| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Hey RB, thanks, the site might appeal to you since I know from past reviews and discussions you like the kinky side some. I sometimes go off into the more out there sites and I am still a member on it, going on my second month since I didn't get to download everything I wanted. And a big plus in my book, I haven't deleted any scene I downloaded and watched. Seems like a site that fits the quality of quantity heading.
|
11-19-12 02:50pm
|
Reply
177
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from jberryl69:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Actually RB - it wasn't the city that didn't have the money to keep them, but rather Art Model made some bad business decisions leading up to the move. Yes, it had to do with money, but Art was held accountable by the fans. Too bad - Art was an innovator and forward thinking owner but this particular move was rather short sighted in creating good will from the fans in Cleveland.
|
10-30-12 11:17am
|
Reply
178
|
Mature.nl
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from pat362:
I have to thank you because this is one of those sites that I've always had of my radar and would probably have joined if it was any cheaper. You touched on all the key points and your score looks more than fair.
I suspect that you would have given the site a slightly better score if it was only 20$. I rarely use the cost in my score but if a site is significantly more expensive than another one then I expect to see value above other sites and if it isn't there then it will be reflected in my score.
Sorry that it cost you so much.
|
10-27-12 06:10pm
|
Reply
179
|
Mature.nl
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from Capn:
TBH I'm surprised you didn't mention the huge premium for membership in your negatives, along with the lack of selectiveness in hiring the models.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-27-12 03:39pm
|
Reply
180
|
Mature.nl
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from messmer:
Bless you, RB. I had been toying with the idea of subscribing for a long time .. you just saved me fifty bucks with your great review!
|
10-27-12 10:46am
|
Reply
181
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Monahan:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Update. Wayne, the webmaster saw my post in the Wet And Pissy comments on PU and provided me his email address on 1 Sept. I responded and he replied saying he would refer the problem to is technical associate. Yesterday, 10 days later and at my suggestion, he provided me a different member name and password which actually worked, which i was rather surprised about.
Meanwhile, I drained all the videos offered on Wet & Pissy while I was waiting.
I will post a review of both sites once I've had a chance to see what Wet & Puffy offers.
First impression is that it's all HD (or damned close to it) and is directly focused on PUSSY as advertised, with all kinds of activities involving PUSSY including pissing, beads, dildoes, bedposts, candles and many other items that can be stuffed inside a PUSSY.
|
09-12-12 12:48am
|
Reply
182
|
Old And Young Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Capn:
For a third of the price I might give it a punt.
Cap'n. :0/
|
09-09-12 03:44am
|
Reply
183
|
Old And Young Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from pat362:
It is a very expensive network but TBP does mention that in their review. In their defense. They do offer content that isn't really available in too many other places. The first major problem I have with the content in most of the sites is that their preview sections are non-existent so no way of knowing what you get for your money. The other problem is that I find that too many of the performers are simply not remotely attractive. I may be in a minority with this last one but I know I'll never join this network regardless of the price.
|
09-08-12 05:59pm
|
Reply
184
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
When I was checking out the preview site for Wet And Pissy it specifically said the other two sites were part of the package and that my logon credentials would provide me with full access. For some strange reason I actually believed it.
That said, I thought about signing up directly with Wet And Puffy, but because the two preview sites were very similar in style and both offered the same deal, I just went ahead and signed up on Wet And Pissy. My mistake.
And with no customer support access, there's no way to resolve the matter.
BTW I've cancelled my membership through CCBill, one day after enrolling. That way I am reasonably sure I won't be rebilled.
|
08-30-12 08:31am
|
Reply
185
|
Body Parts.biz
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from Frannie:
Thanks for your detailed review. We took it very seriously and we have made the following improvements to our site:
We moved to a better, faster Hosting company, so page to page is faster and streaming videos work well.
We have improved our Search, so there are not duplicate file names. We also added an Advance Search feature.
All video/photo descriptions now have clickable links. We added video previews in our Updates section.
Short video clips have all been deleted. Most are now 6 – 15 minutes. We have deleted duplicate clips from our Amateur Video sections.
More older videos are converted weekly for streaming.
Any movement by camera or model (even breathing) is magnified when so close-up. Newer content is better and many of the older clips have been re-edited with this in mind.
As with many sites, our older content is not as high resolution, or as good quality, but still worth a look. We have added dates to all our content, so you can see if the clips are older and possibly lesser quality. (Our CMS does not allow for clip size and length in the Model Directory.)
Our photo set average 50 – 60 images, some much larger. Only in the frequently updated Amateur and Body Parts sections are they 20 per page. Most older photo sets have or will be re-edited to improve overall quality.
We added a Slideshow feature for photo sets. Yes, there are a few models over the years who requested their names be changed. This is only seen if you look at the file names on individual photos.
We have much more variety in our newer photo sets and videos, including themes, models and locations. At member request we are adding more lesbians, fetish, hairy, smoking, peeing, shampooing and pregnant girls.
We have added a “Favorites” feature, to store your favorite content right on our site.
As for our 12,000 MB download limit, this is a significant amount at any one time. It was added late last year, due to those few people who joined or hack into our site and downloaded most of it, to post on their own or other sites. I cry myself to sleep most nights thinking about all the time and money we have spent, only to have our content stolen and re-sold : ( The same with password sharing. We had to hire a password protection company to guard against abuse.
We have a much higher than industry average member retention rate, so many of our members consider BodyParts.biz a very good value and the above improvements should only help.
Please take another look and re-review when you have a chance.
Thanks a lot!
Frannie
|
06-28-12 09:16am
|
Reply
186
|
Old Pussy Exam
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
You're welcome, RB. Now that they split the site in two it would be even more of a waste of your money.
|
04-11-12 02:03pm
|
Reply
187
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#25
from Cybertoad:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I still have copies going back to Dos 5.0 to Windows 7 pro and everything in between. Made it a deal to get them all just in case lol.
Seriously I did tech work and got most free . I have a set of dos 6.22
un-opened floppies with book. LOL
|
04-04-12 04:34pm
|
Reply
188
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I think Petites is in a bit of a mess at the moment.
It is sure to get a lot better if they follow the site model they have used recently on Natural & Hairy.
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-03-12 09:31am
|
Reply
189
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Cybertoad:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I didn't put 2000 as and option but share you good taste in OS's.
2000 was a work horse. Sad that MS never caught on to how good it really was.
CT
|
04-02-12 02:32pm
|
Reply
190
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from otoh:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Hmm - actually I agree with RB (er, not that should be a surprise!)
I generally prefer solo, no toys - au naturel is always better, more realistic. Occasionally I don't mind toys; and if it's girl-girl, then I think a bit more raunchy is better than some of the more insipid touchy-feely material.
|
03-30-12 12:23am
|
Reply
191
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from slutty:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I suppose, but this is why I would think most folks setup a spam email account just for online orders, because it never seems like unsubscribing from things works well anywhere (and for a while I was convinced unsubscribing from one just led to your address being sent to someone else to use as there would be an odd jump in unknown spam). Perhaps I'm just paranoid.
|
03-25-12 01:14am
|
Reply
192
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Ergo Proxy:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Maybe I can put it like this...if you see people idolize something which you can't appreciate or comprehend why they do it, it pisses you off. The time I wrote this comment my "tolerance button" was temporarily switched off. Therefore my weak excuses "erase, dismiss, ignore". Nothing profound.
|
03-13-12 02:41pm
|
Reply
193
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from turboshaft:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I was just watching a little of one his videos the other day. I skipped through looking for something remotely entertaining, possibly sexy, but just couldn't stand it.
Never mind that his first order of business is to deep throat the girl until she is red in the face and vomits all over herself--I'm assuming he requires them to eat something beforehand--but just the fact that they look absolutely miserable, in pain, and not completely consenting is both a turn-off and also pisses me off. Woe to the poor girl who physically fights back (hint: he doesn't let that stand in the way of his boner assault :-O ).
He doesn't edit everything out, or just repeats a cut from a different angle, and you get a taste of just how much of an asshole he is performance wise, unless you consider fuck-her-until-she-screams "professional."
|
03-06-12 10:39pm
|
Reply
194
|
Body Parts.biz
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from mbaya:
Interesting review. I agree with your criticisms, but it is still an interesting site, but only for a one time sign up.
|
03-04-12 01:23am
|
Reply
195
|
Body Parts.biz
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Great thorough review RB. I like the idea of amateur girls rather than glossy professional, but closeups leaves me cold, and it sounds like the site has more than its share of faults.
|
03-03-12 05:10pm
|
Reply
196
|
Naked News
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Capn:
Well, I took them up on it.
As well you know I am not a video guy.
Whilst they have revamped & have refreshed the selection of anchors, I really do not like the current program format. In real terms it gives a lot less stripping, which is really what I am interested in. I doubt I shall let this one renew.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-02-12 11:17am
|
Reply
197
|
Body Parts.biz
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from elephant:
I won't jump in just yet then Ragingbuddist cheers and have a ponder at your review.
Yeah sometimes for a change I like to have a good old closeup but yeah totally get what you mean, it can't be just closeups as its just a bodypart and without a face it loses the fantasy.
|
02-26-12 03:50am
|
Reply
198
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Both, my friend. :0)
You are welcome, I genuinely value your opinions.
Do you have any plans to take a look at their sister site. Anilos?
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-21-12 09:18pm
|
Reply
199
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from Capn:
Your timely review has reminded me it is past time I revisited this fine site.
The fact that you are mightily impressed adds a lot of weight to that thought too, my friend.
Cap'n. :00
|
02-21-12 02:32pm
|
Reply
200
|
Body Parts.biz
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from elephant:
Yeah this sucks and just had a look, its a shame as it looks quite a interesting site this one, has a bit of character.
|
02-21-12 08:12am
|
