| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1226
|
Playboy's Fresh Faces
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Khan:
|
11-30-07 07:34pm
|
Reply
1227
|
Porn Access
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Denner's Reply)
Merriam-Webster Dictionary: stinger, one that stings.
"Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee," quote by Muhammad Ali.
Stinger sounds like a wannabe boxer/fighter. But as the great one also said, "My toughest fight was with my first wife."
So how good is Stinger in a clinch?
My guess is Vegas Ken and Stinger are 2 separate people. Vegas Ken is just passing along the news of the special $5 membership offer that Stinger (from Porn Access) is telling us about.
If you were just making a joke, sorry, sometimes I can be kind of slow on the uptake.
|
04-25-09 10:57am
|
Reply
1228
|
Porn Access
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from lurifax:
Having months of experience of both Porn Access and Videobox, you got me mightily confused in your comparison of the two...
I would not even mention the two in the same context, as Videobox is vastly superior to the other.
By all means, take an other month to look at Porn Access...
...after which you may revalue your opinion.
In a separate comment to the site I have accounted for a number of let-downs, which, taken together, explains my opinion about your 'review'.
|
07-23-07 11:05am
|
Reply
1229
|
Porn Access
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from turismo:
I agree with that review, its decent enough but if you have been a memebr of Videobox or pornstar XS (both of which are better) you would be struggling to find much new material here
|
05-09-07 01:45pm
|
Reply
1230
|
Porn Films 3D
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from andrewsc:
(Denner's Reply)
We didn't convert our videos from 2D into 3D but filmed them in 3D right away.
|
08-01-13 12:02am
|
Reply
1231
|
Porn Films 3D
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from anyonebutme:
What do you mean "How?"
3D is two viewing angles combined into one picture. If you view just one of the angles, then you have your 2D.
There are also algorithms that will detect edges and their lines of perspectives and convert 2D images to 3D - it's an estimation, don't expect perfect accuracy.
|
02-16-11 08:47pm
|
Reply
1232
|
Porn Pass For All
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from ace of aces:
(Denner's Reply)
my dl manager was cost free ^^ maybe that`s the reason why yours is better -.- you don`t use a dl manager today?
..it was not really banning, it was more "like we changed youre password because of..." ^^
|
11-15-07 03:49am
|
Reply
1233
|
Porn Pass For All
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ace of aces:
(Denner's Reply)
thank you denner...and because of the great review the administrator of that page banned me :o)..no a joke..he gave me a new password...as is said so..the login system is awful.
i use the download accelerator plus, which one do you use ?
idm=?
|
11-14-07 01:13pm
|
Reply
1234
|
Pornstar XS
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from roseman:
Thanks for the info Denner
|
04-04-07 09:22am
|
Reply
1235
|
Pornstar XS
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from turismo:
Thanks for the heads up on the site it does look pretty good
|
04-03-07 07:31am
|
Reply
1236
|
Pretty 4ever
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from Drooler:
I second the comment about cutting off the top of the girl's head, her arms, part of an ass cheek, etc. For God's sake, the photos go up to 3456px, so all of the girl can be in a shot. No need to get so damned space-efficient that we have to chop away at the subject with a photo editor.
But there's one exception: legs from the upper thighs down can be cut off in those shots where the girl presents her lovely behind -- without her hands grabbing it in every shot. And please have her looking at the camera! I hate it when they look uninterested.
Technically, this comment's for you Denner, but I want photographers and content editors to read this, too.
Thanks for the review; it presents the important info in concise form.
|
08-18-07 04:42am
|
Reply
1237
|
Prime Cups
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ace of aces:
(Denner's Reply)
congrats to youre last badge :o)
you are right in saying that all the sites from them looks realy the same, but i scored only that site, and belive me, the quality and the content is good. if you are member of the other sites of that company, you are right in saying it bores. same models, same procedure... but regarding only that site... ^^
and one last word...i can`t understand that there is so less trust voting in our comunity. i always try to vote five members a week...it also gives a ticket ;)..therfore it was a nice gesture from khan ..
|
06-15-08 09:33am
|
Reply
1238
|
Prime Cups
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from badandy400:
(Denner's Reply)
I would say that a 20 minute scene should be around 500 MB, 200 can be getting pixelly when they movie fast. Of course this only counts if the original and the compression method are good.
There is a certain appeal to the 8 MBit video though. It does look great, but unless you are going to spend good money on a system to store and play it loses its appeal. Brooke Sky has some 8 MBit video that looks wonderful as well.
Personally I do not worry about file size too much, but I can see many people fretting over 2 GB per scene. Unless you want to start dropping $100 for 500 GB drives you are not going to be able to keep very many of these 2 GB'ers on hand. But on the bright side, at least it is not at Blu-Ray Bit rate!
|
04-02-08 08:43pm
|
Reply
1239
|
Prime Cups
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from badandy400:
(Denner's Reply)
It didn't sound like they cared about downloading so much as getting people's complaints about the stream being jittery. What the webmaster said makes perfect sense to me.
But, Denner, I do have to agree that 1980x1080 is not absolutely necessary. Many people have great looking videos at a fraction of the file size. InFocusGirls and ALS for example, they both have great looking videos at 400-800 MB depending on length, granted they are usually shorter. Good a 2 MBit video with great filtering can look better than a n average 6 MBit video, and be that much smaller in size saving us and the webmasters both space and bandwidth.
Consider, 2.5 GB at 8 MBit/s would be just shy of 42 minutes long. At 4 MBit/s the same video would be 1.25 GB, obviously. InFocusGirls uses that bitrate, although the resolution is 1280x720, they still look great. Plus those videos play easier. Not everyone can use a high end computer for porn watching. I would say for them to keep that in mind when posting new videos. Perhaps posting both sizes would be the thing to do. I am not a member currently, so I can not say if they do that or not.
|
04-02-08 02:03pm
|
Reply
1240
|
Private Worlds
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Yeah, this site has some nice content, but it's really pokey going from one ... page ... to ... the ... the ... next. It's like you'd better get yourself your favorite coffee, then click, slip, and savor a while! ... Ah! Finally!
|
05-14-11 09:15am
|
Reply
1241
|
Private.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd1961:
(Denner's Reply)
I'm sorry I should make this clear---I consider DRM to be spyware. That is when you play one of those videos, the DRM is being used to restrict individuals' use of their own copies of published works. To enforce these restrictions, DRM software must monitor and control a computer users' behavior. Frequently it reports on what it sees. That's by definition spyware. This is why these sites must be boycotted, given an automatic 20 points off in reviews, and brought to the attention of everyone. These sites must be made to suffer financially, even to the point of ruin. This site, Private, which produces quality porn, has for years overcharged on their product. They were one of the first companies to go online. But they do not deliver for the money. Imagine going to a bookstore and buying a book and taking it home to read it. But to open it, you must call the bookstore, and get their permission!
|
12-08-07 03:14pm
|
Reply
1242
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks for the comments, Denner. I like a lot of the European public nudity and flashing sites too, but Public Flash is quite different. Many European countries seem to have a more relaxed attitude to sexuality so those sites can get away with more than those in the U.S. With Public Flash, they show less nudity than the European sites but are in a real way more daring because of the risks involved. One thing I like about Public Flash site is that they show the set-up and you get a sense of how much fun the model is having and how excited she is at being 'naughty.' That element is missing from many of the European sites that simply have a nude woman walk naked down a main street. The American site Nude in L.A. is a lot like the European sites in that they do full nudity on the streets of Los Angeles, but they don't show the preparation and the nervousness. It all seems rather clinical.
One other site I'd recommend is FTV Girls. This is a well known site that doesn't market itself as a public nudity or flashing site but that has some great public stuff. All of the models are stunning, and most do some public stuff before going indoors for full nudity and masturbation. If you're a fan of public nudity and flashing and haven't been a memeber of FTV Girls yet I'd recommend considering that too.
|
11-26-10 03:39pm
|
Reply
1243
|
Pure Beauty Magazine
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Sorry, but I can't help on the videos. I'm a pics guy, or HQ hardcore vids, so I haven't even bothered with the (softcore) vids on those two sites.
|
05-28-07 08:36am
|
Reply
1244
|
Pure Beauty Magazine
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Hey, Denner,
Thanks for the response. Since you're into teen sites, you might check out Teen-Charms. You can get a month's subscription to that one and teenstarsmagazine, both, for 29.99. There's loads of pics and teen-charms has switched to doing nothing but videos for a month or two.
Gotta warn you that the sites can be rather disorganized in places, but for volume of exclusive content (pics often at 2048 or higher), lovely girls (mostly), and some very nice ass shots (when they're not blurry or too dark), it might be worth your while.
BTW: You have to download zips from a model's page. There's no link when you're in a gallery.
|
05-28-07 07:34am
|
Reply
1245
|
Querro
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from shroom:
I was the one who asked that site to be listed here.
It was on my subscribe list, mostly because of its Femjoy look'n feel and because I had some hopes for their vids.
I can't write a proper review right now, but it's an average site, at least for me. I'd rate it 65/70. Not that it's bad, but there's nothing outstanding here.
Too much Photoshop on some pics.
Not enough vids and they're not that good, too amateurish.
It's a one year old site, with a regular update (a vid or a pics' set) once every two days (usually). So don't expect a lot of content.
In the end, that's just another softcore site.
|
10-05-10 04:25pm
|
Reply
1246
|
Querro
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I'm not a member, but your summary seems accurate.
The site seems similar to Met-art or MPL Studios.
The site has some cute models, that are new to me.
I've seen some of the photosets from this site, and the photosets could just as easily have been posted at Met-art, MPL Studios, Femjoy, or any other top line softcore teen site.
The reason to join would be because you haven't seen the models/photosets elsewhere.
But this is a much smaller site than the mega-sites I mentioned.
Edit01: A few of the models have appeared at other softcore mega-sites.
But I do believe the content is exclusive to this site.
|
08-25-10 09:52am
|
Reply
1247
|
Rascal Dog
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from mbaya:
I am not at all familiar with Foxes. Could you help me out with more information about what you are referring to?
|
01-17-10 02:27am
|
Reply
1248
|
Rascal Dog
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from jd1961:
That's what you deserve for going to the Euro!
Just a joke!
|
11-28-09 11:25pm
|
Reply
1249
|
Rascal Dog
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Capn:
Quite agree. CCBill seems very prone to doing this! :0E
|
11-28-09 01:57pm
|
Reply
1250
|
Rascal Dog
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from james4096:
(Denner's Reply)
No prob.
She has 4 vids:
Frisky Pixie
Fine Butt in Mirror
Boobie Slinger
White Hot 100 Video
Also 4 photosets.
|
11-17-09 03:11pm
|
