| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1451
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Cybertoad:
Another great review Pat,
|
10-01-12 04:07pm
|
Reply
1452
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
I don't really know Wicked all that well and I didn't know that most of their titles are on the site. Had I known that I would have definitely included that as a 'pro' since it really shows the studio's committment to the internet.
I was also pleased to see the full-movie option available. I prefer scenes, but I did download a few full movies of some older titles with stars that I like.
On an unrelated note, I'm disappointed to see that Elegant Angel hasn't made "Lexi" available to VOD sites yet. I was looking forward to seeing Lexi Belle's first anal scene this weekend. It looks like I'll have to wait a while longer.
|
09-30-12 01:41pm
|
Reply
1453
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from slutty:
Nice review Pat,
I agree with you entirely. I wish the navigation here was a bit better, they used to have scenes tagged and stuff where their old site, but now it is just a model index. I think it is a highly underrated site. I was a member here last month, and never had any logout problems, so must be a recent thing, perhaps high server demand?
|
09-30-12 12:27pm
|
Reply
1454
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from rearadmiral:
Great review pat. I found your take on this site interesting because while our tastes in porn are quite similar there are a few differences that can be seen by comparing our views on the site. If anything, I'm now thinking that maybe I scored them a few points too low.
Condoms aren't a deal-breaker for me, but my preference is to not see them, but I do respect Wicked for the position they've taken and obviously enforce.
The biggest difference I found between Wicked and many other porn sites is that Wicked really makes 'traditional' story-based porn. That's rare these days. I wonder how important that is to a lot of viewers. For some, it might mean that Wicked stuff can be viewed as couples porn, but for me, I have to confess that I just skip ahead to the sex.
|
09-30-12 11:56am
|
Reply
1455
|
Wicked.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the info.
|
05-28-13 04:55pm
|
Reply
1456
|
Wife Writing
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
I'm indifferent to interracial simply because I see the male talent as part of the furniture so I would neither seek out nor avoid interracial stuff merely because it happens to be interracial. But DFN, mostly on the strength of Blacks on Blondes (and several other sites too, as you mention) is a pretty good network. I'm amazed at what some petite models can take.
As for Meatholes, please disregard my comment about possible credit card issues. There's no mention of it here on the site's page so it has to be another site. Sorry for any confusion.
|
08-07-12 04:09pm
|
Reply
1457
|
Wife Writing
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks pat. I alos liked Blacks on Blondes. That's probably the best site on the network. They've remastered a lot of the older scenes with some of the models I really like and they have a fair bit of anal too.
I was thinking of a Meatholes membership since it's been years since I had one but I recall a PU member saying he had serious credit card issues with them. That's what I recall reading but that may be incorrect.
|
08-06-12 05:51pm
|
Reply
1458
|
Wife Writing
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Now that you mention it I do recall reading that the site will re-issue videos and give them new dates so that might be happening here. I did think it odd that some of the models who's scenes are dated from 2010 were some who really hadn't been in the business for a while.
This site alone definitely isn't worth the price but the entire network is pretty good.
And pat, with your encyclopedic knowledge of porn, are you aware of any other sites with this theme?
|
08-06-12 04:31pm
|
Reply
1459
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from jook:
I agree, this was one of the better reviews on PU. Sure thing for a raffle winner so I'll lay off this week. ;)
Question: The TBP review from 2015 is somewhat contrary to your review regarding hard sex. Can you comment? The following is an excerpt:
"The content here may not be for everyone, the bulk of it, at least. Out of the total number of scenes 1,939 of them are mere interviews up to the 12 or so minute mark before there might be something like nudity, pussy spreading, or possibly some pussy play. If you're the type who really likes to get to know your models before they might be seen later in a hardcore shoot, go for it, but just know that's what you can expect from the bulk of the sites content."
|
03-07-17 11:46am
|
Reply
1460
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from lk2fireone:
EXCELLENT REVIEW, AS USUAL.
WHAT IS NICE IS THAT YOU GIVE A REVIEW OF A SITE THAT MANY PU MEMBERS KNOW, BUT THE REVIEW STILL SEEMS FRESH AND FILLED WITH WORTHWHILE OPINIONS.
I AGREE WHOLEHEARTEDLY THAT SOME GIRLS IN PORN, AFTER A FEW YEARS, SEEM TO HAVE AGED A LOT. FOR ME IT'S NOT BITTERSWEET, JUST FUCKING SAD.
BUT YOU PUT IT IN MORE POETICAL TERMS.
|
03-06-17 09:55pm
|
Reply
1461
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for that tip. I checked that out and it seems that she is pretty messed up. It was weird that Pierre kept mentioning he wanted to set her up for a gangbang. I figured he would have a bit more compassion...
|
07-16-13 05:59pm
|
Reply
1462
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
I did notice the addition of WUNF scenes to the Casting site but I figured I was seeing those since I had a membership to both. I hope he isn't running out of material.
As an aside, there is some stuff that he probably should have not uploaded. Today I downloaded and watched a scene with a German model with a strikingly beautiful face. She says her name is Mika or Mikki or something like that but she listed as "Leylou." She does a scene with no hardcore and while she's likely too thin for most people she might even be too thin for me. But when she undresses there is something that I've never seen in porn and I've seen a lot of porn. Her arms are covered, and I mean COVERED in scar tissue from where she has obviously been cutting herself for years. I like rough porn, I like 'dirty' porn, but this made me uncomfortable. I suspect the last thing this beautiful young woman needed in her life was a porn career. This is her only scene on the site, so I'm guessing Woodman didn't use her for anything else. It might have been best if this scene never saw the light of day.
|
07-11-13 06:04pm
|
Reply
1463
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
Yeah, six months would be an aweful long time to hold onto a membership to his site given the price. He does update his normal site pretty regularly, but still that is a bit much.
|
05-22-11 10:22pm
|
Reply
1464
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the info!
|
09-27-10 09:59pm
|
Reply
1465
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(pat362's Reply)
Watermarks like that are almost always deal breaker for me. I reluctantly understand wanting to brand your material, but blocking a good part of the action with a billboard is ridiculous.
Thanks for the reply!
|
05-03-10 07:04pm
|
Reply
1466
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Wittyguy:
I used to enjoy some of his stuff too. Just wondering if there are any pic sets on the site (and what size they are) if its all/mostly vids?
|
05-03-10 12:20pm
|
Reply
1467
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
Are those download speeds with or without a download manager/accelerator?
Do the videos still have that ridiculously large watermark at the bottom?
|
05-02-10 06:53pm
|
Reply
1468
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from dieselman:
(pat362's Reply)
Hello Pat! I am sure you wont get bored on WowGirls. I agree with elephant, we have lot's of scenes which worth the membership fees alone!
Now, regarding your question:
At this moment, we have the following scenes:
Hardcore films without anal - 77 films (36 girls)
Hardcore films with anal - 16 films (12 girls)
Girl-Girl films - 51 films (49 girls)
Solo films with anal - 3 films (3 girls)
Girl-Girl films with anal - 2 films (4 girls)
Lots of more scheduled ahead of course.
Thank you for your comment!
|
02-10-13 12:35pm
|
Reply
1469
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
I see that now. Thanks.
|
05-13-12 05:02pm
|
Reply
1470
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Sorry to ask a follow-up on this, but what is Lioness? I can't find anything by Googling it.
|
05-13-12 04:48pm
|
Reply
1471
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from AFS Media Ltd:
(pat362's Reply)
Yes, some of them are professionals like Ksyusha & Artyom and it's clear to see, but Laura & Andrey, Ella & Mark, Katya & Vlad etc. are real amateurs - real lovers, married or not, and they shoot as they can, there's no producer with them while they're doing it. Of course, not all our members enjoy watching them eating burgers in their car and doing other stuff since they came here for porn, but we have some great couples like Katya & Vlad, who managed to make non-adult footage very interesting and exciting.
I don't know if you saw The Art Porn already, we update it every 5 days, and our members like it.
I'll discuss the problem of the updates with our content manager, as far as I know we'll update our most popular sites more often soon.
|
08-27-13 12:15am
|
Reply
1472
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from AFS Media Ltd:
Thanks for a thorough review. I'd only like to mention that we do have real amateur couples on Private Sex Tapes that you won't find anywhere else. All the content is exclusive except for Dolls Porn.
|
08-26-13 08:06am
|
Reply
1473
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from elephant:
Yeah nice review Pat of all the network, its certainly one I'll be going back to at that price, hope they start updating more though.
|
06-10-12 01:16am
|
Reply
1474
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from slutty:
Nice review pat, good to know their price is much more attractive now. I'm not a fan of the quantity of filler in the videos, but they do get some attractive ladies.
|
06-09-12 09:42pm
|
Reply
1475
|
X Core Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from hardog:
(pat362's Reply)
It shows the last update being 7/7/09. Two in June, two in May, two in April.
When I click on "all episodes" it lists 31 pages with 4 different videos on each page so 124 total videos.
|
09-01-09 07:58pm
|
