| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1326
|
Red City Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Same here! - and agree: Naughty (and sexy/cute) girl next door.
The volume does not look good right now - but it's worth to keep in mind...
Good hunting!
|
09-22-07 09:57am
|
Reply
1327
|
Red City Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Well, Drooler
I guess we generally are looking for the same sort of content (you for photos and I for videos) - and it's quite swell to have a fellow user at that point - but I guess we'd been into that before.
It's great too....to have someone here to rely on about review-quality in this special content.
By the way have you seen "Helen's Planet"?
The amount is lousy at this stage, but she has just started this site. She's a doll, a sexy doll. I joined Pretty4ever where she has some photos and videos - and SOME of them are just great. (See preview)
best
Denner
|
09-22-07 09:13am
|
Reply
1328
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from DigglerFL:
how can he "re-publish" in 1600px? Do you want bigger, blurry pixelated photos?
|
09-22-07 08:26am
|
Reply
1329
|
Red City Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
Hey again Drooler...
I was a member of Red City Nudes a little less than two years ago (or so).
What I remember was a serious disapointment with both quantity and quality. But they may have changed that (quantity) according to their preview today.
Funny though, the video-teasers in preview are the same as then (three of them, anyway)
Not much help - but do not think I'll pay $29.95 for this one....
|
09-21-07 08:01am
|
Reply
1330
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Certainly agree with your point about the videos...
A solo-model need to act - and not just lying around - even looking bored.
How do otherwise professional (it seems) people from these sites except the customer to not getting bored as well.
I have that feeling about both Hegre Art and Met...
And compared to my favorite at the moment Pier 999 this other stuff is not worth paying for....
But ok, some of the photos in the two sites mentioned are very nice, and your formost a photo-freak, are you not?
By the way this PU keeps getting better and better - AND take up more and more browsing-time.....
|
09-21-07 07:38am
|
Reply
1331
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from jd1961:
Well, if you go to a football game, buy a couple of tickets, and your team stinks up the field, you're not going home happy. But if you're in the pressbox with complimentary field passes and cocktails, you might have a different attitude Lol
|
09-21-07 04:00am
|
Reply
1332
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
Believe it or not, I have been waiting for your answer, so thanks for responding! I was hoping that this site would be more on the erotic side, but i guess not. I have DVD's full of Met-Art material, so I guess I'll pass on this.
|
09-21-07 03:17am
|
Reply
1333
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from apoctom:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hear, hear on the labels in the rankings!
|
09-20-07 10:13am
|
Reply
1334
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler
Thanks for an outstanding quality in your response (as usual).
At this point I'm much better orientated about this site and quite look forward to go there.....
|
09-20-07 08:59am
|
Reply
1335
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
Thanks to Drooler for an other very helpfull review.
Never been to any of the ATK-sites, strangely enough. But what kept me away was the videos which I've seen many times somewhere else (with the atk-logo, I believe). The videos were simply NOT good in quality - old times quality.
And for a certified video-freak that takes the interest away.
So a Q for Drooler - apart from the segments: Is the quality still bad?
|
09-20-07 07:23am
|
Reply
1336
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
I second that (jd1961): Good review and the question of centent compared to the motherload at MET ART.
I had some serious problems with the boredom of the videos - is the style the same here?
|
09-20-07 06:38am
|
Reply
1337
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
What is really funny is the bush is thicker than their waists!
Euro butts poll would be interesting. I would vote for Eve and blame biasedness. Mia Stone is easily one of the most underrated Euros, I've tried asking a couple of different sites for her but it seems she has retired. I never realized how nice of a butt that Sophie had until I watched her video on Give Me Pink. I also would add Lora Craft who has a set with Eve on clubsandy that is one of the best butt lover sets I have seen. They take turns on their knees in front of a couch. I could go on and on, I like Tiffany Diamond's butt too, though she is small. Last, I would be tempted to write in Kayla Marie who has a great, little bit chunky butt. I think we need a site just about butts! I know there are some but they are not that great.
I've noticed in the rating systems of different sites that the skinny flat models seem to score the highest. I never will understand that!
|
09-17-07 10:58pm
|
Reply
1338
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Agree - the new sets with Sarah are great!!!
|
09-17-07 10:18am
|
Reply
1339
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Got me there....
The teacher-things sounds exiting.
But cannot find an AMBER at EGG at the "name asc."
Looked for Ellena too, but nada (found an Elena, brunette at EGG, but guess it's not the same)...
Please give me another hint here, m'man.....
|
09-17-07 09:58am
|
Reply
1340
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Good to hear, Drooler....
I figure we're more here who consider this both SuperSHAM and SuperSPAM...
|
09-17-07 09:49am
|
Reply
1341
|
Just Nude
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
With all due respect: Drooler joined this site as what seems to be the first here at PU - and what also seems to be the case: With an opend mind.
Even for $19.95 I had my serious reservations - especially with the promise of only 4 videos....
And that ridiculous amount does not seem to have any value at all, it looks like.
And the cons. and bottom line - the site's probably got a long way to go.
Generally Droolers review is very "professional" - and with that I mean it's very usefull to the rest of us.
I'll surely save my money on that one, for now.
|
09-17-07 07:53am
|
Reply
1342
|
Euro Pornstars
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from jd1961:
The new Opera browser has a feature called "speed dial". The home page is 9 blocks of space where you can paste in your fave sites, you will actually see the site's page. And, it refreshes the page, so you see the latest updates before entering the site. So you could open a new tab, and keep this site up while you are in the bonus sites.
|
09-16-07 02:38pm
|
Reply
1343
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler has certainly got a point here:
"join primarily for existing content" rather than "join for existing and future content."
Most sites are of that character - most sites will not satisfy my urge for new stuff during the time of membership - that's probably the main reason I still keep looking for new ones.
There are a few sites though that gives you full house/very good deals - 1ByDay1ByNight is one af them - even Pix and Video is worth to mention. (And I'm not comparing the discount VideoBox here).
|
09-16-07 08:41am
|
Reply
1344
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Great point, Drooler.
The marketing of porn sites, of course, focuses on "membership" for a longer period. In fact if they offered a discounted renewal rate ($30 to start and $20 or $25 to continue past the first month, that might make a difference.
In any case, you're right. Even if there were no updates at all the $30 investment to access the archives looks like a good one.
|
09-16-07 07:06am
|
Reply
1345
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Woodruff:
(Drooler's Reply)
Do or do not, there is no try :)
Sorry, even on a porn review site, it's probably pretty geeky to quote Yoda.
Anyway, luminous beings are we.
|
09-15-07 11:38am
|
Reply
1346
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from cblodg:
(Drooler's Reply)
my appologies for the late reply.
I believe that all are entitled to an opinion. My review is not fake, but an honest assessment of the site. Are there things wrong with it? Yes there are things that are wrong with the site. However, at the time of my review I really couldn't find anything.
But hind site is 100% biased.
thank you for the constructive criticism. I shall be more scrutinizing in the future.
|
09-14-07 05:30pm
|
Reply
1347
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
I made it pretty clear that the "wait one month" rule was a rule that I enforced for myself and was not claiming that everyone else on this site should wait that length of time.
There are rules that I believe would help this site.
I just ran across a review for ALS Scan where the reviewer, in a later comment added to her review, said that she had not been a member prior to her review IN OVER A YEAR!!!!
That, to me, is just ridiculous, and should be grounds for that review being yanked from this site altogether.
|
09-14-07 07:43am
|
Reply
1348
|
Bikini Riot
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks, man
I'll take a look again.....
She's worth it, for sure.
|
09-12-07 03:16pm
|
Reply
1349
|
Bikini Riot
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler
Been to Mindy Vegas site for 1 1/2 or 2 years ago - she's beautiful, but the videos at that time where less than average - most bad quality.
Are they any better today? - though I remember you're not too much into videos...
And again: I hope that we through PU as users/customers can lay pressure on webmasters and owners of pornsites to lower their prices in general - and just as importend: get them to see what average customers like and do not like...
|
09-12-07 08:36am
|
Reply
1350
|
Bubble Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from nygiants03:
those are not even the worst parts. The worst part is you can not download the videos :-(
|
09-10-07 12:28pm
|
