| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
451
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from williamj:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I think their done with any thoughts of boy/girl. The lezzie material is getting more hardcore though. J
|
10-19-08 08:02am
|
Reply
452
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Raging B.
This is a bit off topic here, but you do not have an email option in your profile.
I was wondering if you still distrust Cybertoad. You gave him a negative trust and said you would look back at him if his reviews got better. I would say they have gotten better, so why not give that some consideration. I am sure he would appreciate it.
|
10-09-08 06:28pm
|
Reply
453
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from gamblinman:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
do you think bangbros is better than brazzers?
|
10-08-08 04:26pm
|
Reply
454
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Morphious:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
HI, please explain how that is a contradiction? Most sites, I get boared with after looking that them a few times, ( usually due to not enough content being available ) this site has plenty, with plenty of updates on a regular schedule to keep me wanting more ( and more and more ..
|
09-26-08 09:34am
|
Reply
455
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from TheRizzo:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Everytime I've been a member I've been really happy with the site, my only real issue with them is the lack of hardcore. If you like natural and lots of it, hard to find any other site that comes close imo.
|
07-10-08 09:52pm
|
Reply
456
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from TheRizzo:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks for the feedback. That is a shame. I know they got hairy hardcore on Galleria, but I shouldn't have to join 2 sites just to get the hardcore.
|
07-10-08 08:41pm
|
Reply
457
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from lurifax:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
It was a few years ago when I last was a member to 'videobox'. Hence I am not sure about exactly how it happened.
However, I am sure it was when doing the editing in 'Windows movie maker' and therefore, I believe that it happened in conjunction with dragging the clip into that application.
I may go back to 'videobox' in a couple of months time...
|
04-07-08 09:48am
|
Reply
458
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from littlejoe:
yup ive been getting spam since i unsubscribed. i will never join again due to this, even if they have great content
|
04-04-08 05:04pm
|
Reply
459
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Monahan:
I am getting a follow-up at least once a week but they offer no incentive to re-join (such as a discount price or an extra week or two) so it serves only to irritate, not attract return business.
I liked the site when I was a member, then canceled when I was expecting to be off-line for about a month. I planned to rejoin shortly after I returned but kept putting it off...then the weekly "we want you back" stuff started to show up. When I saw a review of Brazzers, I decided to give that site a try before going back to Bang Bros. Love Brazzers so I'm still holding out on Bang Bros.
|
04-03-08 12:06pm
|
Reply
460
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I really dont want to agitate you RB, but you gave the site a 97. There is not a lot of differences between a 97 and a 100. Things that some people see as cons I see in a different light. So far this is the only thing I have seen that we disagree on. So I ask you, is a negative trust really necessary. Hell, I even vote for you, and left a nice comment. I am not here to make people mad, it just happened with that review although it should not have. So far you are the only one still biting at it. So out of what, 26 review, I write one that you dont like and even defend it and you still dont trust me? Is there something wrong with my logic on the VB review.
Also, the difference between what you say about me and what I say about other people when they give a 100 or so is that I am willing to retract a negative trust. And, these people are not giving any reason at all why they feel a 100 is warranted. I gave many reasons and explained them. Explained them well I might add.
I understand you dont need to approve my VB review, but check out my others and set aside any differences you might have. Ask yourself "does most of what he is saying about all these site check out?" I really dont want you to think to yourself "what is this asshole saying now" every time you see me post a review or comment!
Sorry for stealing your thread Denner, RB did not have an email link on his personal page, so this seemed like the better way.
|
03-31-08 04:36pm
|
Reply
461
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
It does work just as he said. If you download it you get to try it out, it works like a tour page with movie downloads that do not show the how movie. I will tell you though that you cant move the girl around the screen and it can get in the way at times. It also sucks system resources, sometimes a little too much. Personally I have had a lot of problems with my copy of it. I have had to redownload it a few times. It is pretty cool, but it sucks that once you cancel you lose anything you did not pay extra for....so it is find like a DRM movie, you lose it unless you pay more. The concept it cool, but they should let us keep the stuff that is downloaded in my opinion.
|
03-27-08 10:45am
|
Reply
462
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Wow...and I though I was going to catch shit for my VB review! I hope this dude has some good answers for the ratings he just posted. As a mechanical engineer I assure you there is no new math....1+1 still equals 2. Perhaps he is on dial up where a 1 GB limit would not be an issue, but for someone even with a lame broadband this becomes and issue with a few hours at least and 10 minutes for others. The reason he is recommending being a member for life is because it would take that long to download everything with that harsh limit!
Sorry, cant say I trust this dude, and that is bad coming from me.
|
03-23-08 08:32pm
|
Reply
463
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Okay. I never said I took off from Twistys based on the DVD section. I always believe that more content is better, and if the extra content is junk it should not matter as long as it does not take away from the real content. I just do not see Twistys as a DVD site. Months ago when i was a member there they did not have a huge quantity of DVDs and they were slow coming, so i would rather them put that time into making actual updates. Then Twistys posts a part of a new DVD it counts as the daily update. I would rather see something that I have not seen elsewhere as the daily update.
VB is specifically design for DVDs, so I expect them to post DVDs from external producers. If Twistys posted the DVDs sperately from th normal updates I would not care because it would be considered extra content. Instead they are posting is the daily update making it main content. I would like to see something I could not buy on DVD posted as main site content for the daily update.
It is based on what I expect from the site. I expect DVD updates as the main content from VB, but I expect something brand new from Twistys as the updates. DVDs is just nor their thing. Also, there are other reasons for the difference in score, such as the file names and media quality.
|
03-23-08 07:54pm
|
Reply
464
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I dont mind fake tits, but they need to be within reason. I do much prefer naturals with nice shape, but fake do look very nice when clothing is worn..obviously not the case in porn! Again, this is a personal preference between each user.
Yes, BV does "steal" their stuff. In other words they do not produce it. They just take a bunch of it and put it where we can all get it. When you go to a porn store, assuming you do perhaps you dont, you want to see stuff from Hustler, Zero Tolerance and all the other producers. No one want to go to 12 different sores to shop for porn. VB is like an online porn shop that you pay once a month and watch all you can. Twistys just did not have enough DVDs to do this well. Also, they way the did posted them was one scene every few days or whatever. At VB they post the whole damn thing at once and dont make you search around for the other half of the video.
I hope I have sufficiently "spun" this for you RB. :)
If I have not please let me know and I will dream up something else!
|
03-22-08 10:03pm
|
Reply
465
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
What can I say, Brazzers is about big titties and who cares how they got there! They could use some more big naturals I agree, but it is there thing. But it is not really right to compare VB with Brazzers. VB doesnt have to make their stuff, they just steal it from everyone else and put it in one place and try to have so much that new people shit themselves when they see the video count. It is very easy to get a few hard drives full a month from them.
Brazzers makes their stuff and they make what they like. It is a different story when you actually have to film the scene and find the women and averything else involved. I wish brazzers could be bigger and better, but they can not simply insert the DVD they just bought and push the upload button. Do have to give Brazzers credit though, they are 600 GB so far and that is nothing to be ashamed of! But they will never match the amount of content the VB has.
|
03-21-08 10:17pm
|
Reply
466
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from williamj:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
What you need to understand is a basic fact: Companies such as the one in question made a very open decision to implement these unwanted charges. It was not a 'computer error' someone at their organization signed off on charging memebers unwanted excess CC Billing, making it very difficult for the person to disput these unwanted charges and I'm sure a bit embrassing to disput. RB, if you where a victim you'd be very upset I'm sure. True?
Guilt by Association? Much the opposite. I created a forum, regardless of how hard it may seem. Other members will read accordingly and see I voiced a unwanted billing problems that many have experienced to great discomfort. I don't believe other members will think I was grouping them in 'guilt of association' and be glad I was so vocal. Other PU members are free to read and make their own adult opinion. I've commented and made replays accordingly to all fellow members.
|
03-20-08 05:52pm
|
Reply
467
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from williamj:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I disagree with you on drama time. If Vegas Ken would have made a separate posting for all to see at Log-In, not deep in some Reply Posting, clarifing his orginal comment to Denner, yes some of my distrust and negativity could have been avoided.
Back on 1/11/2008 PU members began posting this issue with very $$$ expensive over billing. Vegas Ken should have been much more up-front in condeming this site and not wording his response as if they thought it was fine. In time, he addressed his remarks.
Overbilling and mis-representation is real issue with adult sites. My intention was to expose this 'normal business' practice of adding all type of unwanted charges and make members aware of caution.
In the future I will research all comments/replys before I state anything. In all respect, I want to be fair to both the adult sites and mangement of PU.
Thank you for your insight...
|
03-20-08 05:08pm
|
Reply
468
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from jd1961:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
But some porn smells bad !
|
03-19-08 12:28pm
|
Reply
469
|
Girls Love Toys
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from badandy400:
Wow, I can not believe th zip access is restricted like that! That seems pretty sneaky. Thanks for the warning of that. i would have been pretty frustrated with that.
|
03-18-08 09:08pm
|
Reply
470
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks, pal...
Great you too saw the bullshit in this....
|
03-18-08 11:57am
|
Reply
471
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Drooler:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Complacency has a lot to do with it. As long as people don't feel uncomfortable enough, they tend to do little or nothing. Most people, anyway. (The strivers will always be working to get more and/or create more.)
And then there's hubris. It's funny how the Spitzer sex scandal brought on a discussion of the pitfalls of having too much of that. It's nothing new, though, considering myriad other scandals involving gov't and/or business, and those events that should be considered scandals (e.g., the Libby pardon, the phony WMD in Iraq) by our "liberal" (yeah right) media.
I don't know if Winston Churchill meant stupidity when he said something to the effect that probably the best evidence against democracy can be found by having a chat with the average voter.
|
03-18-08 03:15am
|
Reply
472
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Eisenhower famously warned about the military-industrial complex, but now we've got a corporate/government-military-industrial complex with elected leaders that just pay us lip service and allow crises like the present one to take place and then use them as opportunities to look as if they're doing something by tacking on bandaids, as you call them too, such as this "Economic Stimulus" nonsense.
It's actually not hard to fathom that they actually intentionally allow these problems to fester so they'll have something to hoot about come election time, telling us what they'll do to fix these problems they've created for us in health care/insurance and in financial sectors, to name two. As you can tell, I don't have a whole lot of trust in the government.
They don't even have the money for this "stimulus" anyway! The government's in the worst debt it's ever been in! It's ridiculous! Will I spend some of mine on porn? What difference would it make? And they tell us to go out and spend it. Excuse me, but hasn't the problem been one of insolvency? Wouldn't a better savings rate have a more lasting effect? They must really think we're dumb, and maybe a lot of us are.
|
03-16-08 04:49pm
|
Reply
473
|
Overdeveloped Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review from RagingBuddhist:
It's got a real 1990 something feel to it, with the same background I saw when I joined several years ago. Their "Archive Photo Gallery" hasn't changed in years either. It's got the same 27 pages of pictures that were up the last time I joined. The watermarks verify that - they're all marked 2001 and 2002. They've been going at it with the same formula for so long, even the watermark in their videos is now literally fuzzy around the edges.
Even though I believe that sometimes you have to pay for what you want, this site is ridiculously expensive, even at $20 a month. The concept is great - the execution is anything but. I know I won't be back unless there are some dramatic changes on the site.
|
03-16-08 09:08am
|
Reply
474
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from malikstarks:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I think there absolutely is and probably most of the guys on this site are on the borderline (including me), oh well.
|
03-15-08 03:00am
|
Reply
475
|
Divine Breasts
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from jd1961:
500mb a day is lame IMO.
|
03-14-08 05:51am
|
