| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
451
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from atrapat:
When I joined Christy Marks (also by Score) some time ago I also went through a similar page. I don't remember if the credit card page was sent through HTTPS but it was also a page hosted at score servers. I was eventually billed by an unheard of billing company but haven't had any issues afterwards.
You may try altering the http part to https. The server has a certificate but it is for score-cash.com domain (the page you receive is at scorehd.com); you will have to set up a certificate exception but you'll be able to join through a secure page.
Needless to say, an HTTPS certificate costs money (not much, just about a 100$ yearly) but for a company that conducts its business online is a must.
|
04-11-10 07:55am
|
Reply
452
|
Score HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from alexmedia:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yeah, strange join form. I've never seen like this before.
|
04-10-10 08:48pm
|
Reply
453
|
Score HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from alexmedia:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
CCBill not only one good billing company. Probably they have their own merchant account. Do you remember what was domain where you have to enter your credit card info?
|
04-10-10 07:55pm
|
Reply
454
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from alexmedia:
What billing they used when you tried to sign up?
|
04-10-10 06:41pm
|
Reply
455
|
Score HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from james4096:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Good question.
Eh, little bit of both. You will see some chicks in there with mega implants, but also some with big natts. I don't know for sure cause I'm no expert, but they usually have a natural keyword in there if they are.
But everybody should be warned that some of the girls, especially the natural ones, may be a bit thicker every where else too. Especially in XL girls and Voluptuous.
To really appreciate this site you gotta like really big tits, not brazzers tits. Not for everybody.
|
07-26-09 01:15pm
|
Reply
456
|
See Me Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Simarimas:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
hello RagingBuddhist.
I do apologize if you feel this is an advertisement. I can assure you I have not solicited these reviews at all. I had actually forgotten about having my site on here until I received an email stating it had been reviewed.
I do however appreciate the kind words from the members of the site who have reviewed it. We are still growing, and not where I want the site to be yet. I do try to get atypical models for the site, ones who are pleasant to be around. It doesn't always work out that way, but it is an ongoing process. My biggest complaint about the site is that we do not have models who are on 24/7. And I wish we had more models willing to do videos etc, for the site, but I do not ask them to do anything they aren't comfortable with.
That being said, RAGE to your hearts content. :)
|
02-11-12 06:32am
|
Reply
457
|
See Me Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Capn:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I love a good rant.
For me, it doesn't matter if I am Ranter or Rantee!
I always appreciate a good one!
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-08-12 04:33pm
|
Reply
458
|
See Me Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from slutty:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Given your replies for both reviews were similar, I figured you were just simmering.
|
02-07-12 11:37pm
|
Reply
459
|
See Me Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from jd66:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
As a real user of this site for about 3 weeks, my only important negative at this time is that there are not enough models on the site so that there is always someone to chat with. When the roster is expanded a bit that should not be a problem any more. I do have a favorite amongst the current models and she is on quite a lot so I have been very satisfied with the site so far.
|
02-07-12 09:13pm
|
Reply
460
|
See Me Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd66:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Mine is not an advertisemnt. It my honest opinion about the site. I have not visied many adult chat sites and this is the only one where I have gone into a private chat and that was because the host was simply very sweet, friendly and drop dead beautiful. The site is smaller than most but the girls are beautiful and very nice to talk to in free chat. There is not much pressure to go into private chat but it available if you want it. One of the host my favorite one, actually, often goes on during the day just to chat with the users, sitting off camera. I have never seen her even ask for a tip during those times. She is just try getting to know the people who come to the room. In the evenings she is usually on camera and is available for a private chat. I have found it to be a friendly site with a small number of quality hosts and it is a great place to spend some time. Before you judge my review unfairly. go see it for yourself.
|
02-07-12 08:35pm
|
Reply
461
|
See Me Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
How many until you start raging?
|
02-07-12 08:26pm
|
Reply
462
|
Skin Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from graymane:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I'll take your word for it, RB. I sincerely believe your're calling it like you see it. All I can say is we're seeing this thing obviously the same way but interrupting it differently.
For years my old skinvideo page has popped up the same way...displaying my favorites and features in the exact manner. About three or more months ago an entirely new page appears with the new features and my old page recessed in the background. I have to manually click on it each time to bring it to fore.
Sometimes it doean't work at all.
I tell you RB, I know this site like the back of my hand, and it ain't the "back of my hand" anymore.
|
07-04-10 09:12pm
|
Reply
463
|
Skin Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from graymane:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Oh yes, RB....there is a dramatic turn-over here. Everything now is in the color of blue, with a list of the different nitches (sic) and fetishes in the left column. You might trek on over there and you'll see what I mean. In the right, upper, darkend background you'll see the old program with an option to switch over. Being a non-member might not reveal this, and if that is the case, then trust me, the change is real.....and disturbing.
|
07-04-10 06:58pm
|
Reply
464
|
Skin Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
always happy to help where we can.
Glad it worked out ok for you.
|
12-19-09 06:14pm
|
Reply
465
|
Skin Video
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Khan:
I just checked and I am seeing the $9.95 we show in the listing. As well as cookies, make sure you clear your cache (Temporary Internet Files) and then revisit directly from our link.
|
12-19-09 08:22am
|
Reply
466
|
Sleeping Tushy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from littlejoe:
im not a spam bot and for this kind of site its quite good
|
01-24-08 09:32am
|
Reply
467
|
Sleeping Tushy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Drooler:
Thanks for posting this. What are these people THINKING?? ARE they thinking?
|
01-23-08 02:17am
|
Reply
468
|
Slut Savannah
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from savannah:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks for your response and your insight. We (my husband and I)have not been a part of this before as this is our first and only endeavor of this sort. We were unaware of the problem you identified. We would expect a few more responses since we posted the opportunity to our members. We however may not have any more responses; you know how easy it is to do nothing.
It is our intention to offer personal and real service not hype. It is also a site with the chronicles of real life sex not scripted. So I guess I am saying we plan to do this for a long while since this was our life before we went public with it.
I wish you the best for all you do. We know what it is like as we have been blessed with a very good vanilla income so we can do this for fun. Thanks again Savannah
|
01-30-08 07:05pm
|
Reply
469
|
Slut Savannah
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from savannah:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I am sorry for the confusion, Bryant is a member of my site. We were excited about being listed on porn review. There are several of my members that e mail me often. We checked out The best porn and they have a recommendation for webmasters to ask there members to give an honest review. My request was: “If you get a chance please go to The Best Porn and review our site. I would appreciate any input to improve the same.”
There are no incentives or extras for this. It appears that only 2 people did a review and they were stricken. Please do not take it out on them. We are a new site and I am dedicated to making this a honest and successful site. With the site you get me, not a model or an agency. This is a real chronicle of my life. I have been doing it for 6-7 months now online. I have been doing the activity you see for years. I answer all of my e mails and chat with all who write me. I guess I have become good friends with many of my members.
I update 2xs per week. At last count we have over 30 picture sets on the site or about 5,000 pictures (est.) These are shot with a Canon 8d in 12 megapixel reduced to 3 meg for the site.
We also have about 28 videos so far. They are shot with a FX 7 High Def Sony camera in surround sound. The videos go from 6 minutes to 30, sorry but I do not know an average time. We are not trying to shill a site as you say but rather following the recommendations of this site encouraging our members to give there input. I ask all of my members to give feedback even the ones that cancel or site shop.
It is not their fault so please do not be too hard on them for listening. I hope you understand now why there were two reviews for a new site so close together. Thank you for listening and please if you have any recommendations let me know.
Savannah
|
01-30-08 08:58am
|
Reply
470
|
Slut Savannah
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from bryantj:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thank you for your input i am just new to the review side of it sorry for being so green should i add that stuff to my review?? Never really paid for a site till now so i appreciate all feedback thanks
Bryant J
|
01-29-08 08:50pm
|
Reply
471
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Ed2009:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Videos now come in two formats. HD videos are provided in 1920x1080, 1280x720 & 720x405. Standard Definition videos are provided in 720x576 (high quality - sharp picture) and 720x576 (low quality - half the datarate - ie half the filesize). Details are given on the main page and in the videos section of the free tour.
There were originally two reasons for removing the older videos. First of all it gave an extra reason to maintain a continuous members (VERY important for the site's cashflow) and secondly the server was running out of space. Space is no longer an issue.
To be honest I still reserve the right to remove the top quality versions of older videos, but I don't actually do it any more.
|
01-16-12 02:24pm
|
Reply
472
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Ed2009:
I haven't taken any videos down from the site in months. Many of the videos in recent months are posted in FullHD quality with the LOWEST quality option being 720x576. I don't think I've posted any videos at 352x288 in several years!
The review you are referring to is a little out of date unfortunately.
What exactly is a "full length scene"? I shoot the entire game from start to finish, usually with no cuts at all. I'm not quite sure how I can shoot more game than there actually was without scripting it (which I don't do - all games are allowed to play out for real).
|
01-16-12 08:13am
|
Reply
473
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from pat362:
You have now learned the most important thing you should always do before joining a website. I always look at TBP and more importantly the date the facts were updated. There are many sites with an older review but the facts seem to be updated pretty regularly so that you have at least current info on the content.
I just looked at the site and they currently have 94 videos which is only 7 more than when TBP updated the info last May. They now have 28527 pics which is a little more than 1500 pics from last May. I'm a video guy so 94 videos for a site that is 10 years old is not remotely enough.
|
01-15-12 08:54am
|
Reply
474
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Marcus:
Wow, I have pretty low standards I'd say for video resolutions compared to a lot of people, but 352x288 is pretty much unacceptable nowadays.
|
01-15-12 08:42am
|
Reply
475
|
Swinger Quest
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Chipster:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
The existing content earns the high rating. These couples seem like genuine amateurs switching off for some money. Look at some of the sample movies and judge for yourself. There is genuine lust in these sex scenes. I wanted to share, since this site was hard to find. I have been with TBP for over a year, just realized I could add reviews, so pardon my journalistic rust.
|
02-05-08 04:21pm
|
