| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1151
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
That Nathalie is a true slut. The first time I saw her, I thought she was lovely and pink and soft in a photoset, wearing an adorable smile, a white wrist band and a white-and-pink collar around her neck, and nothing else. But then I started seeing her on one site after another, banging away with boy after boy after boy. And my illusions were shattered, because I had thought she was waiting for me to show up, and I was forced to realize she was not really waiting after all. :)
The photography can make a huge difference in how attractive a girl appears. In that one photoset I first saw, Nathalie looked really cute. But in many of the photosets/videos of her I've seen since, she looks just OK to mildly attractive.
I really wish that more sites would pay more time and attention and care to making each girl as attractive as possible, in the photographs and videos. I don't think it would take that much more effort, as long as the photographer/video man was competent.
|
10-16-10 09:46am
|
Reply
1152
|
Rocco Siffredi
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
There's supposed to be software to block spam. But if we could come up with better software that really works to block at least some of this spam, we should make a fortune.
I also get a lot of random spam emails for sex, medications, whatever. Most of that goes into my spam box, but some of it gets into my regular email box. The amount of spam I've been getting recently has increased significantly.
And I'm too lazy to get a new email address, because then I would have to change my email for all the accounts that I really want to get mail and notices from.
Edit01: I did open two email addresses, that I was hoping would get the bulk of my spam. But my regular email address has been put on the list for spammers. And they also use my email address as a "fake" email address of origin when they send out spam, because I sometimes get notices that some messages (that are spam) were not able to be delivered, or that I have gone over the limit of the amount of email I can send. And I did not, obviously, send those spam messages, and I send out very few emails in any one day.
|
10-08-10 07:09pm
|
Reply
1153
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from graymane:
(pat362's Reply)
Spoken like a social genius. A genuinely sensible approach in any language.
|
10-06-10 07:31pm
|
Reply
1154
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from mbaya:
(pat362's Reply)
That is a shame. I want to see you reach 100 points. Your reviews are always a good read.
|
10-03-10 07:10pm
|
Reply
1155
|
Celebrity Spanker
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from alexmedia:
(pat362's Reply)
Thx for your advice.
I joined a couple celebrity sites who has celebrity sex tapes (Celebrity-Worship.com for example) on preview pages but didn't rip me off:) They have good content and don't even have cross-sales.
So I wouldn't say that every site with sex tapes want to steal your money.
But anyway, thank you for your opinion and detailed answer.
|
09-28-10 05:46pm
|
Reply
1156
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
Just trying to help...
|
09-28-10 03:43pm
|
Reply
1157
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
I've had the same problem with some picture sites recently. AO30 and Aunt Jydy's/Older Women certainly have had very mediocre updates during the past year, and they used to be some of my favorite sites.
No wonder I am baying at the moon!!
|
09-28-10 08:28am
|
Reply
1158
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the info!
|
09-27-10 09:59pm
|
Reply
1159
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
I think you are right, Pat! That's why Reality Kings will be my last long term subscription for a while. I had one to American Vice and we all know what happened to them. As you say, in these uncertain times many sites will go under!
|
09-27-10 07:09pm
|
Reply
1160
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Toadsith:
(pat362's Reply)
"Are all of you that voted no, telling me that you believe that seeing a beautiful naked woman in a magazine or on a website is not sexual?"
You are focusing on an extremely narrow segment of nudity. The poll simply asked: "Do you equate nudity with sexuality?" Nude, aside from the legal meaning, is commonly defined as "devoid of a natural or conventional covering; especially : not covered by clothing or a drape" So when the pollster used the term nudity alone without any situational descriptors he/she/it opened up this poll to addressing a very broad definition. While physical nudity is generally associated with humans, the common definition makes it easily applicable to sheered sheep. While some Kiwis might argue with the generalization, most people would probably agree that a sheered sheep does not bring sexuality to mind.
Perhaps we should define sexuality as well. This word has a more precise definition than nudity, though there is still a good amount of wiggle room. Sexuality is commonly defined as "the quality or state of being sexual: the condition of having sex; sexual activity; expression of sexual receptivity or interest especially when excessive"
While the common definition's secondary examples (listed after the colon) clearly intend to associate the word with reproductive activity, we could interpret it as addressing anything relating to sexes. This widened definition would probably allow most people to then include the sheered sheep with things associated with sexuality.
In regards to the examples of Playboy: This publication is clearly aiming for the common usage of sexuality and indeed most people would probably argue it fits it quite well. The women are depicted as females of reproductive age and are usually excessively expressing sexual receptivity in the form of good eye contact, prominent display of genitalia, et cetera.
However, the argument for nudity not equating sexuality boils down to this: Playboy is a good example of nudity but not representative of the definition as a whole. Nude beaches, public baths, locker room showers, hospitals, police stations after being picked up for loitering when you just wanted some breakfast and a bit of respect for having just gotten back from service in 'Nam. These are all places that have copious amounts of nudity that most people would probably not describe as sexual.
Looking at it another way, your argument is argument by example. The question that must be asked: "Is the example representative?" Just because it is valid, does not mean it is true. Notice the similarity:
Playboy has nudity. Playboy has sexuality. Therefore: Nudity is sexuality.
Cobras are snakes. Cobras are poisonous. Therefore: Snakes are poisonous.
The arguments are valid, but the examples aren't representative.
|
09-27-10 02:35pm
|
Reply
1161
|
Celebrity Spanker
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from alexmedia:
(pat362's Reply)
Hm..can you explain why you not join sites with celebrity sex tapes?
|
09-26-10 06:07pm
|
Reply
1162
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
pat and justme, thanks for your thoughts on softcore eroticism. :)
|
09-16-10 09:50am
|
Reply
1163
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
That sure looks like her. I'll check this out. Thanks for the tip. This might be a turning point in my porn downloading. Russia, here I come!
|
09-16-10 03:51am
|
Reply
1164
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Pat - but shouldn't those big, bad webmasters think of the girls too??? They need to eat! Some of them are so skinny!
I hope they continue updating too. But since I only joined to get pics and video of "Natalie" everything else is gravy.
|
09-15-10 03:48am
|
Reply
1165
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
I would agree that masturbation could easily be classified as midcore.
I Feel Myself has some hot masturbation videos.
If done right, a softcore or midcore video can be erotic. But most softcore videos are boring. Take a look at the Metart videos, which can feature lovely teens, and their videos are almost all a waste of time. While photosets of the same models can be strongly erotic. I wish someone would explain the reasons for that in a simple way.
|
09-14-10 08:43pm
|
Reply
1166
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
pat362 - I'll have to defer to you on this one. I have little experience in the world of Eastern European / Russian sites (and yes, I know that's starting to sound like an excuse...) and thought that this was new material.
My membership expired a couple of weeks ago and I've been watching the material since then. But you appear to be right. Since the last update I downloaded there appear to have only been two updates, unless there are more that aren't just shown on the front page. But that doesn't make sense. Maybe I got in and got out while the getting was good. I'll watch for any future reviews to see what others think.
|
09-14-10 03:42pm
|
Reply
1167
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
A good point about corporations; they should have some moral obligation but that doesn't mean they ever will. They priority of any corporation is money--to make a profit--all else is secondary really. If sex sells, then that will be marketed. If celibacy sells, then that will marketed instead. This doesn't just apply to sex, there are far worse things businesses are doing; pollution, ill treatment and underpayment of workers, unsafe products, support of tyrannical governments, etc. I'm just saying you can't expect much from corporate powers.
|
09-12-10 08:38pm
|
Reply
1168
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
It might not be a question of "too much sexuality at a very young age" but really the nature and the context of the messages themselves. If you have two competing extremes of anti-sex/anti-nudity versus the sex-saturated culture then that can make for some very mixed messages to the young and impressionable. I doubt the corporate-born images of sex and nudity would be much different if we had healthier views on sex but they would very likely be easier for kids to comprehend and interpret.
If we adults are unwilling, indifferent, or simply too embarrassed to teach children anything of value on the subject then they are going to teach themselves and then we won't have anyone to blame but ourselves.
|
09-12-10 06:24pm
|
Reply
1169
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
Public disgrace almost always includes Princess Donna or another dom and other boys AND girls. My kind of party!
|
09-12-10 03:12pm
|
Reply
1170
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
Fair enough. A mixture of G/G, B/G, GGGGG/G (many girls on girls) would be great for me. My problem is I am bored by solo play, although others like it, I know.
|
09-12-10 01:29am
|
Reply
1171
|
Real Celeb Scandals
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from alexmedia:
(pat362's Reply)
I see, so no reasons to join the site.
Thank you.
|
09-09-10 07:55pm
|
Reply
1172
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
Agree with pat, I think the "star" part is a bit overused, but I am always in for more hardcore performers - provided they don't have stupid tats or ridiculous fake parts...
|
09-09-10 12:30am
|
Reply
1173
|
Real Celeb Scandals
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from alexmedia:
(pat362's Reply)
Do you mean any videos of these certain celebs or any videos at all?
Thanks for your comment.
|
09-08-10 07:01pm
|
Reply
1174
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from graymane:
(pat362's Reply)
Sorry, Pat, for my delay acknowledging your thoughtful comments. I found a lot of useful material in all you offered....and I thank you for that as well as the trust vote.
|
09-08-10 05:28pm
|
Reply
1175
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from dracken:
(pat362's Reply)
To be honest not that many girls do it and quite a few are just quick tries where the girl gets "pumped" once or twice and wants to change to something else. Since there is no search function you have to view each scene yourself to figure things out and sometimes the description is misleading (I partially joined becuase I wanted to see Chastity doing anal, she doesn't although the description hints at that)
I'd say there are maybe 10-15 anal scenes? maybe...but they are worth the watching if you like amateur porn. The guy usually films the girl's face as he penetrates her and that is something you don't find very often. You basically get a blend of anal penetration shot and face shot, instead of a focus on the but hole.
|
09-06-10 10:15pm
|
