| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
426
|
Pornstar Classics
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Harley Girl:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Hey There!
Yes unfortunately all our videos are watermarked with our website names, even into members downloads! BUT... the good news is that you can download as many movies as you want and keep them forever!!!!
Hopefully you will still consider joining our sites despite the "annoying watermark"
;)
Cheers!
Harley Girl
|
10-01-09 04:08pm
|
Reply
427
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Roberto281:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Ragingbuddhist, if you like old stuff, you might want to try the Smithsonian,they have some really hot pictures from 1920.
|
02-04-13 07:42pm
|
Reply
428
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Implants were still quite new and not yet as popular as they became.
It is sometimes too bad for guys like us who remember a time when the girls who had large breasts did so because of Mother Nature and not a surgeon's knife.
I also found the statement ancient to be quite funy when talking about porn made in the last deacde or so. It's even strabger when you consider the age of the poster. I like ancient porn because I much prefer the movies made in the 70's and 80's.
|
02-03-13 11:06am
|
Reply
429
|
Pornstar.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jd1961:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Come on!
Not being able to share login info is not a con!
That is funny.
|
10-12-09 01:46pm
|
Reply
430
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Hey RB, thanks, the site might appeal to you since I know from past reviews and discussions you like the kinky side some. I sometimes go off into the more out there sites and I am still a member on it, going on my second month since I didn't get to download everything I wanted. And a big plus in my book, I haven't deleted any scene I downloaded and watched. Seems like a site that fits the quality of quantity heading.
|
11-19-12 02:50pm
|
Reply
431
|
Puffy Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from wetandpuffy:
Good morning, I have just seen your comments about the unsubscribe link. If when clicking this it is not working then I will fix this immediately. I will send you a private email and if you could let me know what your username or email is in there then I will ensure you are removed from all lists.
|
08-07-17 12:36am
|
Reply
432
|
Puffy Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I'M IMPRESSED.
I TRIED USING NOSCRIPT BEFORE, WITH FIREFOX.
BUT IT WAS TOO MUCH WORK.
SO I JUST DEPEND ON NORTON SECURITY FOR MY PROTECTION.
|
07-27-17 01:08pm
|
Reply
433
|
Puffy Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I'VE READ THAT IT'S BAD TO HIT THE UNSUBSCRIBE BUTTON ON SPAM.
DIFFERENT REASONS FOR THAT:
- IT TELLS THE SENDER (AN AUTOMATIC PROGRAM) THAT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS IS VALID AND BEING CURRENTLY USED.
- THIS MEANS THE SENDER CAN SELL YOUR ACTIVE EMAIL ADDRESS TO OTHER SPAMMERS. SO YOUR SPAM EMAIL CAN ACTUALLY INCREASE IF YOU HIT A LOT OF UNSUBSCRIBE BUTTONS.
-IT MIGHT GIVE THE SENDER A LOT OF INFORMATION ABOUT YOU AND YOUR COMPUTER.
IT CAN GET COMPLICATED, BUT USING AN UNSUBSCRIBE BUTTON CAN, DEPENDING ON HOW IT'S SET UP:
GIVE THE SENDER INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR EMAIL PROGRAM.
IF YOU'VE OPENED A BROWSER WINDOW AS PART OF THE UNSUBSCRIBE PROCESS, THEN YOU'RE GIVING MORE INFORMATION, AND THE CHANCE TO BE INFECTED INCREASES:
YOU'VE EXPOSED YOUR GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION;
YOU'VE EXPOSED INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEM;
YOU'VE EXPOSED INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR BROWSER;
YOU MAY HAVE ACCEPTED A COOKIE (UNKNOWINGLY);
IF YOU HAVE ACCEPTED A COOKIE UNKNOWINGLY, AND DO NOT DELETE IT, THEN, BY CLICKING OTHER UNSUBSCRIBE LINKS, YOU ARE EXPOSING YOUR COMPUTER TO BE IDENTIFIED PERSONALLY.
WHAT'S THE MOST AMAZING PART: IF YOU HAVE A SPAMMER'S COOKIE (UNKNOWINGLY ACCEPTED), AND YOU VISIT ANY MALWARE SITE, THE SPAMMER CAN INFECT YOUR COMPUTER, EVEN IF YOU DON'T CLICK ON ANYTHING.
THERE'S SOME KIND OF TECHNICAL TERM TO DESCRIBE BEING INFECTED BY VISITING A SITE WITHOUT CLICKING, BUT I DON'T REMEMBER WHAT IT'S CALLED.
BUT COMPUTERS CAN BE WONDERFUL.
THAT'S WHY SOME PEOPLE CALL THEM "HAL". :)
SO DO NOT USE THE UNSUBSCRIBE BUTTON. IT'S BAD FOR YOUR COMPUTER.
INSTEAD, JUST MARK THE SPAM AS SPAM, AND DELETE IT.
MUCH SAFER. AND MORE EFFECTIVE.
|
07-22-17 05:04pm
|
Reply
434
|
Puffy Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from wetandpuffy:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
You are more then welcome. You are the guys that keep my sites alive and I thank you for it and thank you for taking your time to review and make my sites better.
Here is my answers below.
1) For the picture viewer , I can definitly do this and offer both types of viewer and a way to switch between them. What I will be doing in febuary is spending some time in my members areas tweaking and making them better, so any more points you have. please keep them coming and if they make the site better then they will be taken care off.
2) Music in videos , yes we are moving away from this as we agree it was a bit of a distraction to the video.
Thanks once again.
Regards
Wayne
|
01-13-14 12:28am
|
Reply
435
|
Puffy Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from wetandpuffy:
Good morning ,
Wayne here from Puffynetwork.com
I would like to start by saying it is great to read such an honest and brilliant review.
It is nice to see somebody who appreciates the good and can also give such constructive feedback, it has been a pleasure to read.
At puffynetwork we are a very small team who want to make our sites special and be exactly what our fans and friends want and by reading reviews like yours help me improve what we have over here and make it even better.
We have already started looking into the comments regarding the pictures sets and have made contact with our host about the inconsistent speeds.
We host all our content on CDN which should mean everyone gets the very best in speeds but from reading your remarks we see this is not happening and want to make sure this is improved.
I would once again like to thank you for your great review and hope we can keep in touch.
Best Regards
Wayne
|
01-07-14 06:08am
|
Reply
436
|
Puffy Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from turboshaft:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
LOL Maybe you enjoyed this site so much it's turned down your rage somewhat?
Though to be honest I certainly hope it hasn't--I don't want to the sole rageaholic here!
|
01-06-14 10:27pm
|
Reply
437
|
Puffy Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from turboshaft:
Great review, RB! I've been thinking about joining this site for a while now--well, really just Wet and Pissy, as those two words encompass nearly everything I seek out in porn--but if this is the same price for two additional sites, it's obviously the better deal. I guess I'll wait a little while on a review once I join (and don't want to risk carpal tunnel syndrome either!). Your comments on camera work are also a lot more than what I usually manage, the typically redundant "Me see naughty parts in video. Me get horny."
Also, your reply to graymane about use of the term "puffy," that "Big TACOs are the Labia Masters" is hilarious (though I would think the title "Labia Mistress" is more correct). If that were a real award or title it would be one I wouldn't think twice about accepting! :-)
|
01-06-14 05:40pm
|
Reply
438
|
Puffy Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from graymane:
Exceptionally fine review, RB ....... but then I wouldn't expect less from you.
When they say "Puffy" are they referring to those lovely, swelled, lusciously protruding pussies? Cuz I do love'm puffed up like that!
|
01-05-14 08:05pm
|
Reply
439
|
Real Girls Play
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment from RagingBuddhist:
I just got an email from the site to tell me my subscription was done after today. What a generous offer it was to provide a link to resubscribe to a site that didn't update the entire month you were a member. Damn shame you can't get your money back when a site puts up false advertising - THAT might get their attention.
|
03-25-16 12:50pm
|
Reply
440
|
Real Girls Play
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from MargulisAZ:
I had forgot about this site lol. I joined it once and also thought it sucked - interesting because it has an FTVgirls feel to it as far as the shoots go but just totally lacking overall. I left never wanting to join again.
|
02-24-16 09:38pm
|
Reply
441
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from audrina69:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks Raging. Interestingly, when I had a technical issue, I contacted the webmaster thru www.thebestporn.com and got a prompt response. So I hope that someone will read this and take action. As I seriously doubt I am the only one who is aware and disturbed by these issues.
|
04-20-13 08:33am
|
Reply
442
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from morgentau:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I can forgive the repetetive content since 5000+ scenes make it rather difficult to bring something new with every update. If you sort the videos by top rated and simply download the best 20 of every site you can easily skip the bland stuff.
Also, I view RK as a pure video site, just like Met-Art is a pure picture site to me. If you regard the pictures as an online slideshow exclusively they aren't that bad at all.
I joined just a fews days before they started advertising HD, so I got what I expected.
|
08-22-09 05:20pm
|
Reply
443
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Wow...and I though I was going to catch shit for my VB review! I hope this dude has some good answers for the ratings he just posted. As a mechanical engineer I assure you there is no new math....1+1 still equals 2. Perhaps he is on dial up where a 1 GB limit would not be an issue, but for someone even with a lame broadband this becomes and issue with a few hours at least and 10 minutes for others. The reason he is recommending being a member for life is because it would take that long to download everything with that harsh limit!
Sorry, cant say I trust this dude, and that is bad coming from me.
|
03-23-08 08:32pm
|
Reply
444
|
RedClouds
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from picdude:
Sorry if you were disappointed and if my review was a little misleading.
I still believe that the content pushes it up because even in the tgp's the content is too mixed and too much fake (ie pornstars)
I've never seen a fake image on here.
the censored versions are older pictures outside the months archive redclouds holds so you need to be a member of funbags.
It's a good couples site I think
Anyway hope you're not too disappointed.
|
12-01-09 06:49am
|
Reply
445
|
RedClouds
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from picdude:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks for your nice comments I hope you enjoy the site, I do admit if you are a picture hound you may go through the pictures quickly so If you really enjoy the site then getting the archives access is a worthwhile purchase (huge number of photos though not very well organised (just a ontinuation of the date format in redclouds)
Remember though once you have your RC membership you get a discount on the archives purchase.
I'm not such a fan of homeclips (though admittedly last time i visited that or the archive site was a good while ago but i have a feeling it's not changed a huge amount)
|
11-04-09 03:08am
|
Reply
446
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from slategrey:
Well i signed up a couple of weeks ago and it is true that there is no encryption on the part you select your user name and pass but there is one after that part for the credit card info.
|
05-01-11 11:27am
|
Reply
447
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from nostromo:
i want to join this site badly using a virtual credit card, but, nonetheless, i'm rotten with doubt due to the lack of encryption. Why pornsites have to be so iffy?
|
06-17-10 04:47am
|
Reply
448
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from BadMrFrosty:
I had a poke around and it looks like they are using Jquery encryption to send the details to the server via Javascript. So even though the address itself is not SSL encrypted, the credit card details themselves should be. Try the signup form with javascript disabled, nothing works :)
|
04-13-10 05:20am
|
Reply
449
|
Score HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from malikstarks:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I've personally never had a problem with any of the Score sites, and yes I was just recently a member of Score HD. I think the main reason they don't list the billing company on TBP is because they use so many different ones.
For instance, I think I've been a member of Score HD twice, the first time in December it was through Epoch, the second time earlier this year it was through Net billing. I've now canceled Score HD (not because it isn't good). However I still have a running membership to Scoreland which is billed through CCbill (from my checking account)
Score is a pretty reputable company, however you do need to be wary of the cross sells when signing up.
|
04-12-10 06:52pm
|
Reply
450
|
Score HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from atrapat:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Sincerely, I wouldn't enter my credit card info if I had to do the http-https trick. It was just to offer a certain degree of security in case you really wanted to join the site.
AFAIK, communications become secure once you use the https; the warning is because the URL you are accessing (scorehd.com) doesn't match the one in the certificate (score-cash.com). But communication is encrypted and an eavesdropper would only be able to intercept the communication if he were the owner of the score-cash.com certificate.
In this case, the trick works because the server happens to have an SSL certificate installed (even though domains don't match and you get a warning) but, obviously, not all servers will have one.
|
04-11-10 10:27am
|
