| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
Reality Gang
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Colm4:
(james4096's Reply)
Ah I see, very sneaky of them indeed. Thanks for the update.
|
08-31-09 03:39pm
|
Reply
152
|
Score HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(james4096's Reply)
Thanks for the prompt reply and the info, James. Bottom right I can handle. :-)
|
07-28-09 01:21pm
|
Reply
153
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from messmer:
Great review, James. One question: How large are the watermarks on some of the picture sets in the sub-sites now. I know that a couple of years ago 40plus and XL Girls were almost unwatchable because the logos were so huge. Are they more discrete now, and when it comes to the videos how intrusive are they in them? Thanks.
|
07-28-09 12:25pm
|
Reply
154
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from GCode:
Ah, this is what I'm talking about! Glad to see you found a site that you liked recently :)
Keep up the reviews lately, they have been great.
See ya around.
|
07-27-09 07:02pm
|
Reply
155
|
Score HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(james4096's Reply)
Now that's a term I can understand. Brazzer tits are, by and large, enhanced with aftermarket adjustments by Dr. Gene and are becoming a total turn-off.
Naturals are best, by far.
When I was a Score member a few years back when the quality was lousy and the DRM was in force, at least the models were mostly (not always) natural.
And as James says, there were some "thick" ones in there with very large naturals bouncing on their very large bellies, but that's just fine. The assortment was good back then but the price and the HD have me interested; very interested.
Great review James. Thanks.
|
07-26-09 08:35pm
|
Reply
156
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
Pretty much have one question - Are they "big by good genes" or "big by good ol' Dr. Gene"?
|
07-26-09 12:39pm
|
Reply
157
|
Selena Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from GCode:
Another fine review james4096. By the way, I don't think I mentioned this early but congrats on breaking the 100 points mark. Always appreciate the reviews and I think I share a lot of common interests as you.
|
12-30-09 06:54pm
|
Reply
158
|
Selena Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from PinkPanther:
FYI - A better deal can be had by joining one of this company's premium sites - Karla Spice, Gigi Spice, Tania Spice or Pacino's Adventures - all of which include all of the 8 sites listed above as bonus sites. Karla Spice is a topless site, the others have hard-core content.
Gigi Spice's content is limited, I should say. I don't know how much more updates this company has in storage, but as of the beginning of November, pics are out and about of this model with enhanced boobs and a more mature look under the name Caroline Alverez - so when the current stash that they have has been posted, there will be no new material from "Gigi". I suspect that they will make it another bonus site shortly thereafter.
|
12-30-09 06:16am
|
Reply
159
|
Sexy Miss Lizz
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from seekr34:
(james4096's Reply)
Ah, that's ok, I can understand.
|
08-10-09 04:11pm
|
Reply
160
|
Sexy Miss Lizz
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from seekr34:
(james4096's Reply)
Her pics are .jpgs and her videos are .wmvs.
She has 7 pages of videos so far, each page has 17 videos. Each video has anywhere between 1 to 5 parts.
Downloading in zips....afraid not.
Download limit...no limit at all.
Download manager...not sure, never used it myself. I just right click and download.
Updating...she usually is consistant in updating each week. Not always but most of the time, once a week.
Her having sex...no, just her husband. She used to be a soft swinger, meaning she'll give oral to another guy and vice versa but no intercourse. Lately she hasn't done that often.
Other girls, at times, yes.
Fetish, yes.
Nope, never got tricked and very easy to cancel and very easy to rejoin.
As for joining PU, never knew about it before to tell you the truth. Will do search to see what other sites I been to, to make other comments and reviews. I see they have 4realswingers.com. Also a member of that so will work on that one. As for liking Lizz. Have to admit, I do. As I said in a comment, I always prefer amateur over professional. I guess because amateur is more real. Plus if I am able to communicate with the girl, that's a big plus. Most only view the girls as sex objects or what have you but I always been interested in their life and how they got started and such. Most of the sites I been a member of, I have communicated with the girl fairly well. I think there was only one site I been a member of where I didn't really know her on a personal level and that because she was damn gorgeous. LOL
|
08-09-09 07:09pm
|
Reply
161
|
Sexy Pattycake
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
from ih8work:
She is long past her sell by date. She has been online for at least 15 years and maybe longer. That means that she is probably in her mid 30's. want to know why she isn't changing the site/ She probably doesn't have anything to say about it. If you figure how much work can be done in a day and convert that into weekly or monthly updates, it is easy to see how there can be enough material in storage for years to come. I know people get mad, but paying for porn is considered the biggest waste of money there is. With all the xvideos/pornhub/youporn sites that allow you to watch virtually everything online for free, why pay. She isn't ever going to be nude. She was bery early in her career and it probably didn't make her any more money. Do yourself a favor and think about what she probably looks like now at 35 and not what she looked like 15 years ago when she made these videos.
|
01-14-17 01:39am
|
Reply
162
|
Sexy Samantha 38G
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from Watson:
Good review! I think it sums up her site quite well, although the content has probably expanded quite considerably by now. It would be great to see a new review of the site.
|
10-12-11 11:03pm
|
Reply
163
|
Sharing Paris
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from GCode:
Man james4096, you seem to be in a slump in joining some poor sites lately :( I checked out your recent reviews and there are so many in the lower numbers recently. I really hope you can get to join a nice site soon, I'd love to see a positive review SOME time soon! :)
|
07-23-09 07:58pm
|
Reply
164
|
Shemale Yum
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from seanchai:
(james4096's Reply)
After G-Code reviewed all of our sites and his major point was the image size, we polled all members of the site as well as free forum websites specialising in TS porn. Very very few came back wanting larger. We'll continue to monitor and do another poll in a few months but given the amount of people interested in it, it's not reasonable for us to do at this point.
|
04-23-10 09:46am
|
Reply
165
|
Shemale Yum
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from GCode:
(james4096's Reply)
lol about the webmaster response. But, I suppose some response is better than none. No matter how stubborn he may be, as you said I believe I was quite fair and I took all the discussions between him and I into account when writing this. Hell, it's even better than the new 2.0 review from TBP. I believe between your review and mine, everyone can get an understanding as to what they get from the site. Thanks for the response and positive feedback, james4096!
|
09-22-09 08:25pm
|
Reply
166
|
Shemale Yum
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from GCode:
(james4096's Reply)
Yeah, I really wish they made something like a cubic zirconia plan which was cheaper than the other plans, it really took a lot of indecision to come up wit the go ahead to actual fork over $125. But, I really did want to check out shemale yum and re-join shemale japan so I figured that at the least, I can join these two sites again down the road with the tickets to get updates after a few months.
|
08-18-09 07:17pm
|
Reply
167
|
Shemale Yum
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from GCode:
(james4096's Reply)
No doubt they have some great content. I have seen some great models from Grooby and they do some awesome things. They are a bit pricey in my opinion, but for good shemale content I've noticed the better sites are higher priced. Plus, I know grooby does update their sites so much and never lets anyone down in new content. I am not knocking down this site or their others personally, but I think the way of doing the updating of content downright quirks me. Waiting for an update or a new model or a new one coming back, watching it, get really in to the scene with the model in a great costume plus masterbating or toying/being toyed, then stop with no climax just kills a video for me :( As you said, you like some of those videos and I find that great, but to me when that happens the video's content goes down the drain. But, the scenes are usually great quality and the models are top of the line (that's why I think it sucks when this happens). Now that I think of it and getting more information from seanchai, I believe my score and explanations of my shemale japan review was a bit harsh. I think my own bias and being a bit annoyed at that exact time of the review, plus the foreign way that they were updating in this way played a huge part in a undeserving low score. I am waiting a bit more time for some more updates and I will def join that site again with these new things in mind. In the mean time, maybe I should scrounge some change up for this site, it does look pretty good :)
|
04-16-09 07:04pm
|
Reply
168
|
Shemale Yum
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from GCode:
You mentioned this was a site from grooby. I joined a site called shemale japan and commented that this particular site did a set up where they would have a model that gest updated with the first movie which is an interview and strip (that's it) then usually after that you get a bj or masterbation but I noticed that a few cut off before cumshots. Then the third update was usually a total masterbation scene with or without a cumshot. I told this to someone who asked me a question about the site and they misinterepted what I meant and told the webmaster that the models never came. However, the webmaster made a reply to me and said that this format was how all the grooby sites were structured. Therefore, is this the case for this site? Is it a mix and mash of video scenes of the models stripping and a guessing game if they cum or not?
|
04-15-09 12:14pm
|
Reply
169
|
Solo Access
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from mbaya:
I have never heard of a site rewarding you for a second month by raisng the price. This makes no sense.
|
07-06-09 05:30am
|
Reply
170
|
Solo Access
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from Denner:
Fine review - and fine warning.
Looking for new solo-sites at the moment - but after reading the review, I guess, I'll keep looking - thanks james....
|
07-01-09 07:34am
|
Reply
171
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from dracken:
(james4096's Reply)
It's a photo set you can see it here(set 3&4): http://tour.teendreams.com/cms/model/view/i=1583.
The model is found in the hardcore section, but there is no action to be had there according to my friend who sent me the link
|
08-02-09 10:07am
|
Reply
172
|
Teen Emery
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from GCode:
(james4096's Reply)
Thanks for the quick response and info. I think with all the content the price for a month for all of it seems decent enough. Of course, $19.95 would be a bit better but it's not bad at all. The Girls left Alone site kind of enticed me to respond to your review because that content looked decent enough with the teen emery stuff. The lesbian stuff isn't my thing too much but I'm starting to get a bit more in to at by having a current subscription to only cuties, I suppose I can like lesbian scenes if done right. Once again, thanks for the review and heads up on all the other sites, this helps a lot.
|
05-08-09 10:14am
|
Reply
173
|
Teen Emery
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from GCode:
Good review. She really throws out the 'cuteness' factor with those braces and pigtails in a lot of scenes :) I have one question: while you stated the price is high (i agree), what's your take all of the content that you can get with this site and the other sites included?
BTW, you are right with those video res's and rates, new sites should be so much better. I don't get it sometimes :(
|
05-07-09 08:47pm
|
Reply
174
|
Thainee
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from GCode:
(james4096's Reply)
Right on, if you have any questions let me know as usual. But yeah, I would avoid this site. The models are very tempting but I would not take the plunge. Maybe at $14.95 or even MAYBE $19.95 I would say mehhhh....maybe. But, at this current price, no way man.
|
09-22-09 06:01pm
|
Reply
175
|
Total Tranny Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from GCode:
(james4096's Reply)
Tranny Boss was the network that authorized charges to my credit card after my subscription without telling me and then denying it. The details can be looked at on the forum under this link: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=642
Regardless, it's pretty much the same thing that badandy400 with the incredible pass fiacso.
By the way, OnlyTgirls was fine for me to join when I joined individually but I just remembered that when I got my offer to join Tranny Boss, it clearly stated: "since you were a recent member of Onlytgirls.com, we are giving you a special join bonus at $9.95 for tranny boss" in an email and that email + price was what made me join. I hate to say it, but onlytgirls may be someone involved or the tranny boss network is using their dirty ways through onlytgirls somehow without knowing it. Personally, I think it's probably the first.
To be honest, I'd avoid joining this network even though the stinkin' place looks great. All these sites are like $30 individually and you get them all with this network for the same price. Ass Toyed Shemales is on my list but I think I'm holding back a bit now with this recent network association. However, the billing seems to be ccbill or epoch for these sites individually (I think). I don't know what this network bills through. I'm still a bit worried until I can get more confirmation or information.
|
05-08-09 10:09am
|
