| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
551
|
Smooth Skinned Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from guhe:
well...you may be right about problems with login to the site, i also had them but finally it got fixed, i even got reply from the site, i guess the problem was with verotel as i got mail from them at the sign up time saying was impossible to join those sites.
from my point of view, these 2 sites are fine...exclusive content, updates, great pov gonzo action, i also think video quality is enough, videos are quite fine. .....you name a site with these ingredients which is worth to join...nowadays most of the hardcore sites are the same boring shit.
|
09-05-09 11:39pm
|
Reply
552
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Capn:
(Drooler's Reply)
Have you seen the ATK Archive site?
I have been a member there for a while.
There is a lot ot sort through though :0/
|
09-05-09 05:25pm
|
Reply
553
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from nutcrackr:
(Drooler's Reply)
Just an update. I've been a member of this site for about a year now and I visit it even less than I was when I posted this review. When I do visit sometimes I open up some sets but am usually pretty disappointed by the content.
In a recent video of the Mexico Shoot Hegre talked about photography and what his aims where. He talked about playboy being so fake and something he hated and wanted to produce something much more real.
I'm not sure how his thoughts align with the sets that feature a bland monotone backgrounds, fetish items and sterile poses. If anything I can't help by think some of the sets are just like a portfolio, surely the audience wants something more engaging?
I haven't changed my mind, I won't be renewing my subscription. I only hope Anna S makes more sets at Met-Art and less at Hegre-Art ;)
Keep in mind I still think his photo quality is very good, clean, crisp. It's just what's in the photos that I find pretty ordinary.
|
09-04-09 03:14am
|
Reply
554
|
Babes.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey "twin" (some jokes come easy)
Actually I had it just the other way around: Using the models pages - I got the "Not Found" - but trying the calender it was - a bit better.
Still: It's no way to run/manage an almost major site...
Cheers!!!!
|
09-02-09 06:10am
|
Reply
555
|
Private.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(Drooler's Reply)
Perhaps they want to keep there collection private. DRM is a great way to end up having your sign up page far the most part private. Better off to go to a titty bar than a DRM site. Both make you rely on memory, but at least at the titty bar they were real.
|
09-01-09 09:05pm
|
Reply
556
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Well, Bro...joined Teenmodels - and from this user to another:
THANKS!
Just like you said.
Spending a fine time browsing and also browsing the "naughty" section - which is NOT bad at all.
And the motherload here at Teenmodels is just what I've been looking for - GREAT videos - (and great photosets,too)
BTW: I also gave an answer to Andreas of MCN - see it, if you like...
|
08-31-09 05:43am
|
Reply
557
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Andreas:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hello Drooler,
thank you for your statement.
First let me the point that it's nearly impossible to hit anybodies taste with every release.
1. We have a lot of visitors, who exactly welcome this absence of ligtht. They say it has more imaginative power compared to a fully exposed girl. Unless these proponents we keep the level for this kind of sets to a minimum. The rare amount of sets like that shouldn't be a problem at all?
2. Is this something you only realised on MCN or is this a general problem. I have already passed this to our QA. We will discuss this for future prevention.
3. We have to check ourselves if the accumulation of "distanced" sets has been accumulated over the last periods. I personally agree with you, that distanced girls have a another kind of attraction that does not appeal to anybody.
Just to clear it out, in case of approval we will definetly change it real soon again.
Anybody is free to contact me in case of additional suggestions, questions, critics or praise. ;)
Have a nice day
Andreas
|
08-30-09 11:39pm
|
Reply
558
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
I agree with Drooler. The screaming in porn is almost as bad as the shrieking that goes on in Women's professional tennis. It's unnecessary and a ridiculous waste of energy.
|
08-30-09 01:24pm
|
Reply
559
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Andreas:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hello Drooler,
thank you for you comment but to give us the opportunity for improvement we need your critics at a constructive level.
1. Connectivity issuees
MC-Nudes have a support team ready for service. In case of trouble you should contact them first, before spreading rumors that aren't proofed.
We have to check several details like your browser, connectivity, location and so on, to see wher the problem truly occurs.
It's pretty hard to solve something we don't know about and our support team never got any mails or informations about it yet.
2. Can you send a mail to gridcom@mc-nudes.com too explain the "distance" you see on different sets. Please provide examples to get an idea of what exactly distracts you.
3. How about forwarding additional ideas for improvement, we can't handle your critics about, navigation, speed and so on without any further details.
Thanks in advance
Andreas
|
08-30-09 01:06pm
|
Reply
560
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Oh, yes....PUs and webmasters/owners of MC Nudes.
Read Droolers reply and then think about the last line:
'If the models don't seem to give a shit, why should the user?'
|
08-29-09 02:42pm
|
Reply
561
|
Kara Duhe
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from lk2fireone:
If the two sites are the same price, and you get so much more quantity at the Ron Harris site, I don't know why anyone would join the Kara Duhe if they knew about the Ron Harris site carrying the Kara Duhe photosets.
But like you mention, to be satisfied with a membership at either site, you have to like the Ron Harris style of photography. You mention that a lot of pics are nearly the same pose. What bothers me more is his glossy style of photography. I can get bored with his glossy pictures very fast, for some reason, even though he has some very attractive models. That is why a site like Met-art, with a large number of contributing photographers, is so much easier to appreciate. Met-art has a huge number of attractive models, and the photographers can present them in photos that are worth looking at. Obviously not all photosets will be equally attractive to all viewers, but there is a wide selection of styles where you can find the photosets and models that appeal to you.
|
08-28-09 07:12am
|
Reply
562
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(Drooler's Reply)
For me the actively light on my DSL modem is the same as an EKG machine, if it flat lines it is time to panic. Mine never stops, well it is not supposed to, and when it does I take care of that right away. My though has always been that I am paying a monthly fee to see that light flash and when it is not I am throwing money away.
|
08-28-09 03:14am
|
Reply
563
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
It's strange - or maybe not, Ze Dwoolah (wauw - a great new alias) - but some of "our" old sites seems to be suffering - I'm (as you know) NOT to much into the photoset-deals - but maybe it's time, again.
Because it seems like most of those good ol' sites are turning more and more to the pix-deals - and that's ok - if they just forward that message.
And not having been a member of Babelicious for 3-4 months or so, I'm annoyed by their videoclip-updates - glad I only went for the cheap 3-days deal - man, I can download those updates in an hour or so...
BTW: Do you have some new comments on one site in particular: Teen Models - never got around to join, but it looks like my next project...?
|
08-27-09 08:44am
|
Reply
564
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from turboshaft:
(Drooler's Reply)
Could not agree with Drooler more here.
I have lost count of the number of times I have read that "she's a party girl!" and "this model is crazy!" Then there is the all time classic: "this girl loves sex!" Really? My view of girls who pose nude and masturbate on camera is that they are all total prudes... Admittedly some performers look like they are having more fun than others, but really no model has to love anything in porn; she just has to give consent.
More importantly, I don't give a shit about what they really love, hate, eat, etc. since porn is pretty much total fantasy. If the bios/profiles were all accurate, I suspect I would have been too depressed after reading a few and given up porn a long time ago.
|
08-26-09 10:00pm
|
Reply
565
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(Drooler's Reply)
That's always good to hear. :)
|
08-26-09 06:15pm
|
Reply
566
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from turboshaft:
I found that 10th Anniversary deal and I am thinking of joining the herd and signing up. I have yet to be a member of any DDF site yet, so it sounds like my hard drives may have some serious spinning to do...
(I wonder if you guys will be pissed at me if I join and add to the slowness, or for not having ever been a member, or maybe even both! :) )
|
08-25-09 09:18pm
|
Reply
567
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from badandy400:
I have not had much trouble with DDFBusty loading pages. I did have issue the other day with the video downloads having a 10 second latency when queuing up. I am assuming that DDFBusty comes from the same place as 1 By Day. I have not had this problem since.
I will not condemn you for getting mad about long page loadings. To me 8 seconds is only manageable when I am loading a very large page while I am running my downloads full speed. So by all means chuck a brick at them.
Hopefully this issue gets beaten to death before too long, 1 by day is my next site after I finish DDFBusty.
|
08-24-09 10:57pm
|
Reply
568
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from pat362:
I concur and I'll add that it's so slow that I couldn't log in one day last week. It's not the only site. Last night House of Taboo was also quite slow. That's not my biggest problem. I'm actually quite diaspointed with the content on most of the sites.
|
08-24-09 06:28pm
|
Reply
569
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
With the popularity of the main site and the marketing efforts they continue to employ, All these guys need to do is to clean up their navigation and naming conventions.
I'm ready to volunteer to do the naming project.
|
08-22-09 01:00pm
|
Reply
570
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
Good point!
Maybe this site has one of the best previews - also all videos have previews.
|
08-22-09 06:11am
|
Reply
571
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Wittyguy:
Hey Drooler, I just noticed that TBP is running a cheap trial here. I was wondering if they have any B/G galleries or if its all so solo on the pics. I was also wondering about how many pics per set they have on average. Thanks.
|
08-21-09 04:12pm
|
Reply
572
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Duante Amorculo:
(Drooler's Reply)
You've made some very good points. Totally agree with you
|
08-21-09 10:36am
|
Reply
573
|
Walter Bosque Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Gabix:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks for your feedback is always great
as you might see everything is really great now....
Hope you enjoy our site
Regards
Gabriel
|
08-18-09 09:13am
|
Reply
574
|
Walter Bosque Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Gabix:
Sorry I didn't reply earlier but as I told all our users in the emails, the website was up and running until a softweare that wasn't supposed to corrupt the page did it,
any ways as you all might see everything is working pretty good now... and you didn't mention it....
Regards
Gabriel
walterbosque-art.com
|
08-18-09 09:09am
|
Reply
575
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Some web sites don't use zip files, to reduce the chance of piracy. But a web site that posts zip files that their subscribers can't open is obviously more intelligent than a non-zip web site. This way, the pirates will waste their time trying to crack the un-usable zip files, instead of trying to steal the individual photos and videos.
Not replying to emails for customer support might also be part of the piracy defense.
Some pay sites I've joined don't answer emails. I can't say what percentage, because I rarely send emails to the pay sites I join, but there have definitely been times, when I had a problem and I emailed support, that I got no reply.
I know you've had similar experiences.
The old expression, "grin and bear it", seems to apply.
|
08-16-09 08:53am
|
