| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
851
|
Just Teen Site
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler
What's happening.....I may be wrong, but lately I've experienced more and more sites thats either getting worse than before or simply not run well. Yeah, like Just Teen Site, the Bangbros Busty Adventure and this week LSG where my login/password suddenly do not work though I paid till June next year....just examples.
And I'm still in seach for GOOD quality - which also is getting harder and harder to find...
|
09-19-08 01:46pm
|
Reply
852
|
Ariel's Blog
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Cybertoad:
I would join but seems just so so .
darn she looks hot.
|
09-19-08 12:04am
|
Reply
853
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Jay G:
(Drooler's Reply)
If "backdoor" means anal with the girl lying on her stomach on a bed, that's HOT! Position does mean a lot in excitement for me. The common "reverse cowgirl" anal (which seems the most common these days)is far less satisfying than "backdoor", especially when the girl is flat on a bed.
|
09-18-08 07:43am
|
Reply
854
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elonlybuster:
(Drooler's Reply)
Backdoor sex? That's a new term for me, but I can't figure out if it's back entry aka anal or having a guy walk through the backdoor and start doing the chick where ever... Or just something completely different.
|
09-18-08 06:05am
|
Reply
855
|
Beauty Is Divine
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from roseman:
Very good and detailed review, thanks for the info I was planning to join this one.
|
09-09-08 12:30pm
|
Reply
856
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from joeyhart1:
(Drooler's Reply)
I'm with you on that dude, they need to steer clear of some of these girls.
|
09-08-08 07:46pm
|
Reply
857
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from pat362:
(Drooler's Reply)
I might even be willing to put forward that cartoon and comic porn, are in many ways a riskier types of porn. One example is lolicon. You have countless lolicon, but you'd have a very hard time getting this produced with real people, regardless that you found 18 yrs old that look like 14 or 15 yrs old girls.
|
09-06-08 06:33pm
|
Reply
858
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from ace of aces:
(Drooler's Reply)
i didn`t really see "reloded" stuff from the site an i have at least 162 gb downloaded at all. some videos from former times (2005 e.g.) but maybe it`s so much stuff that i have lost control of it :)
therfore i have to say, even if there should be "reloded" stuff in there, it`s not making the site bad.
|
09-05-08 12:41am
|
Reply
859
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
Two months of nothing but recycled material sounds like a huge con to me - especially when they don't even mention it. I guess they spent a lot of money when they went to two full pic & vid sets a day and this is their way to sit on their laurels and rake the money in, since they aren't paying models or all of the other costs of doing new shoots, which can be extraordinary.
At this price I can't justify paying them to just recycle their old stuff. But that's just me.
|
09-03-08 06:52pm
|
Reply
860
|
One Girl a Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment from Drooler:
Consider this an extension of my comment. I just finished a second time as the subscriber. There were very little to no photo updates to the site since the last time I was paying for a month here, in May.
I've given it a rating of 60 for that reason. It certainly doesn't qualify as being in the 80's as a photography niche site now.
|
08-30-08 03:22am
|
Reply
861
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
I notice you good americans use the term/short of: LOL - a lot. Guess it means "lots of laughs"
So to this, Drooler: LOL!
And agree, buddy: Let's keep out of each others hair and go on for more serious bussiness: like finding good porn...
|
08-23-08 10:10am
|
Reply
862
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
First a great thanks to you, Drooler - an honorable friend, pal and buddy - with whom I'd had some of the finest discussions - and help - about the essential thing here: our search for good porn-sites for a long time....
So on second thoughts: Why should some inferior debate and insults "run me out of town" - no way.
I've read some of Droolers inputs after my - maybe a little premature - goodbye. It states, that I'm not the first who had to deal with personal insults, though that should be banned here...
Man, how can a common interests in different porn-sites result in personal dispute?
This is supposed to be a place for help, a good way of porn-search - I thought.
Drooler, you have a way of doing a debate with top-arguments, that I'm glad your're my buddy - and not the opposite.....keep it on, bro...
And thanks to both the Drooler and Kahn, I do not see any reasen to leave.....
|
08-23-08 08:34am
|
Reply
863
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from roseman:
(Drooler's Reply)
lol,
well, I never insulted you in the past, you are the one who did that.
About your friend Denner, if you know how to read and you don't have a '' fragile ego '' as I do you will see that he started this. Please do not advise me about what kind of a place pornusers is, as I am an older user than you in here and I know exactly what this place is, but I doubt if you actually do.
Anyway, as I said I don't care about your opinion as I don't care about people who think from their friend's point of view and not logically.
|
08-22-08 07:18pm
|
Reply
864
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from roseman:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler,
as I said in the past I don't care about your opinion and so I don't want to hear it :-)
In the past you were the one that got into little childish, playground games ... don't forget.
|
08-22-08 05:48pm
|
Reply
865
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Marianna:
(Drooler's Reply)
u are accusing roseman for other people mistakes
u are the reason that i stopped posting reviews in here because u gave me negative vote in the past because i didnt agree with one of ur reviews and then u changed it thinking that it will show that u are good.
so stop talking allright ????
what i think is that denner is ur buddy and u try to make other users like roseman seem bad. isnt that a game? like u did to me
|
08-22-08 05:39pm
|
Reply
866
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Not being a big photo guy I totally forgot about that. FTV is way below average as a photo site vs. a video site.
But you and Denner tend to match my tastes so as I said to him, I'm going to switch over to Nubiles for a month to give it a go.
|
08-21-08 01:23pm
|
Reply
867
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
BTW:
About sunglasses: Cannot agree more - strage new trend - do they get some sponsorship from Gucci or Rayban - still it's just kind of stupid/looks stupid and weird in some way...why, folks, why?
|
08-21-08 09:54am
|
Reply
868
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler
Yes, that upsell is really annoying - man, I curse too many times here trying to let the mouse stay away from the corner, jeeeez....
Thinking about rejoining MyGlamourSite - also becuase of all the extra stuff you get - and that Nikki Case sure looks fine in the preview - good tip there, bro.....
|
08-21-08 03:59am
|
Reply
869
|
Ero Nata
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from renton:
Hi Drooler,
Just thought I'd reply. Over the years, I've come to know the owners/producers of eronata - via their averotica.com website.
I can understand your misgivings about the "non-nude" aspects of the eronata.com site, but I can assure you the lovely Nata will be 100% nude in future updates. The non-nude sets were part of the site before the site had officially opened to the public. So, your review was in fact a tad premature.
Perhaps you can re-review the site a little later.
I know fans of the lovely Nata will love the upcoming updates to eronata.
|
08-18-08 08:44am
|
Reply
870
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler, that is interesting about New Sensations, at one time, probably 2005-06, that was my favorite site on the internet, and I still hadn't heard of her! I will have to go back to NS soon, price is still plenty low and see what all I missed back in 2006.
Porn.com really is a solid site, that the staff is improving almost daily. Back 4 or 5 months ago, they had one video of Aubrey Adams, who has to be the cutest, sweetest, curvy below the waist American models to come along since Kayla Marie. They had one video of her back then, and it was only a handjob one. After requesting more and complaining about the broken links, probably 25% of all links were broken at the time, I go back last month and they now have 12 Aubrey Adams videos, 11 new ones in 4 or 5 months and all broken links have been fixed that I can see and most of all, they almost have all of their movie files in that 576 high end, 2000 bitrate. I just hope they don't raise the price anytime soon. $9.95 is one of those hard to pass up prices. The only problem is the pictures with no zips. If you save them, you have to also change the name or every picture has the same name. I just started making a folder for each model that I wanted pictures of and numbered each picture when I downloaded 1.jpg, 2.jpg, into their own folder.
I had noticed that one of the members had reviewed one of their "exclusive" sites Whale Tail'N, though it isn't exclusive, they do have several of these niche sites included with membership as well. Whale Tail'N has one of my other favorite American models best scene, Micah Moore and of course, all of those focus on the thonged butt in jeans or shorts.
Talk to you later.
|
08-17-08 12:33am
|
Reply
871
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler, thanks, you nailed that one! Figuratively of course. Lucky for me, I checked porn.com where I still have a membership and they have 5 videos with Lindsey Meadows in them, including the one on Glamour Models Gone Bad that is in the preview. It is listed as XXX At Work: Secretary's Day, Scene 4 and even better besides the gyrating butt, she starts out the set in a dress outfit with black glasses like Eva Angelina's. And they have the pretty impressive quality 578 high end, 2000 bitrate version of it. Man, I wish I had a Secretary! I had never heard of her before you posted this. Thanks again.
|
08-16-08 08:31am
|
Reply
872
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from MargulisAZ:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yeah this sucks, this site used to be awesome and now I probably won't even join again. No reason to since there aren't any more new girls or shoots. How lame.
|
08-15-08 09:37am
|
Reply
873
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from 2 Free K:
Those per-gallery-page zip downloads are a real drag. Great review.
|
08-15-08 05:09am
|
Reply
874
|
New World Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Wittyguy:
(Drooler's Reply)
I hear ya. My only reason for bringing up the issue of posting a review or comment was the fact that TBP has no review of this site and Denner's comment (the only one posted) doesn't mention the price gouging. I thought others might want to be forewarned more clearly is all.
|
08-14-08 03:58pm
|
Reply
875
|
New World Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Wittyguy:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler, I'd say go ahead and post a review on this one even though it's been a while since you were a member. I found this site looking at an outside review site and was tempted until I checked here. Several sites have given this one a high rating. For me, it means more when I see a review as opposed to just a comment. After relying on good ol' PU I think I'll pass on this one for now.
|
08-14-08 11:58am
|
