| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1176
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from elephant:
(pat362's Reply)
Cheers for the extra info.
Yeah I guess this is a problem these big sites have when they have so many sub sites they tend to get updated less on some of the sites and it's a shame but some are more filler sites I guess. Yeah 31 scenes isn't too bad, I'm quite picky though, the older woman has to be attractive, that's when it becomes slightly harder to find real gems, I also like them to be of a difference in age, sometimes you get scenes like say older and younger and they look hardly any different. Still its great when you find a perfect pairing. The Zoe Kush and Ray Veness one looks out of this world, I really like Ray Veness she is one of them great dirty talkers I love.
I wish a site would do this and this only and loads of updates a week, I'd join in a shot, I've got so many b/g sex sometimes it does become predictable and I'm finding more and more these days I like the group scenes better more though the GG/M than G/MM.
|
10-28-12 09:51am
|
Reply
1177
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from elephant:
Nice review Pat as usual, I always like reading your views and reviews.
I will join this site again soon as some of the latest we live together updates look really up there with the best lesbian porn being made today, yeah like less tats but we know that's never gonna happen lol.
Also impressed with the Mom Bangs Teens series looks awesome, since watching a few older woman and younger woman have sex with a guy on the sweetsinner site and it's now my fav niche, some of these look nice.
Milf next door, pure 18 and euro sex parties are Okish too but none of the other interest me too much to be honest, I will join though soon, probs a Christmas join with elegant angel.
|
10-28-12 05:56am
|
Reply
1178
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Monahan:
I'm good with all of Pat's observations, especially the identification issues and the low quality of the older stuff. Those two aspects are what makes me score this site at 85 (I reserve 90+ for superb sites with no significant shortcomings.
Identification - What's the problem with the site here? There's no legitimate reason these people can't maintain a consistent naming convention and make it easy on those of us who pay the bills to find what we want when we want. My only conclusion is pure laziness.
Older stuff - At least the site could tie the multiple clips together for Pete's sake. It isn't that hard to do. Then consider doing what Bang Bros has been doing; remastering the really good stuff in the archives.
I have one additional significant beef with this site; they don't do a decent job supporting Fire Fox Mozilla browsers. While a member I was forced to switch over to IE to access the site, a real pain in the ass because my download manager is a Fire Fox add-in.
Three significant issues (with a few minor ones at well) make this a low 80's for me.
|
10-26-12 08:11am
|
Reply
1179
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
I agree that any comparison between porn and mainstream movies economies is silly. But with gross sales being what they are it makes clear how big the porn industry is.
I've been spending a lot of time at ADT reading old threads. It's an amazing site for porn trivia. I haven't posted anything yet, but PU will be my default site for as long as it exists. And the purposes of the sites are completely different, as you point out so one could never replace the other.
|
12-29-11 07:41am
|
Reply
1180
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
pat, as usual you're a source of great information!
For me, Captain Stabbin isn't about the crew but I have a nautical fetish AND an anal fetish so this site is a sensory overload for me. I do like the original Captain as he's just so lucky and he knows how lucky he is.
I hadn't really given any thought to the economics of mainstream porn. I guess I always thought that it was a great way to get rich fast, but after reading what you wrote that obviously isn't the case. I hear estimated numbers that the porn industry brings in each year, and I recall that the porn industry is reputed to bring in more than Hollywood, but there are tons of studios out there cranking out the titles. And I'm certain that piracy hurts the porn industry more than the mainstream movie business just because of the size of studios.
Still... I suspect that when a star like Tanner does her first anal it will also sell better than the average movie. But the piracy will be more too. I'll definitely be keeping an eye out for any Tanner anal scenes that might come out in 2012.
I just signed up for the forums at ADT and there is a lot of useful information there as you said. Thanks for that tip!
|
12-28-11 07:01am
|
Reply
1181
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
I probably still would have joined because the promo pages made it look like Captain Stabbin was back on the high seas and i always liked that site. It isn't really back, but there are some new scenes.
I'm surprised that Tanner would have done anal for Evil Angel since EA has a bit of a reputation for porn on the harder side. They must have driven a dump truck full of money to her front door to entice her to shoot anal for them. Thanks for the tip and I'll definitely be looking for those scenes. If you ever hear the titles would you let me know please?
|
12-27-11 05:14am
|
Reply
1182
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
After a long relationship with RK (over 18 months straight) I also threw in the towel.
Main reasons are:
Several download problems.
Non responsive customer support.
Less than exciting updates compared to other sites.
I found two sites that are great and are working hard to keep my business: 21sextury and DDFProd. They have convinced me that RK is no longer worth continuing.
The signs are there that you may be right; the site may well be on its way to oblivion.
|
03-19-11 11:56am
|
Reply
1183
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Hodgepodge:
(pat362's Reply)
I had similar experience.
Regarding your suggestion about technical support, Reality Kings HAS no real support; toll-free for billings & cancellation, but no reply to my emails for technical support.
About 2/3 of videos I downloaded lacked audio, and no one would respond to my repeated request for help.
Please see my other notes in my full reply.
|
03-13-11 01:48am
|
Reply
1184
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
I've had the same problem with some picture sites recently. AO30 and Aunt Jydy's/Older Women certainly have had very mediocre updates during the past year, and they used to be some of my favorite sites.
No wonder I am baying at the moon!!
|
09-28-10 08:28am
|
Reply
1185
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
I think you are right, Pat! That's why Reality Kings will be my last long term subscription for a while. I had one to American Vice and we all know what happened to them. As you say, in these uncertain times many sites will go under!
|
09-27-10 07:09pm
|
Reply
1186
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
Go to any InTheVip scene, I get the system message when I go to those. I guess they are adding a new video, but I have gotten that same message since last night.
Although the site does seem to be running faster now.
|
07-14-10 09:08pm
|
Reply
1187
|
Rebecca's Office
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(pat362's Reply)
Sadly it seems worse than that. I tried logging in and get a we’re closed message (but it does say watch this space for more MILFs 🤷♂️)
PU admin please do whatever you think is best.
|
05-25-21 06:47am
|
Reply
1188
|
Redhead In Heat
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from gaypornolover:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for that, hope you didn't mind me pointing it out, just didn't want your review to be spoiled by a little mistake it's all too easy to make!
Curious though - what's an IR performer?
|
08-26-11 08:01am
|
Reply
1189
|
Redhead In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from gaypornolover:
A good warning review, but you seem to have missed a chunk out - one of your sentences ends mid-sentence - "with multiple partners at the...."
Sounds an awful site of a good model which is always a pity - and pop-up hell is ALWAYS a bad sign.
Thanks for warning people off the site, this is what PU is really useful for.
|
08-25-11 11:53pm
|
Reply
1190
|
Redhead In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Capn:
I just made the mistake of looking at the 'tour.'
Popup hell!
Never a good sign.
Cap'n. :0(
|
08-25-11 11:32pm
|
Reply
1191
|
Redhead In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from BradlyH:
You have me laughing over here. 320x240 vids and 640x480 pics ? wow.
|
08-25-11 06:41pm
|
Reply
1192
|
Redline Star
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from BadMrFrosty:
(pat362's Reply)
Sometimes you have to take one for the team, this time it was my turn. Glad I helped at least 1 person save a bit of cash, hope you put it to good use :)
|
01-17-11 07:08am
|
Reply
1193
|
Retro Raw
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from whynot2:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for cueing me to that pat362. I did read the review and take note. Darn that nostalgic tug. The irony might be how the concept of 'value' has changed: I'd guess that the magazine that contained the photos that I remember, probably cost something like $20, in like 1978 or so dollars.
Anyhoo...we'll see.
|
08-09-11 09:28am
|
Reply
1194
|
Retro Raw
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Capn:
This is part of the problem.
A lot of these retro sites seem to have stopped updating.
It is a shame because I am sure there would be more of a market if it were done properly.
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-13-11 02:53pm
|
Reply
1195
|
Rocco Siffredi
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
There's supposed to be software to block spam. But if we could come up with better software that really works to block at least some of this spam, we should make a fortune.
I also get a lot of random spam emails for sex, medications, whatever. Most of that goes into my spam box, but some of it gets into my regular email box. The amount of spam I've been getting recently has increased significantly.
And I'm too lazy to get a new email address, because then I would have to change my email for all the accounts that I really want to get mail and notices from.
Edit01: I did open two email addresses, that I was hoping would get the bulk of my spam. But my regular email address has been put on the list for spammers. And they also use my email address as a "fake" email address of origin when they send out spam, because I sometimes get notices that some messages (that are spam) were not able to be delivered, or that I have gone over the limit of the amount of email I can send. And I did not, obviously, send those spam messages, and I send out very few emails in any one day.
|
10-08-10 07:09pm
|
Reply
1196
|
Roxy Raye
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Monahan:
I just discovered this babe and I agree with Pat's comments about Roxy. In what I've seen on Evil Angel, where she's done a lot of stuff, she's really into messing with her butt in ways I've never considered. She's one super cute babe who doesn't look like she'd ever be into anything as kinky as this extreme anal stuff.
In any case as with Pat, I also don't quite get the erotic appeal of shoving bottles, large dildoes, even miniature basketballs, either as an observer or a participant.
But I am really into Roxy as a total babe!
|
04-15-13 08:26am
|
Reply
1197
|
Rub A Teen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
I haven't yet, but as i see from marvin at TMW and you that is likely the way to join.
|
11-20-12 01:18pm
|
Reply
1198
|
Saffron Taylor
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Latex Addict:
(pat362's Reply)
Yeah I am new here and I simply left my personal thoughts on what I felt the site deserved. It is a high quality site, great navigation, images and video subject matter which I adore along with crystal clear quality.
If you want honest member reviews, then this is my personal opinion of this site.
I did not rate this site 100% simply because of the small minor comment about old standard def videos, but apart from that I can't find fault.
I noticed in the main review that there were comments on the amount of content, but I was kept quite busy for a few months here, and there was a new video and photos added each week, which kept me waiting for more. I love that... keeps me on my toes, never knowing what to expect in the next part.
I will be searching through for other sites I have joined and giving my feedback on those too!
|
03-15-12 11:22am
|
Reply
1199
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from mashy:
(pat362's Reply)
The issue I have is not the download limit, at least queued links dont go dead with this site which is a huge plus point. The issue is the rant concerning how they were losing money with customers like me. After all it is a free market; they set the price and the rules for their site, so ranting at customers regarding loosing money is unprofessional in my opinion.
|
06-22-11 10:03am
|
Reply
1200
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from otoh:
(pat362's Reply)
I have to agree with pat362... whereas it's annoying when sites limit you to eg 2gb per day - stopping you even downloading just a few scenes in one go - bandwidth does cost the sites and 41GB is pretty generous.
Unless you were trying to download an entire site with eg a 3-day trial membership - which, to be fair, isn't really in the spirit of things - I can't imagine that being much of a restriction.
And if you can download >1TB of content for around $30, there's really not much of anything - porn or otherwise - that can compare in value :)
|
06-22-11 01:39am
|
