| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Nude Sport Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review from littlejoe:
just chiming in to say the newest vids are still 720p but look great. one of my favorite sites
|
12-19-12 02:45pm
|
Reply
102
|
Nude Sport Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from JBDICK:
littlejoe
Is the preview page evverything on the site. file sizes look good. the only thing I don't like is they look like they start off naked straight away which is a shame... nice to see girls with tight gymwear on before we get to the stretch and letch...
nice looking girls though...
another question...is the trial a real offer or is it restricted in anyway?
|
05-06-08 11:40am
|
Reply
103
|
Nude Sport Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from kkman112:
Nice review. I was a member around the time when they first opened the site, so I havent given a review. I really like their content. You can't beat girls working out! I just never really liked the site they included, nudevoyeur.com. I wish they would offer a 2-site price including this site and SpecialExercises.com, their other exercise site. I am planning on joining again soon to see what new stuff they have.
|
10-14-07 04:37pm
|
Reply
104
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from JBDICK:
(littlejoe's Reply)
Hi littlejoe
thanks for the compliment...promise not to let it go to my head unless there's a fit fanny choking my whammy...
I just joined Killergram.com...done a review. I just had to get it off my chest...
The Girls are very vocal on there. Which I like. Have a Hard Spot for Delta White...Ding Dong.
Anyway, I hear that PMT will most defintely be providing us with plenty of Bushy Badgers in the near future.
I know he has a VAST collection...and the key thing about his stuff is that you can't reproduce it anymore. It is priceless because it's in the past...having said that, I know he has got curreent stuff aswell, I think I downloaded about 20GB about 2 weeks ago.
Anyway, thanks again for the reply and vote of confidence...
I Love TBP & PU...it rocks.
|
04-08-08 05:30pm
|
Reply
105
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from paulmarkham:
Hi Littlejoe
Thanks for the review. Some good points.
Can you tell me more about the downloading problems so I can sort them out. You should be able to download in the back ground while you surf the site, but I can't allow auto downloaders at the moment. we are testing new software that will keep out password traders, if it proves good we will loosen the download levels. Passwaord traders are a problem and a few of those with auto downloaders running will grind the site to a snails pace for everyone else.
|
02-11-08 12:42am
|
Reply
106
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from Davit:
Have to agree about SE getting worse in recent months. Whilst the technical quality (resolution, picture quality) is better than the vast majority of sites out there (even better than many so-called HD sites), the content has become dull. I think the webmaster has taken his eye off the ball for a while.
Still, it's worth a month's fee to get all the archive, which is still mostly brilliant stuff, very reminiscent of what we see from Viv Thomas.
|
01-19-08 05:44pm
|
Reply
107
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from cross eyed:
I agree - Older stuff much sexier even though the video quality is lacking.
Newer content has excellent video quality, beautiful girls but lacks the heat of the older stuff.
Still a great site worth every penny.
|
02-09-07 03:10pm
|
Reply
108
|
She Muscle
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from SnowDude:
(littlejoe's Reply)
Hey Joe,
I would say that SheMuscles had the most erotic and explicit sex themes of any similar sites, but there are muscle girl sites like Land of Venus, Sexy Muscular Women, and The Female Physique that I would say are related. All of them are in the database here and at TBP, so check 'em out and if you join any please do a review!
-SD
|
04-04-07 04:51pm
|
Reply
109
|
Sleeping Tushy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from RagingBuddhist:
(littlejoe's Reply)
Not sure what a spam bot means in this case, but I do know there's quite a difference between "quite good" and a perfect score. Unless things have changed since I saw a couple of their episodes (maybe a year ago), the video quality alone was enough to drop their score. 320 resolution doesn't exactly put you on top of the heap by any stretch of the imagination.
I also think that someone telling me what my porn preferences are, as in, "This site has everyone's fantasy in it", could only come from the mind of someone trying to sell a site. Is it quite good? Maybe. Is it my fantasy? Nope, sorry. Is it a perfect site? HELL no!
|
01-24-08 02:38pm
|
Reply
110
|
Strapon Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from King:
320x240 vids resolution? Tell me new are better, please!!!
|
04-24-07 04:09pm
|
Reply
111
|
Streamate.com
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from atrapat:
Both PinkPanther and pat362 are right. Streamate.com's "private" is referred at other cam sites as "group" since any number of user may join and chat with the model. It's easy to tell when a model is in exclusive because you don't get the option to join her current "private".
Things get complicated when you throw in the flat rate "gold shows" in the mix. If you have the time and courage, you may try reading my "Taxonomy of a Host's Online Status" comment further down at the Streamate.com comments section here on PU.
As to what models prefer, I've seen all kinds of situations at Streamate.com: models who don't even know that the exclusive option exists and also models who set the exact same price for private and exclusive to encourage 1 on 1. When I asked a model who set the private 1 cent cheaper than the exclusive, she said she did so because she couldn't cope with the multiple requests at the same time that come from a non-exclusive chat and preferred giving attention to just one member.
|
05-02-12 11:57am
|
Reply
112
|
Streamate.com
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from pat362:
I think pinkpanthers explanation makes sense and I just want to add that there must be a huge increase in the cost associated with the type of show. Private cams shows are, in my opinion, unbelievably expensive to begin with so I can imagine that getting an exclusif one would be nothing less than astonomical.
I've seen mentions of private shows for porn performers in the range of 12$ to 14$ a minute. That's private so exclsuif would have to be at least twice as expensive for them to even consider doing it.
|
05-02-12 10:04am
|
Reply
113
|
Streamate.com
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from PinkPanther:
I'm guessing, but it's not a complete ass-in-the-wind guess. I believe that with the normal private show, other users can also gain access. If you click on a message that a model is in a private show, you get a message, "This model is in a private show, if you want to join, the cost is $3.99/minute" or whatever.
Given that reality, I would imagine that the model can work out a deal with a guy to block all other users so that she is truly exclusive to that 1 user. Is that important to you that you be the only person giving the private show? If so, then exclusive is better. If it's enough that the model is giving you a show where she is responding to your desires, then the exclusive option is really only better for her (she gets to charge more).
|
05-02-12 06:53am
|
Reply
114
|
Teens in Wet Panties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from WeeWillyWinky:
(littlejoe's Reply)
OK, littlejoe, I reviewed a bunch of vids.
Most of the girl/girl vids I saw feature what sound like American girls. A few of the solo models have accents. My favorite, Vanessa, sounds German, and she has nine or ten vids where she feasts on her own dirty undies as well as those from her "panty girlfriends", as well as masturbating feverishly with them. Unfortunately, while I think she's very hot - she reminds me of a woman I worked with once and on whom I had a terrible crush - her vids are just too whacky and hectic for me to enjoy. I prefer much more subtle stuff. BUT, if a woman "tasting herself" is your biggest fetish, you would probably like them, although her vids aren't of the best quality. The best quality vids are mostly solo/strip/tease/masturbation scenes.
I didn't mention it in my review, but there are some b/g vids as well.
From what I can see, the content at this site seems to come from several different sources.
|
12-01-08 11:18pm
|
Reply
115
|
Teens in Wet Panties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from WeeWillyWinky:
(littlejoe's Reply)
Well, if that's your biggest fetish you are bound to find something to like at this site.
I can't look through what few videos I've kept from here since my kids are over at the moment, but may give a better answer later on...
I can't tell you if most of the girls are European. Many of them have accents, but the dialog is so silly, for the most part I usually turned the sound off. Not only that, most of what I downloaded were solo vids.
Will try to give a better answer later.
|
12-01-08 05:59pm
|
Reply
116
|
Tushy School
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(littlejoe's Reply)
Great news! Really appreciate your reply! Thanks.
|
01-27-09 08:32am
|
Reply
117
|
Tushy School
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from Jay G:
Joe, I take it your opinion of the site has improved from "Don't bother with it"?
I'd like more information if it's now worthwhile. I've been tempted before, but your warning kept me from it.
|
01-26-09 03:45pm
|
Reply
118
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from DavidinVegas:
(littlejoe's Reply)
I gather you are a member of U.S. and I have wondered if the member videos are longer than the previews or the 6 segment samples that are around. You say you have almost 18 gig so I am guessing there are a lot of them available and they are fairly long?
About how many new "matches" appear each month?
Thanks
|
04-23-07 05:23am
|
Reply
119
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from SnowDude:
(littlejoe's Reply)
Thanks little joe! I have always thought I'd enjoy it, but it's getting more likely I'll join. I just have to be careful about which sites I join since my budget is smaller than I'd like! ;)
|
03-31-07 09:56am
|
Reply
120
|
Underwater Show
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from rearadmiral:
I don't know whether to say this site is odd or interesting... But like you, I suspect that I'd find it repetitive after watching several scenes.
|
01-10-18 02:27pm
|
Reply
121
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Call meta billing, tell them you cancelled and are still being billed.
If that doesn't work, call your credit card company and tell them you are being billed after you already cancelled. That any charges from that site are fraudulent. If need be, cancel your old credit card account, and the credit card company should give you a new account number, without any charges to you for the new account.
|
11-09-13 07:13am
|
Reply
122
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from dracken:
Good review.
Caught the good and the bad about Videobox.
I am curious what kind of download speeds did you get? My membership goes up and down depending on the time of month or something :) Just curious to compare.
|
11-07-11 05:32pm
|
Reply
123
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from gaypornolover:
I've joined VideoBox Men and agree it has lots of content but not necessarily the quality. Must post my review of that soon. Good review!
|
11-06-11 12:31pm
|
Reply
124
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from messmer:
If you refer to a buggy web page is that because if freezes on you? I know this happens quite frequently with me, everything goes swimmingly and then, no matter which link I click on, there will be no response from VB for a while. As to your speed, that might be a problem on your end (provider, routing etc.) I regularly download at a speed of 1.7 MB/s, not my top speed but good enough.
|
11-06-11 09:59am
|
Reply
125
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from Monahan:
Been a member for 4 years straight and love the site. When I joined we got 1 new video per day. Now it's 5 with an occasional bonus. The five used to be loaded every 4+ hours during the day. Now they drop all 5 at the same time, an improvement.
I agree with LJ's review except I would boost the score by 5 or 6 points because for sheer content there's no other site with nearly as much stuff. I can't go much higher than 86, though because their identification of the talent still really sucks. If you want to check out a specific model, you'll be really frustrated because to find all of a girl's stuff on the site you need to try a search on several different spellings and even that doesn't always do it especially when they do not identify the girls in the first place.
Good part - Huge inventory.
Bad Part - Lousy needle in a haystack search feature.
|
11-06-11 09:24am
|
