Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Denner (0)  

Feedback:   All (2775)  |   Reviews (120)  |   Comments (399)  |   Replies (2256)

Other:   Replies Received (1709)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1626-1650 of 1709 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1626
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment from lk2fireone:

I guess we have been spoiled by the high quality videos and photosets that some sites offer.

X-Art and the Diesel Access network are two of my favorite glamcore sites.

The Diesel Access network now has a new membership system. I don't know what the rules are:

But I currently have access to all 14 (I think it's 14) sites in the Diesel Access network.

Plus they are now including access to Wow Girls and Wow Porn at no additional cost.

Like I say, I don't know what the rules are for gaining access to all the sites.

The webmaster posted at PU that he will explain the rules.

The new membership system went into effect about 3 days ago, and I posted a comment to that effect under 18 Only Girls.

I know you wanted access to all the sites in the Diesel Access Network, and to the 2 Wow sites as well.

Well, it finally happened.


03-11-13  08:35am

Reply
1627
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from messmer: (Denner's Reply)

Thanks, Denner. I just hope my enthusiasm doesn't lead to disappointment on your part. But I really do like Videosz better than VideoBox .. I am subscribed to both at the moment and the former appeals much more to my taste even though I don't always get what I want when it comes to the updates. Still, my niches are better represented here so that's what I go by. LOL

01-26-12  01:26pm

Reply
1628
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment from asmith12:

Wait, I didn't compare VideosZ and VideoBox - maybe VideoBox is even more "same old", I didn't try it yet.

And what I've meant when I've wrote that VideosZ is "same old" is more about the overall sad state of adult DVD industry, where 90% of the scenes look exactly the same: fade in - one guy (maybe 2) and one girl (maybe 2) are coming into the motel room - crossfade - she sucks him - crossfade - they're fucking - crossfade - position change - crossfade - he's masturbating to cum on her face - fade out. IMHO, best www sites (and especially networks) currently provide MUCH better variety then average DVD stuff which is all over VideosZ (yes, you can find something good on VideosZ too, but it takes time and effort, and unfortunately there isn't enough of it there).


06-24-09  06:14am

Reply
1629
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment from jd1961:

They are a lot better Denner. I was surprised. I only wish they had the video editor as Videobox does.

06-23-09  06:21pm

Reply
1630
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(0)
Reply of Denner's Review from james4096:

This is a good review by Denner. This site is a really good site and is worth joining at least once.
If you liked videobox you'll like videosz.


03-24-09  02:38pm

Reply
1631
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(0)
Reply of Denner's Review from messmer:

Hey, Denner, great review and quite accurate. I subscribed to this site on the strength of your comments and am not disappointed, except for one thing: I find the mp4 files to be no great improvement over the usual wmv files in other video archives. They all come out pale and colorless with none of the "crispness" I normally get with this format. I also think that avi (dvx) is a poor choice for a default format, but I suppose that it has its advantages for many people.

03-24-09  11:08am

Reply
1632
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(0)
Reply of Denner's Review from TrashMan:

How did you go this long without reviewing VideosZ?

03-18-09  04:01pm

Reply
1633
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from Tree Rodent: (Denner's Reply)

Just read it. Thanks Denner I really appreciate it, especially as you are one of the most objective members here, and one who's opinion I always valued, even before I was a member.

03-18-09  12:17pm

Reply
1634
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Tree Rodent: (Denner's Reply)

Thanks Denner. Will do.

03-18-09  11:43am

Reply
1635
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(0)
Reply of Denner's Review from Tree Rodent:

Great review Denner. I was thinking of joining this one as I refuse to joing Video Box or New Sensations because of regional discrimination. I would rather pay more for this site than be insulted by Video Box's higher price for Europeans. VideosZ sounds like a really good site. That review has sort of settled it as far as I'm concerend. Your review was very timely, so I think this will be my next site to join.

03-18-09  11:01am

Reply
1636
Visit Vintage Flash

Vintage Flash
(0)
REPLY TO #17 from messmer: (Denner's Reply)

Me, too, Denner. I have missed our talks!

06-20-12  10:44am

Reply
1637
Visit Vintage Flash

Vintage Flash
(0)
REPLY TO #15 from messmer: (Denner's Reply)

Hi, friend Denner. Actually I subscribed (and had a review) to this site before. I was just giving it enough time to acquire some more material. It IS my kind of site. As a matter of fact it is the only one I found so far that matches my taste almost exactly. And thanks for the positive comment.

06-20-12  09:42am

Reply
1638
Visit Vintage Flash

Vintage Flash
(0)
REPLY TO #10 from messmer: (Denner's Reply)

Anything / anyone my pal Denner likes must be good. I'll have a look at Michelle Thorne and see if our tastes are alike in this instance. :-)

12-06-10  01:41pm

Reply
1639
Visit Vintage Flash

Vintage Flash
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from messmer: (Denner's Reply)

Hi Denner, you did well in recommending this site to me. I enjoy it very much because it gives me exactly the models in vintage lingerie I was looking for. I think yesterday's poor download speed must have been a temporary blip somewhere because last night's speeds were fine. I had assumed it might have been because it was during European "prime time" but if the server is not located in Europe then it must have been a glitch somewhere. I think I will adjust my score upward a bit based on that fact.

12-06-10  09:35am

Reply
1640
Visit Vintage Flash

Vintage Flash
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from messmer: (Denner's Reply)

Thanks, Denner, much obliged!

07-24-09  09:36am

Reply
1641
Visit Vintage Flash

Vintage Flash
(0)
Reply of Denner's Review from messmer:

Thanks for a great review, Denner. Sounds like my kind of site. Could you make a rough guess on how many videos are in 1024x760 format? And when it comes to the next level of quality down (640x480) how "crisp" is the picture. In other words how well would a video like that do in full screen? (21.5")? Thanks.

07-23-09  10:14am

Reply
1642
Visit Vintage Flash

Vintage Flash
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment from james4096:

Looking forward to that review. I joined a long time ago but I don't remember much about it.

07-12-09  09:42am

Reply
1643
Visit Virtual Models

Virtual Models
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from Drooler: (Denner's Reply)

Thanks. You never know when a page could get an "infection," so to speak. Like I've been waiting for Sage Style to finally get his website going. It had been promoted, by way of enticing example, on Mindy Vega's site, but it never seemed quite ready.

Then one day I went and immediately a Trojan was caught by my antivirus and I never went back.

And the site has very little to show for the time it's been online. I've deleted the bookmark for it.


02-18-08  02:41pm

Reply
1644
Visit Viv Thomas

Viv Thomas
(0)
REPLY TO #8 from tangub: (Denner's Reply)

Denner there are currently 253 vids with an HD option on the site, doing a quick count up i found 106 with the HD WMV option, as far as i can tell everything released in HD since December 2010 has had the MP4 option.

11-18-11  08:00am

Reply
1645
Visit Viv Thomas

Viv Thomas
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from rearadmiral: (Denner's Reply)

Yes. It was pretty rare to see an HD scene in wmv format. I didn't download a lot from this site, but I only managed to get one HD scene in wmv. Most of them are mp4 and it looks like all new HD material is mp4 only.

Maybe tangub can add to this as he's got a membership here too.


11-18-11  05:47am

Reply
1646
Visit Viv Thomas

Viv Thomas
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from rearadmiral: (Denner's Reply)

Thanks Denner. I appreciate your comments.

As for wmv HD, it really looks like they've decided that HD material will be in mp4 only. Those of us who prefer wmv are out of luck.


11-18-11  03:58am

Reply
1647
Visit Viv Thomas

Viv Thomas
(0)
REPLY TO #11 from Cybertoad: (Denner's Reply)


Hmmm I will have to join up Teen Dreams, but the ones at http://www.vivthomas.com/home.php seemed good quality to my old eyes LOL.


09-21-11  01:16pm

Reply
1648
Visit Viv Thomas

Viv Thomas
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from Nick Spillum: (Denner's Reply)

Hi Denner, yes the main difference is in quality. All our scenes are available to download without DRM as CyberToad mentioned in 720p - currently 239 full scenes: http://www.vivthomas.com/videoByCategory.php/26/HD

09-21-11  06:57am

Reply
1649
Visit Voyeur Russian

Voyeur Russian
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from WeeWillyWinky: (Denner's Reply)

I was a member here twice, I think, and enjoyed it both times. I ended up deleting the videos I took both times over worries whether the material was actually contrived or not. If it's real, it can't be legal, if it's legal, it can't be real, right? Or am I wrong? From my reading, I believe that candid public material is still legal, but material shot in a private setting - or a public place where privacy is expected - without the knowledge and consent of the subject, is not legal, nor should it be. The WC vids would most certainly be illegal if they were genuine, nor could I feel comfortable watching them even if it were legal to do so. If I could know for sure that it was all contrived and set-up I'd probably go back with a clearer conscience.

I've heard it many times that these kind of sites feature contrived videos, even though the site owners claim that they are real. However, I was a member at one of these voyeur sites and one vid which was set in an asian public bath-house had a small child in it, who was blurred. If this was contrived, why would there be a child present? There were also a few elderly people who I can't imagine would want to participate in such material. I emailed the webmaster at said site and he would only insist that the material was legal, but would not concede that it was contrived.


01-04-10  03:03pm

Reply
1650
Visit Walter Bosque Art

Walter Bosque Art
(0)
REPLY TO #10 from Drooler: (Denner's Reply)

That's interesting. The part I don't get is that it was "scrambling" to find a new upstream processor after its contract with the current one expired. That sounds like somebody "forgot" something that was, well, kinda important. ;)

That's when defecation impacted the rotary oscillator (i.e., the shit hit the fan).

BTW: by "the alternative," of course I meant NO PORN :-(


12-09-08  11:59pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1626-1650 of 1709 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2026 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.67 seconds.