| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
876
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Wittyguy:
(Drooler's Reply)
I'm all for that one my man, all for it. I've noticed that we don't seem to be getting as many poll submissions from users any more, probably because most of the easy ones have already been done. I think it might be worth a carrot; meaning up to one raffle ticket for a poll idea. Don't know though, maybe the PU staff has a boat load of poll ideas but I sort of doubt it. You should send an email to the PU staff about that one unless Khan wants to post a reply here.
|
08-11-08 11:48am
|
Reply
877
|
Teen Flood
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Just as an FYI ...
The increased character count has to do with some changes that are in the works. I'll post something in the forum a little later on. The actual announcement for the changes will be made once they're all in place.
|
08-10-08 06:41am
|
Reply
878
|
Teen Flood
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler, yes, I am making full use of the new 3,000 character limit on my reviews ha ha. I really wanted to like Teen Flood more than I did, I think one of the best comparisons came from my wife, she said it reminded her of ATK Galleria. Teen Dreams is buying up a lot of licensed content. They have at least 10 sets from Eve's solo site.
I had thought about joining it for several months, but just kept putting it off. I was thinking it wouldn't have any exclusive content. I had seen the Eve in the tub set, that looks to be from her first year in the business on TGP sites. Which is the set that I believe Teen Flood has pulled from a Twistys set. She has the same hairstyle, same panties, same bathroom, everything, but these look like alternate poses from the Twistys ones.
I always wondered why more sites don't do that, when buying licensed sets, why not buy the unused photos that the site didn't use? It at least makes it feel exclusive to see new poses.
You know, I saw a site the other day that I bet you would like and I can not remember the name of it. The first 3 sample photos I saw from it where of models on their stomach, looking over their shoulder. I will search my history and try to find it.
Talk to you later.
|
08-10-08 12:14am
|
Reply
879
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
I'm in relative agreement with all you say, Drooler.
When I see anal sex, I'm reminded of the old ship board caution of Navy EM's, "after a 3 month cruise, if you drop the soap in the shower room, leave it on the floor unless you want a rude surprise."
To me the sensation of experiencing vaginal sex is so much better than the sensation of shoving my willy up a girl's ass that I really don't see the attraction as a "doer." Now for gays, of course, rear-ending is the only way to get any physical sexual gratification.
Thus the logical connection is made between a male who enjoys doing anal as being "queer."
As for group sex, I also agree. My interest in watching a porn video is the babe, not the guy(s) doing the porking. A GGB video is fine, but a GBB is usually not so good because the babe is hidden behind the two guys. I want PTA* in my porn, not dicks, scrotums and hairy asses.
*PTA = Pussy, Tits and Ass.
|
08-06-08 10:37am
|
Reply
880
|
Nikki Benz
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks! Sometimes I wish I could be more succint, though :)
Ms. Benz is a favorite of mine too. The site had a trial membership in its previous incarnation but not now. I'll let some time pass so it builds up more exclusive content before joining again. We'll always have Brazzer's Network in the meantime.
|
08-05-08 02:03pm
|
Reply
881
|
Walter Bosque Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Pretty wild - remember once seening a beautifull brunette acting as a falconer - with a real bird and all...just do not remember where (typical)....
|
08-05-08 06:26am
|
Reply
882
|
Walter Bosque Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
In spite of some serious cons: No zips - no videos, this site has really got the attention of this user.
Main reason: New exclusive stuff! (including a new way of soft latina material)
Tnanks to Drooler for this first/exclusive and fine review - and though the score does not reach for the skies - I'm going for it.
Check out the preview, BTW....
|
08-02-08 02:54pm
|
Reply
883
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Blond Sandra Shine....Of course - what a lack of memory for my part: Her own site - well, you can't win them all...
|
08-02-08 02:39pm
|
Reply
884
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from ace of aces:
(Drooler's Reply)
:)
|
08-02-08 06:03am
|
Reply
885
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from ace of aces:
(Drooler's Reply)
didn`t wanted to "hurt" you as a danni fan :) but as you said..there is not much softcore as i want at the site. it`s not that kind of stuff i am interested in. but like everything it`s a question of taste, and beeing honest around 4 or 5 years ago danni was something quite good, but in my opinion, those days are gone.
|
08-02-08 04:52am
|
Reply
886
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yes, sir - judging from the cover-photo Lola is a smashing brunette!!
BTW: Brunettes - have you seen Sandra Shine has turned blond?
Just found a DDF Prod. -clip, don't know from which site, though.
A bit of a shame: she looks older and less elegant/classy...
|
08-01-08 04:11am
|
Reply
887
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks for that tip, Drooler.
Judging by their looks the site seems to have some new models - faces/bodies I don't recall having seen before, anyway.
And names - we can never depend on....
|
08-01-08 03:39am
|
Reply
888
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from MargulisAZ:
(Drooler's Reply)
Taking a closer look at the updates recently, it actually looks like ALL OF IT is remastered old material. Yikes, that's really scary if one of the best sites is now no longer updating any new material and models at all. Even the ones that do not say reloaded are old from what I can see.
|
07-31-08 07:34pm
|
Reply
889
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
NEW STUFF
BTW Drooler:
You may have seen this - it sure looks good (video-wise) and/but a french site:
http://www.megane-officiel.fr/
She's done a bit at Explicite Art
|
07-31-08 07:16am
|
Reply
890
|
Ero Nata
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Wittyguy:
Hillarious (and very good) review there Drooler. $25 for one darkly lit nude scene? Makes me think there is still hope for my pseudo on line pornstar dreams ... $25 a month to see some average mostly clothed white guy staring at his computer and downloading actual nude porn. Seems like a bargain in comparison to this site.
|
07-28-08 11:57am
|
Reply
891
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from CaliFornicator:
(Drooler's Reply)
Only advantage is that you can hit it bare back and not have to worry about them getting pregnant twice... (c:
|
07-27-08 10:52pm
|
Reply
892
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from BostonPJR:
(Drooler's Reply)
LOL
|
07-26-08 08:23am
|
Reply
893
|
Helen's Planet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
That site has now been added to PornUsers.
You may enter your remarks at:
https://www.pornusers.com/review/eronata/
|
07-26-08 08:02am
|
Reply
894
|
Helen's Planet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler
Thanks for the updates on this...and for the warning!
What a bummer!
It's somewhat strange with that nude-posing "advertising" - and the reality looks more like a no-nude site. Strange because "our little friend" do a lot of full nudity at her own site, at Nubiles and even some masturbation-like at Solo Teen Girls....but bottom: Yes, ripoff.
BTW: Never joined Helen's Planet - and I'm glad - the lack of updates here is also like ripoff.
Man, that eronata-site deserves a Drooler-review!
Cheers, mate!
|
07-26-08 02:48am
|
Reply
895
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
Thanks for that update on EA....
Reading the first part - I thought: maybe EA has come around with better content, better allround....
But it seems to be a socalled "facelift" - like when a four-five year old car-model needs reneweal - we change a little bit here and a little bit there......but when it comes down to facts...most is just the same old story.
|
07-24-08 08:57am
|
Reply
896
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from asmith12:
(Drooler's Reply)
> It saves bandwidth (aha! my "compression" guess was in the ballpark),
> but too much to the detriment of visual satisfaction.
Right, but there is also another side of it: it seems that most of web porn is shoot with amateur camcorders these days :-(, and progressive scan is usually not an option there :-((. Or from a bit different angle: 720p is usually about the same class/price/amount of information as 1080i, but see how much better "we have 1980x1080" looks on site web page (either camera manufacturer site or content web site) than measly "we have 1280x720" :-(.
|
07-22-08 01:03pm
|
Reply
897
|
Nextdoor Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from OliverK:
Great input about the site!
We have tried to implement most of the items you mentioned. Here are a few of the most recent changes....
A) Completely new navigation system using icons and text below them.
B) Lots more nude models! Don't get me wrong we are still shooting tease but many more of the new girls eventually show it all.
C) We now list the last 6 updates in the members area and post the newest models right on the front page and well as that days update and a sample from that update.
D) We update 5 times a week with a New Model on every Monday!
E) The shoot with Amy Ried was one of her first full nude shoots. So little bit of history there.
F) Still 100% exclusive!
G) Images are 1600 pixels tall min.
H) The video section is growing every week higher quality camera gear has greatly improved our movies.
I) Bad news is we raised the prices to $24.95 but if you join for 90 days you get one month free so thats only $16.60!
Check out the site again a lot has changed and I would love to hear what we can do to make it even better.
Oliver Klozov
|
07-22-08 12:09am
|
Reply
898
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from TheRizzo:
(Drooler's Reply)
I agree although I would prefer to see them make the effort to go back and rerun all their sets in a single zip file, I would settle and be happy if they just did it for the new sets going forward.
If they are doing singles for premium, I am not sure how they can't incorp the same procress for their other sites. Can't imagine it would take a programmer all that long to go into their software and make the tweaks to make it doable.
I do appreciate the effort that Karups did to go back and rework their zips. Karups and ATK must have had the same system for doing their updates back in the day.
|
07-20-08 03:10pm
|
Reply
899
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
To amplify a bit on Drooler's reply, the Twistys network has 7 separate sites:
These five are individual with unique content. Some models appear on more than one site but there is no duplication of content among these five sites:
Twistys - the "parent site" Multiple updates daily
When Girls Play - Lesbian - Several updates monthly. They keep it fresh. (This does not appear to be a separate site that has a preview/join us capability.)
Anette Dawn - Single model site with 4 or 5 updates each month.
Naughty Staff - Brand new site - No established update schedule as far as I can tell.
Blue Fantasies - Glamour site - 2 or 3 updates each week
These two have content duplicated from Twistys that fits their genre. There's no unique content:
Eurofoxes
BustyOnes
As Drooler said, the quantity is superb for the price.
|
07-20-08 01:39pm
|
Reply
900
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
Obama has his "porn and personal responsibility - what it means for the economy and national security" speech scheduled for February 2009.
|
07-20-08 07:57am
|
