| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
476
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#27
from Pinche Kankun:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I can't either, man!!!
How do those fucking dudes even have the time and power to do that during that phase of a man's body... And plus that shit looks gay as hell because in most cases the guy doesn't immediately cum so he has to play MEAT BEATER JEOPARDY with his dick on camera!!!
GAY SHIT, MAN!!!! >:(
No offense, but I bet you that the homosexual men out there enjoy seeing that shit and producers have lost their fucking mind try to cross that gay shit over into straight porn!!!
MAN, I TELL YAH!!!! >:(
|
03-13-08 11:26pm
|
Reply
477
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from jd1961:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
You can set your account to receive email notification of postings to this section. I hope everyone will be aware of the new forum.
|
03-13-08 01:15pm
|
Reply
478
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from jd1961:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I'm exactly the same way, I turn off the video when it starts. Porn is so stupid, portraying sex with attractive women that climaxes with a man masturbating himself. Doing something like that in real life would never occur to me in a million years. And yet the porn industry more often than not subject us to the spectacle of men yanking themselves as if they must include it.
|
03-13-08 04:25am
|
Reply
479
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from jd1961:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I just collect the highest quality now. Videobox has very little of that.
|
03-13-08 04:18am
|
Reply
480
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Can't argue with you about getting your money's worth, RB. Because you do. I would rate the site highly for that alone but it has been taking a lot of sifting on my part during the past two weeks to find some scenes that I found erotically stimulating. Maybe it's just me, after all thousands like the place and not just because of the price. I guess after a while one gets jaded and I seem to have reached that point, at least when it comes to modern American made hardcore.
|
03-12-08 06:48pm
|
Reply
481
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from malikstarks:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Not to beat a dead horse, but you know what the funny thing is, the most recent poll running the the Brazzerspass site asks: Which possible site improvement would most influence you to keep your membership? Among the choices are, higher quality video (my choice), more sites (I'm like hell no enough already), and others.
Lo and behold boneheaded users of the site have chosen OVERWHELMINGLY that adding yet more sites would help to keep them a member. Mind you this a network with about 20 sites already, many of which have long since been abandoned, go figure.
|
03-12-08 12:53am
|
Reply
482
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from dilbert4100:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I guess I should have been more clear on the cancellation part. What I should have said is if the user cancels his or her account, membership access is blocked immediately, no matter how much time is left on the membership period. Even though they tell you this up front, I still think that this might be an illegal practice. You have paid for a specific membership period, and you should get the product that you have paid for. Alternatively, they should refund you the difference. Personally, I think they do this in order to bilk as much money out of you as possible by hoping that you will forget to cancel your membership in time and miss the automatic renewel date, thus forcing you to pay for another membership period.
|
03-11-08 02:04pm
|
Reply
483
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from jd1961:
I've gotten to the point where I don't mind paying a high price for top shelf material. Maybe I've seen too much porn !
|
03-11-08 11:28am
|
Reply
484
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#26
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Then lets have the webmaster delete the option to leave a 100. But then I would give them a 99 because that would then be the perfect score! This is an endless cycle.
Worth noting, any time someone says "Valid but ignored." it throws up an immediate flag saying that "what I am about it say is in ignorance because I am ignoring statements that I myself classify as valid." Please do not take that as a personal attack, I do enjoy this debate.
|
03-11-08 10:14am
|
Reply
485
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#25
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Very nice point! It does make thing more interesting, and I like to play devil's advocate. But I do honestly believe they are the best. Every other site is lacking something as well. Videobox lacks the least at this point. I do promise however that if someone comes along and beats Videobox in my eyes than I WILL adjust my score. If a perfect site does exist, there can not be two, unless they are identical in which case that would be pointless. There is always a best out there. And the best is always the most close to perfection, and therefore would be our closest approximation to perfection. As this site words it...they are looking for approximate perfection.
Also, no one has defeated the logic behind my statements!! :)
So yes, I do enjoy this.
|
03-10-08 10:50pm
|
Reply
486
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
simple. raid, or span volumes
|
03-10-08 10:26pm
|
Reply
487
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Jay G:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
They need an "all of the above" box for you! :)
|
03-10-08 05:13am
|
Reply
488
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from malikstarks:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I just checked out your review of Brazzers Pass, and I have to admit that you aren't completeley off the mark. For a site that robust both the picture and video content could be better. In comparison, Reality Kings has far superior pic quality, (not quite sure about the vids).
That said I would have given the site a higher rating than a 70, if for no other reason than the sheer volume of content (and most of it at least watchable). I myself am still a member, basically for the loyalty discount of 9.99 a month I can't see quitting. Too many hot pornstars, even if the content IS a bit repetitive and cliche.
|
03-09-08 04:55pm
|
Reply
489
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Davit:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yeah, I was gonna put 1958, but somehow the hippy talk just didn't work in that context! (Don't ask me why I went into hippy mode, I have no idea!)
What's the next poll gonna be? 'Has your lady ever asked you to perform cunnilingus?'
1. Yes, and I DID!
2. I did it without her asking (and now regret not waiting until we'd left the church)
3. Yes, but I refused, I'm watching my cholesterol and don't eat beef
4. No, she doesn't like me to drink from the furry cup
|
03-08-08 02:41pm
|
Reply
490
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Denner:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks, RB
Some of these files in DVD is as close to "crisp" as I've seen at VB... SO: it can be done.
|
03-08-08 08:44am
|
Reply
491
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
This is why I still use a CRT monitor, even though it's a dinky 17" by today's standards. I spent perhaps 10 minutes with the flat screen that came with my latest PC and I just couldn't stand the halos at the edges.
|
03-08-08 04:31am
|
Reply
492
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Hey RB
My PC works just fine - I have several/hundreds of absolutely crisp fullscreen videos on my HD.
At Videobox I've in this term of membership downloaded some 5-6 clips i both DVD and highresolution (ex. a couple of clips with Alexis Love) There's hardly any difference in quality - and certainly not compared to the file-sizes. The same goes for some older stuff - ok I may find some better quality along the way...
Still I haven't found the upgrade worth the money.
Do you have any examples were there's really a difference, please let me know...
|
03-08-08 12:25am
|
Reply
493
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Davit:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yeah - the 1280x720 movies are crystal clear on my 17" monitor, and the colours are so natural. I haven't felt the need to go higher than that (not that my processor could really handle it anyway).
To be honest though, I have downloaded the vast majority in the 640x360 version, after weighing 'picture quality' versus 'size of file on my hard disk' and 'speed of responsiveness of my media player'. I find these are still very good quality, and the close-ups are still very detailed. It just gets a little bit pixelly where there's fast movement, and the colours are a bit less vibrant. But the brain is very good at dismissing that, when the action is so hot.
|
03-07-08 04:31pm
|
Reply
494
|
Her Sweet Hand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from williamj:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks...I've been strictly a solo or lezzie fan but I've been thinking about adding a cock site. I'll put it on my short list.
|
03-07-08 09:28am
|
Reply
495
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yeah. You could say that. But I am not sure that everyone wants a different theme. If you want different themes then I say go to a different site, which is what I did. If someone like what they have than that is great because they have a lot of it!
|
03-02-08 03:53pm
|
Reply
496
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#16
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Hum... I think I remember saying that about the perfect score. I do understand your point though, and it is very valid. However, keep in mind that I said that I score it at 100 because it is perfect for ME. You may have scored it differently. Please do not take me as a jerk for saying this, but please reread my posts and you will find answers to most questions you might have about my reasoning. Also, this is the ONLY site I give this high of a rating to. I love Brazzers, but I give them a 90 for reasons stated, although perhaps not perfectly.
Consider this: If a site is viewed as the best, than is it not perfect when compared to its competition? On what I have seen of other sites this is the most perfect site yet. Again, if I find something better I will drop my score, but until then it must stand, for me that is.
|
03-02-08 03:14pm
|
Reply
497
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
On verity, to me it seemed like the same thing with different girls a lot, but that is just me. It did not see much verity in the theme, but if you like the theme than that is great! I have no regrets downloading it.
The download limit is set for those you are using site clones or some other auto-downloader. They do not want people downloading the site twice. This is information directly from the webmaster when I received my bandwidth warning for downloading 200 GB in a matter of days. Sometime people use a site clone wrong and it attempt to redownload the webiste using a lot of extra bandwidth, with costs them money. They actually lost money on my membership because of the speed I used! Of course there is no issue when you resign, or download over several months. They worry when someone downloads the site in 5 days since tey must pay for the bandwidth usage from their servers. When people go over the allotment they must purchase more at a higher price to keep the site up.
If you download the site properly there should be no issues unless you do it fast, but they do not kick you off unless you start redownloading.
I hope this helps someone!
|
03-02-08 03:05pm
|
Reply
498
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from buckdaddy1:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thank You for the help
Abby is still Number One here.
I'm giving it another perfect score.
Thanks again RagingB
|
03-01-08 07:18am
|
Reply
499
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from powerman:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yes 100 - I also gave Naughty America 100 and I still had cons. These cons can be easily over looked - they are wish bag cons and not real serious ones like bad vids, too expensive, ugly girls, or videos broken up into many pieces. I don't work for that video site - guys, life is too short to worry about things like ratings for an excellent site. Velvet Ecstasy is also an incredible site - Abbie Winters is very good too and it always seems to get really high rated - I like her girls, nay love them, but there are better sites that should be in the top ten.
Maybe I will change the 100 in time.
Thanks for the feed back.
|
02-25-08 06:07pm
|
Reply
500
|
D Archives
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Mr Fountain:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
yeah, the token deal was expensive. I joined it one time and after that stuck with the d'archives part of it for $15. I liked the way the models showed a little attitude when they were shot- they really posed 'in your face style'. almost every model appealed to me. .. Did you see Brandy? short haired brunnette? very hot. The stoppage of updates was frustrating; though the material that was there I liked a lot... though def limited by the abandonment of updates. I've been a member three times for one month per without regret. The $15 is still pretty good for what i got. Though not a site that I would rebill over and over again..
|
02-23-08 11:44am
|
