| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Nerd Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
from Ston Nerd:
Hi James,
Thank you for your comment,
We have two video formats, HD and SD
90% of our movies are shot in HD and the other other 10% are our reality sites shot in SD wich still a great quality.
Our content is very good and gets better everyday, we are not a network that shoots similar from others, we focus on our own ideas.
We are also the new home of D. Sanchez one of the creators of the bus site.. and he used to work with BangB., and he has his own style and off course he will bring that to our network.
Please let me know your thoughts!
|
08-04-09 03:19pm
|
Reply
127
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from spot:
(james4096's Reply)
I was curious about this too and after searching their user forum for a little, you'll find the site owners of Newbienudes asked people to check out this site and write reviews:
http://www.newbienudes.com/forum/default...n&d=221020091800
http://www.newbienudes.com/forum/default...&d=2110200916130
The forums there aren't used by the majority of users (come on, they boast 2.3 million users and 2.3 million people are definately not using their forum). So just based on that, its going to be a biased review. When you see comments in their user forum from users who wrote reviews, along the lines of "Hope it contributes something for the site NN", you know its going to be biased. I'm sure people who are no longer members, don't pay anymore, etc aren't going to be asked to post a review somehow lol.
Make a free account yourself and do you own research, then maybe by a premium for a month. Just too much fake accounts, fake posters, and very little moderation when it comes to posting for me to even consider this a genuine "amateur" site anymore. Was much better years ago, but the site owners just don't seem to care about keeping it about genuine amateurs.
|
04-09-10 07:19am
|
Reply
128
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(james4096's Reply)
It wasn't just that. Without any real details, she really doesn't tell anyone much about what they can find on the site. The Pro section and the bottom line both read just like an insider's hype for the site.
|
10-18-09 10:45am
|
Reply
129
|
No Rest For The Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
from pat362:
I didn't see the scene but it wouldn't have appealed to me. I like anal sex but I don't really consider that sex as much as a circus act. There is no way that anyone involve in that scene enjoyed themselves. Just looking at it makes me feel uncomfortable. I prefer anal sex where the girl seems to be into it and there is no one that could act as though they enjoyed getting tripled penetrated.
I was shocked when I saw Verunka/Irenka/Sandra getting anal fisted.
I'd just discovered her and I'd only seen her do lez stuff before that scene.
http://www.norestfortheass.com/index.php...ofile.php&id=160
http://www.europornstar.com/Verunka/Verunka.html
|
02-02-10 06:50pm
|
Reply
130
|
No Rest For The Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
from Capn:
One in each hole is quite sufficient!
Cap'n. ;0)
|
02-02-10 03:40pm
|
Reply
131
|
No Rest For The Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
from anyonebutme:
It's not so much a scene but just a moment for a photograph just to say it was technically accomplished.
|
02-02-10 01:00pm
|
Reply
132
|
Nude 2 Rude
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from GCode:
(james4096's Reply)
I just joined 2 days ago but I will write a full site review for sure within 1 or 2 weeks. As far as your question now, I count 47 on each video update page with 3 update pages, so I'd say roughly 130-140 videos with some being 1-4 parts of a scene because the vids can be quite big, the highest res is 1920 X 1080 (1080i) HD WMV (not bad for 12.95? :)). As for the pics, there are roughly 75-85 models but these models are also categoized as model A with Model B if they are together with another model in a lesbian or threesome scene with about 1-8 sets per model. The site is a bit small and the organization could be better, but so far it seems to be quite good for the bang for buck niche.
|
04-02-09 09:57pm
|
Reply
133
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(james4096's Reply)
I suppose they do -- as long as you don't close the account until the last possible minute. Maybe it's a matter of recording not only the date you subscribe, but also the hour and the minute!
In which case, it would be best to subscribe in the evening, their time, so as not to miss any updates -- which post in the mornings.
Then maybe you can grab that last, 30th day update in the morning and quit!
|
08-03-09 02:27pm
|
Reply
134
|
Perfect 10
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from Xororos:
I agree 100%. I was very disappointed with the site. I'll probably write a review myself, although yours covers it very nicely.
|
03-31-09 11:55am
|
Reply
135
|
Perfect 10
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from messmer:
Thanks for the review! The "no zip factor" is always the deal breaker for me, especially if the pictures are as small as you say. No subscription to this site.
|
03-17-09 11:28am
|
Reply
136
|
Perfect 10
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from Goldfish:
I'm more of a video guy myself but I like a good photography site on occasion. Good to know this site has the false leads with the videos and the sub-par photos. No thanks!
|
03-17-09 04:17am
|
Reply
137
|
Perfect 10
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from badandy400:
Does not sound too promising. Guess I will have to put them on my avoid list for now. Thanks for the review.
|
03-16-09 04:40pm
|
Reply
138
|
Play With Faye
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from ace of aces:
(james4096's Reply)
ah, i see. are the other sites more delightfull? was it all together the money worth?
|
03-24-10 10:00am
|
Reply
139
|
Play With Faye
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from ace of aces:
(james4096's Reply)
thumbs up for trying that site out at first of all our users ^^
regarding youre statement i won`t try that site in the next 12 months :)
|
03-22-10 07:59am
|
Reply
140
|
Policeman
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(james4096's Reply)
I used to go over my limit for cons much more often. I tend to ramble and use a lot of words where other people are more succinct. I've given up trying to write really nice reviews. Though I do appreciate reading good reviews from others.
|
03-19-11 10:04pm
|
Reply
141
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
from badandy400:
Vent! I feel your pain on this. I have seen a decent number of sites that advertise other sites or networks. It gets old very fast. And when they use flashing banners it is enough to make me leave a site. Something that webmasters should look into avoiding.
|
04-14-09 09:47pm
|
Reply
142
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Netsirk:
(james4096's Reply)
Hi james4096,
Thanks for your post. And yes, customer service is an area that we're really focusing on this year and we hope to set the bar high for our competitors before the year is out.
I have no intention of picking apart your post. I appreciate that you've taken the time to post a well-thought-out opinion. What you're saying makes complete sense and you're entitled to your point of view.
The other sites you mention are great sites but we all do things a little bit differently. I hope that surfers don't think we're trying to be shady as like I said before - it's certainly not our intent. The best thing about pornusers is that you can read other people's experiences with a site before buying (and you get great discounts!) and make an informed decision.
Thanks again for posting,
Kris.
|
07-25-09 01:00pm
|
Reply
143
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
from Netsirk:
Hi james4096,
The intent behind displaying overlapping porn content on different site layouts is to satisfy differing porn users' tastes. It is never our intent to trick anyone into signing up to our sites. Unhappy customers cost us money when they cancel and poor reviews cost us new sales. It's in our best interest to make you happy!
We gear different sites towards different types of users. The examples you gave are good ones and we have long-time customers on all three. All three of those sites have different navigational structures, different layout and different video players. Some members of PORN.com would hate surfing porn on Downloadpass.com and members of Downloadpass.com might hate PORN.com
We invite people to check out all of our sites and pick the one that suits you the best - that's what's so great about PORNUSERS.com
We hope that you like one of our sites / designs and become a customer but we have it posted on the wall in the office...
"Different Strokes for Different Folks...."
Happy surfing,
Kris
|
07-23-09 12:19pm
|
Reply
144
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
from atrapat:
I had the same question when I wrote my Porn.com comment on 03-14-09 (Mega Site Pass + Download Pass = Porn.com?). At that time, according to the TBP facts and what I could gather from my Porn.com membership, it looked like you got the most content possible when joining Porn.com; the other two sites only gave you partial content. On a side note, I was unpleasantly surprised about not getting any reply from someone at the company since they have a pretty active webmaster at PU.
I never gave much importance to a company offering the same content through different domains (TBP is extremely helpful in identifying these situations) but you certainly have a point regarding customers accidentally joining the same content from two different domains.
On the other hand, I once tried to join a site through ccbill to get a temporary offer even though I had a couple days left of a monthly membership. ccbill detected the credit card I was using was still linked to a valid membership to the site and didn't let me join again. I wonder if the billing setting / provider this company uses in its myriad of sites would also block similar double membership attempts.
|
07-20-09 11:38am
|
Reply
145
|
Rascal Dog
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(james4096's Reply)
Thanks, james....saw this now.
Fine review - and one more q: are there any videos of Laurena Lacey???
|
11-17-09 02:40pm
|
Reply
146
|
Rascal Dog
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review from james4096:
@Denner
'cause I know you like her, they have 43 Candice Cardinele photosets and 6 videos.
The videos are:
Maid for Pleasure
Views From Down Under
The Big "M"
Sofa Seduction
Fantastic Fanny
Unbelievably Naughty
Not sure how much overlap from her site.
|
11-14-09 01:09pm
|
Reply
147
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from Denner:
Thanks for a NEW review of this damn pretty girl/model - if you like 'almost' teens with small tits - AND a great sexy charisma. Peachez got that!
It looks like the site and the quality of the content is getting better, according to james4096. It WAS needed. The earlier content was lousy - in video-quality.
Just found one newer video - a Christmas-hc - AND it's just great.
Is that the deal with all the newer videos???
|
08-02-09 10:10am
|
Reply
148
|
Real Punting
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from dracken:
Interesting review for an interesting site. It's almost like a reality site but not really since the girls on it are prostitutes. Could be interesting I guess. Will have to check it out at some point.
|
08-09-09 06:37am
|
Reply
149
|
Real Punting
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from atrapat:
I used to think punter was a UK slang term for customer, whether it's of a regular shop or a prostitute.
|
08-07-09 01:25am
|
Reply
150
|
Real Punting
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from mbaya:
Very interesting and well written review of a site I have had my eye on for some time. Thanks for the helpful information. I like the idea of nonpornstars, but was afraid of the quality.
|
08-06-09 05:02pm
|
