| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
576
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from PinkPanther:
(Denner's Reply)
I wouldn't have recommended it on my previous one-month membership, but I'm enjoying it more this time.
There is a ton of content and I've never been a member of ATK Exotics or ATK Premium, both of which have a good deal of Petite Girl material here. It's that old thing, "If you haven't seen it before, it's new to you."
|
03-30-10 07:05pm
|
Reply
577
|
Pacino's Adventures
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from exotics4me:
(Denner's Reply)
Hey Denner,
I think you may be getting the Pacino's Adventure site confused with Pacino's World. Looking at Pacino's Adventure's model index there are 3 Euro models out of 64 models. Those are Anita (Dark), Tina (Christine, Christina) and one named Carrie that I'm not familiar with, but her page says Europe on it. On the other hand, Pacino's World has Eve Angel, Evelyn Lory, Gabriella Lupin, Renee (Anetta Keys) and Jana/Teresa to name the ones I recognize. If you will notice in my review; I point out that the Pacino's World content is NOT exclusive, but the other included sites are exclusive. Seeing that Pacino's World is just a throw-in bonus site; I can't see punishing Pacino's Adventures for that.
On the videos, the newer videos on Pacino's Adventures are 1440x1080 with 6500 bitrates. The newer videos on Pacino's World are 720x480 with 3000 bitrates. That's a pretty big difference in technical quality.
And on the score part, I'm mainly going by considering this the best overall Latina network/site and following the TBP/PU scoring scale of best in its category between 90-100.
Check the Pacino's Adventures preview and model index out to see what I mean about only 3 Euro models.
|
03-30-10 12:12pm
|
Reply
578
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
Kudos to MetArt for being sympathetic to the cause, and to Denner for being doggedly persistent about it and bringing it home.
|
03-29-10 11:47am
|
Reply
579
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Rick:
Just checked our link from an England proxy and it looks like our link converts correctly (14.69 Pounds), so maybe they corrected the regional pricing after Denner contacted them.
Kudos to Met Art for hooking up our users with a great price!
|
03-29-10 11:21am
|
Reply
580
|
18 Magazine
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Do you know if they are updating again at 18magazine? Looking around the preview pages, the last update seems to be in late 2009. I joined a few years back, and the site was not updating at that time, all the material was from years earlier, I thought. A lot of cute models, but the material did not impress me much. The photos were just ok, and the videos were poor. This is strictly a softcore site, and the content is from years ago. The comparable content from mega-sites like met-art, mplstudios, etc. is so much better.
|
03-28-10 10:45am
|
Reply
581
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from jeppegutt:
Thank you for the warning! I planned to join but now I'm not joining.
You are right about new sites! For example sites like youngsexparties, sellyougf etc. All this sites seems to offer a lot of download, but they most of the content is streaming. They fool us to pay money for a product which is not worth it!
|
03-28-10 06:38am
|
Reply
582
|
Torbe Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from JustThy:
(Denner's Reply)
wow hold on guys.. whats going on here?
we dont have and never did PRE-checked xsales, and we have always used epoch as our primary biller... and the other billers in the cascade have no xsales whatsoever...
if any of you got signed up automatically to the other site then you are saying epoch is cheating everyone here... even myself..
but i really find it very strange that EPOCH would do that..
may be you just clicked the box by mistake? anyways im sure you can ask epoch for a refund and they will give you the money back...
and about our members area, i dont get it, its 100% clean, you can ask anyone from TBP, we have a few upsells and thats it... but you have to manually signup to any of those upsells... there are no automatic joins or anything... either you are confusing us with some other site or just trying to make us look bad...
cheers.
thy
CEO torbenetwork.com
|
03-25-10 10:45am
|
Reply
583
|
Torbe Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Rick:
(Denner's Reply)
Would love to get more clarification as to what happened. Like justme, I also checked the join page and saw an unchecked xsale on the join page with the header "Special Offer". Seemed very legit at least from that standpoint. Look forward to getting more info.
|
03-25-10 08:34am
|
Reply
584
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from rome476:
I can't agree with all of the criticism of VB. It offers an enormous amount of porn of all kinds for less than $7 a month when I renewed for an 18 month membership. It also has a lot more euro quality porn than porn.com that seems to have almost all 2nd rate American porn.
|
03-24-10 05:02pm
|
Reply
585
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from uscue:
(Denner's Reply)
I agree, download speed has slowed CONSIDERABLY the past year and the updates are getting a little boring to the point I don't even check every day or every few days anymore. But as far as video quality, I think it's important to note differences in what viewers want. Reading the comment, it would sound like old-school bang bus videos or something that are extremely grainy. I believe you're looking for High Def, which is what you mean by low quality. Is it high def, I don't know, I always download the "High" instead of the "DVD" options. But for just a casual viewer, even the "high" looks great -- no grain, audio/visual in line, etc. I never noticed that my take on quality must have been a lot lower than high-def regulars until using this site the past couple of years with people digging on the quality of a lot of sites I'm a member of that the quality looks fine to me. If you join Easy Dater and say bad quality, I agree. If you join Bang Bus/Videobox/Reality Kings, etc and say bad quality, I'm like "your standards are WAAAAYY high" (as in you like high-def only).
|
03-24-10 01:01pm
|
Reply
586
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd1961:
(Denner's Reply)
CCBill gave me a refund
|
03-23-10 09:43pm
|
Reply
587
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
Have to agree with you Denner. For me this is the most overrated site out there. I prefer the quality and customer service of American Vice as a DVD site. If I were to look at a second choice DVD only site it would be VideosZ. I found the download and streaming speeds were ridiculously low on VideoBox. Members continually talk about the poor customer service and all the negatives you have mentioned here, yet other PU members still love the place. Oh well, just a matter of taste I suppose. I also think sites like 21st Sextury and Porn.com provide the same sort of stuff but in a different way, and as an addition, you get pictures with those sites.
|
03-23-10 04:35pm
|
Reply
588
|
Zemani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Denner's Reply)
I actually joined Zemani as a member 3 days ago, based partly on Drooler's review and partly on the site preview. I like pretty girls, and this site has a few beauties.
|
03-22-10 02:12pm
|
Reply
589
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Capn:
(Denner's Reply)
A tease is no good without the pay-off!
I made that point a few years back when I was a member.
My main beef with them is when they claim sets to be nude when they are not.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-21-10 02:06pm
|
Reply
590
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from mbaya:
(Denner's Reply)
I tried very hard to leave out the lack of nudity as a criticism. I think that they did not succeed very well at presenitng the erotic within their own self imposed restrictions.
|
03-21-10 09:26am
|
Reply
591
|
Torbe Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Tree Rodent:
(Denner's Reply)
It was your comment about some fat ugly guy having sex with innocent young girls that really got me interetsed. I thought that sounded like the site for me. TheSquirrel is beyond help.
|
03-21-10 09:21am
|
Reply
592
|
Torbe Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Tree Rodent:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks for the reply Denner. Would you believe it was your review of the site that got me interested in the first place?! I know you don't like the network all that much, and you are totally correct about your negatives. It's just it is so different from a lot of the other networks that I just had to try it out for myself.
The owner of Torbe network emailed me to ask me why I had cancelled, and I said because of the poor picture side of things, and the POV was a bit irritating and camerawork was not all that good in places. Also the network is not that large compared to some of the big ones. I said I thought it was worth the month's money but not more.
I would be pleased to recommend it to anyone who just wants to check it out and see. If they are looking for something a little different I don't think they would be that disappointed. There have been very few reviews on this network, and if anyone joins I would be interested to hear what they think. It's just they have to consider Denner's negatives and my negatives before deciding to join.
Another small pro, is that sofcore amateur picture lovers may like that side of things. Most of the amateur pitures are softcore only.
|
03-21-10 07:56am
|
Reply
593
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(Denner's Reply)
I still maintain any webmaster that makes use of this 'service' doesn't deserve any subscriptions from anyone in Europe.
Cap'n.
|
03-19-10 10:35am
|
Reply
594
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
They say that all of their videos of her are exclusive; there are just 3. For the record, they've got only 5 photosets of her; 2 are not claimed to be exclusive and 3 are, though the schoolgirl outfit one I'm not totally sure about.
Hope this helps.
|
03-18-10 03:26pm
|
Reply
595
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks, Denner. Your information is very helpful as I would be returning for the videos and not the pictures. I subscribed once before and found the models too perfect, airbrushed and Playboyish and only used the site a couple of times during my month there. But, having had general bad experiences with picture sites lately I have been switching more and more to videos, so given your information I will sign up again soon. Solo is fine with me. I love Anilos and Nubiles which are mostly solo. The hardcore contents I quarantine! Strangely enough I like videos from places like Videosz but don't like hardcore in places like Twistys. Go figure. Thanks again.
|
03-18-10 08:13am
|
Reply
596
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Shap:
(Denner's Reply)
It's exclusive we shot it ;)
|
03-18-10 08:08am
|
Reply
597
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Shap:
Thanks Denner! I really really appreciate it.
We are working really hard to make 2010 our best year ever at Twistys.
|
03-17-10 08:47am
|
Reply
598
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from turboshaft:
(Denner's Reply)
You can get rid of your spy agencies in Denmark simply by voting them out? Sorry, but here in America voting only changes the names on the corner offices and the photos on the wall (which I have always found very creepy). The last thing any voter would be able to do is dictate the policies of the FBI or NSA or any of the other alphabet soup agencies 'protecting' us, much less get rid of them all together. Hell, if we could do that I might start voting again and get the defense budget cut by half, legalize all drugs and prostitution, outlaw the Patriot Acts and have the top officials from the last Bush administration arrested and sent to Gitmo. ; )
Oh, if only it were so...
|
03-16-10 07:22pm
|
Reply
599
|
Rookie Babe
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
It's a huge surprise and an even bigger disappointment. Who would think they'd actually REDUCE the sizes of the most recent pics? That hasn't been the direction that most sites have been going (the Babelicious lot notwithstanding, at least until their recent turning back to larger than 1000px, and only on the one site they continue to update).
I can't imagine they wouldn't have the larger sizes from the original shoots, as they have large ones posted of the same models. It's not that costly to continue posting them at least as zips.
You subscribe in good faith and then pay $30 for someone else's very stupid decision. That really pisses me off.
|
03-13-10 01:46pm
|
Reply
600
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from BadMrFrosty:
(Denner's Reply)
Well looks like they were talking complete rubbish, 1 month later and it still costs about $45 !!!!
|
03-10-10 06:55am
|
