What's the difference between like and love?
Spit or swallow.
Seriously, I think facials are just stupid, and I concur with Denner and Toadsith that they are just porno performance gimmicks (if I may paraphrase) that have nothing to do with real life.
The '70's pornstar Annette Haven refused to do facials and got criticized for that, but maybe she just thought they were a dumb idea, too?
They'd at least be more entertaining (though no less dumb) if they weren't always done so predictably! How about synching the splooge moment to a climactic point in a well-known piece of music? There are plenty of public domain classics that won't entail royalty payments.
Or the video images can be rendered into a "cartoon" style (such as seen in some TV commercials) right at the moment the jizz hits the jawline.
Or get the girl to sneeze a big loogie on the guy's cock before he gets a chance to let fly -- a sort of quid pro quo.
Sure, these are stupid ideas and one's kinda gross, but given that facials are here to stay, we need to put our thinking caps on and help the industry take the facial to a new, artistic level!
Disagree, Pat. If the director wants the girl to be nastier, he should call 'cut!' and ask the girl off camera to be nastier, then resume filming - or at least cut his chatter from the soundtrack, IMO.
True that, true that!! Put there are still a handful of porn viewers that still wish for the decent down-to-earth porn... I AM ONE OF THEM. :) Therefore, I continue to fight!!
I respect your opinion pat but I have to disagree with associating legal, legitimate porn with child abuse and rape. That's one of the huge problems with sexual expression in our society today -- people automatically associate it with something bad as you did.
When you talk about your favorite restaurant do you have to throw out a disclaimer that you are not obese or anorexic? Of course not. Plenty of people enjoy erotic media in a healthy way alone or with others.
If society had a healthier view of porn and sexuality in general I bet you would talk about it more openly.
I don't want to see guys deliver!! I want to see women make guys come early because they got some good shit!!! I want to see them fuck desperate amateur blue ball muthaphuckas that will smother a woman's body with nut!!! I want to know how good the pussy is!!
Women that phuck guys that get pussy every 5 minutes will not allow me to find out how good their pussy is, man!! That's one of the reasons why most cumshot scenes today involve vast quantities of "BEAT THEIR MEAT" concepts!!
AND...
Those "DELIVERY GUYS" you speak of... Are too busy trying to shove their dick down a woman's throat!!!
I'm tellin' you, man... It's the dudes that we see AAAALLLLLL THE TIME in porn that are with these girls!! The producers don't understand that it should be "BARELY LEGAL GIRLS" with "BARELY LEGAL GUYS (Sounds gay, doesn't it? :) Don't worry, I have no intention on getting confused!! :D)"
When you see those same old dudes that are always in porn (i.e.: Lee Stone, Marco Banderas, Jack Derrick, Talon) that seem like no kind of pussy can fade them, how do you feel about that?!
Me, I want to throw the remote at the television set!! >:(
I just don't want to see Lee Stone's big musclebound ass fucking some teen chick... It just doesn't look right!! I cannot stand musclebound pornstars cuz most of the time, they are trying to hog the camera or they have a low sperm count from fucking steroids or something!! >:(
As far as the girls, NEW GIRLS OR THE 18/19 YEAR OLD ONES!! In most cases, girls that young look like they just got out of High School!! Girls that young looking... NAKED... IS SERIOUS WHACK OFF MATERIAL, ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY STAND UP NAKED FOR THE CAMERA WITH NO SHAME!! When they keep putting someone like Courtney Simpson in Barely Legal, I really know they are full of shit!!! Come on, that woman is not Barely Legal!! :) She's flexible as hell, but not Barely Legal!!
I'll use Hustler's Barely Legal series as an example of real sexy, I'm talking about maybe the first 30 episodes of that series.
I really like the dim atmosphere, the really young teen girls, the unfamiliar guys (Not the constant appearing pornstars :( ), and the when the girls take showers or pose naked for the camera on their solo parts!! I could be exagerating, but after the 30th episode, that's when they started introducing pornstars that are way over their 20's and trying to say they are "BARELY LEGAL!!" Shit, I thought barely legal was 18!! :-l And I am so sick of seeing Kurt Lockwood, Lee Stone, Marco Banderas, Sascha, Mr. Pete, Mark Ashley, Chris Charming, James Deen... All those dudes that I constantly see in porn!! I want some new guys that really aren't trying to show their face too much on camera, like new unfamiliar young men that aren't in porn like that, like the girl's boyfriend or something!!
The same reason why some women get involved in bukkakes or gag on some dude's chishcabbob stick (Sorry, don't know how to spell it! :)), or even worse, suck on a dude's dick after it's been in someone's asshole like it was an automobile's shock absorber!! :)
I did Join and it said Full Members I think it either means that if you join the sites individually or if you cancel they switch you to the new members area.
First go to the Teencore club page in Bestporn then click on the picture that takes you to the teencore club main tour page then click where it says members click here at the top area of the page when you click on that page you will see two columns the left one says
Access for FULL MEMBERS of Teencore club is here:
There is a list of sites below.
Access for NEW MEMBERS is here:
There is a list of sites below.
This is classic bait and switch tactics. The objective of course is to get you as a long term member, if you are not pissed. This is a very poor marketing strategy, and will cost the company more in long term sales. Look to the most successful networks in this genre. They garner a long term membership base by the update rate they keep. Holding back sites in the network is more aggravating than endearing to loyalty as a customer. Since this network claims a very fast update rate I do not understand the choice to hold back sites in the network. They would be better off creating two separate networks. I know I would pay for both, because the quality and update rate are top rate.
I will cancel my membership and move on. If they change there ways, I will return.
> if all porn was condom only, then any teen/young person who saw that
> would probably think that it's a good idea for him to wear a condom or
> her to ask that her partner does as well.
Exactly my point. On the other hand, I'm not that optimistic that it is possible to make ALL porn condom-only, and think that there are much better chances to make SOME porn condom-only, but restrict TEENS exclusively to this SOME condom-only porn (and even if this last restriction will be only 80-90% successful, it would still be a positive thing).
Here, here. Makes me think of Jassie, or Klaudia (the Hungarian brunette), or a host of other VERY fine women who are perfect just as they are. Even if they can afford a silicon beefup, let's hope they never have one!
> We know everything at that age, and our parents are the ignorant ones
Right! Exactly my point.
> You and I both know that since the hardcore porn exist most will bypass the mild stuff, and go for the hardcore one.
Sure, but my point is that even hardcore can easily be educational and promote desired behavior, so it is not about it being softcore. My point is that if there will be hardcore but with condoms all the way and with models/actors showing care for each other, it should be enough for a teen to stop looking for something more hard, and on the other hand will get used to the view that a guy ALWAYS puts a condom before starting sex. As I remember myself as a teen, I would definitely NOT try looking for anal or BDSM or anything else if I'd be able to see just simple plain hardcore, with condoms or not; and the younger the teen - the less chances for him to try going further, that's a good thing too. Compare it to what we have now: when teen starts looking for porn (and he starts for sure), most likely he'll find some stuff where women are treated like s**t, and/or all kinds of things which are really harmful at that age, from A2M to WS and beastiality; don't you think that if he would run into hardcore, but condom-only and "caring" porn, it would be much better for him?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
