| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
326
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from turboshaft:
Great review RB!
Pretty close to my score and I have to agree with a lot of your points. The "search" feature is definitely weak, especially considering it only applies to the videos and the photo sets don't necessarily have the same content. The alphabetical order is annoying too, but I like to organize by release date since that is how they are numbered.
I never had any login issues with Firefox, so maybe your browser is the problem? I also love the 1920x1080 videos since that's my monitor's max resolution, so combined with the wide angle lens it can make for some interesting videos.
Lastly, I think the number of girls with implants can be counted on one hand, and breasts really are not the focus of the site, unless they change the "C" from crack to cleavage. My favorite models are generally not these anyway. I like the ones who look like the girl-next-door with a nasty imagination and they usually are quite slim with reasonable proportions.
|
10-04-09 03:51pm
|
Reply
327
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from ControllingMind:
RagingBuddist, are you sure you didn't miss anything out in that review?
I like it, lots of detail.
I'm not too happy about that download speed, but this site is still next on the hit list.
|
10-04-09 08:57am
|
Reply
328
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from mbaya:
I totally agree with your assessment of the photographic style on the site. The closeups come well after a lot of whole body showcasing. This I felt was the perfect combination of whole body and closeups. In the site the closeups were really CLOSE.
|
10-04-09 08:51am
|
Reply
329
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from Drooler:
I've had Firefox remember my login for it, so that it's already typed in when I go to the login page.
My big, really big, gripe with the site is that even though it's an "ass" site, there are almost never any shots of the models cropped from the mid-upper thigh to the top of the head when they're showing off their booties, evenly cheeked. It's either "ass fills the shot" or head to toe.
And I've pointed this out in a polite tone to the site when they were soliciting suggestions. Yet they remain locked in to their habits.
I find it very strange that "ass" sites are usually the worst when it comes to the subject, but that's been my experience.
InTheCrack should have 4000 pixel photos for the high price they charge.
|
10-04-09 03:13am
|
Reply
330
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review from RagingBuddhist:
Here's the layout of the site:
When you first enter the site, you're on the first of six headings - Models, What's New, Searches, FAQ, Contact Us, and Links.
The models page starts with the last 8 shoots, with a page index for the rest - currently 43 pages of 8 shoots each
The What's new page gives you 6 large thumbnails of "Coming Soon" and a list of the last dozen and a half shoots.
Searches, as mentioned above, lets you search by fetish, date, model name or keyword
The FAQ is kind of weak, although it does start with a cancellation link. It then goes onto briefly talk about video issues, model requests, Mac users and membership options (there are no options)
Contact us - has (Surprise!) an email link and a CCbill link
Links has five links to other sites (all nice and out of sight unless you want to see them)
To wrap it up, this site's a keeper. Expensive - and not without some issues, but still one to check out.
|
10-04-09 01:52am
|
Reply
331
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from turboshaft:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
That's odd, though I think I have read about this from other members. My experience is that you get a maximum speed -- for me, it could be up to 1.5Mb/s -- with single downloads, and it halves with two simultaneous downloads, and goes to about a third of the original speed with three, etc. I have FreeDownloadManager set at a maximum of four sections per download and it worked fine.
It's important to remember that InTheCrack limits the number of connections (I think it might be twenty), so certain download managers might not work with this, and I could rarely get more than three downloads going at once with FDM, but it still worked up until that number.
|
10-01-09 03:54pm
|
Reply
332
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from ControllingMind:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yeah ok, I would still get a good month out of it. Once I finish my 3 month stint at DDfprod, I'll be looking there.
I've seen a few sites now that try to restrict simultanious downloads in some way, like the server temp out of service, for downloading more than a couple of files at once. Even Sapphic Erotica does it now, though I found chica's place was the worst of all with a slow speed limit, DL limit and temp out of service for simultanious files.
I've still managed to get what I wanted on sites like that though, but its quite annoying and enough reason for me to not return there.
|
10-01-09 07:38am
|
Reply
333
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
This is why I still use a CRT monitor, even though it's a dinky 17" by today's standards. I spent perhaps 10 minutes with the flat screen that came with my latest PC and I just couldn't stand the halos at the edges.
|
03-08-08 04:31am
|
Reply
334
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Davit:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yeah - the 1280x720 movies are crystal clear on my 17" monitor, and the colours are so natural. I haven't felt the need to go higher than that (not that my processor could really handle it anyway).
To be honest though, I have downloaded the vast majority in the 640x360 version, after weighing 'picture quality' versus 'size of file on my hard disk' and 'speed of responsiveness of my media player'. I find these are still very good quality, and the close-ups are still very detailed. It just gets a little bit pixelly where there's fast movement, and the colours are a bit less vibrant. But the brain is very good at dismissing that, when the action is so hot.
|
03-07-08 04:31pm
|
Reply
335
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from williamj:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
What you need to understand is a basic fact: Companies such as the one in question made a very open decision to implement these unwanted charges. It was not a 'computer error' someone at their organization signed off on charging memebers unwanted excess CC Billing, making it very difficult for the person to disput these unwanted charges and I'm sure a bit embrassing to disput. RB, if you where a victim you'd be very upset I'm sure. True?
Guilt by Association? Much the opposite. I created a forum, regardless of how hard it may seem. Other members will read accordingly and see I voiced a unwanted billing problems that many have experienced to great discomfort. I don't believe other members will think I was grouping them in 'guilt of association' and be glad I was so vocal. Other PU members are free to read and make their own adult opinion. I've commented and made replays accordingly to all fellow members.
|
03-20-08 05:52pm
|
Reply
336
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from williamj:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I disagree with you on drama time. If Vegas Ken would have made a separate posting for all to see at Log-In, not deep in some Reply Posting, clarifing his orginal comment to Denner, yes some of my distrust and negativity could have been avoided.
Back on 1/11/2008 PU members began posting this issue with very $$$ expensive over billing. Vegas Ken should have been much more up-front in condeming this site and not wording his response as if they thought it was fine. In time, he addressed his remarks.
Overbilling and mis-representation is real issue with adult sites. My intention was to expose this 'normal business' practice of adding all type of unwanted charges and make members aware of caution.
In the future I will research all comments/replys before I state anything. In all respect, I want to be fair to both the adult sites and mangement of PU.
Thank you for your insight...
|
03-20-08 05:08pm
|
Reply
337
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks, pal...
Great you too saw the bullshit in this....
|
03-18-08 11:57am
|
Reply
338
|
iStripper
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Wraith0711:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I did check it out and it is istripper now
|
03-08-20 12:12pm
|
Reply
339
|
iStripper
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Wraith0711:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks for the reply sir. I donβt mind the models just would like to see more diversity. I love Asian and Latinas and they are few and far between here.
|
02-24-20 12:41pm
|
Reply
340
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Joymii:
Hi!
Thanks for voicing your concerns.
There is adult contemporary-style, intro and outro music that lasts about a minute, but there is no music during the action. You hear the models' real voices.
It's definitely not like 90s-style porn with no voice track and just music :)
|
03-17-14 01:46pm
|
Reply
341
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jaypegged:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I would estimate that about 40% of the models have fake boobies. Not my cup of tea either, but they make up for it in other ways, and it is overall a good site. There are only a few models that are in the 50+ category.
|
11-13-09 05:47pm
|
Reply
342
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from marcdc1:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
What's wrong with Zombaio? I've never had a problem with them, but I think this is the only site I've ever used them with.
|
04-05-13 01:38pm
|
Reply
343
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from LeluLove Co:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks for the quick and awesome review and answer Marc as always!! :)
And @Raging, you can join through CCBill right here:
http://www.lelulove.com/external/Lelu-Lo...-Presentation-3.html
Hope that helps!! :)
Love,
Lelu XOXO
|
04-01-13 04:07pm
|
Reply
344
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from marcdc1:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
How's this for an easy answer - on the newer videos there is no watermark.
I looked back over 800 videos and only found watermarks on her blog content - not the member videos. That took me to March 2011. When I look at the oldest content I can see a watermark but I found it unobtrusive, it's a light pink (almost white) watermark in the corner. (That video was dated Feb 14 2011)
I hope that fully answers the question. I have to confess I really like Lelu and highly recommend her site. I think any solo content girl that updates everyday and gives her fans personal attention is deserving of all the success in the world.
If you decide to join please do a review, I ranked it at 100 which I know is awfully high, but like I said in my review; when you accomplish what you set out to do, and fulfill your marketing, what else could we customers want?
|
04-01-13 01:25pm
|
Reply
345
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Goldfish:
Hey RB, That's a bummer you're getting the script error. Did you try reporting it to the the Web master? Maybe they'll fix it and give you your money back.
I've been a member of this site a few times and have always enjoyed it. Hopefully this technical glitch is just that and they correct it promptly.
|
08-18-10 02:47pm
|
Reply
346
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from pat362:
This was the main reason why I did not enjoy my membership on little mutt. As much as I'd like to give them another chance. Comments like these mean that I won't. The preview page are fine but man is it a pain in the a.. once you're a member. There were some evenings that I couldn't log in and on those that I did manage to log in. It was about a minute to go from one page to the next.
|
08-17-10 06:35pm
|
Reply
347
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from mbaya:
What did you think of the content of the site?
|
08-17-10 10:03am
|
Reply
348
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from anyonebutme:
Their tour pages come up very fast for me at the current moment, and my maximum internet connection speed doesn't come close to even 600kbps, I would *love* to have that speed ;)
As always, check you have the most current versions of Adobe Flash & Java installed on your computer - and with Flash there is an install for IE and a separate install that covers all other browsers.
|
08-16-10 10:44pm
|
Reply
349
|
Love Wetting
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from WDGirls:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
OK, we have both made our points. Our opinions differ, that's all.
Merry Christmas!
|
12-21-16 01:37pm
|
Reply
350
|
Love Wetting
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from WDGirls:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Again - we are talking about bonuses from other websites that we are offering to customers who WE THINK are going to stay with us. Somebody who cancels immediately obviously won't stay with us, somebody who has been staying with us for 20 days MIGHT stay with us so we're simply giving him a free gift to encourage him to stay loyal. I absolutely don't understand the discussion, these 10 videos are something EXTRA and it's up to us to decide who can download them. If we decided that only people with green hair got access, it would still be only our own business decision that we have a right to do. The decision may be wise or stupid but it's our business and our right to give extra stuff to selected members. Complaining about not getting access to something extra is simply unfair, mainly when the conditions were absolutely clear in this case.
People think running an adult website is so easy... sometimes I wonder why people don't run their own website when it's apparently an easy way to make money. In this particular case (LoveWetting) it's incredibly difficult to persuade a girl to wet her pants. Even professional adult models are ashamed to do it, it's a really embarrassing moment for them...
|
12-21-16 11:01am
|
