REPLY TO
#1
from asmith12:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
IMHO his review is still MUCH MORE useful than facts like number of pictures (which can be easily found on TBP, and even if they're not 100% up to date, they're most likely pretty close):
380+ Photo Shoots (avg. 100 pics each)
Hi-Res Pics: N, Model Index: N, Small & Large Pics: N, ZIP Files: N
Watermarks: Yes, medium-sized (all pictures).
Videos: 205+ Videos (approx. 4 min. each)
Full Scenes: N, Multi-Bandwidth: N, Vid Caps: N
Watermarks: Yes, medium-sized (all videos).
Yes, it's true that many of met-art's sets are not very sharp at all. More specifically, they often have low depth-of-field (one part of the body is in fairly good focus while everything else is not.)
Lack of sharpness is also more apparent on this site because they offer very large images (sometimes 7000 pixels), so the softness is very apparent. There are, however, a few photographers who offer better sharpness, like Matiss. I just wish it was more consistently good across other photographers' sets. Still, most viewers just wax poetic about every set that's posted there, which makes me laugh.
I know what the RagingBuddhist talking about here, but I've seen the blurriness problem with HegreArt, MPL Studios, etc. etc. as well. I can't think of a site that hasn't disappointed me when there's a pic I really like and the model's face, on closer inspection, is in something of a blur.
Suffice to say that photographers and photo editors can't predict what I'm going to want, so I just try to take the good stuff and toss out the fuzzy-wuzzies that I don't want.
I'm not seeing it - I'm checking out the Loxie by Antonio Clemens set, posted the other day - viewing it in the High Res selection, and while there is some "softness" to the image in the face area frequently, which I see in every site except for ATK, which is all about glaringly direct photos, I don't see blurry and distorted. Mesoti by Antonio Clemens, posted yesterday, is even sharper.
I think it's a matter of taste. In the glamour area, you're pretty much always going to see treatment of photos. Hegre is sometimes an exception. You can often see every bit of facial hair on his models at the same time that they are undeniably presented in a very glam-art mode.
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks for the clear explanation.
I've read reports by some PU members that mention distortions in photos, and now I better understand what they were talking about. Because I always thought the photo quality was perfectly acceptable.
Using a smaller monitor, and almost never zooming in for fine details, explains the difference.
I agree that MetArt has tons of content and thousands of lovely models.
Maybe there is too much content, and the average viewer starts to get bored. A psychology thing.
Very few of the videos at MetArt are worth watching or saving.
That's my opinion, in spite of how lovely the models can be. The vidoes are boring, not erotic.
$60 is a great price. But like you say, there aren't enough hours in a day (or week, or month) to spend at these sites.
{I'm switching to capital letters, because it's easier for me to see and read. I know it not proper etiquette, but fuck that. I am tired of squinting and trying to read the tiny letters.)
A BETTER APPROACH IS TO SIGN UP FOR THE METART NEWSLETTER. YOU CAN SIGN UP AT METART DOT COM FOR FREE.
IN THE NETSLETTERS, THERE ARE SOMETIMES OFFERS TO JOIN ONE OF THE SITES IN THE NETWORK FOR A REDUCED PRICE. SOMETIMES AS LOW AS $10 FOR THE FIRST MONTH.
JOIN ONE OF THE SITES, THAT YOU THINK YOU MIGHT LIKE. FOR $10 OR WHATEVER.
ONCE YOU HAVE JOINED ONE ONE OF THE SITES IN THE NETWORK, YOU CAN NOW JOIN ANY OTHER SITE IN THE NETWORK FOR $10/MONTH, RECURRING.
THAT WAY, YOU ARE TRULY GETTING YOUR MONEY'S WORTH, BECAUSE YOU NOW HAVE THE TIME TO EXPLORE EACH SITE, AT YOUR LEISURE.
BELONG TO ALL THE SITES IN THE NETWORK, OR 8 OF THEM AT ONCE, JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE BECAUSE YOU CAN ONLY DO SO MUCH IN A DAY. UNLESS MONEY IS NO CONSIDERATION.
METART IS MY FAVORITE PORN SITE. I'VE BEEN A MEMBER MANY TIMES. BUT NOT EVERYONE LIKES IT. IT'S TOO SOFTCORE FOR SOME.
THE VIDEOS AT METART ARE BORING. REECENTLY, SOME OF THE VIDEOS HAVE GOTTEN TO BE A LITTLE MORE EROTIC. BUT YOU CAN SPEND HUNDREDS OF HOURS LOOKING OVER THEIR VIDEOS, AND THE ONLY THING YOU WILL THINK IS: WHAT A WASTED OPPORTUNITY OF THESE LOVELY YOUNG MODELS.
LIKE PAT SAYS, A LOT OF THE SITES HAVE SIMILAR MATERIAL. SO IT'S PROBABLY BETTER TO IDENTIFY THE SITES YOU REALLY WANT TO JOIN, INSTEAD OF JOINING ALL OF THEM.
LIKE I SAID, METART IF MY FAVORITE. HIGH QUALITY PHOTOGRAPHY. MASSIVE CONTENT OF PHOTOSETS, NASSUVE NUMBER OF MODELS, YOUNG TEEN, MAINLY NATURAL, WHITE, ETC. BUT VERY SOFTCORE.
I agree with you that the cost is a little high but seeing as these are all top notch sites then that shouldn't be an issue for people looking for a good deal. The time needed to surf all these sites is a bigger hurtle and one that might make some hesitate joining.
Another problem and possibly the biggest one is that the although all the sites are top notch. Is there really a lot of variation from one of these erotic photography sites to the others in the network? If there isn't and most of the women appearing on one of the sites also appears on the others than all you are getting is more of the same. The only one that seems to distinguish itself from the others is sexart but that is because it's more midcore to hardcore than the others and may not appeal to fans of the other sites.
REPLY TO
#1
from yadayada321:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks RB. Maggie's review is very accurate as well. Yeah, I saw all that crazy stuff in the forums too. That lady and her minions are a bunch of crazy weirdos, but I don't think their intention was to deceive like a lot of those other crazy Russian websites do with their fake reviews. Nice site, crazy people. She even e-mailed me once (how she figured out my other username I don't know) to say thanks despite all the criticism I gave her site too.
Hmmm... time to proceed with dling some more latin lovelies now ha ha ha ha! I've had enough with this British knickers stuff; time to go find a porn site that calls em what they should be called, panties!!!
REPLY TO
#1
from 1BestBoy:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
OK, so you want bullet points so you don't have to read sentences, and all the details that you can readily find by clicking on the website anyway....number of videos/picture sets, video quality (HIGH) etc, well, I'll remember that for my next review. I gave an honest opinion of the site, but you disagree, thats your perogative.....but don't EVER call me shill!!!! (I'm Shirley at the weekends!)
No, I didn't email them about it. I guess I should have. But I've done exactly that before with other sites and got no results. However, posting the complaint here seems to get their attention sometimes, but not always.
Thanks. No, it's 50 tokens for a flash, not $50. 50 tokens is about $5 (or less, depending on how many tokens you buy), and with other people tipping etc, you shouldn't need to tip too often.
I was a member on LF more than 6-8 months ago. I still have the videos from their previous updates. And, yes, they're super crisp. Nadine's videos though are not as high quality, but they still look incredibly sharp. I am 100% positive that these video are originally shot in 720P and not upconverted like a lot of other sites. However, I personally prefer Nadine's lactation videos and models to LF (or XX-Cel), because of the style of the videos. All of Nadine's videos look home made, very professionally home made. Whoever is directing these videos know what they're doing, none of these look amateurish nor low budget at all. This is like the X-Art of lactation sites. The videos are that well done. But Nadine only has three lactating ladies right now. Lactation updates are infrequent at best. I've emailed Nadine about this and it seems to me that she won't turn this into a full lactation site, at least not yet. As for the the models, she features a lot of familiar faces. Recently there are Shione Cooper, Valory Irene, and Katarina. And they're only featured topless and nothing below the waist. No pink at all. The most notable one is Vendy Star (aka Vendy, Westy), she's gotten really thick because of the pregnancy, and she has lactating boobs like you're never seen. The few exclusive models she does have are "no names". And they're GORGEOUS if you're into curvy, chubby, thick homely MILF type ladies with HUGE all natural boobs. These are real hot moms. There are some pregnant content from the past but not recently. And Nadine has stopped lactating maybe a year or two ago. I think there are about 250 video, about half of those are in HD, the older contents actually look pretty good to this day. Again this tech person/director knows what s/he was doing even back then. There are about 25 lactation videos right now and they're ALL in my iPod. Not enough for a lactation fan but here quality beats quantity. And I think this is a great time to be a member, maybe we can convince Nadine to turn the site into a lactation site if we get enough fans to join.
Well, I took them up on it.
As well you know I am not a video guy.
Whilst they have revamped & have refreshed the selection of anchors, I really do not like the current program format. In real terms it gives a lot less stripping, which is really what I am interested in. I doubt I shall let this one renew.
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
My experience with cam sites is scarce but I believe 4 or 5 USD per minute for the type of service most performers offer here isn't that expensive. But that's not the main reason why I listed the prices there: unless they are real cons or I run out of space, I usually state the bare technical facts in the pros section of my reviews.
REPLY TO
#8
from jberryl69:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yeah - I'll have to think of a term for it.
I remember a scene with Jamey Robbins and Ron Jeremy where they are playing fuck face with her face and it is delightfully paced - enough where you can see it distinctly sliding back and forth down her throat.
As it is, one of the reasons I edit productions is to slow down the action. I'm not much into anal, but seeing Lily LaBeau squat her asshole down on Mike Adriano's cock needs to be slowed down.
Off topic - do you think Adriano asks girls not to fully throat him, thus giving the illusion that his cock is larger and more unmanageable than it really is? These thoughts have been creeping through my head lately.
I think when the invented Gonzo it equated out to Frantic Maneuvers. I think it only is suppose to mean, NO Plot. There are things I really like about Gonzo with the definition of no plot, inasmuch as plot tends to interfere with the sex.
Though I like the sound and feel of SexArt (lush for a better word) it probably is not a site I would subscribe to.
REPLY TO
#5
from jberryl69:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I know! I have things I'd give my left nut to see.
I was fantasizing about a true spit roast where she gets dp's and does deep throat all the way down - repeatedly - Not some frantic face fucking, but just some slow and deep penetration she can handle - NO ONE does this.
I can think of only one star who actually tried this some - Alicia Angel in a five way... and still they didn't take their time. Oh well, so much for my fantasy of the day.
PS - Blowbangs should be this way too - slow and thorough and not over the top - something where you can focus on the actual blowjob rather than her being passed back and forth. I just saw Jonni Darkko's trailer for Wet Food 4 which is a blowbang and it is way too frantic for me to enjoy. Not that I wouldn't watch, don't get me wrong, but I'd never download it.
This is one of the reasons I don't usually like two on one - the best I ever saw at that was Scott Hancock & Chris Strokes taking individual turns with Rebecca Blue (Throated.com) - nothing rushed about that one!!
oh yeah because i'm deleting nudes a poppin probably today or tomorrow
so i moved all the content into my other sites
launching 2 new sites
also deleting iowacoeds and putting all the content into nebraskacoeds
i'm a one man show man :D no money for designers or anything. I spend all i make on finding new girls... my girls are not on any other sites (with perhaps maximum 5 exceptions)... i meet them out in the real world... which takes all my time
but the software that runs my sites told me today, after seeing your post, that they have like 5 years newer site templates i am way behind on upgrading to, including adaptive video streaming, a fix for the over 4.5gb problem (happens only to some customers so i never have figured it out)... and also a fix to the search functions, as there is nothing wrong with my taggings (at least not for the updates that have tags)
anyway man, i love the feedback and i want to do better
but i do this for the love of finding new girls and making videos with them... and then sharing to some people who sign up.. i don't know anyone that can recruit like i can, so i'll just keep focussing on that until i'm too old (i'm already 37, so already i'm really wondering how much longer do i even have)...
so right now i'm largely focussing on filming videos way ahead of posting (i'm probably 200 videos ahead on filming now than what is posted)... so i will continue that and then focus on making the site much much better , like perfect, after I'm too hold to find new 18-21 year olds to come home and get naked for my cameras :D
for the free access, just email me and i'll give you like a year, and you can just give me feedback after each change i make :D
hey and also, the stabilizer won't happen...I have a dji ronin m, but the girls are spooked by it... remember, these are real girls that have never done this before, not some bullshit marketing ploy claiming that :D :D :D
All of what you complained about is known... but none of my videos are shared amongst my sites! You are mistaken there... ok there are some repeat footage on afterhoursexposed.com ONLY and only because I get many complaints from nebraskacoeds members when I post any hardcore stuff there, so I just make the full "uncensored" part also on afterhoursexposed... but that only affects something like 10 videos in total :D
I would like to offer you, or anyone else that would be down to help me get my sites back into the modern ages a free membership for 6 months, while they help me fix things :D
just email me n e c o e d s a t g m a i l
i will give you a login right away :D
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
You raise an interesting point that I've never considered - that the site access as a bonus to the other sites is different than if you joined through NVG. I have nothing to go on but speculation, but I'm guessing that the site access is the same whether you get a membership as part of the ECG/BRCC/NVG or whether you join specifically through NVG and get access to the other two. Maybe someone else can weigh in on that point.
10-28-1403:20pm
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
