| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1601
|
Bubble Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Well, I'm definitely archiving this one ;). My own "wisdom," such as it was, took a trip into outer space and got lost somewhere on Hanna Hunter's lunar landing surface.
I figured the least I could do was to gallop through the PU community with cries of "Warning! Warning!"
|
09-10-07 09:26am
|
Reply
1602
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Boobs4ever:
I agree some here, I would love if VideoBox wrote out wich year the video was produced aswell when they added it. But VideoBox isnt the only one that does like this most sites that arent exclusive does this. The high ratin isnt that overated they do give you nice amount of vids and good quality and options for vids.
|
09-10-07 03:09am
|
Reply
1603
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from exotics4me:
Sorry about that. For some reason, I really liked the site. Maybe I am having glam-burnout? My wife couldn't believe I liked it. It reminded me of Sapphic Erotica in a way. Very playful models. I also like FTV for the same reasons, I like to see that the models are having fun and into it. Another thing that may have boosted my review was that I'm a big Sarah Blake fan, and finding b/g of her isn't easy. Also, the model Ramona, she doesn't have a lot of fully nude content.
The sets I liked the best were the ones that Alex, the helper or photographer got involved. Seems like the first time I ever watched porn, I thought to myself, "Why doesn't the photographer get turned on?" it gave the site a real feel to it.
Again, sorry that you didn't like it as well. My newest joins have been back on the glam side where I seem to do much better in my reviews with. No offense taken at all.
|
09-10-07 12:42am
|
Reply
1604
|
Barbi's Slutty Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from Jay G:
I'm in favor of lower prices and porn user reviews like yours help me find the sites to not join yet, as well as the great bargains. I'd like to have a special list of "great bargains" submitted by the regular porn users, but for now do often look at TBP's "special interest section" that lists many special bargains.
|
09-09-07 05:26pm
|
Reply
1605
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from jd1961:
I think the high score is for the cheap price. But along with the cheap price comes less than premium videos. It's a trade off.
|
09-09-07 05:14pm
|
Reply
1606
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Tom Veller:
(Denner's Reply)
Hmmm I don't know ... Maybe Google Analytics javascript?
|
09-09-07 09:49am
|
Reply
1607
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Yes, I can't find any new sites to join these days. Spending more time with computer porn housekeeping ("homemaking"?) this days, though I think I've got one or two more reviews to write fairly soon.
Looked up "ilk." Used to mean people of a family or territory; now it's a handy, single-syllable expression of "type" with a negative tone. It's a old, old English word, but it's good for describing sites like Hungarian Honeys; it rhymes with "bilk." Ha-Ha.
|
09-08-07 04:39pm
|
Reply
1608
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from jd1961:
They're not even all Hungarians
|
09-08-07 02:51pm
|
Reply
1609
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from Drooler:
Nice review that gets to the point about this site and its ilk. I joined a couple of times over the years at the discount rate, and your review shows that nothing has changed except maybe the availabity of zips (finally!).
TBP still rates it at 80 or so, which is horseshit. Looking at the list of other site reviews on the TBP page, one notices a steady points decline from earlier to more recent reviews. At least that indicates something positive about standards going up.
|
09-08-07 10:02am
|
Reply
1610
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
There is one thing that does stand out as a positive with this site, though, and that's the hardcore sex, especially in "Mega" (streaming) mode. I'm really impressed by how the girls go at it with such abandon with the guys. And the girls are really, really sexy and beautiful. Makes me think they are very selective about that. The scenes are stylishly done. It's definitely a leader in that regard.
And once the buffering is done, you can replay parts of the scenes. Just can't save it.
|
09-07-07 06:57am
|
Reply
1611
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from jd1961:
(Denner's Reply)
I haven't joined, I'm still trying to figure it out! Looks like a good site though.
|
09-07-07 02:25am
|
Reply
1612
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from pinkerton:
Thanks for the review, she does look good. Can give you give us more info on the size and technical quality of the videos - the TBP review mentions that the vids are small
|
09-07-07 01:38am
|
Reply
1613
|
Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from Drooler:
I've given up on this one. Got spoiled on better quality and went rotten on non-exclusive content. I guess I ... gone bad m'self.
The Lonnie stuff was interesting for awhile, but it never updates or almost never does, and the Crissy stuff got folded into Aziani though it might still be with this collection, too.
|
09-06-07 04:23pm
|
Reply
1614
|
Sexy Employee
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#19
from guneros:
(Denner's Reply)
I hope you will correct the informations about the file formats and so on soon. Because many pornfans wanna download DivX vids to play them on their dvd-players. Wmv-format isnīt supported as much as DivX-format
|
09-04-07 12:18pm
|
Reply
1615
|
Sexy Employee
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from guneros:
Wow!! You downgrade the site for at least 3 updates as a minimum per month (until now) :-( You should consider that I do all the work for the site myself. There is no assistant or other support. Your 50% "studio" ratio is definetely not correct and degrades my efforts and work in an unacceptable way. But also when I am attending studio productions I have to manage a lot. Not managing the camera doesnīt mean that I can just hang around. I need to give advices and so on. I am doing always my best but you canīt expect that I can bring every week a virgin novice into hardcore.
Last but not least: I cannot understand why your review still says my site has wmv parts. There isnīt even 0.00000000000000001 byte wmv format. The new vids are not devided into 8 parts. The vids are usually splitted into 4 parts nowadays. However...to provide comfortable downloads I have inserted a story board and pick-up thumbs. The advantage of dividing the vids into parts is a better server performance, the downloads are more fast. I have always to keep an eye on the server performance because the PSP and ipod vids are fulldownloads.
The facts about the server performance are correct if your are not running a "mega server" like me.
|
09-04-07 07:16am
|
Reply
1616
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from Drooler:
Hey Denner,
If you like Pier999, you might want to have a look at www.topmiss.com. It's got a great collection of softcore photography of Eurobabes, mostly to all exclusive. Pics are in a variety of sizes, to 3000px, each gallery.
There are a couple of pitfalls: no zips, so collecting is a chore. And it's in French (Mon Dieu!), so it helps to be passably literate for porn purposes.
But since you're in Europe anyway and the site is Euro-currency based, I thought I'd mention it.
I've been a member, the weak dollar be damned. PU won't allow a review, though, 'cause it's not an English site.
|
09-03-07 07:24pm
|
Reply
1617
|
Glossy Angels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Agreed. A while back, the webmaster at W4B responded to some of my criticisms of that site and said that it was all exclusive with a small number of exceptions. To be fair, I don't believe that "Glossy Angels" was in existence at that time.
Still, what is going on? Who gave the go-ahead on Glossy Angels? It sure looks like a clone to me, kind of a "Mini-Me" to W4B, which I think is the better of the two since there are more image size options.
|
09-03-07 02:31pm
|
Reply
1618
|
Bad Russian Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from jd1961:
Hi! I Elena, and live in St. Petersberg! You very sexual man! My mama sick with cancer :( Hospitals very bad Russia :( But can not afford Visa :( You sexual man help me save mama? Please send me $1000 to western union, and together we will be, me and my sexual man! Elena :)
|
09-02-07 06:25pm
|
Reply
1619
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from jd1961:
Maybe we should change the phrase from "shilling" to "payola"!
|
09-02-07 06:01pm
|
Reply
1620
|
Louis De Mirabert
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from turismo:
(Denner's Reply)
I prefer CC bill, never had a problem, and nice and easy to cancel subscriptions, I have had problems with other billing companies, especially when it comes to 3 day trials
|
09-02-07 01:54pm
|
Reply
1621
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Well, as the saying goes, "Everyone has their price." If I could do as I wished for weekend with, say, Marina/Euphrat at LSG models, I'd hand out out 100 point reviews with no shame at all!
|
09-02-07 09:26am
|
Reply
1622
|
Bikini Riot
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Hi Denner,
I just logged back on to check. There are five videos of Crissy, three of Mindy, and one of them together.
I'm cautious with the points ratings, so they might seem low in light of the positives that I mention for a site. I just don't want another user to feel misled by the points ratings, should that user spend hard-earned dough on a site and see it quite differently, in a negative way, from the way I do.
That's why I try to include enough specific info about a site as well, so that the user has a pretty good idea of what's there and how good it is, or not.
If Bikini Riot provided zips and photos at 1600px, retroactively, I'd probably rate it in the 80's even without more frequent updates as there is enough content buildup now to merit joining at the current price of $19.95.
The bit with the points is that people tend not to see them the same way, as they are the most subjective part of a review, being numbers. So I use the basic guidelines: 80's mean I recommend it, 70's mean I might, 90's mean I do strongly.
|
09-02-07 09:03am
|
Reply
1623
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
I've been "approached," by e-mail, from various sites offering me free access and asking me to do this or that regarding my posts about their sites.
They haven't directly asked me to show any bias in my views, but the I think the implicit "understandings" have been there.
I've changed my e-mail preferences to keep sites from contacting me away from the posts that appear on PornUsers.
These "offers" are the kind of thing that could very easily undermine credibility here, to where one wouldn't be sure about reviews even by an established reviewer. It wouldn't take long for it to get out of hand.
And for all I know, maybe it has already started to.
|
09-02-07 08:42am
|
Reply
1624
|
Louis De Mirabert
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from Drooler:
I visited. One thing that really stands out as a negative for me is the lack of light. I guess that Monsieur Mirabert is an expert at working the shadows and low light, which is fine if you like that kind of artistic approach.
But I want to see things with the lumens turned up.
|
09-01-07 04:29am
|
Reply
1625
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from exotics4me:
(Denner's Reply)
From what I remember it was maybe 1 or 2 sets that you couldn't access unless you were a recurring member, but they did let you see the cover of the set to entice you, but the ones they had didn't really interest me enough to stay another month. I guess they are trying to create a reason to stay, though the content is quite good on its own. I loved the Eve Angel material and Anetta Keys material they had.
|
09-01-07 12:15am
|
