| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1276
|
Babes.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from juanchopancho:
Blonde Aneta Keys, what the hell??? All I want is Aneta videos but it seems I would have to joing 50 sites that don't have much of her stuff anyway. I tried her "official" site but not much luck there, it only had 20 lousy videos.
Where can I find the most Aneta video content? Twistys?
|
03-27-08 07:25pm
|
Reply
1277
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(Denner's Reply)
Just a little parting remark, at least in connection with the subject of Twistys. I think I owe them a partial mental apology. I'm a picture guy and found every model I looked at too phony, orange tinged and unrealistic, but when I had a look at some vids today I found that the same models looked much better before their bodies and faces had been worked over by the professional picture enhancers. Maybe I'll start watching videos! :-)
|
03-27-08 11:23am
|
Reply
1278
|
Cum Brushers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from williamj:
(Denner's Reply)
Check out the comments on Incredible Pass...the link on my comment takes you there. There are lots of comments, all bad, regarding this company. I never joined the site so I can't say they got me but they got lots of others with unwanted billing.
|
03-26-08 01:23pm
|
Reply
1279
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(Denner's Reply)
Yes, after a while you've seen it all. I am starting to stray into areas I would not normally visit just to see something DIFFERENT! Help, are we like addicts, always needing more? :-)
|
03-26-08 12:33pm
|
Reply
1280
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(Denner's Reply)
What gets me about the bonus sites (forget about Nubiles to which I didn't subscribe) is that the models look exactly the same as those at Twistys. Barbies! Unless you have a favourite (Anette Dawn?) and like to get as much material of her as you can. But, again, my opinion only. I get bored easily! :-)
|
03-26-08 10:22am
|
Reply
1281
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from messmer:
Denner, I trust you and others who rate the site highly but must say that our ways part when it comes to taste. You all rave about a site that left me bored after a short look. This is the first time I've wished sites had a money back guarantee because one hour with all the Barbies was enough for me.
And I freely confess that my taste must be flawed since so many love Twistys, so don't take it as an attack on yours. :-) Cheers!
|
03-25-08 10:34am
|
Reply
1282
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from badandy400:
I guess I have to speak up on this one. I am "that guy" who rated them at 100!! I agree that older videos suck, as they do on all sites, but VB does post old shit as new at times. In their defense though they do post enough stuff every day to keep most people busy. SO if you dont like a certain video just skip over it because there are certainly plenty others and at least a few of them will grab your attention. The quality on video box does need to improve. They have the bit rate to provide some good looking stuff, but I believe it is upscaled to use twice as much bandwidth to show the same thing. I still do not believe anyone else beats them. Besides, it you download one movie every other day you still come out ahead of paying a buck for the movie at the shit bin in the store. I believe they are great, but need to do better if they want to stay on top because others are catching up pretty quickly.
|
03-21-08 10:10pm
|
Reply
1283
|
Flashy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from badandy400:
No zips!!! :0 That is terrible! I like the reference to only tease, but how could it get any softer without going into the non-nude realm? I though only tease was teddy bear soft. Thanks for a good review!
|
03-20-08 09:00pm
|
Reply
1284
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from williamj:
(Denner's Reply)
Thank you for your Replay. PLZ read my response to RaggingBuddist.
If anything, Pornusers give us a voice. I understand a poor rating because the site is just poor. If the owners read the remarks, maybe they make business changes to market their site better. That is a goal to make sites more erotic by our input at PU? But flat out over charging from domestic or foreign adult web sites, well I just have to hammer down hard. Like any other product we expect quality not trouble with credit card billing and false advertisement. In short, I tend to get my "Irish" up when it comes to taking peoples money and playing us as a fool. I will research a bit more in the future, but I'll call it like I see. No apolizes.
|
03-20-08 05:31pm
|
Reply
1285
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from williamj:
I'm at lost that someone from PU (Senior Staff) would endorse and worse yet seem happy that Incredible Dollars will no longer rip PU customers off , but everyone else is fair game. I seriously lost all respect for Pornusers management and especially Vegas Ken. Its almost as if their complacent with the owners of Incredible Dollars. I think the whole situation stinks.
By all rights and good business I think Vegas Ken should explain himself to PU Members not as a replay but as a separtate posting to clarify his remarks.
|
03-20-08 01:07pm
|
Reply
1286
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Vegas Ken:
Denver,
I guess that I did not communicate everything exactly as I intended. :) I re-read my comment and see your point. I agree with you on sites taking advantage of consumers.
The point I was trying to make was that we heard your comments and went to Incredible Dollars to seek a solution. We were able to get scam free links to their sites. From the user perspective I agree that this is how it should be from the get to. However in the online adult business world, unfortunately this is often not the case.
We here at PU and TBP do listen to your feedback and do everything we can to look out for your best interest. I was excited that we were able to get clean links. This is the first time I have heard a company doing such a thing. I was not trying to present this as an "offer". I think that my excitement cam thru the wrong way in my previous post. For that I appologize.
Vegas Ken
|
03-20-08 11:01am
|
Reply
1287
|
Only Carla
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from silver:
(Denner's Reply)
Maybe we shall get a little bit interaction from this chick sometime :-)
|
03-18-08 12:03pm
|
Reply
1288
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Khan:
Sorry I didn't catch this when it was submitted. By all rights, it SHOULD have been a REPLY to Ken's COMMENT rather than a stand-alone Comment.
The remark Denner is referring to is HERE
|
03-18-08 11:52am
|
Reply
1289
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
I don't think you were supposed to notice that, Denner.
I'm laughing my damn ass off on this one. It's nice when people see through the bullshit. Good catch!
|
03-18-08 11:19am
|
Reply
1290
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
Hey - looks to me like Brazzer's is leading the pack here - and I'll be damned if I understand THAT. At least on Videobox I've found more natural women - and in higher resolution video - than what I saw while at Brazzer's. I'll admit that Brazzer's is more consistent in their content. All their video is relatively clear and well lit, while some of the vids on Videobox are just plain crap. But I don't WANT to clearly see women with basketballs growing out of their chests. The only stuff I found good enough to save from Brazzer's was all at 320x240 resolution - about 22 gigs worth. On the other hand, I have over 120 gigs of 720x480 vids from my latest trip to Videobox and my month isn't even up yet.
Sure - it's all about preference. You might not have agreed with me on the the stuff I rejected from Brazzer's or what I saved from Videobox. But to say there's not enough on Videobox to keep it really high in the ratings? I can't say I understand that. At the time of this comment, there are 4326 videos to choose from. Are they all hi-def? Nope. Are they all clunkers? No way! I say, "Step up to the salad bar of porn. You might want to pass on the tomatoes and the bleu cheese dressing - they're a bit stale looking. But the rest is definitely good to go!"
|
03-16-08 02:08pm
|
Reply
1291
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#28
from Pinche Kankun:
(Denner's Reply)
So many scenes have to end up in facials because:
- There are crackhead muthaphuckas out there requesting for this cocksucking bullshit and telling the producers they should only produce facial porn... BULLSHIT, MAN, YOU KNOW WHAT I AM SAYING!!
- There are not enough rebels out there in the porn world opening their mouth to combat this shit!!
- GAY PORN IS TRYING TO CROSS OVER INTO STRAIGHT PORN!!! SHIT... GAYS CAN GET MARRIED NOW!!!!
- Producers are biased, too, man!!!! >:(
|
03-13-08 11:30pm
|
Reply
1292
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from jd1961:
(Denner's Reply)
I have discovered that the best hardcore porn is being made in Japan. A lot of people have a problem with the mosaic censorship though. But if you can get past that, you will see they do it very well. The non censored stuff is bootlegged 3rd rate material though. The great looking girls are all censored. The males in American porn are so awful at ruining every scene that I can't even watch it anymore.
|
03-13-08 01:06pm
|
Reply
1293
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks, Denner. I'll have a look at Killergram.
|
03-13-08 12:02pm
|
Reply
1294
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from jd1961:
(Denner's Reply)
You got it Denner---"facials" used to be aginst the law to show in porn. Same with anal "sex". And to a certain extent, interracial sex. Then when it became allowed, the knuckleheads in the porn industry showed it as a thrilling taboo, that's how they sold it. IMO, their endless interracial video lines and sites are in fact very racist, because they are portraying it as a kinky taboo. But you know what, I have found that most people have no taste in porn outside a taboo shock value kick. That doesn't include the people at PU, who are experts! ;-)
|
03-13-08 04:29am
|
Reply
1295
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks, Denner. That's the way I feel, not only about VB but also about the "adult" videos they show on our cable channels late at night. I go past them so fast that my head spins because they are so incredibly boring. And I'm a porn hound or I wouldn't be here! :-)
I suppose a kid who's never seen a naked woman before would be entranced but if you've lived for any length of time, nudity, "enhanced" by various body modifications and accompanied by phony screams of "o YES and o GOD!" doesn't cut it with real adults.
Producers of adult movies have forgotten about eroticism and so you see an endless stream of actors who barely have time to open the door for their sex partners before they are wrestling with them on the floor, or against the wall, or on the kitchen table etc. etc. I can hear the producer say "In order to save time and get straight to what people want, leave off panties and bra .. lights, hand held camera, action!" Sadly, many are like that and feel that any leading up to the action is a waste of their time.
No foreplay, no teasing (gradual revealing of the body), no story. Arghh. And thanks for letting me vent! :-)
|
03-12-08 06:36pm
|
Reply
1296
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from littlejoe:
if i understand what your saying, id think ud really like paul markham teens
|
03-11-08 09:09pm
|
Reply
1297
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from badandy400:
(Denner's Reply)
Honestly I believe that nubiles and teendreams were a bit better. Siminscans is good though. The girls on nubiles are much better looking though, and the videos are a higher quality. A good handful of Fugly chicks on simonscans. Teendreams from a years ago still beats simonscans on quality.
Simonscans does have quantity of photos though. About 70 GB worth. But only about 330 videos as of early march.
|
03-10-08 09:06pm
|
Reply
1298
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from exotics4me:
(Denner's Reply)
Hey Denner,
I was hoping you wouldn't take my reply wrong, and think I was having an attitude. I'm not really into the high tech computers myself. Just bought a new one this past Christmas and went ahead and got the bigger monitor. And thought I would share my experiences with it compared to the more regular monitors.
It also could be the bitrate of the videos that is causing the blurriness or not clear parts. I just joined porn.com the other day, they have pretty nice resolution 640 high end, but their WMV are only 1,000k bitrate, their DIVX files are the same resolution but are 2,000k bitrate and look much nicer. The bitrate seems to be where the smoothness of the video shows.
As I was telling apoctom, this new computer that my wife bought me for Christmas is a real monster of a computer, it has the top end video card in it and over 4000 RAM, so I probably am going to get clearer videos just by default because the computer is so fast and powerful.
I also think the file type can make a difference. Which is why I think in the TBP reviews you can notice where there take away for sites not giving many download options of file types. Try some DIVX files with a high bitrate and see if they don't look clearer to you. I'm starting to think WMV files are no longer the best.
Last, the bitrate also effects the size of the file, I had forgot to mention that in my last post. Those two videos that I used as examples in the other post have a large difference in bitrates as well. Both are Eva Angelina clips. Fabulous has a 4,586k bitrate which is very fast, but Don't Hide it, Divide It has a 7,540k bitrate which is extremely fast. I had read your post about the 1byday re-releases, that is what they are doing to those, raising the resolution and raising the speed of the bitrate.
I'm not quite technically savvy enough to say that a video card would make a huge difference, but I know a video card can make a difference in the frames per second that a video game runs at, which makes it smoother. That could be something you could look into. A good video card doesn't cost much over $100, and are a snap to put in, no technical ability required. But do try that with the DIVX clips and let me know if those look clearer than the WMV ones, so I can make sure I'm not losing my mind! Talk to you later.
|
03-09-08 09:56pm
|
Reply
1299
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
Well, Denner... I guess it all comes down to personal preference. Sometimes you find yourself going against popular opinion, just like I did with the Brazzer's Network.
I agree with you - there are a lot of clunkers on Videobox - plenty of videos that just plain look bad in any resolution. I just figure that $15 these days, for a menu that large, makes it worth the cost - even if you have to pick through it all to find the keepers.
It's okay - Videobox doesn't work for you and there's plenty of porn out there on other sites. : - )
|
03-08-08 12:10pm
|
Reply
1300
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from RagingBuddhist:
(Denner's Reply)
Check out the Tony's Amateur Tapes series. 720x480 looks sharp (although I'll admit it's not quite DVD quality), while the 480x352 is a bit grainy.
|
03-08-08 05:41am
|
