. It finally happens, Sandra Shine hardcore, but only in picture set as of right now. The only thing is, it isn't for her site, it is for some other site and to download it you have to pay 3,90 Euro which I believe is a little over $5 (US). Which sort of ticked me off a little. I hardly see one picture set being worth that much. It didn't help that she also sells each of her sets individually for exactly the same amount as this hardcore set. Don't get me wrong, the videos are great quality, especially if you are used to .mov files. I just hope it doesn't become one of those sites that wants extra money for the hardcore sets, especially since the most hardcore b/g I have seen with her is on Clubsandy, where a guy gets her off with a dildo.
|
06-05-07 03:46am
|
Reply
1462
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Zensavage:
(Drooler's Reply)
I agree, glutton is an apt term that describes my appetite for young beauties on video. Obsession too. Pics are secondary to my interest in video. I convert vids to be played on set-top players.
Please note, MPL has updated its site to the 21st Century...finally! They have started to include High Definition vids (2 at this time) and they now allow unlimited downloads. This has to be good for us collectors. I say this because I trashed them in earlier reviews. They cancelled me because I critisized their site, the SOB's. But I did wind up with a lot of their content for free. I'm tempted to try their membership again. The dozen vids I do have, though not the best quality, are very well done. Windows (640x480; 1500k) Avi (720x528; 1486k). To be fair, I use a 24" high def monitor that may contribute to my opinion of MPL's video quality. It shouldn't matter. My brother has a 19" CRT monitor. It's more than adequate. Most sites don't have HQ vids let alone High Def--yet. That must change. My guess is that within a year all will include HD or die a slow death. Wide screen HD is the future. Most new computers and laptops have wide screen monitors. The vid content has to follow.
Be aware that size alone doesn't mean the vid has true clear HD quality. I recommend 2 sites with the best HD quality:
Mc-nudes.com and infocusgirls.com. Both sites update vids at least 3 times a week. Both have a library of well over 100 incredibly clear, true high def vids that cater to the high speed Internet downloader. Even those with 50" Plasma HD monitors will not be disappointed by the image size and clarity. But with HD close-ups comes the stretch marks, moles, blemishes, bristly pube stubble and other unsightly imperfections. My gawd! The models are human after all!
BTW, this is not an advertisement, just my endorement. I don't make a cent. I get nothing free. I have to pay just like everybody else.
|
06-03-07 03:53pm
|
Reply
1463
|
Lora Craft
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from shakta:
Hi,
thanks for letting us know! There's a misconfiguration with the billers, we will fix this small glitch ASAP and you'll be able to sign up for the discounted rate.
Drop us an email after signing up and I'll add an extra 2 weeks to your membership for free for letting us know.
Thanks!
|
06-03-07 01:00pm
|
Reply
1464
|
Lora Craft
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from roseman:
LOL, once again ... a woman can make a man crazy about her :-)
|
06-03-07 10:03am
|
Reply
1465
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Gazette Risque:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yes, I agree. The editing is their job ;)
But I gotta say, if you are able to download the full gallery in one archive, it doesn't really matter to me whether there are some awkward pictures in there or not.
And a crowded hard drive is just nature's way of saying: "Hey! Throw out some old porn!"
|
06-02-07 12:34pm
|
Reply
1466
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
ok, I've passed that one on as well.
Thanks!
|
06-02-07 05:40am
|
Reply
1467
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
The 2nd one I'll pass on to the editors, thanks!
The first .. you might want to check it for being a typo. I say that because I'm seeing what looks to be a domain parked at godaddy
If you have any other pay sites you'd like to see listed, just pass them on here or in an email to support [at] PornUsers [dot] com
|
06-02-07 05:12am
|
Reply
1468
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler, thx for the heads up.
While neither of those two sites technically fit the non-nude category, they should qualify for a listing at TBP. I've passed them to the TBP Editor so they should be added w/in a few days.
Thanks again.
|
06-02-07 04:05am
|
Reply
1469
|
Eva's Garden
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
It looks like they've already updated the listing and it's just as you've just specified.
Again, thanks for the heads up.
|
05-29-07 02:59pm
|
Reply
1470
|
Eva's Garden
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Khan:
As an aside ...
I've passed your comment about the price change to the TBP editor so they can update the listing.
Appreciate the heads up!
|
05-29-07 04:38am
|
Reply
1471
|
Pure Beauty Magazine
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
It looks like a good tip.....thanks!!!
I was there 8 or 9 month ago (TSM) and was quite dissapointed with the videos.
Just went through the preview of two sites now and it looks A LOT better.
Are the videos ok - with quality, amount and so?
They state some 600 videos - guess the older ones are still low quality or what???
I can deal with bad navigation - you get used to it with a lot af these kind of sites - but bad and too few videos is a bummer for me...
By the way: Thay have this girl Maui (also know as Lera nad more) as model of the week - does she have video?
thanks again
|
05-28-07 07:57am
|
Reply
1472
|
Pure Beauty Magazine
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
Thanks to Drooler.
I've also had my eye on this site for a while - but the lack of videos kept me from it.
And it seems like the videos (and photos) are a little too artistic for me.
I think I'll save my money for a couple of re-visits to some of the good ol' teen sites.
But fellow PU-users - we need more teensites - sites that are even better than Teen Dreams og Nubiles. What was the song "I just can't get enough".................
|
05-28-07 07:14am
|
Reply
1473
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Cenobite75:
Wow, my thoughts exactly! Twistys is falling behind on quality. The only thing that keeps this site interesting is the amount of content. I too would very likely subscribe for a long(!) time if the quality was improved.
Photos: 2000px would be great
Videos: 640*480 has become standard at best, and looks very blurry in fullscreen. 960*540 or even 1280*720 (like on onlycuties.com and infocusgirls.com) is the standard of tomorrow that every other site should strive for!
|
05-27-07 04:03am
|
Reply
1474
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler, who do you suppose approved the poll question? In case there's doubt, it's me. And yes, it is interesting to see how the question is seen from the consumers' side of the fence.
I am not faulting you for the question or for that matter, anyone for having their preferences about the issue. As I stressed, my main reason for making my comments was so you'd have another perspective and perhaps not think poorly of sites who don't use the names you're used to.
|
05-24-07 03:14pm
|
Reply
1475
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from SnowDude:
Great review Drooler! I had forgotten about the freaky effects in some of the sets and agree they aren't ideal. When they offer the large resolution shots they are quite stunning, but that sucks about some elements being inconsistent. Thanks much for the awesome review and keep 'em coming!
|
05-17-07 05:00pm
|
