Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review from Tree Rodent:
Thanks guys. Had a real moral crisis on whether to do the review. Had it completed nearly six months ago and had to go with it now or it would be too late. I hate contributing to a forum that has censorship regarding free material, on the other hand I admit they do a lot of good, and help their members. I can't condemn them too much as they do seem to have a conscience.
It was asmith who said I concentrated too much on tech and not enough on opinion, content, and stuff that couldn't be found elsewhere. In looking back at my reviews I found he was right. My reviews did not explain what the site would be like to a new subscriber. So I wanted to do one that was better.
Added to that there were some things I wanted to say about this site. In my opinion TeenCoreClub has some of the best material on the internet, totally let down by all the negatives. With content of this quality it should be scoring 10 marks higher than the usual 80 something that everyone seems to give it.
I always enjoy what you two, Wittyguy, Messmer, Drooler, Denner, and the rest say. I find myself nearly always wanting to add something, but have stopped myself because of the PU censorship. I know this site does provide a great service for porn lovers so maybe I am being a little unfair. I may be putting in the occasional appearance as PU has always been great fun. Not sure what I should be doing. I know if this site were gone I would miss it, along with all the characters here.
|
02-25-10 05:25pm
|
Reply
277
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
from mbaya:
I agree. Nice helpful review and welcome back. I have always appreciated your opinions.
|
02-25-10 03:50am
|
Reply
278
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
from lk2fireone:
Welcome back after a long absence. You wrote a solid review, as usual. Hope to see you much more often, for reviews, comments, general posts, whatever.
|
02-24-10 09:02pm
|
Reply
279
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
I was a member a couple of years ago, so you can consider my information dated.
But there were very little tatoos on the models. Most girls are tatoo-free, the others are only modestly tatooed.
This is a mega-site for teens.
-5,600+ models
-1.4+ million pix
-1,400 vids
The quality of the pix is mainly good. The clarity (focus) of the pix is mainly good, the colors of the pix are mainly OK to good. The quality of the pix is not as good as Met-art or MPL Studios, but the quality is still decent for a lot of the pix.
The attractiveness of the models varies, but they do have a lot of the top European models on this site.
The vids I downloaded as a member were mainly soft core solo shoots of each model. There is hardcore on the site, both pix and vids, but as I said before, I'm not into vids that much because it's really hard to find attractively shot vids; quality photo shoots are just easier to make, for a variety of reasons: lighting, make-up, dialog (hearing these models speak destroys the illusion of glamor or style you want them to have), etc.
I do agree that the search feature is poor. I honestly do not know why these mega sites can not have a simple, easy to use search like met-art. Another problem is that different models can have the same name, which adds to the confusion. And the same model can have different names.
I think Teen Dreams is definitely worth joining at least once, to check out the massive collection of models, pix, and vids that are available.
But if you have specific desires that don't fit the simple criteria of a a mega teen site with a lot of pix and vids, then you are better off looking elsewhere to spend your time and money.
|
02-27-09 08:39am
|
Reply
280
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Wittyguy:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Actually, there's a good tat ration here. Only a few and they tend to be more modest. As for the vids, can't really help you there. Most of the solo vids are in the 10 to 15 minute range if that helps at all.
|
02-25-09 10:31am
|
Reply
281
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
from hoppytoad:
Excellent review, but I reckon 80 is way too high - this is a very disappointing site, wasting a lot of good looking models with poor-quality pictures and videos that have no chemistry at all. The camera's chat up lines on some of the solo/POV videos are particularly hopeless. Money down the drain for this user.
|
08-15-13 08:41am
|
Reply
282
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Stas RC:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Hi, now crossels are prechecked only on our secondary billing, it process less than 7% of all our users.
I`m still fighting with my bosses to remove these prechecked crossels.
|
06-04-13 04:34am
|
Reply
283
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
from Stas RC:
Hi, I want to apologize for that.
I`m trying almost everything to get my boss to remove these pre checked crosses :-(
|
05-27-13 12:29pm
|
Reply
284
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
from Capn:
I think this is becoming more widespread.
It is a worrying turn of events.
IMO it smacks of desperation.
Certainly not good!
Cap'n. :0(
|
05-23-13 10:25am
|
Reply
285
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
from Micha:
Yes a very good review, but 80 seems high to me
I personally love the thin young things but they were not enough to pull this one out of the fire. These are the slowest porn sites I have ever visited.Download speed does not exceed 178 Kbps
(I have a 2Mbps cable modem) Navigation is an experating experience.The whole network is juat klunky.
Do not consider these sites unless you have a DL manager. Fifty to one hundred download resumptions were not uncommon to DL a 25 minute vid. Without the manager they would all have aborted.
I am new to using a DL manager, so some of the problems may be with the user. The most common responses on these sites :
Error.....Server Busy...waiting to retry and Waiting for reply
Almost every page that loads has a notation that there is an error on the page. Images are missing everywhere. They may load tomorrow, or next week, but not now.
I will say that about 25 vids and photosets were of the best I've ever seen but most the remaining 3000 were of abysmal quality. Tricky Masseur,Fuck Studies, Nubile Girls and Beauty Angels had some decent content, less so for TeenSexMania and TeenStarsOnly.
The rest of the network is really not worth a look. Believe me, I've looked,
Anal fans may enjoy this site more than me. Rabid anal fans seem to make up the bulk of the vocal members and their comments. They seem to be of the “it ain’t good anal if it don’t hurt” school of thought. Not for me thanks.
AmateurTeenMover refer not to the models so much as the cameramen. TeenSexMovs is the porn equivalent of a recycling bin. Five to six hundred vids, mostly crap
|
06-19-11 08:20pm
|
Reply
286
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
from Stas RC:
Thanks for your review!
|
05-07-11 02:37am
|
Reply
287
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
from graymane:
I gotta say, squirrel, although I don't get around to checking out many reviews, this is about the best one I've had the pleasure of reading. If you missed any essentials at all, then it never was there in the first place.
All you left out, Pal, was the kitchen sink.
Congratulations.
|
05-06-11 11:58pm
|
Reply
288
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from slutty:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Good review man, luckily for me I like them with a little less baby fat. I very much agree with your points though.
Hadn't downloaded any pictures from there the last time I was a member, a shame to hear they are just scree caps.
|
05-06-11 09:34pm
|
Reply
289
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
from lk2fireone:
Excellent review.
Skinny white girl is the gold standard for teen porn models. Very few US or European sites deviate from this.
There is a large number of very attractive girls at this network. But the videos (and the poor photos) do little to show off the girls to their best advantage.
|
05-06-11 06:54pm
|
Reply
290
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Denner:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Thanks Squirrel, nice words there! And allow me to say: visa versa!
|
01-11-11 07:45am
|
Reply
291
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Hey Squirrel
Thanks!
There's a lot you have to leave out and something you forget along the writing of reviews - you know that.
But the new deal with those 4 quality-sites io the pack is worth the price. (you might be lucky to find some rare and exelent stuff at some of the other sites, though)
And if your're into those less known easteuro/russian/ukraine-models, you'll not go wrong here.
Don't know your taste in models - but here are all kinds - mostly teens, of course...
I'm still exited browsing through all those videos - but of course, they're are too large in file-size, if you go for the hq - the worse thing about this is you got to have patience to download all the good stuff - and a hd with a lot of space.
Still, the best tip here is the way to download small-sized scenes before going for the whole deal...
Cheers!
Denner
|
04-17-09 06:02am
|
Reply
292
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Thanks Squirrel - you're right - the preview is lousy in the matter of giving the user an idea about the updates (this site and network) in general.
BTW: The Teen Sex Mania site has a couple of updates (in the last few days) with this full/natural breasted (and not that skinny) Margo - nice material...
I did not regret this join.
|
05-30-10 06:33am
|
Reply
293
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from spazlabz:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Not all of the sites we have are available with a Teen Mega World membership.
|
07-01-09 06:53pm
|
Reply
294
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
I wish I could confirm one way or the other, but all I can say is that it wasn't available last month during my membership. If it is then that would be great for the next person who joins. I'm afraid that it will be a long time before I rejoin because they do not update often enough for mew to justify joining with less thah a year.
|
11-30-08 06:27pm
|
Reply
295
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Do you actually get this site on the network though, I don't see it listed on teenmegaworld
|
11-30-08 09:49am
|
Reply
296
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
I think you expressed the idea very well in your review of Teen Mega World:
"For some members, the thin girls will be an absolute plus, so I admit this is all about personal taste...Add 10 points to the score if you like thin young models but subtract 15 if you don't."
Personal taste is a huge factor in how much you enjoy a site. But patience and other factors also count: are you willing to wade through the junk you don't like to try to find what you might enjoy, or will the junk turn you off before you can find any material to your liking?
I know that I have paid for sites I barely looked through because the material I first saw was boring or disappointing. There might have been videos or photos I would have liked, but it just wasn't worth the effort. So psychology plays an important part in how much we enjoy a site, in different ways.
There is very little material at Teen Mega World network that I find really outstanding. But I think the network deserves a high score, not because of my personal satisfaction or dis-satisfaction, but because there is a large amount of content that is "good" quality and the price is low.
But the network could be improved a huge amount. By better material, easier navigation, etc.
|
05-10-11 10:58am
|
Reply
297
|
Teen Stars Only
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from lk2fireone:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
My theory is that by splitting the contents into 30+ sites, it makes the contents appear much bigger than if the contents were split into 1 or 2 or 3 sites. So it's basically a marketing decision, I think. Also, with the contents spread into many small sites, they can offer access to the sites through each separate site, and through a group offer which is through teenmegaworld, which is not a single site but a mixture of most of the separate sites in the network. Somebody might be drawn/interested in a solo teen site, a boy-girl site, an old-young site, etc. etc. And they could offer a loyalty program that includes more sites in the membership the more months a person stays a member.
So it's basically a marketing strategy, I think.
But the site layout and design for each site is basically the same, from the sites I've seen, as far as navigation and having a video with an accompaning photoset, and the different options for downloading are the same from site to site.
I was a member of teenmegaworld before, and Denner's review is accurate. The navigation has not improved at all: it's very basic, and the search is very poor as well. I agree with Denner's review, except my score is much lower, because my taste in videos is different, and I have a slow ISP download speed (about 160 Kb/s), which makes downloading a single video take about 2 hours (in high quality), and I can't play the videos in flash mode, because my ISP speed isn't fast enough (the flash video stutters and stops, instead of playing). I mentioned the cons in my review, which is why I gave the site a lower score than Denner, who gave it a 90.
If you are into gonzo teen sex, then the network has a lot to offer. I personally want something with a "prettier", more glamorous look, where the models are attractive (they do have attractive young girls, but they are not shown to advantage), and there is more than just a meat factory fuck-suck sex. I would like some tenderness, or some slight story behind the sex to give it some meaning, or where the girls are really excited and enjoying the sex. The girls and the guys could be shovelling snow or mud for all the excitement and heat and enjoyment they are showing in many of the sex clips. I mean, the guys look like the sex is a chore, like they are working for a paycheck, instead of actually enjoying sex with some really cute girls.
|
08-02-10 05:20pm
|
Reply
298
|
Teen Stars Only
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Thanks for the kind words. This site (and you get many other sites in the network with a membership) has some really attractive teen girls. The videos are all hardcore. But they leave me cold. I wish it was otherwise, because there are some lovely girls, but they are not attractive in the videos, and in the pictures they are even less attractive. That is me. I know there are PU members who find these videos hot, but I find them boring: hardcore fuck and suck, without any erotic or arousing quality. A real shame, considering some of the girls are really attractive.
|
08-01-10 07:59pm
|
Reply
299
|
Teenamite
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Fuck Studies is part of the TeenMegaWorld network, or maybe it's called the Royal Cash network, or the Royal Cash network.
That network is a solid teen network.
If you do sign up for that network, be sure to look for the pre-checked trial that will sign you for a 3-day trial to some other site. That trial turns into a high-priced subscription to the other site unless you cancel if you are accidentally hooked into a subscription. There's no reason to get the trial, so make sure you uncheck the box.
Only a few of the sites in the TeenMegaWorld network are currently updating. But there is plenty of hardcore teen content to look through.
The navigation is poor, the search is poor. But you can't have everything.
There are some very sharp (good clarity, good definition) videos at this network (TeenMegaWorld). The action is almost all gonzo: 2 or more teens banging away. But you have a lot of good-looking teen girls at this network.
The above is talking about the TeenMegaWorld network, not the TonyBucks network of my review.
|
11-09-10 09:42am
|
Reply
300
|
Teens Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment from Tree Rodent:
One thing to add - unfortunately Anal Euro is not currently part of the Team Skeet package, which is a real shame. Hopefully it will be added as a promotion sometime in the near future. If it is, I would rejoin this network.
|
06-18-13 07:36am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
