| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1001
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from yote78:
As beautiful as the models are on MPL, MetArt and the like...and as as glamorously as they are shot, those sites are just too artsy for my taste. I'm not into really rough stuff but I do need more than just nudity, that is,some kind of sexual action, to differentiate between erotic photos/vids on a website and oil paintngs in a museum.
|
12-22-10 07:16am
|
Reply
1002
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(Denner's Reply)
I've stated my opinion on Met-art videos several times on the PU forums, and in my review of Met-art. And my opinion of Met-art videos has changed very little over the years. The Met-art videos have improved quite a bit since the first videos they posted, many years ago, on a technical basis. But almost all Met-art videos are, in spite of lovely young models, boring and a waste of time to watch. Met-art has created an artform in boring videos of naked, lovely young girls. What a wasted effort.
The erotic and sensual value of most Met-art videos is close to zero.
|
12-21-10 03:16pm
|
Reply
1003
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Lionheart:
I also have been wondering about the style in which they shoot their movies in. I have heard great things about this site have been keeping my eye on it. I'm fine with directors making these movies more with an artistic flare as long as the actions is still good.
|
12-21-10 09:34am
|
Reply
1004
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from lk2fireone:
If it's a contest, I'd say that Nubiles and X-art have much more erotic vids than Met-art and MPL Studios. Nubiles has softcore and hardcore, the same with X-art, but the X-art approach is more softcore erotic, even when doing hardcore.
But if you are doing a straight comparison of MPL Studios and Met-art, then MPL Studios has more erotic videos.
Personally, I think the main value of Met-art and MPL Studios is in their photosets.
Nubiles and X-art have value in both their photosets and their videos.
X-art is the smallest site of the 4 sites. But if it had the same amount of content as the other 3 sites, I personally think it would be the best site to join. But that will never happen, because Met-art keeps adding content at a massive rate. And the other 2 sites are much larger than X-art.
But I think that all 4 sites are fine choices, to join. That's my personal opinion, because some PU members think Met-art is a waste of time and money.
|
12-21-10 08:44am
|
Reply
1005
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from lk2fireone:
It would be very difficult to find any site where the videos are less erotic than Met-art videos. The main value of Met-art is in the massive collection (and massive updating) of their softcore teen photosets. MPL has very fine photosets, as well, but in much smaller numbers, than Met-art. I agree the MPL videos are slightly more erotic than the Met-art videos. But I have not really found any softcore teen site where I thought the videos were truly erotic. For me, it's much easier finding erotic softcore teen photosets, than to find erotic softcore teen videos. There are many fine sites that feature teen glamor photos. But I have not found any site that has, for me, outstandingly erotic softcore teen videos.
Edit01: But X-art, which has become more hardcore lately (not truly hardcore, but definitely not the softcore it used to be), has extremely fine quality videos. Lovely girls, fine lighting, professional camera-work.
|
07-20-10 05:16pm
|
Reply
1006
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from adrenalinrush:
(Denner's Reply)
You're right Denner but as you said it already, the set issue is an "old" one and I was just pointing to the recent envelopments I've noticed. Hope they find their way back to their old ideals.
|
02-05-10 12:23pm
|
Reply
1007
|
My 18 Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(Denner's Reply)
The speed issue is the reason for the low score. This site deserves a 80+ for actual content. The funny thing is I'm sure that the speed was much better when I first joined them but since I did my review this week and I was trying to download about 4 videos which took me over an hour to do then the score suffers.
|
02-21-11 07:11pm
|
Reply
1008
|
My 18 Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from Wittyguy:
Nice review, thanks Denner. I had my eye on this site for a while but I think I'll put it on hold at least for now.
|
04-30-08 03:59pm
|
Reply
1009
|
My 18 Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from Drooler:
Thanks for the review, Denner. I'll skip it. (Deleting bookmark now ... ;)
|
04-30-08 02:38pm
|
Reply
1010
|
My Angel Funs
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from jd1961:
From what I understand, Teenfuns was banned by CCBill because of lolita content. I believe this site is owned by a different company.
|
12-02-08 01:50pm
|
Reply
1011
|
My Angel Funs
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from mr smut:
Well the domains are for sale and all you can find asking mother google are some old promo pages for teeenfuns. Seems as if the business has been closed but I wonder why.
|
12-02-08 01:36pm
|
Reply
1012
|
My Fetish
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from atrapat:
If you are willing to sacrifice ease of use, the network as a whole has interesting scenes. Check Orgy Max for a list of sites included. The free tour lists all that's available inside but the members' area, as it was a couple months ago, was a bit of a letdown after seeing a quite promising tour.
The scenes' themes are often Messi but what's really Messi is the organization of the site. There's a model index but you see the same scene several times; also, at the scene index, there's little to no indication on which models are in a particular scene.
When I was a member recently, they were talking about a beta site and asking members to participate; I'm hoping they will do something to improve the model index and scene metadata.
|
04-07-10 11:58am
|
Reply
1013
|
My Fetish
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from anyonebutme:
I like the site. It's a part of a much larger network. Just know they specialize in clothing fetishes (silk/satin, rarely will a girl ever get totally naked in a video), and sometimes messy, usually just water (wetlook), or occasionally a transparent goo or powder. You can see it in the previews. And the subscription price was lowered significantly this year.
|
04-07-10 09:14am
|
Reply
1014
|
My Lovely Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from Zauber:
Seems most of the good solo girl stuff of this network comes from SecretVirgin, a site that I have been eying for some time but which apparently no longer updates. And the videos are surely good. But that doesn't bode well for the updates of the hdteens network.
|
06-03-08 03:33am
|
Reply
1015
|
My Lovely Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review from Denner:
Just downgraded for one main reason:
Poor updates!
|
05-16-08 08:42am
|
Reply
1016
|
My Lovely Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from jd1961:
Thanks for the review, I've been too nervous to join because the preview is so stingy.
I think these sites are affiliated with Amour Angels, because AA sent me an email about a new sister site that is affiliated with these:
https://www.pornusers.com/review/sugarparadise/
|
05-01-08 12:08pm
|
Reply
1017
|
My Lovely Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review from Denner:
Sorry, folks - did'nt have enough space at review:
So about: Exclusive Teen Porn:
here is about 50-55 of great full-scene videos - but of course all after your taste in girls - crisp quality - and if you want to get split up scenes they have it.
Well, down to earth - if you're into russian teens/ukranians or whatever EASTEURO- videos - this might do it for you. I did it for me anyway! Also apart from the shitty alternative sites in this pass - but those you will not need.....
Absolutely recommended...to fans of russian girls!
|
05-01-08 08:27am
|
Reply
1018
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from ex1am:
This is an archive site for the last 2 years. I was a member about a year ago and there were no new updates. The daily update listed on the home page is false advertising meant to hook new subscribers. I agree that amourangels is the closes site for the same type of content.
|
05-30-12 06:25pm
|
Reply
1019
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Have you looked at GoddessNudes? It might have what you're after. The download speed is also a plus. It's faster than the average pay site.
|
04-22-12 11:17am
|
Reply
1020
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
What about ShowyBeauty or AmourAngels? They're in the same vein. Good luck!
|
04-20-12 01:59pm
|
Reply
1021
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
I stopped nearly two years ago (as per my 7/11/10 comment about their being no updates). I wouldn't bet on there being new ones.
There were also some really bad problems with the webmastering during my last time when any new content was showing. On some thumbnail pages was a mix of thumbs and actual full-sized pics which forced the browser to deal with a sudden demand of RAM to look at pages that were hard to make sense of and find links on. It was a real mess.
Besides, the new content was dwindling down to just a thing here or there over months of time.
Have you ever been to FootFetishDaily? I thought it was OK content-wise, though it was a bitch with the navigation.
|
04-19-12 11:44pm
|
Reply
1022
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I'm not a current member.
Drooler made a comment on 07-11-10 that the site was having update problems.
A lot of the content at this site was posted years earlier at a different site that I was a member of, Teen Stars Magazine. Teen Stars Magazine stopped updating maybe 5 years ago, but the preview pages for Teen Stars Magazine has a program that shows old content from years ago with the current date, so you are tricked into thinking the site is still updating, if you haven't been a member before.
I think the girls at My Precious Virgins and Teen Stars Magazine are really cute, and I like their style of photography.
But, unfortunately, I think Teen Stars Magazine and My Precious Virgins are archive sites. By "archive", I mean they stopped updating, probably years ago.
|
04-19-12 10:19am
|
Reply
1023
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from bibo:
(Denner's Reply)
According to the update history, the last movie was added in February 2010 and the last picture set was added in June 2010. They seem to have pretty big gaps in between their updates from time to time.
Yes, itīs definitely more a photography site than a movie site. I`m not a big fan of picture sets, but to be honest, Iīve seen better quality on other sites. Images are often photoshopped (which is a no-go for me) and some sets are lacking variety.
After surfing the site for a couple of hours, I spotted a few more glitches and bugs. No big deal, but annoying and it confirms my initial statement, that this site needs a rework. Itīs just sloppy and poorly coded.
As for the review, I never wrote a review and I donīt know if can be bothered. I think my comment contains all the crucial points, so people can form their own opinion without my score.
|
11-01-10 11:45am
|
Reply
1024
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
I haven't been to NewSensations since late last year. The downloads are quirky, meaning you might have to try more than once to make one work, but the material I got was really hot. It's a network, with some sites still updating and some not, but for $14.95 (TheBestPorn price) ... (hope they wouldn't pull one you with the exchange rate).
|
06-14-09 09:49am
|
Reply
1025
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Have you been to Mikes Apartment lately? Great hardcore and it's part of a network. Or maybe NewSensations? Sorry if I'm repeating any earlier recommendations.
|
06-14-09 08:55am
|
