| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1301
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from jd1961:
Don't get me wrong, Eve Angel is great, but I've got so much of her material from other sites that I never joined hers. What is at her site that I couldn't basically get elsewhere?
|
09-30-07 04:23am
|
Reply
1302
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yup, m'man
It's numero 2 Vicky - that you mention. She has six videos at TeenDreams - in her first she asks: Do you like me? - in a soft voice with a cute accent - I did'nt need to answer that one!
If you ever see a new video of her, please let me know...
And, of course I'll give you a holler if I find some newer Mia Stone-material...
|
09-29-07 10:46am
|
Reply
1303
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
Thanks for update/review about "our" Eve.
Glad to see some things are still working here.
Agree on the "Section of collected galleries and vids of Eve is a confusing, disorganized mess"
A little confused though: You mention Mia Stone - can't find any new things at preview about this fine model (I'm not not a member at the moment). Are you only referring to older stuff, here?
By the way. Drooler - I think maybe you're my best shot here: Did you see my question/request under Comments for Teendreams...?
|
09-29-07 08:46am
|
Reply
1304
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler, I believe that you're thinking of their sister site, ALCWPP (All Ladies Covered With Pecan Pie). It folded in 2004, unfortunately. I can't imagine why!
|
09-29-07 07:43am
|
Reply
1305
|
Jack's Playground
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from jd1961:
I don't understand these kind of porno companies. They're almost as bad as Vivid.
|
09-28-07 08:05pm
|
Reply
1306
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from SnowDude:
(Drooler's Reply)
Of course I meant you Drooler! Sorry about my slip up there dude! :)
|
09-28-07 10:35am
|
Reply
1307
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from pat362:
(Drooler's Reply)
I agree with you that the purpose of thumbs is to give you a good
overall idea of the action in the video, and the written description should help clarify it a little more. I agree that written descriptions are sometimes vague, but I've noticed that the reason is sometimes because they know they can attract more people by lying.
I don't need a major story, but a description of the different action that is inside the video ie: straight sex, anal, dp, lesbian
and so on.
|
09-27-07 07:44pm
|
Reply
1308
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from SnowDude:
(Drooler's Reply)
That's an excellent point Denner dude! I'm sure I've saved more money by not joining crappy sites than I've won in the raffles, that's for damn sure!
|
09-27-07 06:22pm
|
Reply
1309
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from pat362:
(Drooler's Reply)
One thing that annoys me about thumbs/stills in the preview page is that they don't always show all the action in the video. I'm not asking for dozensof thumbs. I'd much prefer a mixture of written info with some thumbs. This way I can read about the action, and I
can see the performers. The websites handled by kink.com are a good example.
|
09-26-07 07:03pm
|
Reply
1310
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from King:
You've just taken them down 5 places in the ranking. From 1st to be more painfull :). Doubt they read it but I agree, they need to improve - a refreshner
|
09-25-07 03:44pm
|
Reply
1311
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
I just found proof positive of my allegation that Mya's site is a dead site - only "updated" with 2 year old sets carved off from the early days of the site. One of the most recent sets - "Sandy Loves Mya" - was posted on the 23rd and 24th of September 2007, right?
Check this link to a Mya promo set for her site from Freeones.com
http://galleries.myadiamond.com/mya-diamond-sandy-205/olabola:rs:myadiamond/lesbian-pussy-licking-toy-dildo-21.html
Check the date on this promo link above - or check out the copyright date on the pics in the promo itself - 2005.
It's probably the same with Eve Angel's site, though I haven't done the research to prove it - it could easily done by looking at the promos for Eve at Freeones.com, though.
|
09-24-07 11:29pm
|
Reply
1312
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from PinkPanther:
At least they're doing new sets and putting their older stuff on their bonus sites instead of going the General Entertainment (Mya Diamond.com,etc) path of just putting the old stuff in as the new stuff. I like this site, but since I can get so much 21st Sextury stuff from their stepchild sites, I maintain my membership there instead. I love the florid colors and they've got a lot of drool-worthy models.
|
09-24-07 08:23pm
|
Reply
1313
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Don't take this wrong but ...
Without getting into a protracted discussion (which would serve no purpose here) I'll just say that your speculation regarding production costs of creating content and the risks involved are inaccurate in the most part. While it could be argued that reselling content indeed keeps makes the cost per photo less, the speculation that creating content is "easy money" in any measure shows a certain lack of understanding of the subject.
Not a bad thing as it's not really a subject a consumer would need to be knowledgeable of.
|
09-24-07 03:24pm
|
Reply
1314
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from pat362:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hi Drooler sorry for not replying sooner I was visiting a friend. I'm mostly a video website guy, but when it comes to a preview. I'll be honest and say I don't mind if it's in thumbs, video trailer or even a description of the action (like handsonhardcore.com). I'm like you in that if I can't get an idea of what the videos offer. I won't join the website. I haven't passed on many websites, because most have smarten up over the years, but there are still a few that I'd join if I could get a good idea of what exactly those videos look like.
|
09-23-07 07:09pm
|
Reply
1315
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
You should be happy with your 1 "no" rating Drooler...it's the exception that proves the rule!
|
09-23-07 03:54pm
|
Reply
1316
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from jd1961:
I avoided reviewing this site because they have the worst server in pornoville and i would probably let that get in the way of a decent review. Actually, I got a refund, so I'll leave it at that.
|
09-23-07 03:35pm
|
Reply
1317
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from exotics4me:
Definitely some moved material. I still haven't figured out where the Eve and Thomas, b/g bathroom set went. I have it saved on an old external HD and it has the 21st Sextury logo on it. It would have to be from 2003 or so. I believe the name of the video was, "Eve takes it in the bathroom". I believe that someone on here told me it is now on Eurobabes or that 21st had licensed it out and in doing so, removed it from PixandVideo. The worst thing, the picture on the opening page of the site is from that video! I do think 21st Sextury is trying to get too many sites going. The login problems are from hackers, though, if I go back to check out the newer content, my login that I had months ago is still there. I haven't been on their sites for about 6 months now. I used to join every 3-4 months. May make a trip back to ZoliBoy soon. I can't find my blasted DVDs that I burned from it.
|
09-23-07 02:59pm
|
Reply
1318
|
Xisty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
One thing I had noticed with Xisty and it was a reason for my higher score on their site, is that they have great content of models who I never thought looked that great on other sites. After talking with Xisty's staff away from PU, their photographer Fred, has to have something to do with this quality. Britney/Brigette had never been that impressive to me, but her Xisty content is excellent, top-level. Same can be said with Gabriella. I haven't seen her Simon Scans content, but I had seen her before. Matter of fact, I've never been a member of Simon Scans, not enough Eve content ha ha! While I don't base a membership solely on Eve's content, where I consider myself a collector of Eve's content, I at least like to know that I will get a few exclusive sets of her when I join a $30 site.
I think it just goes to show that most of these models have photographers they are good working with and others that they are not good with. In Eve's case, I noticed a very, almost excited Eve on Zoliboy's site, that I have rarely seen and her new content on Xisty is also some of the best I have seen of her.
|
09-23-07 02:42pm
|
Reply
1319
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
Hey man...
Fine review - get your point here - also about rating. In May I had it a little higher, but now as a member again I'm getting a bit tired of it - and espcially concerning the same as in your first line of "cons"...
By the way: guess your're familiar with pretty-virgins.com.
Been there a long time ago - somewhat a bit strange site where lot of the girls seems to be dressed for carnival...
Tried to find some new review, but nada - and no lists here at TBP, Porninspector or the rabbit.
Just wonder: you got any infos here?
|
09-23-07 08:37am
|
Reply
1320
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Rick:
(Drooler's Reply)
Once implemented, the rule will start that day. So all previous "no" ratings won't require reasons and will stay as is unless the user ammends it. That was the only way we could justify adding this rule.
|
09-23-07 07:53am
|
Reply
1321
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
I always compare the webmasters to the guy at Babelicious. He appreciates the paying customer.
|
09-22-07 07:22pm
|
Reply
1322
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
You can see his reply to "Ragingbuddhist" right here at PU. I don't need to be giving my money to someone who treats the paying customer like sh1t.This old school porn business attitude of "you'll take it and like it" is pathetic. It's no wonder that porn sites are so hit and miss.
|
09-22-07 06:39pm
|
Reply
1323
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Wauw - Drooler is sharpening his pen! (again)
What a reply!
|
09-22-07 01:01pm
|
Reply
1324
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from DigglerFL:
(Drooler's Reply)
Ok, well I "ass"ume he shot digitally, and he used a 1024 save-size or maybe just used a 1 megapixel camera. SLR multi-megapixel cams were mega-bucks until recently. I doubt he shoots with film or a point and shoot.
|
09-22-07 11:41am
|
Reply
1325
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from DigglerFL:
(Drooler's Reply)
what I meant, is that you can't convert 1024 pixel photos to 1600 without stretching them. You can't add detail. So its just not a reasonable expectation. He'd have to reshoot.
|
09-22-07 10:23am
|
