| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1026
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Yes, MetArt's pretty much the sine qua non for pics. I've been scrounging about, too. Just did a trial of PaulMarkhamTeens. Went through 7 months of old, recycled (but freshly dated!) content. Talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel! Had to take a 4-hour nap after that. Gettin' old! ;)
Hey, have you checked out the new Rookie Babes? It's in its Grand Reopening (or should I say "Gland Reopening") with big sized, exclusive pics.
|
06-13-09 12:57pm
|
Reply
1027
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
I haven't been to AmourAngels since mid-March. I was actually very disappointed, too. Maybe the vids would have been good (?). I also tried to find Kristi at both AA and MyPrecious, but couldn't. Sorry.
|
06-13-09 08:50am
|
Reply
1028
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
Hey Denner,
Believe it or not but I'm a current member. ;)
The big problem is that they only show the current and next update, but there's no archive of updates per se.
So as a member you have to keep checking back every day -- which might not be a problem. But as a returning member, you have to check the archives of many of the models to see which ones got updates, AND have filed the ones from your last visit by the set numbers (e.g., Portia 01) or know when you last quit.
And the zips are colossal while the server is pokey. It's like loading up a mule with 300 pounds of gold bars. Tsk-tsk! Yah!!
These days, at least, they've been doing the photo updates on closer to a daily basis. Used to be more hit-and-miss. And the models are pretty darn hot. My favorite, I think, is Shaina. The most recent set of here is, well, DAMN!!!
But their Erica, who just updated today (aka Angelica, etc. etc.) is a really cute one, too. ETC.
Have fun!
|
06-11-09 12:49pm
|
Reply
1029
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment from Denner:
A follow-up - just joined.
First impression:
Still some great teens with exclusive photosets
Site/Browsing very disorganized (only model-search in sitemap without photos, only names (who can remember all those?)
Video-files divided (for most) - and VERY large.
Also some very large zip-files for photo-sets - came across one that was 592 MB!!!! - for a zip-file!!!!
Be back with a review
|
06-11-09 07:13am
|
Reply
1030
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Yes, the timeout is annoying. Can't quit the page without being VERY quick on the draw with the old click-cancel-control-w maneuver; the login box just keeps popping back up! It takes a few "practice" tries before I finally get the slight of hand within the acceptable range of milliseconds!
Our "Helen," the boy-next-door's babe of naughty dreams, is starting to show up, but so far there's only one set.
I'm not sure but I think they might have just added more girls in the middle areas of the updates. I just discovered "Yolka," as she's known at JustTeenSite, as "Leisha." Cool yet smoldering, and a very nice butt!
|
10-15-07 12:07pm
|
Reply
1031
|
My Sexy Kittens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Oh, yeah, that nonsense: You have to rename the pic files yourself, so you're not only clicking, right-clicking and saving, but having to keep track of file names as you go and type each one. Jeez. I HATE that. Hey, we're porn hounds; we're not secretaries!
|
03-16-09 12:56pm
|
Reply
1032
|
My Sexy Kittens
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from Drooler:
Hey thanks, Denner, for this review. I'd joined this thing over three years ago. Blew some of my "Christmas money" on it! Hard to believe that I'm over 50 and Mom still sends me Christmas money. (She'd probably stop if she knew this! But she'd still send cookies.)
Anyway, I only got a short handful of galleries and the damn pics weren't even 1200px! AND I had to cherry pic each shot, being woefully ignorant then of the charms of download managers. So I said, "Screw this," and never went back. I mean, I really got fucked good. And I never did a review because it was in The Year 2 B.P.U. (the 2nd year Before Porn Users).
And still no zip files? And still that crappy navigation? (I still have fleeting memories myself of roasting synapses and a rigid wrist.)
This site must be someone's cash cow. Moo!
(BANG!)
|
03-15-09 05:42pm
|
Reply
1033
|
My Teen Video
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from slutty:
How regularly are they updating these days? It was pretty spotty when I was a member a year or so ago. Sorry to hear the camera work is still shitty, its always a pitty when a scene with a really attractive lady is ruined by the cameraman.
|
01-27-10 02:42pm
|
Reply
1034
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(Denner's Reply)
Denner, hadn't noticed your reply until now. That is strange, the yellow thing wasn't flashing at the top of the screen. I have been a big fan of Mya's site. I still am NOT that big of a fan of Mya herself. I like women who smile more, laugh some, like Eve is. Mya does have a great body though. Now, if they moved Eve's friends to Mya's site and Mya's friends to Eve's site. Eve's site would have a 99 from me. Plus, I really like the General Entertainment sites, I like sites that let me use a download manager for one thing. Thanks for the reply!
|
05-15-07 11:46pm
|
Reply
1035
|
Mystique Magazine
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from jd1961:
(Denner's Reply)
Yeah, you know the porn shops around here still sell used (rented) DVD's for $40-$45. They treat the customer like a pusher treats a junkie.
|
12-05-07 06:22pm
|
Reply
1036
|
Naked Novices
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from ramscrota:
I agree, Denner. The site's a total dog. It's good we have this forum to give some of these sites the reviews they deserve.
|
12-30-08 07:19pm
|
Reply
1037
|
Naked Novices
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from Jay G:
As usual, I appreciate and enjoy your reviews. This one seems to be another example of how higher-priced sites generally are of far less quality than medium (or even lower) priced sites and networks.
Has your experience shown you this also? The few times I've paid for higher priced sites have ALWAYS been a disappointment. Seems webmasters that charge a higher price are relying on us when we are hungover or just being stupid, and are not really interested in large audiences for quality work. The quick buck from a few is preferred to lots of customers.
Thanks again for the heads up.
|
09-25-07 06:46am
|
Reply
1038
|
Nasty 19
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from Hardcore J:
Denner -
Thanks for taking the time to review Nasty 19. I'm sorry to hear you weren't satisfied but it is true that we have only some exclusive content.
If you're looking for exclusive stuff I'd suggest trying out https://www.pornusers.com/review/123laceypink/ - she's 100% exclusive to us! :)
|
05-01-07 07:51pm
|
Reply
1039
|
Nasty Czech Chicks
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from nccsite:
Hello,
we are very very sorry, the new hardcoe update is ready to be added as announced, unfortunately we are experiencing technical difficulties with our provider and since it was New Year holiday we were not able to resolve this issue as quickly as we would normally due. We should be back on track tomorrow. We many updates ready and let me say we are trying to improve the quality of our videos as well, you probably noticed we are shooting the newest videos in HD.
Also better resolutions of photos will be added soon, and not only with new photoset but many already released sets will be published again in higher resolution.
Again very sorry for what happened with the speed of our sites :(
----
And hey Denner, please contact me to our support email privately, we will send you something to make up this inconvenience :-)
|
01-01-08 02:28pm
|
Reply
1040
|
Nasty Czech Chicks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Okey-dokey. Thanks again!
|
01-01-08 11:58am
|
Reply
1041
|
Nasty Czech Chicks
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
Hey Denner,
Welcome back and Happy New Year! Was wondering where you'd run off to.
Thanks for the "heads" up on this site. I just tried and speaking of nada, all got was a plain white screen. Maybe the site is in "sleep" mode or something.
TBP said it's all exclusive and "hi-rez" pics. If you can, could you give me your opinion about the "exclusive" part and what the maximum pic sizes are? Muchos gracias.
|
01-01-08 10:05am
|
Reply
1042
|
Natalia Spice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from tjpacinonetwork:
(Denner's Reply)
Hey Denner,
Natalia Spice is actually shot by the same photographer that shot Karla. So her videos will be like her newer stuff video wise. It's very clear and vibrant. If you want a sample, just check out her sample on her tour and video page :) Also members can either download her videos or stream it in members. Just for future reference, PacinosAdventures.com video quality is a lot better now as well. The milky effect was only from our older videos that we shot years ago back when we opened the site. The site has been online for a few years with better quality. Thanks!
|
04-02-11 10:31pm
|
Reply
1043
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(Denner's Reply)
N/A and Brazzers are on my 'Not Again' list as well.
Primarily because of the fake boobs! :-)
|
07-13-10 07:43pm
|
Reply
1044
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from hodayathink:
Did you try the Ass Masterpiece scenes? I'm pretty sure each one of those has a tease before the start of the actual fucking/sucking (they may not all have full nudity, though). As for everything else, it's hard to do a tease when you're trying to do scenario-based porn. What pseudo-real life sexual situations can you think of where the girl stands there naked for a minute or two before getting down to business?
|
05-08-09 12:44am
|
Reply
1045
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from GCode:
Hey Denner,
Yeah I remember when I was a member the content all got very stale after seeing a bit of the content. Everything just blended together, even during the fact that they were trying to make storylines in the scenes as well. I think it's a great place to get a few of your favorite models content within the different sites than move along. If you continue watching a large amount of the content, you will have a hard time not realizing that you are not watching the same scene over and over after awhile.
|
05-07-09 08:38pm
|
Reply
1046
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from james4096:
I agree with you. It's really not a top site.
The strange thing is if I recall correctly they have women write the scenes. Not what you might expect.
I've been a member before, but joined back just to see the new scenes with Maya Divine.
|
05-06-09 11:09am
|
Reply
1047
|
Naughty Euro Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Yes, it looks like one of those run-of-the-mill "your waste is our reward" sites.
|
09-07-10 11:34am
|
Reply
1048
|
Naughty Girl Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from exotics4me:
Hey Denner,
I've been considering joining this site, but now think I may hold off another month or so. The amount of content wouldn't be too bad if they were updating more, but I had seen another review that said updates are not very consistent on the site. I know she has been on Twisty's, but I don't remember if she had any videos on it. Thanks for the honest review!
|
06-03-07 03:15pm
|
Reply
1049
|
Naughty Julie
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from HonestJoe:
Actually most of those videos you are seeing as 'new' are even older than 2006. Many of them go back as far as 2004 and are from her old site juliesxxx.com
What happened is that Julie has retired from shooting new material (the last actual 'new' scene of her, with her current brunette hairstyle was shot in 2008). So to fill the void of any new material she has been posting remastered versions of videos from her old site. If you download all the vids on Naughtyjulie you will actually notice that while they are sequentially numbers, the ones being posted as her 'updates' now are earlier in the # sequence, because they were all already on the site from day one but just not linked up to the members page. They were there as padding for the times when didn't have time to shoot new stuff, and now that she has completely stopped shooting new stuff that's all you see in the preview pages, the old videos all being re-issued. It's a drag.
|
08-18-09 12:56pm
|
Reply
1050
|
New World Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
I actually joined this site not too long ago. Don't bother. It's not even worth the $10 membership I paid for it. The zips didn't work, the photo quality was mediocre and sometimes poor, the women tended to be rather masculine-looking or aged, and the photosets were often rather small. Out of 8 months or so of content buildup, I got just one photoset that I thought was satisfactory, and I had to cherry-pick it because the zip wouldn't download.
In short, I was very disappointed. A good sandwich with a side and a drink would have been a better way to spend that $10.
I didn't bother to review it. Waste of time.
It's NOTHING like MetArt. MetArt leaves it completely in the dust.
|
05-15-08 02:48pm
|
