| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1001
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mr smut:
(Drooler's Reply)
On the other hand who would be stupid enough to loose a box of high quality porn DVDs? I might return them but first of all I'd view this stuff that's for sure because having my hands on fresh porn makes me curious :-)
|
05-01-08 03:48am
|
Reply
1002
|
Baltic Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
You're certainly right about the preview ....
And about the girls too - wow, some pretty ones - and some I've never seen.
But it also looks like - from the trailer - that the videos are of photoshoots...argh...
But right again, 29.99 is really too much for that content.
|
04-30-08 02:44pm
|
Reply
1003
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
Sophie deserves better, and it would be a good selling point. Maybe she should move to a better company.
|
04-30-08 12:38pm
|
Reply
1004
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from JBDICK:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler
the reason scenes with 15 minutes of futtbuck sex are so rare is probably because the girl ends up with her face pushed into a pillow or something else that cuts off her airway and she passes out...I'm sure that's why they slap the girls, so they don't go limp, the girls that is...
interesting that they never include the shot afterwards where everyone raids the fridge and has something to eat...
|
04-29-08 02:12pm
|
Reply
1005
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
Lol...sorry, but I was looking into this when I saw your very negative feelings about this site.
|
04-28-08 01:45pm
|
Reply
1006
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from jd1961:
You've got 2 months to go !!
|
04-27-08 11:52pm
|
Reply
1007
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#26
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
I love porn names. Remember Carol Connors was named after Archie Bunker!
|
04-27-08 11:41pm
|
Reply
1008
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
It does point out the quality of the site's navigation, doesn't it? I remember at one point looking for some photo sets that I KNEW were on the site featuring Stephanie Swift. I looked in one way that made complete sense, found nothing. I thought of a few ways that their wacky navigation might hook me up with what I was looking for, found the stuff in a very few minutes, but you do have think like a person that is only somewhat organized in order to find what you want, frequently.
|
04-27-08 06:11pm
|
Reply
1009
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
I'm not sure where you're looking, Drooler. I just did a count and found 21 new photo sets so far in April - several of them are accompanied with a vid set.
|
04-27-08 07:52am
|
Reply
1010
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Webmasters/girls: Read that former input from the Drooler.
You'd do yourselves a favour - and us users.
Get all the name-things together - and you'll probably get new costumers - and make everything easier for us at the same time.
And to the webmasters of places like Eurobabeindex and theNude.eu - keep up the good work...
|
04-27-08 07:07am
|
Reply
1011
|
K Package Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
But if you dig deep, you'll see that he suckered the poor webmaster from Twistys into a long argument over him giving Twistys (2 hotlinks!) a 57 score. I guess I didn't notice it at the time, or I would have clued the Twistys (there's 3) webmaster to this shill.
You may add your reply here:
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3118
|
04-27-08 05:03am
|
Reply
1012
|
K Package Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yes... Like the great Markus:
TRUST USER? YES (0), NO (17)
This guy is the worst. He shills all these sites, and look at the score he gives the competition! LOL
https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1257
|
04-27-08 02:52am
|
Reply
1013
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
Let the dead bury their dead.
I truly thought that those ridiculous implants were a thing of the past. I'll say it: they're ugly! There is no cleavage. They don't jiggle. They look like they're going to explode (and sometimes do). I have actually touched them, and they are hard as rocks. Men that like them should curse their mothers for bottle feeding them.
In a word: they should be outlawed!
|
04-26-08 04:58am
|
Reply
1014
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from badandy400:
(Drooler's Reply)
The reason I was wondering why it posted where it did is because it did not post my reply to you under my comment about M&B, but rather it was posted under a pole question's reply section.
|
04-24-08 10:46pm
|
Reply
1015
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from badandy400:
(Drooler's Reply)
Honestly i liked a lot of their pictures, I just wish I had a copy of them BEFORE the butchered them with heavy airbrushing. They air brush to the point of it looking like it was painted rather than photographed.
In a perfect world a webmaster who pulled that dirty trick of hiding fees would be shot. Fortunately, for the webmaster, it is not a perfect world. But, we can refuse to pay the fee. Using Download Them All for Firefox I believe would do the trick for downloading the photos without buying the zips. This would take a little extra time, but not too much. Certainly not $40 worth of time! This made me wish I was not a picture lover...I could have saved good money.
PS...Why the hell did this get posted in here! This post is for my comment about Mac&Bumble and the zip file fee.
|
04-24-08 05:59pm
|
Reply
1016
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler sez:
"As for their zip files of their dinky little 1067 pixel photos, I could suggest some rather creative backup storage options."
I didn't know you were into anal, Drooler! ;-)
|
04-24-08 05:43pm
|
Reply
1017
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from zachvenice:
Thanks for the feedback, Drooler. You may want to check out our new tour and what we have to offer. We currently add about 5-10, 3000-pixel sets a month as well as 2 HD video updates (about 8 non-HD). Our style has since evolved into quite a bit more eye contact and tease before the 'goods' are shown.
|
04-23-08 03:23pm
|
Reply
1018
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from zachvenice:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks for the review. The only thing that I would like to add is that the video-editing has been cut back quite a bit. You will see more restraint practiced in the majority of our video sections. There is only one particular video update per month that will purposely be stylized, called Dream Flicks.
|
04-23-08 02:15pm
|
Reply
1019
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Never figured out that Ron Harris-site.
It's more like fetish than glam - and still none of those.
Most videos are close-ups of a girl using a toothbrush (electric, of course) or maybe a hairbrush - no elegance, no finesse.
Though very short - I agree with the review from Douggie:
Quote:
"I didnt feel he did his videos for his viewers. Almost like bubble girls, he did them just as much for himself (his own jollies) as he did for concerns that the video would be what people would pay to see."
|
04-23-08 01:08pm
|
Reply
1020
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from jd1961:
Did you know that your phrase "eurobabes" has turned into a link!
|
04-23-08 02:41am
|
Reply
1021
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
Harris is a tremendously disappointing site IMO. I did give Danni a try with the discount when I wouldn't ordinarily have joined.
|
04-23-08 02:38am
|
Reply
1022
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
A friend and I went to see Last Tango In Paris back in the day and were mightily disappointed at the lack of porn in it. Why it got an X rating I'll never know. We did enjoy sitting in back of 2 old ladies though!
Caligula would be a better example I think.
|
04-20-08 09:50pm
|
Reply
1023
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from malikstarks:
(Drooler's Reply)
Bottom line, all of their online properties are currently being seriously outflanked by sites that are simply better.
Scoreland- Brazzers: more pics (although lower quality). Tons more hardcore.
Legsex- HotLegsandFeet
XLGirls- Tough call here but I think BBWpornpass is slightly better
18Eighteen- Take your pic: Abbywinters, Karups, clubseventeen. Hell you might simply do better to just get Brazzers for the TeensLikeitBig site or RealityKings for Pure18; although these sites don't have any soft core content.
40somethingmag- Allover30, Karupsolderwomen
NaughtyMag- Again, take your pic, from basically the same list as 18eighteen but slightly larger.
Ridiculous considering the Score Group has way more resources than any of these companies. I totally simpithize with why you rejoined 18eighteen though. All of their sites have VERY intriguing content. But you get the feeling that they spread themselves too thin to be able to fully capitalize on it.
That's All I will say on this topic, for now. Perhaps I should have started a thread in forum.
|
04-18-08 11:09am
|
Reply
1024
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from malikstarks:
(Drooler's Reply)
It appears to me that the Score Group is a Company that has failed to make the transition to the online format. As a result they are dangerously close to going the way of Playboy and Penthouse. Both aforementioned companies live off their past glory, and the latter I hear is tens of millions of dollars in debt.
In my opinion they (Score) ought to just scrap all their mags and focus solely on their internet sites. Right now they have a bunch sites that have always had potential, but that are simply mediocre at best (with the possible exception of Scoreland) .
|
04-17-08 09:29pm
|
Reply
1025
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Toadsith:
(Drooler's Reply)
Well they could have stuck with the 6 traditional continents, simply exclude Antarctica because Penguins make their own porn. Or perhaps this is the heralding for more poll options - if even the masters of Porn Users are getting constrained by it then something must be done! ::cue dramatic music:: ::a crowd of people point to the sky as a fleet of airplanes fly overhead::
|
04-17-08 03:32pm
|
