| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Goldfish:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
FYI Young Legal Porn is a recently renamed site. It used to be Youngporn.net. If you were a member of the network before and thinking this is a new site, think again.
|
07-18-10 06:59am
|
Reply
202
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from slutty:
Good catch man, it is also interesting that it is cheaper to get the 14 site pass through this site than through younglegalporn ($35 vs $40).
|
07-15-10 02:14pm
|
Reply
203
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks for this support - or maybe also sharing some views...
I'm mostly a sc-fan, too - but my main interest is softcore-videos/solo-videos (not much into lez) - but, still building up a pretty fine library of sc-photosets. (Like the old days, LOL).
|
01-17-10 06:07am
|
Reply
204
|
18 Stream
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from careylowell:
I'd give the site a score somewhere in the mid-80s 'cause of the rawness to most vids. Can a tripod be an unaffordable luxury? I realize this amateur feel would be a plus in many rater's eyes, those who do not care for the overly polished flicks from the US. While I've not an iota of proof I suspect these gals are getting their love canals reamed for peanuts compared to an American porn starlet's takehome.
I can't think of another site where both genders are on display under the models section. Is this important? No, but its certainty unique in my experience.
I enjoyed yer bottom line cts and wish my own reviews were as well written.
|
04-15-11 04:28pm
|
Reply
205
|
18 Stream
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from slutty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I went the spunkybee route that you recommended, seemed like the best offer.
combative was the word I meant, I am a typo king.
|
09-17-10 02:39pm
|
Reply
206
|
18 Stream
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Well, lk2 - with that dl speed the 3-days trials are not attractive, agree - man, do really consider a faster connection.
About the exclusive - I think it has to be a matter licensed material - I've seen a lot of those vids elsewhere at some russian or other easteuro sites - and I guees even at the S&S Royal Limited (Teensexmovs, Teensexmania ect.)
But no matter: I also agree here - generally quite a lot of attractive models...
|
09-17-10 06:06am
|
Reply
207
|
18 Stream
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from slutty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I agree that scoring is very subjective, and I wasn't intending to throw it out there as a disagreement with you, that was just my opinion of the network so far - sorry if I came off as compative. I have been pleasantly surprised so far, and there are a good number of models I hadn't ever seen before. The outdoor sex site and light bondage site are both pretty decent as well.
I haven't downloaded a huge amount of stuff from here yet, but I'll have to check out Klara.
|
09-17-10 01:12am
|
Reply
208
|
18 Stream
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from slutty:
Good review man.
I would say, that while the navigation is better than the rest of the network, it isn't exactly good (different models listed under same name, same model listed under different names, etc.). There are also some duplicate scenes across the network. Also, download speeds are a bit inconsistent for my tastes.
All the same, I agree with most of your points, I'd probably score it a smidge lower - maybe 86 or something including the bonus sites.
I agree that the material is definitely better than most euro sites, and plenty of American ones.
|
09-17-10 12:04am
|
Reply
209
|
18 Stream
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Denner:
Just some words from an "old timer" regarding those easteuro sites:
You will see all or most of this material outside this network - the Tony Bucks Company has never had a single exclusive as far as this PU knows. Even the enormous amount of vids from Teenburg can be found elsewhere...
Still there's a lot of great stuff here (and all for download in spite of the rather stupid name of this particular site). And the vids here are from somewhere at the network and other places..
Teenburg, Tinseks, Teensexfusion ect. all have good material.........and for rookies on these sites: Why not go for the 3-days deal and go hunting and downloading for 72 hours for the price of $ 4.95 - LOL. But still.....
|
09-16-10 10:14am
|
Reply
210
|
18 Stream
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks for the info man, very useful comment. I will have to look into it...
Also, it says the special offer ends on the 30th.
|
09-15-10 10:59am
|
Reply
211
|
18 Stream
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment from lk2fireone:
(Continuation of original comment. Added because comments are limited to a certain number of characters and a certain number of lines.)
If you join the same network from one of the other sites in the network, you will probably pay $29.95 for 1 month, but you will get a smaller number of bonus sites in your membership. You can get access to anywhere from 3 or more sites, up to 10 sites, depending on which site you join through. There are 11 sites in the network, but I didn't see any offer which included all 11 sites.
It makes no sense, offering access to different numbers of sites depending on which site you join through, but that's the way it sometimes happens.
At each of their sites, they advertise that the special offer ends today.
Maybe they will extend the offer, maybe not.
But if you are seriously considering the network, I would take advantage of the special offer, and join today, and join through the spunky bee site.
|
09-15-10 05:52am
|
Reply
212
|
18 Stream
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from slutty:
Good info man,
I hadn't really lokked at this site since it had "stream" in the name. But after looking it appears as though it isn't a streaming video site, I guess I'll have to look into it more...
|
09-15-10 01:34am
|
Reply
213
|
18 Virgin Sex
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
No certificate and I don't think anyone would believe them if they showed one anyway. Since you are a past member of Diesel and current one of TMW then you probably don't need to join this site.
TMW offers higher resolution videos than these guys do so it's another reason why you may want to avoide this one.
|
05-17-12 05:06pm
|
Reply
214
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from MargulisAZ:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
cool thanks for the feedback. Yeah I literally thought a lot of those pics were of the exact same girl and scene.
|
01-12-17 12:11pm
|
Reply
215
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from MargulisAZ:
so not including the newtwork sites, this site has 483 updates? are they all exclusive? I've never joined because the preview page was so awful to me, with just a bunch of pics from the same few scenes thrown in together in a mash and that's it.
|
01-11-17 11:52pm
|
Reply
216
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Hi lk2fireone, no I don't intend to write a review, nor spend much time at this site, sorry. I found out on the first day that it absolutely was not what I was looking for. I expected something like young.legal.porn with lots of solo videos and found to my regret a hardcore site specializing mostly in anal. I do intend to drop in now and then (if I still have access) to see if there are any updates I might like, but that's about it.
|
12-13-13 11:23pm
|
Reply
217
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#19
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Sorry, I wasn't very clear in my statement. My ISP limits me at a maximum of 100G of allowed download per month without surcharges. That's why I really dread the day most sites go Hi-Ddef. I can't afford to pay the cost of over downloading. I remember getting a bill of 400$ for one month of downloading. It was my fault because I knew I had a limit but the rules had just changed and I didn't pay attention to all the big video files I was downloading. I don't do that anymore. The first thing I always look at first are the size of the files. If they offer low, medium or Hi-Def then more than likely the medium file will win everytime.
|
10-19-10 06:37pm
|
Reply
218
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I think the major difference in this one(aside from the green tinge) is her hair style and she doesn't seem to be wearing any makeup and she's still beautiful.
http://picsgall3.tinseks.com/012/10/001/
I've never been good at guessing age either and as long as she's 18 than I don't need to. I'd hate to have older content from the days when some Countries had different legal porn ages. There is content out there of 16yrs old having sex and that content was legal then.
I have a very good internet connection and I can't complain about my download speed. It's my download limit that's bothering me. I'd love to be able to download big files and maybe one day I will but until then. I try to limit my video files to no bigger than 500Mb.
Even at that size I would eat up my alloted quota with only 50 scenes.
|
10-18-10 07:02pm
|
Reply
219
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I think that the best phtographers in the world might be able to get away with the natural look but it depends on far too many parameters to say that it's always possible. I think the proper application of makeup and correct use of lighting can alter a models appearance to the point where she almost looks like someone else.
The strangest part about her career is that she has appeared on many websites but only did a few movies. I'm guessing that it has to be by choice because there is no way that a director would pass her up if she was willing to do movies.
She's Daisy at nubile and she almost looks underage in the picture. Mind you she was probably 18 at the time so she wasn't far from it.
I'm also including 3 other links from the same site so you ca compare the difference from one scene to the next.
http://picsgall3.tinseks.com/011/10/001/
http://picsgall3.tinseks.com/012/10/002/
http://picsgall3.tinseks.com/012/10/001/
For some reason I don't think she's in it for the long run and I'm never bothered when a performer chooses a life outisde of porn.
|
10-17-10 05:33pm
|
Reply
220
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I don't know if it was just at the beginning of her career but I've often seen her under the name Benta. The one thing that seems to have remained constant with her is her looks. Some performer can look very different from one site to the other but she always looks about the same. Some sites make her look cuter but that could be because of proper makeup application and better lighting.
|
10-17-10 10:33am
|
Reply
221
|
1Pondo.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from slutty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks man, hopefully my splurge is a better value next time ;)
|
03-28-11 11:38pm
|
Reply
222
|
1Pondo.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I came into some fine birthday money, so I joined there and ddf, probably could have spent it a little better now that I think about it, but ah well... doubt i will be spending that kind of money on a site again.
|
03-27-11 11:03pm
|
Reply
223
|
21 Naturals
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Shen:
Very good, insightful review. Heh, I don't know if I'm becoming more aware or not but the foot fetish niche has become more popular over the last few years. Likewise, it does nothing for me but I know for a fact that there are quite a number of people into it. The only time it bothers me is when it gets too much coverage - I recall watching a video where it took up 10 mins of a 45 minute video from a site that is not foot fetish focused. There was only around 20-30 mins of total action as well so you can imagine how big that chunk was. But whatever, different strokes for different folks as with all niches!
|
03-05-19 02:00pm
|
Reply
224
|
21 Naturals
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from jook:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thank you!
I wasn't entirely serious, though it really does irk me to see newcomers with unhelpful reviews getting such merit.
However, I really don't think such a distinction is necessary. One can tell from reading a review whether it's reliable and/or helpful.
I know this is never gonna happen, but formatted or semi-formatted reviews that more or less force a reviewer to include certain information would go a long way to helping the quality of reviews. I think newcomers need this structure and I speak for myself when I was a newbie. But alas, this idea has been discussed and tossed in the trash bin.
|
02-28-17 03:56am
|
Reply
225
|
21 Naturals
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jook:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Not to digress, but I want more trust badges! I have 1 lousy badge, always one of the minute irksome things in my life, haha.
Which reminds me of the Reggie Hammond character... when asked what kind of cop he was, he responded:
You know what I am? I'm your worst fuckin' nightmare, man. I'm a nigger with a badge which means I got permission to kick your fuckin' ass whenever I feel like it!
|
02-27-17 03:19pm
|
