| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
651
|
Rookie Babe
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RBmarc:
(Drooler's Reply)
*Update*
The slide show default has been changed so that its not 'auto start' :)
Cheers,
Marc
|
06-09-09 02:22pm
|
Reply
652
|
FM Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
FuckedHard18 - great site, agree - and with some beautifull models you see rarely anywhere else..
|
06-09-09 01:09am
|
Reply
653
|
FM Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks - guess I expected that deal with shitty way of showing updates at the preview - lack of organization!
Anyway - your judgement/views about the stuff updated during the last year or so gives me some pretty fine hints... (think I'll skip it this time and save the money for some other site)
Do not know what's going on at some of these sites (and a lot more) at the moment - don't they care for new/old costumers, don't they know that people are getting more and more concious about what they get for their money?
Well - we do!
Thanks again for this update/info.
|
06-08-09 11:50am
|
Reply
654
|
FM Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
Hey Drooler
Can you help me here - thought about rejoining (FM Teens) - and browsed the preview/free tour.
They state 35 issues and 35 as the latest issue (of course) - but in the preview the latest is 26 - is there issues 27-35? Or is that ALSO a lack of organization along with the name-problems....
|
06-08-09 02:41am
|
Reply
655
|
Sexy Zdenka
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(Drooler's Reply)
It's still updating 3 photo sets per week on average although it looks like one of them is usually just magazine scans. Latest sets are being released at 2000x1333.
The galleries section of the free tour shows everything you'll find inside.
|
06-07-09 01:20pm
|
Reply
656
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from atrapat:
(Drooler's Reply)
This wikipedia article pretty seems accurate:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluffer
Don't know what part of it is a myth. I remember some gang bang (Houston 500?) where there were fluffers on film keeping the guys ready. I also remember a fluffer character in some porn movie parodying the porn industry.
|
06-07-09 08:34am
|
Reply
657
|
Rookie Babe
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from RBmarc:
Hello Drooler,
Thank you for your interest in and comments about Rookie Babe. We have made steps in the right direction lately and can learn more from reading comments like yours.
The slide show can be stopped by clicking on the text link at the bottom of the image: "stop slideshow". Also, the ability to download just single images in the larger sizes is something I will add to the "to-do list".
To be blunt, at this time, we have limited WM resources and so things get done much slower then I would like but we have made great progress overall.
The aggressive updating that we are working on will get us back up to 120+ babes very soon and each babe will have 2-4 sets/videos on average. We have gone from only 40+ babes active with about 40 photo sets to 60+ Babes with 75+ photo sets in just over 1 month. We are also adding completely new Babes biweekly and most of their content is much more explicit with pink and toys.
The server speed and ability to navigate while downloading are points that I am addressing with my WM again. I will post further on that when I know what can be done and how soon.
Best Regards,
RBmarc
|
06-04-09 04:34pm
|
Reply
658
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Agree - even the Fillmore EAST was great - once in a while I still listen to The Allman Brothers Band "At Fillmore East" (1971) and Jefferson Airplane "Bless Its Pointed Little Head" (1969) - also recorded live at Fillmore East... (and not to forget: Some Frank Zappa live came from here).
That kind of music has and will never come back....
|
06-03-09 05:49am
|
Reply
659
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from turboshaft:
(Drooler's Reply)
I am not a fan of seafood, and that's an understatement, but to each his own, especially if you thought the flavor was nice. : )
It only stands to reason that what we put into our bodies influences what comes out, right? All the times we (guys) have waxed endlessly, if never eloquently, about the diet-to-flavor relationship we have heard at least a little truth, just how much truth is anyone's guess.
The first three choices don't sound too appetizing for a flavor you might taste on a partner's most sought after parts. Chocolate sounds kind of good, but is probably too sweetened and processed to have much benefit. For me, fruits and vegetables are the only ones that naturally have a palatable flavor, or even smell, to them. Plus, with all the botanical flavors and scents added to many of the hygiene products that women buy, they must like them anyways.
|
06-01-09 03:21pm
|
Reply
660
|
Rigin Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from nutcrackr:
Just came across this site via a model I liked on Met-Art (Natalia on Met-Art) and the no zip policy has pretty much ruled me out of going for this site. I'm a collector and I'd have to manually open each image of the set and then save them using my firefox plugins.
I don't see how this stops piracy? Surely the pirates would just do the same, zip them up and post them, then the pirates get nice zip file collections and paying customers have to do it manually every time?
|
05-31-09 04:25am
|
Reply
661
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
What's interesting is that while 1byDay posts these ALS Scan sets as their main post for the day, from what I've seen, ALS Scan posts the 1 by Day and Met Art material that they post as bonus posts in addition to their usual posts of their own material.
|
05-30-09 07:30pm
|
Reply
662
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler, I stumbled across that Euro Babe Index announcement a few weeks back while checking for any new Eve content. I was really worried at first since the picture showed Eve with Woodman, and I thought he was going to be running her site. That isn't really a bad thing, but his sites are mostly in French.
Then one day while brushing up on my psychology jargon, I somehow typed in Eve Angel on wikipedia and found out about the new DDF site. Gotta love being paid to search for Eve! Anyway, the site is here www.eveangeloffical dot com. Thing is, now I'm worried about it too. I remember what a mess DDF made of that Cherry Jul solo site and who can forget the ill-fated Sandy's Fantasies? I'm hoping his supposed deep love for Eve and what he calls, "A living sculpture of the perfect natural woman" will make him work harder on her site. We all know Eve can handle the daily update schedule, so fingers are crossed on this one. Also wondering if he will slap that DDF standard $35 a month on it right from the start.
Like I told badandy a few weeks ago when I found the new site, my dumbass will be there credit card in hand as soon as it opens, $35 or not. I signed up for the email updates that is on the splash coming soon page, but have only received one email so far and all it says is coming soon, spring 2009. Oh and if you haven't seen the splash page, be sure to go by and check it out, beautiful picture of Eve on her belly, side view of her butt. I would hope DDF runs with her elegant woman look she has in that one and most of her newer sets instead of trying to make her look younger.
Thanks for the tip.
|
05-29-09 10:59pm
|
Reply
663
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from turboshaft:
(Drooler's Reply)
I wish webmasters would understand that many of their members download photos to keep. I remember back in the '90s when 800 x 600 was a big photo and it took up the entire screen, or most of it. Of course, with higher res monitors being offered with better quality at lower prices, this "Why would anyone want pictures that are bigger than the screen?" argument goes out the window (or out with the smaller monitor).
I love it when material is higher quality, not simply because of better details and it shows people care about what they create, but the material can have a much longer life, even with the inevitable introduction of newer equipment. I think the "Why would anyone want more?" question is always regretted given enough time, especially with technology.
Though I do wish quite a few sites would improve photos, as well as videos (and I am not talking purely about technical aspects or either category), I would like to see some more innovation. This partially crosses over with the exclusivity choice, but I am so tired of seeing the same models on multiple sites doing pretty much the same thing, in the same settings, and often captured with the same equipment. For me this leaves the first four choices properly satisfied to the point where I hope for some creativity and unique content on the part of the webmasters and producers -- and they don't even have to risk breaking the laws or hurting some poor model's feelings to do it.
|
05-28-09 09:36pm
|
Reply
664
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(Drooler's Reply)
I'm more soft core than hard core. If the girl is attractive enough, I don't mind looking thru a "taking nothing off" photo set.
I was just looking thru some photo sets I downloaded from Teen Stars Magazine years ago. Isabella, Maria, Nicole and Rebecca are some of the models I can look at, whether they are nude or not. They are just good-to-great looking girls. Their photo sets are also at My Precious Virgins, where they also have the same names as at Teen Stars Magazine. It's easier when you don't have to list a model under different names, like you sometimes have to do at met-art.
And even tho the photo sets are not as high quality or artistic or artsy as the met-art photos, I can enjoy the photos of these girls as much as the met-art photo sets. Simple can be nice, for a change.
Sometimes I find myself almost drooling over some of these girls. I have to remember to keep my mouth closed. Lol.
|
05-26-09 05:08pm
|
Reply
665
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from ksauz:
Hello!
It seems there has been no update since few weeks or may be months...
|
05-26-09 01:15am
|
Reply
666
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler: "BTW I don't have an organization issue because I do it by model name --> source --> name of video or gallery. It's the last piece there that gets the treatment every long once in a while. Some titles just need ... help!"
I do the same. The model name gets adds at the end of the name, occasionally, such as (!!!), (.)(.) or ??? [when I think the name provided by the source is inaccurate]
The source is never altered.
The file name is where I use a touch of originality if the title from the source is not descriptive, but I try to be descriptive, not humorous...unless I can be descriptive and humorous at the same time.
|
05-23-09 12:09pm
|
Reply
667
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Wittyguy:
(Drooler's Reply)
Of course we're all holding our breath ... when's the last time you smelled nasty dog drool breath ;)
|
05-22-09 02:10pm
|
Reply
668
|
Spears Fever
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler,
I checked out the review you posted on the previous version of this site, thanks for the tip of it switching to this new name. I had cheated on TBP a little and read Rabbit's Review of it, it looks like they didn't carry all of the content over from the original version that you reviewed. Rabbit has the numbers as 19 pic sets, 11 videos, review date was May 2008, but Rabbit has the site listed as updating twice per week. That makes me skeptical since I'm wondering if they are just releasing the content they removed from the original version of the site as new content. Oh and the genre at Rabbit's is listed as "Fetish". So I guess it is going to be mostly these strange settings and sets that the previews show.
I think that one listed update that has her in the Blue Nike bikini is the one thing pulling me back ha ha. What a stomach and curves in that one! I just noticed that it says "65 updates and counting" I didn't understand the whole reason though for only 30 photos per update that Rabbit lists, that is a terribly small set of pictures. Thanks for the info on the original version.
|
05-21-09 12:38am
|
Reply
669
|
Stunners
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Well, well, well - your're absolutly right about your doubts of exclusive stuff at Stunners...
Just spend some time browsing again - AND browsing Twistys (for one) ... and some of those fine videos I thought COULD be exclusive - they are at Twistys too (how did I miss them)
Like you say they (Stunners) do probably NOT produce any stuff themselves. Still some of the bonus-sites are ok.
|
05-19-09 05:44am
|
Reply
670
|
Finest Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from LawrenceG:
Hay Drooler,
Thank you for the review. We've just recently launched the new version and thanks to your review, we have corrected some bugs including a new image viewing system. We didn't realize our Java viewer couldn't allow saving of individual images so we removed it entirely and created a new viewer from scratch. You may now download images individually or the entire gallery via .zip file in multiple image resolutions when available.
Also, I wanted to clarify the reason why there are some galleries that are still at 1024 only resolution. Those were our updates pre-2006. During that time, we only edited images at that resolution. Updates post-2006 we edited images at higher resolutions. It would be time consuming to go back in the past and re-edit those galleries into 4256 sizes. But rest assured, everything released now (on a daily basis) are available at high resolution.
We have worked hard on the members revamp. It's a big difference now from the past. We've recompiled everything to include flash video, multiple wmv resolutions, and even to make them ipod compatible.
We are still the same company. No change of ownership. If you have any further suggestions, we'd be more than happy to hear them!
Thanks again!
-Lawrence
|
05-18-09 01:30pm
|
Reply
671
|
Stunners
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler
Been spending a couple of hours going through some of the content - including bonus-sites...
Guess your right about the exclusive - STILL: I never saw those three videos here with Jana Cova anywhere else (the videos where she speaks to the viewer) - been at Babelicious and Sexy Babes quite recently - but did not catch those videos..
And there are some clips with Sophia Lynn, Nikki Cane, Sandy Sweet - and even some with Charlie Laine and Capri Anderson - that I have not seen before - they all have this dirty talk - so: Have you got any idea where else those videos can be seen - in that case I'd have to skip my guess about even "some" exclusives.
Cheers bro....
|
05-18-09 05:09am
|
Reply
672
|
Stunners
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Babelicious posts pix 5 days a week (daily except Weds & Fri) and one video clip on Weds and Fri.
SexyBabes.TV posts pix 5 days a week (Mon thru Fri) and a video clip on Saturday.
I am now a member of New Sensations and am OK with that site but not thrilled. That's really the main reason I've been reluctant to sign up with Stunners.
But if Stunners updates twice or more per day, I think I'm going to give that site a try. Their preview site is superb and if you and Denner are this positive about that site, there's no reason to wait any longer.
|
05-17-09 01:19pm
|
Reply
673
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
Notice this comment from the Drooler - especially present AND former "fans" of Pier999 - this user is/was one.
Once a fine site - today it seems like they do not give a damn about providing updates for members. And BTW: The video-updates are - again - misserable....
|
05-17-09 06:20am
|
Reply
674
|
Rookie Babe
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Khan:
I passed this on to the TBP Editors (thanks) and they've now updated our listing.
BTW, they said they got the trial option to work ok so you may want to give it another try.
|
05-16-09 09:57am
|
Reply
675
|
Karlie Montana
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(Drooler's Reply)
As I said, I got the feeling not much care was put into this site's design. Regardless, if Karlie Montana made regular use of the features at hand, fans of hers would get their money's worth.
For instance, that exact content engine is used at Jessica Drake but jessica drake seems to be working on her site several times a day (blogs, travel pictures, comments, Wicked Pictures movie stills or whatever). The site is as ugly, cumbersome and download-unfriendly as this one but her fans have good reasons to check in on a daily basis.
In any case, I'd still recommend the trial to Karlie Montana to anyone who's had a thing for the model at some point; I feel her "nutty" personality is one of her main appeals and it shows a lot here.
|
05-12-09 11:26am
|
