I have a current membership in the Diesel network. That gives me access to all 14 sites in the network.
I think the 3 best sites in the network, that have the most value are: 18 Only Girls
Young Legal Porn
Beata Porn
18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn are very similar sites that seem to trade material between the two sites, and still update.
Beata Porn is one of the other sites in the network that is still updating, and has an attractive model. Beata is not gorgeous or lovely, but she's a nice-looking model with a very nice body.
Denner,even if you haven't been a member of 18 Only Girls for over a year, I think if you rejoined the site, you would feel disappointed with the content because you would have seen most of it before, and the new material, while nice, would not justify the membership price. That's just my opinion.
The network has a slow update rate. (Most sites in the network don't update.)
There are some attractive girls in the network, but some of those attractive girls are from the "archived" content, material that was done years ago. And the amount of content on many of those attractive models is very limited regarding photosets and videos.
The Diesel network is definitely not a scam or a cheat. But for the money, once you have seen the contents, they just don't come up with enough new content to justify rejoining for a very long time. Much more than a year, because of the slow update rate. If they had the massive update rate of Nubiles or Teen Mega World, then a return membership to Diesel through 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn would make sense, depending on your tastes. Because the Diesel network has more limited audience than Nubiles or Teen Mega World, in my opinion.
But even if you like the material at Diesel, which I assume you did, you've already probably seen most of it. And you won't feel happy paying for a new membership based on the new content you will find.
The problem is not with the quality of the content: I think the quality of the new content is fine or acceptable. The problem is with the amount of the new content.
I think I deserve a special star for giving such a long, winding answer to such as short question.
Maybe it should be named: the Star for Being Unable To Simply Answer A Simple Question.
The last time I was a member was some time ago, and when I had joined it has very unclear what sites you got - if you used the TBP discount only like 15 sites showed up on the little thumbnails, if you didn't 20 or so showed up. Glad to hear they have clarified that as well.
I agree, this is a solid network. I've had my complaints since the first visit but I've also seen progress. The large number of downloaded video on my harddrive speaks for itself.
Nice review Denner, good to see this network is keeping the new talent coming. This network is definitely one of my favorites, my main complaint being I wish they were a bit more clear on the join pages exactly what sites you were joining - as it isn't always super clear.
Yeah, the score reflects the amount of duplicate content one eventually ends up with. As a starting site this however is not necessarily worse than the others.
Hey I watched that video of ABBA in Australia. I suspect that the camera operator was being just a little bit opportunistic with regards to Agnetha's gluteous maximus. But having seen it, I do understand, indeed.
Frida had nice legs, too!
And your X-art thread ... wow, I am most impressed!
Since August 2009 the videos have been in multiple formats - wmv, divx, ipod and flash - the bitrate has been upped substantially too.
The photos have also been in 2 resolutions since that date - 1280x853 and 2000x1333 and both are available in complete zips.
Also the price was lowered back to it's original price.
As beautiful as the models are on MPL, MetArt and the like...and as as glamorously as they are shot, those sites are just too artsy for my taste. I'm not into really rough stuff but I do need more than just nudity, that is,some kind of sexual action, to differentiate between erotic photos/vids on a website and oil paintngs in a museum.
I've stated my opinion on Met-art videos several times on the PU forums, and in my review of Met-art. And my opinion of Met-art videos has changed very little over the years. The Met-art videos have improved quite a bit since the first videos they posted, many years ago, on a technical basis. But almost all Met-art videos are, in spite of lovely young models, boring and a waste of time to watch. Met-art has created an artform in boring videos of naked, lovely young girls. What a wasted effort.
The erotic and sensual value of most Met-art videos is close to zero.
I also have been wondering about the style in which they shoot their movies in. I have heard great things about this site have been keeping my eye on it. I'm fine with directors making these movies more with an artistic flare as long as the actions is still good.
If it's a contest, I'd say that Nubiles and X-art have much more erotic vids than Met-art and MPL Studios. Nubiles has softcore and hardcore, the same with X-art, but the X-art approach is more softcore erotic, even when doing hardcore.
But if you are doing a straight comparison of MPL Studios and Met-art, then MPL Studios has more erotic videos.
Personally, I think the main value of Met-art and MPL Studios is in their photosets.
Nubiles and X-art have value in both their photosets and their videos.
X-art is the smallest site of the 4 sites. But if it had the same amount of content as the other 3 sites, I personally think it would be the best site to join. But that will never happen, because Met-art keeps adding content at a massive rate. And the other 2 sites are much larger than X-art.
But I think that all 4 sites are fine choices, to join. That's my personal opinion, because some PU members think Met-art is a waste of time and money.
I agree that Teen Mega World is less expensive, and offers greater quantity (through its network) and better technical quality videos.
But I've been a member of Teen Mega World twice recently. I didn't bother to write any reviews of their sites, because there have already been some fine reviews written by other PU members.
And I was looking for something different.
So in spite of the higher price, I thought I would give 18 Only Girls a try.
And I like that 18 Only Girls is less hardcore than Teen Mega World. I also like that 18 Only Girls has some nice photosets. The photosets, as I mentioned, are not the high quality of sites like Met-art and Mplstudios, but the photosets are still nice. I wish the photosets were better, I wish the videos were better, and there are other ways 18 Only Girls could be improved. But I think it's still a worthwhile site, even though there are better (and cheaper) sites around.
There are plenty of sites that I would like to try. But I only have so much money, and so much time. And it takes a while to go through a single site.
I still need to upgrade my Internet connection, so I can get faster downloads. There are so many photosets and videos to look through, to find something I might really like. And the people at PU are not doing my job for me: they like videos and photosets that I don't. Grrrr.
I need not only a faster Internet connection, but also a couple of clones, that will have my same tastes and opinions, that will search out material that I can really enjoy. But I can't really afford to make or build a couple of clones of myself, at this time. :)
Yeah I do agree with this it would be hard to beat Teen Mega World, its very good perhaps needs better navigation and search engine but can't fault the quality of girls they have. I guess though if you've been recently or still a member but looking for some more of the same this site could be good, this prce going up though does put me off though $19.99 for one site and $29.99 for the network would be good and atract more customers I would think.
Just to clarify on Viv Thomas: I haven't been a member of his site for a long, long time because I find it too pricy; I usually watch (and wait eagerly for) his movies in Hotmovies.com. But he is, in my opinion, one of the best girl/girl-action directors.
I also find that DDF has less of a problem with close-ups: although they do include them, they also offer wider angles and more full body shots.
Thanks, Denner, I didn't know that this was a common complaint, I assumed it was just me.
An example of a director that does not have this problem -and I think this explains at least partially his success- is Viv Thomas: his lesbian scenes are filmed with great taste, big angles and a special focus on the girls' faces while enjoying themselves.
Actually, I read slutty's review of this site yesterday, which is why I decided to join the site today, because of the high score he gave the site.
I also re-read your review of the site yesterday. When I read your review originally, that you wrote back in January of this year, I decided to avoid the site because of the low score you gave it.
I think that slutty's and my and your tastes are somewhat similar, in that we often enjoy similar things. We are not exactly the same, but slutty and you serve as useful guides for me, while other PU members can have far different tastes, and their reviews, although honest, have less relevance for possible sites I might join.
Having said that, I've been thinking about this site for a long time. I think some of the models are very attractive.
Your review put me off the site, and I didn't join, because you gave it a low score.
But slutty's review gave the site a much higher score. He does not think the site (or its network) is perfect, but he thinks it has at least a certain value.
So, because I think there are some really attractive models at this site, I thought it was worth taking a chance that I would appreciate at least some of the site material.
I've been a member of this site for less than a day. And I don't think the site is perfect. But because I really like some of the models, and I have looked at some of the photosets and videos, I think it was, for me, a worthwhile join.
Excellent review. This seems to be one of those hidden and overlooked sites on the Internet. I'm very interested in Adele Stephens. I know your review is more than 1yr old already, but can you remember how many video sets she had and what the quality was like?
It isn't really a clone anymore they release material on the two sites seperately now - although the older material is pretty commonly shared. The videos I dowloaded all seemed fine to me, the camerawork can be a bit poor - given the self-shot nature of some of the shoots, but this didn't really bother me that much The mid-mp4 was plenty crisp for me.
I went all the way back to their 2007 releases, and they have both low and high h.264 videos (mp4). I'm pretty sure they had these when I was a member here last time...
I agree the login is fucking irritating, but they email you a link now that fills out all the security info for you except the captcha.
I can understand the frustration of joining a site and finding a lot of duplicate material from another site, I haven't seen any of that lately, but maybe its just new to me.
I'm not sure about your complaint on variety, there are 300 models on this site. Given they are all young, and euro, so there isn't a lot of variety in ethnicity or age. But I think it is a reasonable variety of models that is consistent with most euro sites.
Everyone has their own tastes I suppose, I think the material is pretty good here and I don't feel as though I wasted my money. I guess maybe I go against the grain sometimes, I for one can't understand why people like 21sextury so much, that place just pisses me off for some reason.
12-09-1001:26pm
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
