| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
676
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
Evelyn's videos and even photos on her site were really great, much better even than some of the videos I've seen of her on other sites. I had just mentioned to Messmer that Eve as well, really gave her all in her videos on her site, more so than her videos on other sites. I just hate that Eve's site has gone down so badly and can't wait for that new DDF solo site of Eve to open. Though I am starting to be skeptical of it since I first about it back in March and here it is May and they are still showing the Coming Soon splash page.
You know, I had completely missed Bambi, think it was the hair color change that threw me off, but have picked up a bunch of sets of her from the 21st Sextury sites and I was surprised at how good her content is. The little UK model Sasha/Sara also is quite good solo, mainly because of her dirty mouth ha ha. I have always believed that models like Eve and Evelyn, both could be super models if taller, are much more comfortable by themselves or in Eve's case, with another woman than man. I remember saying one time before that Eve does more with her fingers than most models do with a male model! I picked up an Eve video, believe it is from Digital Desires, but not positive on that. It is almost true POV, a guy holding the camera very close. Believe it is called, "Sex with Eve". She purrs at one point, with a grin on her face and eyes closed, "It is cumming". Broken English be damned! That was one of the hottest moments I've ever seen of her since she rarely speaks in English.
|
05-11-09 11:55pm
|
Reply
677
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Did you ever join this site? If so, any observations?
|
05-10-09 07:42pm
|
Reply
678
|
Euro Pornstars
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey bro - well, if this site was functional/user-friendly this user too would go up in the higher 70th for score.
But do not remember having troubles like at this site - go away - during downloads - for a short while - and you have to login again - I spend an afternoon login in ten times or more.
But still I've saved some fine photosets here (a little too large "watermarks" though).
BTW: Spend an entire night/evening using different browsers trying to get the best of it - but all the same (including my favorite Firefox)
So one thing here: The content is generally ok - but, man - they got to upgrade the site and how it's working..
|
05-10-09 10:59am
|
Reply
679
|
Ambya
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from lk2fireone:
I think you brought up a really interesting point. How long should a video last?
Maybe you could make that a poll question.
Personally, unless a video is really fantastic, I don't see the point of a video that goes beyond 10 minutes. Since most videos are basically rutting, with little attention to elegant style or storyline or other factors that might increase the appeal, I think these rutting scenes get tired/boring very quickly. For me they have little appeal. But even if the models are attractive, which would be a real plus, I don't think it's more of a turn-on for a single sex scene to last beyond 10 minutes.
I am talking about the sex scene itself. It would be great to have some prolog/story that leads up to the sex scene itself, if the story is not really stupid, the conversation is not really stupid, or demeaning or trash.
Erotic is something that most sex videos ignore or have forgotten about.
It would be nice to find a site that specializes in erotic videos, where the body is mainly natural, no tattoos, lovely young models (maybe a few over-30 for Drooler and his buddies), and the videos are like mini-movies or actual movies, with a sensible plot, good dialog, good lighting, good color, soundtrack, etc. etc.
Dreaming the impossible dream. :)
|
05-10-09 05:47am
|
Reply
680
|
Finest Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from PinkPanther:
My biggest complaint about this site - most of the Tila galleries are gone - I found the site pretty lacking when I did a one-month join a while ago as well as having lots of glitches like vids that didn't download - so many that it wasn't even worth sending them a note, in my opinion. I just knew that I was only going to be there a month. Frankly, as soon as I saw how much Tila material was gone, I felt ripped off. They do have some hot photo sets, though, including new ones.
|
05-09-09 08:02am
|
Reply
681
|
Finest Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Jeffrey99:
Nice review. The whole not being able to save image by image and the low resolution of the images will probably keep me from giving the site a try. Sucks too, as it sounded like one I'd probably like if they fix those two things.
|
05-09-09 04:40am
|
Reply
682
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from uscue:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey drooler thanks. Oh just to clarify after reading my initial comment. I meant the New Sensations tour has trailers for their upcoming DVD's (they also have previews for just individual scenes like you would expect from a website, but I'm talking about full DVD trailers).
For instance, on the new sensations site there's a DVD trailer release for "Brats and Braces" -- it says the DVD will be released May 11. All these trailers seem separate from the individual scenes I see on their tour. I'm curious if these actual New Sensations DVDs are available to download. Curious because I saw a few girls that I recognize from that trailer that are not listed in their models index (and these are girls with common names -- no way they were just "mis-cast" in the models index).
|
05-05-09 06:05pm
|
Reply
683
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Jay G:
(Drooler's Reply)
"Virtual encounters"....exactly the right words!
|
05-02-09 11:43pm
|
Reply
684
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
I sure agree with practically all in your very fine review, Drooler - well, no wonder...lol
They site has gone back to entirely softcore - again, yes that's probably for the better - some of those hc/bg scenes are not very good.
And one thing I didn't think about before is the props, as you call it (tried to google that word)- and yes, a little too much of pearls, flowers ect. - they really should try to leave that out..
AND I look forward to more scenes going indoor again - too many lately are in shot by or in some lake, in the sand or some wilderness - not too crazy about scenes like that...
|
05-02-09 02:30pm
|
Reply
685
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Jay G:
Wow! Your point about the girls looking at YOU (into the camera) and not into the void is so true and so sexy. It's a wonder more photographers don't realize the power of beautiful eyes.
|
05-02-09 08:57am
|
Reply
686
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from james4096:
(Drooler's Reply)
I agree. Certain women they don't real have to do anything to get me going.
|
04-30-09 10:37am
|
Reply
687
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Wittyguy:
(Drooler's Reply)
I saw somewhere that Ron Jeremy's penis already has a twitter account going. Which, when you think about it, probably has more intelligence than anything he could post.
|
04-27-09 02:15pm
|
Reply
688
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Tom22:
Very good review, thanks for taking the time to do it.
I totally agree with you on the ass slapping. It does nothing to increase the eroticism of the scene in my opinion and only makes her butt red, which I hate. I'm paying to see the girl's beauty, don't mess her up with that nonsense! And its a shame so many sites do this, I hate it.
|
04-25-09 10:43am
|
Reply
689
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Netsirk:
(Drooler's Reply)
UPDATE: thanks to the help of another pornuser (messmer) we were able to make some tweaks and resolve the speed issue for users that were having trouble.
|
04-24-09 01:05pm
|
Reply
690
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
I do believe that you are correct. Looking at comments on her site, it was noted that the site opened January 2007, but the site currently shows the first update dated July 2007, so it looks like they chopped off the first 6 months to use as "new" updates.
|
04-19-09 08:36am
|
Reply
691
|
Stuffed Petite
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
Hey Drooler
This is an old review - but nevertheless: Just joined partly because of that and because of the fine 3-days deal at the moment.
And do not regret - some very great stuff here - you might also recommend this to the "sad" messmer...
Cheers, bro!
BTW: Agree with the recommendation of FuckedHard18 - Capti Anderson among others are hust great here...
|
04-19-09 07:20am
|
Reply
692
|
Blue Fantasies
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
thanks, Drooler - will look into that.....
|
04-18-09 01:57pm
|
Reply
693
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from TalonIcefire:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler, I've had everything go wrong that you've listed to include the McFuckafee mess. Coincidentally, I no longer use that program. Now I reformat every drive be they internal or external before storing data. I use an internal drive for all downloads, scrub them, sanitize them, and then transfer them to whatever external I've got them designated for as well as backed up DVD discs. If it's all the same, I'd prefer to hold off on the next unforeseeable "surprise."
|
04-17-09 03:37am
|
Reply
694
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Wittyguy:
(Drooler's Reply)
Mmmm, after taking another look it appears that you might be right. I haven't joined this site before so I can't say for sure but I'll take your word on it. Too bad they can't seem to come up with more original content.
|
04-16-09 11:17am
|
Reply
695
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from james4096:
(Drooler's Reply)
I don't know why externals sill come formatted in FAT32. The first thing I did when I got my WD mybook was format it NTFS.
|
04-16-09 03:42am
|
Reply
696
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from nutcrackr:
(Drooler's Reply)
Well they seem to have toned the fetish stuff back. Which is good, however I still am finding a lot of sets extremely boring and void of any life or soul compared to other sites like met-art or errotica archives. Recent one "Jane french lingerie" Is 59 images of near enough the same photo, good model standing against a white background with basically two different camera positions.
What might be even worse is they basically censored my comment about it being boring. Previously they were getting quite a few negative comments in that section, I guess they decided to delete many of them and paint a false positive opinion of the sets.
All I know is at the current rate I will not be subscribing again. Anna S is hot but not worth the full price alone.
|
04-16-09 12:50am
|
Reply
697
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from JENNY:
(Drooler's Reply)
I LIKE PUSSY AND TOYS.IF YOU DONT HAVE THAT WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO HAVE?
|
04-15-09 11:28am
|
Reply
698
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Shap:
(Drooler's Reply)
I agree 100%. I reviewed the Kagney set that was mentioned and agree with the original post. We are going to get it fixed so you guys are happy ;)
|
04-13-09 01:05pm
|
Reply
699
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Shap:
Thanks for the feedback Drooler. Our team is fixing this today. They are coming up with a number of different watermarks and we'll see what our members prefer on our Twistys Forum ;)
Thanks for the feedback! It helps us improve the site!
|
04-13-09 12:00pm
|
Reply
700
|
Anette Dawn
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Shap:
Hi Drooler. As you know I'm always honest to fault I hope you guys appreciate that ;)
Regarding Anette she's taken a break from shooting. For the time being we aren't sure when we will have more content to update.
I know this news will not be welcome by Anette fans. It is one of the reasons we included it with the Twistys network. So Anette members still get huge fresh updates daily from Twistys and hopefully still feel they are getting their monies worth ;)
|
04-13-09 09:18am
|
