| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
Body Parts.biz
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Denner:
Bummer, RB - plain Bummer........
BTW, of course: Thanks for the warning.
|
02-21-12 07:16am
|
Reply
202
|
See Me Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Simarimas:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
hello RagingBuddhist.
I do apologize if you feel this is an advertisement. I can assure you I have not solicited these reviews at all. I had actually forgotten about having my site on here until I received an email stating it had been reviewed.
I do however appreciate the kind words from the members of the site who have reviewed it. We are still growing, and not where I want the site to be yet. I do try to get atypical models for the site, ones who are pleasant to be around. It doesn't always work out that way, but it is an ongoing process. My biggest complaint about the site is that we do not have models who are on 24/7. And I wish we had more models willing to do videos etc, for the site, but I do not ask them to do anything they aren't comfortable with.
That being said, RAGE to your hearts content. :)
|
02-11-12 06:32am
|
Reply
203
|
See Me Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Capn:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I love a good rant.
For me, it doesn't matter if I am Ranter or Rantee!
I always appreciate a good one!
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-08-12 04:33pm
|
Reply
204
|
See Me Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from slutty:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Given your replies for both reviews were similar, I figured you were just simmering.
|
02-07-12 11:37pm
|
Reply
205
|
See Me Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from jd66:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
As a real user of this site for about 3 weeks, my only important negative at this time is that there are not enough models on the site so that there is always someone to chat with. When the roster is expanded a bit that should not be a problem any more. I do have a favorite amongst the current models and she is on quite a lot so I have been very satisfied with the site so far.
|
02-07-12 09:13pm
|
Reply
206
|
See Me Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd66:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Mine is not an advertisemnt. It my honest opinion about the site. I have not visied many adult chat sites and this is the only one where I have gone into a private chat and that was because the host was simply very sweet, friendly and drop dead beautiful. The site is smaller than most but the girls are beautiful and very nice to talk to in free chat. There is not much pressure to go into private chat but it available if you want it. One of the host my favorite one, actually, often goes on during the day just to chat with the users, sitting off camera. I have never seen her even ask for a tip during those times. She is just try getting to know the people who come to the room. In the evenings she is usually on camera and is available for a private chat. I have found it to be a friendly site with a small number of quality hosts and it is a great place to spend some time. Before you judge my review unfairly. go see it for yourself.
|
02-07-12 08:35pm
|
Reply
207
|
See Me Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
How many until you start raging?
|
02-07-12 08:26pm
|
Reply
208
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from BubbaGump:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Hello Buddhist. Thanks for the feedback. I only have two other sites I belong to so only a couple more reviews to do.
|
01-17-12 03:28pm
|
Reply
209
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Ed2009:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Videos now come in two formats. HD videos are provided in 1920x1080, 1280x720 & 720x405. Standard Definition videos are provided in 720x576 (high quality - sharp picture) and 720x576 (low quality - half the datarate - ie half the filesize). Details are given on the main page and in the videos section of the free tour.
There were originally two reasons for removing the older videos. First of all it gave an extra reason to maintain a continuous members (VERY important for the site's cashflow) and secondly the server was running out of space. Space is no longer an issue.
To be honest I still reserve the right to remove the top quality versions of older videos, but I don't actually do it any more.
|
01-16-12 02:24pm
|
Reply
210
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Ed2009:
I haven't taken any videos down from the site in months. Many of the videos in recent months are posted in FullHD quality with the LOWEST quality option being 720x576. I don't think I've posted any videos at 352x288 in several years!
The review you are referring to is a little out of date unfortunately.
What exactly is a "full length scene"? I shoot the entire game from start to finish, usually with no cuts at all. I'm not quite sure how I can shoot more game than there actually was without scripting it (which I don't do - all games are allowed to play out for real).
|
01-16-12 08:13am
|
Reply
211
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from pat362:
You have now learned the most important thing you should always do before joining a website. I always look at TBP and more importantly the date the facts were updated. There are many sites with an older review but the facts seem to be updated pretty regularly so that you have at least current info on the content.
I just looked at the site and they currently have 94 videos which is only 7 more than when TBP updated the info last May. They now have 28527 pics which is a little more than 1500 pics from last May. I'm a video guy so 94 videos for a site that is 10 years old is not remotely enough.
|
01-15-12 08:54am
|
Reply
212
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Marcus:
Wow, I have pretty low standards I'd say for video resolutions compared to a lot of people, but 352x288 is pretty much unacceptable nowadays.
|
01-15-12 08:42am
|
Reply
213
|
Fever Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
The only other browser I have is Exploder (which is just a safety for when Firefox goes down the hole and needs reinstallation).
I don't know why this problem exists, but it's strange that it's happening. Why most other sites don't have this kind of problem is worth keeping in mind.
I joined for the enjoyment, not for a new hassle. Fuck all, I've got plenty of those already!
|
01-14-12 09:17pm
|
Reply
214
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from littlejoe:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
last month i just about reached 250gb. i think i got down to 500mb
|
01-12-12 04:29pm
|
Reply
215
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Basil:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Hello RB,
Thanks for your warm words and yes, you're absolutely right - we're still miles away from perfection but working hard to get there. You're not the only person with such complaints/requests and for us it's a matter of breaking "odd" habits of our photographers that were formed over the years of their shooting and as you may understand it's not that easy to do so.
So far we've got rid of many bad photographers and working hard with remaining to get the best content ever. It's a very long and painful process but I hope that you'll see the improvements soon.
Thanks for rejoining guys and all the best in 2012!
Basil
|
01-02-12 03:45pm
|
Reply
216
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Capn:
Welcome back, RB, good to have you around again! :0)
As you say the site has grown and has many positives, most importantly the 'can do' attitude shown by Basil.
For my tastes, there is still far to much 'touchy, feely' & toy play.
Clear, full body nude shots are still unfortunately way underused.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-02-12 12:24am
|
Reply
217
|
The Art Of Blow Job
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Piper:
As of today, we have 226 unique updates on The Art of Blowjob, so there's plenty of content and more being added every week!
Kiss,
Camille
|
10-10-11 08:01am
|
Reply
218
|
The Art Of Blow Job
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Jay G:
P.T. Barnum knew human nature. I still remember paying for the carnival sideshows where the "acts" inside had almost no relationship to the lurid and fascinating paintings on the canvas entrance. But once they had your money, you were the "rube."
|
10-08-11 06:01am
|
Reply
219
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from slategrey:
Well i signed up a couple of weeks ago and it is true that there is no encryption on the part you select your user name and pass but there is one after that part for the credit card info.
|
05-01-11 11:27am
|
Reply
220
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from abbywinters:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Actually, since that five months ago, we have significantly "shaken things up", largely due to the feedback offered here on these forums (but also on our forums). The original poster, above, selected a shoot that was shot 1.5 years ago.
If you look at the more recently-shot shoots (some examples include kelly_r, masie, rachel_e, anna_l_2, elisabeta, nichole, and gretchen) you'll see we've changed a fair bit.
It's ok if YOU don't like the new shoots, or AW in general, or me, or the models, or whatever - this site is designed to let people air their views. But it's not cool to bitch about people DO like the site. They have an opinion, and it's just as valid as yours.
|
11-28-10 03:11am
|
Reply
221
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from turboshaft:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yeah, I agree here, and I'd probably throw a tantrum while I'm at it.
"Unavoidably" better mean the police have arrived at my doorstep just to "look around," but I tell them to come back when they have a search warrant. Like any responsible citizen I patiently wait for them to return--while wiping the hell out of my hard drives as fast as I can click my mouse. I can only hope a police officer thinking "I smell porn in these here parts" is not considered an exigent circumstance...though they'd probably have busted down my door a long time ago if it was. (Gee, am I paranoid or what?)
Knowing my luck they'd return with a warrant that doesn't include going through my computers--d'oh! : - (
|
11-13-10 05:08pm
|
Reply
222
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Your comment brings back memories of seeing 8mm films and low-grade projectors available by the hundreds at the back of most porn magazines. I remember wanting to order some but knowing that they'd be seized at the border. Remembering this makes me grateful for new technology.
|
11-07-10 04:13am
|
Reply
223
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
You're welcome,RB. Actually the watermarks don't exactly cover the fun parts, in reluctant defense of this site, but quite often intrude in the hair and foreheads of the models.
|
11-06-10 06:52pm
|
Reply
224
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
RB, I've been getting a big increase in the number of spam emails the last few days as well. I can't prove who the source is, or the cause. But I can say that the spam emails I've been getting from AmateurMatch are almost certainly from my partial signup at porn pros.
So my feeling is that the rest of the increased spam came from the same source, my partial signup at porn pros.
Have you been getting any emails from AmateurMatch as well? It wouldn't prove anything, but it would be an indication that your signup at porn pros was the cause of some of your increased spam.
|
11-03-10 03:51pm
|
Reply
225
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Goldfish:
Hey RB, That's a bummer you're getting the script error. Did you try reporting it to the the Web master? Maybe they'll fix it and give you your money back.
I've been a member of this site a few times and have always enjoyed it. Hopefully this technical glitch is just that and they correct it promptly.
|
08-18-10 02:47pm
|
