| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
601
|
Fuck My Melons
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from BadMrFrosty:
(Denner's Reply)
Agree, content was nice its a shame the dont update any more. Do you know of any simular sites by any chance?
|
03-10-10 02:47am
|
Reply
602
|
Fuck My Melons
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(Denner's Reply)
Undated updates always arouse my suspicions.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-09-10 09:51am
|
Reply
603
|
Fuck My Melons
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from BadMrFrosty:
I was a member late 2009 and they had about 120 videos then. As they don't date their updates I can't tell you exactly when the last update was made.
|
03-09-10 08:19am
|
Reply
604
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Khan:
(Denner's Reply)
Denner,
Users can of course add Reviews or Comments. The webmaster has requested we (TBP) not review the site until April for his own reasons. We usually respect those holds unless it's absolutely necessary for us to do a review. But, if you feel compelled to do one now, no-one here will stop you.
|
03-08-10 11:42am
|
Reply
605
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(Denner's Reply)
Errrr .... looking at the site, at the very bottom of the page I see a link for "support/contact"
... which takes me to: http://www.explicite-art.com/contact.php
Towards the top of that page (right under the text "Email us") I see links that will open your email client and automatically fill in the correct email address.
If you still can't find it, drop me an email and I'll pass on the email address it fills in.
|
03-08-10 10:05am
|
Reply
606
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from mbaya:
(Denner's Reply)
When I use CCBill, if they have regional pricing it shows my price in Canadian Dollars. Yes, the price is higher. What pisses me off is that I don't live in Canada, something I posted in the forum a few months back.
|
03-08-10 08:41am
|
Reply
607
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
I just noticed this about the webmaster asking for a hold on the review until some time in April. That might actually be a prudent decision. Without a huge load of content, the site could suffer due to a low early score.
I've actually joined once myself already and can't say I have any strong regrets, though waiting would have been better. But the blame for that goes only to eager little me.
|
03-07-10 01:43pm
|
Reply
608
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(Denner's Reply)
Denner,
The site does not offer a link to Epoch. You are right you must go to Epochs site and sign up that way. By the way, I think you remember that my address is Canadian and CCBill charges me a higher price. They have links for Europe and Latin America though. Weird.
|
03-07-10 09:01am
|
Reply
609
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from turboshaft:
(Denner's Reply)
"Didn't know women have orgasms"...in porn. ; )
I just couldn't resist either, but c'mon, really? Every time a girl does a scene she lifts off at the end and produces another mind-blowing orgasm? Sorry, but I doubt it (but I can dream can't I?).
Unless she's a squirter--another controversial topic--than what exactly does she have to physically do or 'prove' the way a guy does when he, ahem, hits his mark? I understand some convulsing and screaming as if she is possessed by satan himself is to be expected in some cases, but a little light moaning and groaning and most directors seem to be satisfied. It's hard to believe that they are really climaxing that often though.
|
03-06-10 11:32am
|
Reply
610
|
Babes.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Yes, I guess that those sites that used to stand on their own no longer do, so they've been folded into the bonus realm of Babelicious. Kinda reminds me of those software bundles one used to get when buying a -- OH MY GOD! -- 500 MB hard drive! Stuff that at one time was either great or at least satisfactory, but no longer draws the bills from the billfold.
|
03-06-10 06:26am
|
Reply
611
|
Babes.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
Hey, Denner, you got your wish. Babes.tv is now a bonus site to Babelicious. In fact, they've added some others, too, like "In The Mask."
I don't know how good this news is, though. I was going through the Babes.tv visitor's area for pics and they have only 1000 px images! At least as far as I could tell. Even when there's a 2000 px "option" there's no active link, so I can't tell if that's just the demo or that's how it is in the real site.
|
03-05-10 05:21pm
|
Reply
612
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Isn't it weird how the same good stuff can turn into crap on the same site? I once joined Digidolls in 2005 (in the Era Before Porn Users). While I was a member, they shut down for two weeks. No access. Once they came back on, they'd reduced all of their large pics (at 1500 px) to 1200 px! WTF!
Getting back to Club Sandy, there is a certain persistent weirdness there, too. Imagine being with the girl ...
1st: Ohh, nice legs!
2nd: Nice breasts!
3rd: Marvelous ass!
4th: Work it, girl! (as she masturbates and shoves her fingers in deeper and deeper)
5th: Hey, what the fuck?! (as she pisses on the floor)
I mean, I just don't consider peeing to be a common element of an amorous encounter. But at Club Sandy, it is!
|
03-05-10 03:56pm
|
Reply
613
|
Cuties Galore
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from pat362:
I thought so because I downloaded most of their content. I don't know if you are aware but they have a preview site(see below link).
I find it great to see all new and upcoming updates without visiting each site individually.
https://www.pornusers.com/review/pornpassforall/
|
03-05-10 10:41am
|
Reply
614
|
Grandpas Fuck Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mbaya:
(Denner's Reply)
Hi Denner,
I don't remember seeing complaints about reviewing single sites within a network. I know that many networks contain within them individual niche sites and I feel that comparisons are most appropriate. If some of us complain, I really want to know why.
|
03-05-10 05:10am
|
Reply
615
|
Cuties Galore
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Wittyguy:
I'll post something after I get access to it in about. However, I should note that I don't get access for another 42 days (apparently this is one of the sites I have to wait two months for before I get). Anyway, it is mostly softcore and it does appear to have lots of fresh faced girls on it. Not a top notch site but at the price levels ($15 US after one month and $10 US thereafter) if you had any inclination at all to check it out then it would be worth staying around in my book.
|
03-04-10 03:04pm
|
Reply
616
|
Cuties Galore
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from pat362:
I chose to stick with the network long enough to get access to this site. It's not a bad one but I find that it falls in the middle of Lez Cuties and Anal Teen Angels. Many of the same performers on those site are here. Quite afew of the scenes are girls doing solo stuff where anal is prevalent.
|
03-04-10 02:01pm
|
Reply
617
|
Cuties Galore
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from mbaya:
My membership does not include access to the videos, but it does to the photos. I like the looks of the models here. They mostly look fresh and not as gonzoish as those in the other sites in the network. The picture sets, at least at first glance, look like they are stripping to nudity and then explicit.
|
03-04-10 11:50am
|
Reply
618
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from pat362:
(Denner's Reply)
That is one of the things that annoys me about todays porn. THey are too lazy to edit these things out or film it all over. No, they prefer to save time and keep it as is. I'm sure it happened in the past but producers and directors had too much respect about their job that they either dropped the scene or filmed it again.
|
03-03-10 06:28pm
|
Reply
619
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from moonbyrd:
As one example, the Pix and Video scene from 2008/07/25 with the then dark brown haired Aleksa Diamond is available only in low and medium quality, "medium" being 400x226 pixels. However, I have previously downloaded this same exact scene from hornyeurosluts.com, where it was 1280x720. Maybe it is still available there in that resolution.
It would probably be more useful to contact the webmaster instead of grumbling here. In any case, I won't be writing here any more.
|
02-28-10 02:39am
|
Reply
620
|
Thai Girls Wild
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from alexmedia:
Thx for comment, probably I should try it.
|
02-26-10 10:24pm
|
Reply
621
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Wittyguy:
I just checked and the mid level video downloads (at least in the .wmv format which I think they all are) are a bit grainy in comparison to the newer content. It's not dreadful but not crystal clear either.
|
02-25-10 04:57pm
|
Reply
622
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from jd1961:
Slowest site I ever joined, that was 2 years ago. Doesn't seem like they have improved since then.
|
02-24-10 08:38pm
|
Reply
623
|
Thai Girls Wild
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from jd1961:
Thanks for the warning.
Check another on my "never join" list.
|
02-24-10 08:29pm
|
Reply
624
|
Thai Girls Wild
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Vegas Ken:
I just want to let everyone know that we had removed the links to this companies sites yesterday, but have re-added them today. The tomporary ban had more to do with behind the scenes business issues and not with the sites themselves. We are happy to list the sites once agian.
As aleays, we appreciate you using our site!!!
|
02-23-10 10:14am
|
Reply
625
|
Thai Girls Wild
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Rick:
Hi Denner,
Unfortunately the operator of this web-site took issue with comments and reviews posted recently. He demanded we remove them or didn't want to work with us. We tried hard to resolve the issue without being forced to censor what we felt were genuine feedback from users. Since we couldn't come to a resolution, we had to pull the links.
BTW, we will give better explanations when we pull a company like this. It'll take some time to organize it all, but it's something we will be working on soon.
|
02-23-10 08:39am
|
