| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1476
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Twotails:
(pat362's Reply)
I find the end of Kim - "Do Me Darling" very glamorous, with that sort of kissing we're looking for - perfect :D
|
07-18-15 03:37pm
|
Reply
1477
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Abel Semen:
"*Sorry but facials should never be included in glamorous porn because there's nothing glamorous about shooting cum all over the face of the woman you had sex with since there's no way you are going to kiss that mouth and obviously neither do the guys in these videos."
It may not be a surprise given my nick, but I couldn't disagree more. Facials are, for my money, easily the most visually interesting element of mainstream porn (on the average), and it constantly frustrates me that otherwise high-quality "glamour" sites tend not to include them.
And, post-facial kissing is very much a thing, and one that if anything I wouldn't mind seeing more of. Seems only fair on the part of the guy if he wants/expects his girl to take it in face. I don't want it in every scene, but it would be a good occasional inclusion, *especially* in scenes with a bit more of a romantic feel.
|
03-24-14 07:37pm
|
Reply
1478
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from sonofzog:
(pat362's Reply)
I'm totally with you on facials (and for that matter, on money shots in general). Like most porn fans, I enjoy video that plays into my own fantasies about sex and beautiful women. Of all the lovers I've had over the years, from marriage to one-night stands, I never felt a desire to come on her face, and I'm reasonably sure it would never have been received graciously. I have always preferred internal release regardless of orifice.
The whole cliche of shooting onto a woman's back or belly or face is an archaic throwback to porn producers who wanted to prove that it was real screwing with a real ejaculation. I'm pretty sure we've gotten past that but I still see many comments from those who want to see a huge load on the woman's face. Don't get, never will.
|
03-14-14 09:33am
|
Reply
1479
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from XArt:
(pat362's Reply)
Hi pat362 - Thanks for your message. Happy to hear you prefer the mp4 format. The reason we removed the .wmv is that we're about to launch a totally new and improved version of X-Art, which will be way faster and even easier to navigate and use. We've streamlined the interface and we're switching to a new hosting and CDN infrastructure for screaming fast downloads and ridiculously fast streaming! We did a survey of downloads and found that the wmv and quicktime formats are rarely used anymore. Always open to your feedback and suggestions. All the best, ~ Cindy, X-Art Customer Support
|
01-20-14 04:36pm
|
Reply
1480
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
While we may disagree on facials (and I don't want them for every glamour scene), we certainly agree on kissing and men going down on ladies. I was watching a recently uploaded Maddy O'Reilly scene from EroticaX a couple of nights ago and the male talent goes down on Maddy and two things struck me: 1) how rare it is for me to see that these days, and 2) how incredibly hot it is to see (when shot right). I was also struck with the though that this would be a great job for a fella!
|
01-09-14 02:02pm
|
Reply
1481
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from rearadmiral:
Great review pat. Like you, I try not to let my subjective opinions cloud an objective review. I may not like the porn on offer, but if the scenes are good, the site is well laid out and the downloads are simple then the site still deserves to be credited for that. Where we differ on this site is that I really liked the scenes here. I haven't rejoined yet, but I will.
(And I guess we also disagree that facials have no place in glamour porn. I still think they do but agree that a facial doesn't need to be the only ending to a scene.)
|
01-08-14 01:55pm
|
Reply
1482
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Another excellent informative review. This is a borderline join for me, and it's still borderline, but thanks to your review I have more idea of what I'm spending money on.
|
01-08-14 10:26am
|
Reply
1483
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
Perhaps, I just sort of find the bandwidth hog argument a little bogus on a smaller site like this, given that in theory it is material they would like to download anyway, the same amount of bandwidth is used.
My guess is that it is a preventative measure against site rippers, which is unfortunate, but I guess it is just what we have to deal with these days. The only Kink sites I was a member of let you queue up a pretty substantial collection, but that was a few years ago so perhaps things have changed.
Nice to see you are still around, seemed like everyone was leaving for a while and I have been way to busy lately, I was worried PU would be basically empty.
|
11-03-13 01:23am
|
Reply
1484
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
pat,
As a big fan of x-art, their new setup is quite frustrating, I can see limiting people, but queuing files up only works for maybe two videos now before the rest time out, which is a bit excessive. Given it is a small site, I am sure they are concerned about rippers, but it does make thinks a bit inconvenient for loyal costumers that join a couple of times a year and don't have the time to monitor their downloads (like me). I would prefer being able to queue a bunch up, even on a limited bandwidth, as I typically only download videos 3-4 times over a month of membership - which I don't really consider "hogging". If the majority of members prefer the same methodology I do, I don't know that it would drastically harm other users as long as they weren't all hitting the site at the same time.
|
11-02-13 01:59am
|
Reply
1485
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Cum Play John:
(pat362's Reply)
Facials do evidently still command a large % of endings in glamour sites. There's a whole raging debate about cream-pies versus facials debate on many porn sites comment pages... I definitely favor the latter.
Agreed that porn behavior must adjust to incorporate the latest information on what's safest for the women.
There's a lot of stuff out there disrespectful to women... Fisting, slapping, peeing on women, double-penetration, anal sex (of most varieties) and yes, gratuitous sloppy cumshots in the eye or bukkake.
But laying aside how the cum gets there, many men seem to find the sight itself of semen on a gorgeous woman's face arousing. It doesn't necessarily have to be sloppily shot all over her eyes. It doesn't have to be large quantities from men of unknown provenance (i.e. with possible STDs.)
It might be cum art of the sort Camille Crimson might shoot with her trusted boyfriend.
I guess the point is, as with other sorts of porn -- like anal -- there may be a way to shoot things in a safer manner that are still visually arousing without being unsafe.
Men love to see women eat their cum; Chris Rock had a quip about believing he could speak Arabic after watching his girl swallow.
I think there will always be a market for it, but yes it does need to be done safer.
Artistic displays of semen on a woman's face for longer periods of time may have only a small % niche appeal -- but I can certainly imagine that appeal is real for some men given how historically popular the facial itself is.
There is, after all, always a slight risk to almost any kind of hardcore porn conceivable...
|
09-23-13 10:54am
|
Reply
1486
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Cum Play John:
(pat362's Reply)
You may be right... though I envision something new that hasn't been done.
I'm not concerned with gross-out quantities of sperm or men treating women badly.
I'm more interested in the artistic HQ/HD display of facial cum in creative ways and women eating it.
Perhaps even from just one man... The point is a new kind of porn for sperm fetishists that makes eating the semen a more slo-mo affair -- with lots of eye contact.
Many guys love the sight of semen on a gorgeous woman's face -- I'm all for extending the fantasy.
|
09-22-13 10:04am
|
Reply
1487
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from elephant:
(pat362's Reply)
Exactly Pat362, it just makes a refreshing change to now and again see a movie with a little more slowed down vibe to it and you can admire the girls more in their beauty. Works for me having a nice wide variety of porn genres and niches.
|
08-26-12 01:15am
|
Reply
1488
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from elephant:
(pat362's Reply)
Hi Pat362
Thanks for the kind words bud, Yeah it was one of them sites for me, always wanted to join but thought it might be a little on the soft side for my tastes, I've been thankful I did join now as some of it I'd put to my hottest scenes, I've not been through that many as yet though so hopefully there will be tons more favs scenes also here.
So I don't know how many anal scenes as yet, Up to now I clocked around 6 I think, but there is bound to be more, I'll try and give you an update when I've been through more of them, unless someone else knows for sure. Its something I'd like to see added to their site, some indication of what is what.
Lots of scenes too the guy comes on her back and I'm so used to a facial so it's a little strange on that score, I think I prefer a facial to be honest but as I say I'm more used to seeing this in porn.
Thanks for the link, no hadn't got around to getting all the girls names sorted, so will do that with your link, cheers
|
08-25-12 09:13am
|
Reply
1489
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Jutti24:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks =) PU guidelines defines the 70-79 point range as "Does some things good, some things poor. Might recommend." - I find that this describes the problem quite well.
I also do remember reading about the reason behind streaming-only, but TBH: that's the wrong way to go. You can't really stop piracy without making paying customers unhappy. And I don't want to see the future for paying customers in streaming-only which means you can only watch videos as long as you are a paying member. After leaving you have little left.
No problem about your request: I just rechecked - signup page lists 1 month recurring as 29.99$(21.57€) and 1 month non-recurring as 39.99$ (28.77€) - I always sign up as a recurring member if there is a difference and cancel right away - saves you 10 bucks! I also do remember I signed up via a promotion link from some other website that mentions a 10$ discount. Not sure if it's cool to post the link though...
|
07-17-12 02:03pm
|
Reply
1490
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(pat362's Reply)
I just spot checked and am seeing the $39.99 we have listed.
|
07-17-12 06:58am
|
Reply
1491
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jutti24:
(pat362's Reply)
I absolutely agree, The Score Group's business practise of mostly streaming sucks.
And I also agree - they deceive you when signing up by "hinting" that you can download all the videos. I am also warning as many people as I can about this limitation - hence my reason for this review.
Yes I am positive about the price. I just cancelled my subscription and it says "subscription for xlgirls.com @ 19.99 USD renews every 30 days". I agree, 40$ would be extremely steep for streaming only - and to be honest, the amount of content isn't THAT large, as many many models only feature old photos.
It was a tough decision on the score! While I enjoy the content and the models and everything, but the turnoff is the download-limitation... Maybe I'll rework the score depending on my lasting impression after a while.
|
07-16-12 11:57am
|
Reply
1492
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from gyang79:
(pat362's Reply)
why did they stat doing this. they should atleast cut the price in half
|
03-30-12 01:12am
|
Reply
1493
|
XX Cel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from fiou:
(pat362's Reply)
80-89 Very good. I am not making this up, it is written. For the last time, this site is not very good. Period. I'll turn off the notification now. This is stupid.
|
02-04-14 01:27pm
|
Reply
1494
|
XX Cel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from fiou:
(pat362's Reply)
I don't have a PHD in mathematics, but I really really think that 80 % is not "bordeline moderate". Anywway, I just hope my comment will warn others before giving $30 for that 60 % paysite.
|
02-04-14 05:13am
|
Reply
1495
|
XXX Gianna
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from james4096:
(pat362's Reply)
Shit, gianna doesn't need her own site. She's got bangbros, or brazzers for that matter. I swear she has to be the most prolific female pornstar in the last few years. I see her in multiple scenes on every internet and dvd site I join. The only person to challenge her might be trina michaels(no relation).
Those are some hardworking girls.
|
08-12-09 11:01am
|
Reply
1496
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Thomas20:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks pat362. It sounds a bit like my sexy kittens but with bigger jugs so I might join. Oh, and and full length vids instead of 6 parters.
|
04-12-11 01:20pm
|
Reply
1497
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Thomas20:
Hello pat362. Can you tell me :
1. Do the girls look at the camera a lot like in my sexy kittens ?
2. Are the vids ruined by music ?
Thanks.
|
04-11-11 06:34am
|
Reply
1498
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from lk2fireone:
TBP says only 1 site is included with the membership. I assume you got a package deal that includes a number of network sites with your membership. Is that a public offer, where anyone can join this network and get access to a number of different sites, or what?
It gets expensive very quickly when the price to join a single site in the network is $25-$30/month.
|
04-10-11 11:44am
|
Reply
1499
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks pat.
|
08-06-13 06:02pm
|
Reply
1500
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Marcus:
Great review, and I definitely agree following my membership at Ivana a few months ago.
|
08-06-13 12:18pm
|
