Denner, I explained this in a comment before, but if you do choose to join this network, it can make a difference which site you join through.
For the last month or more, the network has been offering bonus sites when you join any one of their sites.
For most sites, the 1 month membership is $29.95.
To join the 18 stream site the 1 month membership is $34.95.
With all the the different memberships, you can get a different number of bonus sites. By different memberships, I mean which specific site you choose to join through.
If you choose the 18 stream, you pay $34.95 and get 2 bonus sites.
If you choose the SpunkyBee, you pay $29.95 and get 9 bonus sites.
One of the bonus sites included when you join through SpunkyBee is the 18 Stream site.
If you join through other sites in the network, you pay $29.95 and get less than 9 bonus sites (maybe 6 or less bonus sites).
So join through the SpunkyBee site, you pay $29.95, and get full access to 10 of the network sites.
That is the based on what I see being offered currently. The network can change their offerings in the future. But that is what has been offered for the past month and more.
The network said it would end the special bonuses over a month ago, then they extended the offer by 2 weeks, then they extended the offer by 2 more weeks. That I know of. They might have been extending it in the past that I don't know about.
We were both teasing. But sometimes it doesn't come across as clearly as it should. :)
But I also mean it when I say there are new, attractive girls turning up in porn all the time. Back in the 1970s (which is ancient history) an attractive-looking girl in hardcore porn was rare. But now it's very common. You can find them easily.
I was the one who asked that site to be listed here.
It was on my subscribe list, mostly because of its Femjoy look'n feel and because I had some hopes for their vids.
I can't write a proper review right now, but it's an average site, at least for me. I'd rate it 65/70. Not that it's bad, but there's nothing outstanding here.
Too much Photoshop on some pics.
Not enough vids and they're not that good, too amateurish.
It's a one year old site, with a regular update (a vid or a pics' set) once every two days (usually). So don't expect a lot of content.
she's still cute, the back tattoo isn't that bad (not nearly as bad as belicia's anyway). looked around a bit and didn't see any photos showing her huge feet, so i'll have to take your word for it on that one...
Denner, did you notice that Hayden Winters has ink marks on her back (better known as tattoos), a belly button ring, and feet that are overly large? She even has a stud in her tongue. So I would not rate her as a top porn model. But I have seen the video "My Little Panties", and find it disturbing: A porn star should be wearing new underwear in her movies, and it appears she's been rubbing her panties over-much and needs a new pair (the old one has lint-balls or something over the crotch area). LOL
And that guy sniffing and chewing her panties? Does he have a fetish or what?
I am torn about this "improvement" myself, Denner. The picture is superb but up until now I downloaded the smaller, streamed HD videos (3500kbps, 1024x576px) with my helpful Firefox add-on and the picture quality was great with that one as well. Maybe not true HD but certainly good enough.
Now I no longer have that option. It's either the really large one at 1920x1080px with a total bitrate of over 10000kbps or the smaller one at 768x452px at 1535kbps. Nothing in between. There will certainly be a lot of soul searching in the future before I download and store an update! Just thought people might like to know!
Thanks, Denner, rearadmiral, my review was honest, but maybe some PU members will enjoy the videos at this site. My tastes are far softer than many PU members, even though I do find some hardcore that I enjoy. I like many Pierre Woodman videos, even though I think he is sometimes abusive to the girls. And I still don't understand how he is able to get them to do what they do, and even apparently enjoy his rough treatment.
But this site was a waste for me.
In spite of that, if you get a membership to this network, and this site happens to be included, you should check it out for yourselves. Because there are some models here who are actually porn stars. So you might easily enjoy the videos more than I do. Or want to view them out of curiosity because of the model in the video.
Thanks for the nice compliment, Denner. But make the age thing
78 yrs. next month.
Getting it up naturally "easy" at my age? Nay....
You're predictably too kind, Sir. Denner. That was yesterday. But thanks to modern pharmaceuticals and amazing prosthestic engineering anything almost is possible now.:-)
I'll never forget the first time I saw Blazing Saddles soon after it was released. It was in a theatre with a bunch of guys, and ... how to put this ... we had "prepared" ourselves for the hilarity. I laughed so hard it hurt, and the popcorn tasted extra-good.
Well, said, Denner. Your many accolades towards the subject remind me of the "speech" scene in High Anxiety, with Mel Brookes playing Dr. Thorndyke, the eminent pyschologist. From the script itself:
The woowoo?
THORNDYKE: Yes. The woowoo.
Perhaps the most significant
psychological feminine component...
...known to mankind.
The reason I proposed this poll is because some time ago I discovered, with some surprise, that I was sharing in PU things about my sexual life and fantasies that not even my closest friends know, only my sexual/romantic partners (and sometimes, not even that). And I was curious to know if I was the only one or if this was a common thing. And I am partly relieved to see that it's common for almost everybody :)
Thanks for the support, Denner. I wanted to download a few videos from the site to see what they were like. But as I said in this review, I can't currently download a complete video file. And a partial file is not playable. That is why I gave the site an extra-low score.
There are other sites in the network that are much better.
There are plenty of Melissa's around, and Lexa's, too, but when I see "the butt" attached to the name, I know immediately who it is! And she's got such a sweet face, too!
I'll keep the ITC in mind. There's a slowly growing collection of her at SweetAndNude, too, that's pretty outtasite. Plus the MetArt, HegreArt, etc.
Yes, she's The Ultimate Czech Butt, and that's saying something!
My current ISP DSL download speed maxes out at 150-160 KB/s. I am seriously considering paying more for a faster connection.
Until I do get a faster connection, the 3-day trials are not that helpful to me. To download a single 1.3 GB video file takes about 2 hours 30 minutes, and if I'm surfing the Internet or looking at other sites, that slows my download speed so the download takes even longer.
I can't really watch these videos as streaming, because they mostly stutter and stop, stutter and stop, while playing.
So I just need a faster connection. :)
There do appear to be a large number of videos at the Tony Bucks network. My experience has mainly been softcore photosets. I haven't seen any of the videos at Tony Bucks at other sites. There are some attractive models here.
Hey Denner,
You might want to check out a new find I just got listed: shedontblush.com
It's kinda small, but the content looks good and it's all exclusive. You might want to put it on your back burner until it grows some more. And they charge in Euros -- so there won't be any of that "regional pricing shit." ;)
I've dove back into TorridArt recently. The photo quality has really gotten great. And it's only 19.95 for a month, in greenbacks, anyway. (Hopefully, they don't do that "rpS.") ;)
Read your review of InTheCrack. Too bad they don't do the backside like TorridArt does. If they did, I'd be gettin' a hand cramp for sure, with that fast typing and mousing and all. But ITC has just two approaches to the booty: full body or "I, the viewer, am a housefly passing over a fragrant valley."
Hey Denner! Como estas? (Sorry, I'm too lazy to deal with accent marks.)
My well-honed credit-card-number-typing fingers got itchy when I last previewed Kscans, a couple of months ago, but it somehow cleared up. (Maybe it was the hand cramp.)
I've also seen stuff elsewhere that has shown up at Kscans. One, for instance, is "Kya" as she's called at Nubiles, or "Helen F" at MetArt, peeling her bedclothes off in a big bed. That one has made the rounds.
"Advertised as exclusive" is about as reliable a statement as "It really works" or "The check is in the mail." I mean, it COULD be TRUE! ;-)
Best not to "Get two. Just pay separate shipping and handling."
The last time I was a member I re-downloaded some of their older material as I had also lost it, and the quality didn't appear to be any better. Perhaps they have re-encoded some stuff since then, that was back in March. I doubt it though, I'm sure their focus is much more at getting new material out.
Agree with Denner. I'm a video guy and quit Met-Art after about 3 months. The photo sets are good with a lot of full spreads and excellent angles. But I agree; no heat at all, no insertions and very little eroticism.
Yes, we already established here that they do have downloadable video files. They made that a part of the site very early on. The early stuff was PAL resolution & framerate, 4mbps h.264 encoding.
By the way, if you do everything right (you uncheck all extra memberships and you cancel the trial membership on time) maybe you can get yourself a good deal; the problem is, if anything goes wrong...
08-27-1007:11am
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
