| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Voytastic
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from Tom929384600:
I would be very careful with such a statement, especially in regard to your trust level.
As far as I have read a lot of voyeurs are working for this site and you will not know who is where, why and whatfor and whats behind. Possible that one of those voyeurs perhasp published some of his videos in earlier times somewhere, who knows? But on the whole, I believe in the exclusivity.
On the other hand, its probably rather the reality that many "trial leecher" or even longtime members steel the content of paysites and put it illegaly into the usenet, trading clients or even other websites.
Whatever, I have all the videos have since been seen anywhere and find them great. love em.
tom
|
04-05-08 04:07pm
|
Reply
127
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from LPee23:
The photographer who goes by MarK shoots some really amazing stuff for W4B. Some of the best close ups around, and great peeing scenes too.
|
03-24-15 07:13pm
|
Reply
128
|
Water Bondage
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from JBDICK:
(littlejoe's Reply)
so top performances in that flick...
I liked James Gandolfini in it...He was totally believable in his character and I thought Joaquin Phoenix got his character right down to a beat...
Good movie...never saw the sequel, I always figure if no one from the original is in it, it's probably crap
|
04-12-08 04:17pm
|
Reply
129
|
We Live Together
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from Davit:
I agree with all these comments. As I said in my own review, it's unlikely you'd want to join this site more than once, as you just know the updates would be kind of more of the same.
It would be better if all the girls were changed regularly - if it was a different house with different housemates for each show. If that were the case, I might return. But as it is, it's not worth it.
|
01-03-08 05:23am
|
Reply
130
|
We Live Together
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from SnowDude:
I have to agree with this comment, although I felt the girls that were first featured on the site did the best job and were the most attractive. Individual video sets can be pretty hot especially when the "third girl" is really into it, but the setup does get very stale:
Girls go out partying/eating/shopping. Spot third girl, act like they have never met her before, and quickly convince her to come back to their apartment. Arrive at apartment, ask third girl if she's been with a girl, and commence lesbian sex. End up in shower together.
I'm not saying it isn't hot because it is, but after awhile I didn't see much reason to stay a member since I'd seen it all before. The site would be much improved with some variation or even being truthful about the setup rather than thinly veiling the repetitive plot. If you do happen to like the reality genre and young lesbians, you really can't do much better.
|
01-29-07 08:42pm
|
Reply
131
|
We Live Together
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from TheConnoisseur:
Yeah...you're right about this one. Usually with these "reality" sites, the same main "actors" are used, and the only difference is who they fuck. It does get old after a while.
|
01-25-07 08:07pm
|
Reply
132
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(littlejoe's Reply)
My experience is discussed in a comment I made last August.
All problems were resolved but not easily. There is no support function available to members. Fortunately the webmaster reads posts on the PU site and posted a reply with his email address. He was on it immediately.
I decided not to renew mainly because of limited time, but once I was able to access the site (and the two sister sites) I was impressed with both the quality of the material and the natural beauty of the models.
I hope that the webmaster has since added a support capability to address issues that arise.
|
02-28-13 11:59pm
|
Reply
133
|
Wild Rose Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from SnowDude:
(littlejoe's Reply)
Thanks for the heads up! Was it every site or just some of them?
|
04-16-07 06:28pm
|
Reply
134
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from tangub:
I do think the tours are misleading on these sites in that they don't make it clear that what you see in the tour is the network updates and requires a $99 minimum spend to see it all. The figures they quote for the number of models, images, scenes etc are for the entire network and not a single site subscription.
|
10-09-12 11:19pm
|
Reply
135
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from slutty:
18only is not an exact duplicate although there is a fair amount of overlap, for a while it seemed as though they'd put the video on one site and the photoset on the other, although I don't know if that is still the case. As far as the size of the site, it is pretty large, so 326 pages may be accurate.
|
10-09-12 04:06pm
|
