| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1426
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from roseman:
(Drooler's Reply)
lol, you forgot to check Anonymous negative votes for user Roseman.
I am against anonymous ratings but that's PU rules, if you don't like them you can stop posting and leave.
|
06-21-07 05:33am
|
Reply
1427
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from roseman:
(Drooler's Reply)
If you find poll's question 'dump' or stupid you could just do not answer and NOT post replies that insult me or PU team that approved this poll.
I do not care about your trust rating, I am here because I think that some people are here for the same reason as I am for HELPING people and ourselves. Arguing in here seems stupid and of course lame to me :-)
So if you dont like the poll just be silent and do not use words that can insult someone just respect his question or opinion! Continuing replying with the way you did and you still do will lead you to a ban I think.
Thanks again.
|
06-21-07 05:30am
|
Reply
1428
|
Sandra Shine Live
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler, I have gone through most of the site and have found some sets that go up to 1500. Surprisingly, the first set I found at 1500 was the Eve Angel set. I would still say that less than half of the sets are 1500.
I've seen a video of Sandra in a bar, where a guy stands back and watches her masturbate on a pool table, and the CS video, after going back and watching it again, the guy actually gives her oral in the video. It is probably the hottest video I've seen of her. I would say it is her husband. You can tell she is really comfortable with him. At one point, he sits her on his lap, and uses her dildo on her, including sliding a finger in her butt.
I'm still happy with her site. I do tend to prefer solo sites where I get lots of content of my favorites. She seems like a really sweet person. Her journal talks about her real life, not the typical porn diary of, "I woke up wet". I even like the non-porn clips of her on the site. I had seen one of the on location clips with her on CS, with 4 or 5 other models. She came off as the very shy one of the bunch. While Sandy and the others were dancing, she sit off to the side, laughing at them.
|
06-21-07 12:39am
|
Reply
1429
|
Earl Miller
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler, I will reply to both. That is pretty bad when it asks, "Are you sure?" that would probably start bothering my OCDC! I didn't even recognize the Earl Miller name, but seeing Lanny Barbie on the entrance page, pulled me in to at least check it out.
The models that I mainly look for besides Eve Angel are Anetta Keys, Anette Dawn, Sophie Moone, Lucky, Zafira, Angel Dark, the top Euro models. Then in American models, Eva Angelina, Aria Giovanni and Teagen P. Throw in Sativa Rose, Jeneveve Jolie, Sky Lopez and Nautica Thorn.
The Euros seal the deal for me since the American ones are easily found on most sites. Thanks!
|
06-21-07 12:21am
|
Reply
1430
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
You wouldn't believe how long I've pondered joining superglam before doing it. I can remember looking at it last year because I wanted that damn Eve Angel set with the black spandex shorts on. Never realized I had a spandex shorts fetish until then! I think I kept waiting to see if TBP would get a discount price on it. I've also read very varied reviews on it, but I really came away happy with joining. I agree about the pictures. I had read your review about the false marking, but still found myself clicking the 4000, hoping it had changed!
|
06-21-07 12:08am
|
Reply
1431
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from roseman:
(Drooler's Reply)
You are nothing more than a kid if you are acting like this.
You gave a negative vote to me calling me 'Coward' 'little man' etc because you did post a lame reply and got an answer, LOL
You gave a negative vote to anyone that didn't agree with your opinion, so I guess that you don't judge by reviews but ... by opinions?
Anyway, thank you!
|
06-20-07 11:44pm
|
Reply
1432
|
Earl Miller
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
Here's my question, Drooler. I've seen awesome photos of Jesse Jane by Earl Miller and had considered joining the site. However all of the pics presented in the sample area have this weird blurriness in the face - like the photo shopping went bad for some reason.
Is that just an issue with the samples or are a lot of the pics on the site that way?
|
06-20-07 07:37pm
|
Reply
1433
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from roseman:
(Drooler's Reply)
hahahahahaha, geez!
okay, I am sure that you chose 'I can not tell, I am shy !', didn't you?
Pitty that I forgot to add as an answer 'At any time if girl drools' ;-)
|
06-20-07 04:12pm
|
Reply
1434
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Marianna:
(Drooler's Reply)
L O L, were u drunk when u wrote this or something?
maybe .. u had just had .. sex? awwwww !!!
*drools* :-P
|
06-20-07 03:59pm
|
Reply
1435
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Penthouse Mike:
Hey Drooler,
Thanks for your comments and for being a member.
I took a look at the issue you described and I can see that
Georgia Rules was updated on Jun 13th. Here is the link:
http://www.phvip.com/ph/galleries/galler....html?ph_num=pv428-2
Sometimes we don't post a gallery scheduled for a particular day until the afternoon so it looks like the set is a 'phantom' but that just means it will be added in a couple of hours.
If you live in Europe it might seem like lots of posts are late because we add galleries and videos during our working day in New York.
We never put stuff in the calendar and then don't post it tho.
If we have the pix there is no sense keeping them to ourselves :)
I hoped this help.
Thanks, mike
|
06-18-07 03:52pm
|
Reply
1436
|
Lora Craft
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Vegas Ken:
The special discount has been corrected!
I just double checked it here and it was working fine. If you are having issues at this point, it may be an issue with the cookies in your internet browser. Go into the tool section of your browser, and delete the cookies. Then link to the site again from PU or TBP. You should now see the special pricing.
Take care!
Vegas Ken
|
06-18-07 09:42am
|
Reply
1437
|
Lora Craft
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Vegas Ken:
Hey Porn Users!
This is Vegas Ken, The Webmaster Relations person here at PU. I will contact the site owner to get this issue corrected. I will post a message once I have confirmation that the issue is resolved.
If you ever have an issue with the special pricing, please feel free to contact us at support(at)pornusers.com and I will get right on it for you.
Thanks for your support of us here at PU & TBP!!!
Vegas Ken
|
06-18-07 09:35am
|
Reply
1438
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from Jay G:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks drooler! I enjoy reading good writing, and your writing is always fun to read.
|
06-17-07 09:02am
|
Reply
1439
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Monahan:
Great review, Drooler. You touched on a number of characteristics that would not be obvious without plunking down some money for a month's sign-up. They, along with TBP's alert that DRM is used, has made me decide that I'll try this site later rather than sooner.
|
06-17-07 08:53am
|
Reply
1440
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from exotics4me:
DDF sites are most definitely some of the best on the internet. Good to see that you like Stracey and Simi, I was starting to think I was the only one! Nice review
|
06-16-07 09:01pm
|
Reply
1441
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
For people like me that look at membership status when reading reviews, it would definitely be helpful if you noted - returning member here - or something that let people know that your entire experience was not less than 1 month. I have seen notes like that in reviews, possibly in yours, and it was note-worthy to me.
In any forum that has a good amount of people posting, we're going to have people capable of, or interested in, writing solid in-depth reviews, and others who write reviews that are more "thumbs-up" or "thumbs-down". The good thing about the comments is that we can always try to draw people out some more if we care to.
Thanks for your comments.
|
06-16-07 01:40pm
|
Reply
1442
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
>> "See, I don't know how to do that proxy thing with the IP addresses. LOL"
Haha .. right. Of course the fact that we require users to have 5 points before they can give Trust Ratings (hopefully) will discourage folks from doing the proxy thing. In a recent conversation with a User, Rick (TBP/PU's Founder) commented about why he selected such a high number for the Trust Badge. He said, "The goal was to choose a target that in the long run would be attainable and still somewhat challenging." Which as you point out, makes it really mean something special once it's achieved.
Your comment, "... there's the implicit message to write the reviews carefully, with a balance of positive and negatives and a reasonable enough score" really hits the nail on the head in regards to what we hope the Trust Ratings will do.
Again, thx for your feedback.
|
06-16-07 10:32am
|
Reply
1443
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler, you're quite correct in saying that *sometimes* a negative rating might have been a mistakenly cast vote. Because of that, it never hurts to reply to negative vote asking for the reasoning. You may not get a reply, and hopefully you won't be personally insulted if you don't, however, if it was a mistaken vote, it'll bring it to the users attention and they can easily recast their vote.
|
06-16-07 06:16am
|
Reply
1444
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Jay G:
(Drooler's Reply)
Good points, Drooler.
But I guess my biggest problem was the anonymous negative without explanation. I guess I'm thin-skinned, but when someone throws an egg on my car, I'm bothered and would like to know what's going on.
Not "trusting" is different from having an honest disagreement. I like porn that others might be uncomfortable with, ok, but to not "trust" me????
|
06-16-07 01:02am
|
Reply
1445
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
What's to stop me from entering with a proxy and giving myself anonymous positive trust ratings? Not a thing. I am baffled as to why they allow this.
|
06-15-07 08:15pm
|
Reply
1446
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from DivBZero:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler - Can see where your comment hits home here.
I really quite like Simons' use of toys, but I really wish that he would organise toys of the right size and variety that ordinary girls use on a daily basis. Girls like the right size and fully strong vibration.
I'd happily lose the close-ups to see a little more expression.
And as usual I think that 3000px would be exquisite given Simon's photographics skill.
That said, I still rate the site most highly
DivBZero
|
06-12-07 03:58pm
|
Reply
1447
|
Pornstar XS
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from jd1961:
I use Opera. which seems to work best for me here. Don't know why.
|
06-11-07 02:23pm
|
Reply
1448
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Robare:
(Drooler's Reply)
ALS does have, as I write this, 79 DVDs of material available for sale. For some reason, 32 of their titles are available for shipping on a physical disk. All 79 are available for download in three formats. The good news is that the customer isn't required to purchase the entire DVD of material. Individual scenes can be purchased and downloaded. So, if you're looking for specific models or specific behaviors, you can browse through and select the ones you like.
And, while I haven't gone through all their offerings or been a member long enough to go through their production/offering cycles, I suspect that any scenes being offered for sale via ALSDVDS and also being available for download at some point on ALSScan or ALSAngels are more the exception than the rule. In the few months I've been a member, I don't recall seeing any duplication of availability.
|
06-10-07 10:24pm
|
Reply
1449
|
Bubble Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from nygiants03:
(Drooler's Reply)
yea i think your right. You can also check it out for not that much. you can get 10 day access for 9.95 which isnt bad. I forgot to add that to my review
|
06-10-07 06:06pm
|
Reply
1450
|
Bubble Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from nygiants03:
(Drooler's Reply)
i understand. I just don't see how he rated the site a 59, its not that bad. Most of the pics are 512x768, but they look good to me. The 2048x3072 ones are huge and very nice. But there are not enough of them.
|
06-10-07 05:52pm
|
