| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1126
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Cybertoad:
Very nice review and informative
|
11-09-10 11:54am
|
Reply
1127
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Another excellent review. Ik did one on Teenamite, and these two networks do look okay. No dirty tricks I presume. I will not tolerate regional discrimination or pre checked cross sales. I may even stop downloading for free and join a deserving network.
|
11-09-10 09:15am
|
Reply
1128
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the reply, and taking the time to edit and check the update facts at the different sites.
My impression (which could easily be wrong) was that at the time I joined TeenMegaWorld, the fuckstudies videos were not part of the TeenMegaWorld content. I definitely know that the fuckstudies site was not one of the bonus sites at the time I joined.
At the time I joined TeenMegaWorld, when you joined any one site in the network, you got, as a bonus, access to most but not all the sites in the network. The specific sites you got was arbitrary: It changed depending on which site you joined through, and the date you joined that site. Also, when I last joined (July 2010), if you joined through the PU/TBP link, you got a discounted price, but you were penalized by getting access to a smaller number of bonus sites.
I posted a comment about the smaller number of bonus sites when joining through PU/TBP link, and Khan or someone else at PU contacted the network to get the higher number of bonus sites for the PU/TBP link.
So Khan and the PU/TBP team are looking out for us. Sort of like a big brother, or maybe like the mafia? Lol.
|
11-08-10 10:57pm
|
Reply
1129
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from dracken:
I have to agree that this network can be a bit funky with what sites you get when you join. I had the same issue of not getting fuckstudies, but I think I had some old men on teens site which made up for it.
Either way, nice review, thanks for sharing and thanks for he personal touch in the review, that's what makes this site the best for getting info on what to join :)
|
11-08-10 07:32pm
|
Reply
1130
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from rearadmiral:
Excellent review. Based on your one line "This site is for people that enjoy watching cute teens having hardcore sex and getting sodomized" I think I'll check it out. I do want to see your response to lk2fireone re the limited sites depending on how you join.
|
11-08-10 12:58pm
|
Reply
1131
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from lk2fireone:
I joined teenmegaworld back in July, hoping that fuckstudies would be one of my bonus sites. But I didn't get it as part of my membership. So I am giving fuckstudies a fucking low grade of 30 because I never got inside the members area.
Regarding anal versus vaginal, there doesn't seem to be all that much of a difference, except when the guy sometimes pulls out and shows how enlarged the anus is. Which doesn't turn me on very much.
So maybe I should drop my score for the site another 10 or 15 points. What do you think?
I did see a few videos from the site, and they seemed to be very sharp in focus and clarity and color with good action with good looking models. Which is why I wanted to get into the site to see what else they had.
So which site did you join that gave you fuckstudies as part of the package?
|
11-07-10 09:17pm
|
Reply
1132
|
Gapeland
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from RustyJ:
I'm also planning to write a review some day now but would like to comment. Do you also think that even the 1080p content on this site is quite not up to the same standard as on the other 21Sextury sites? It seems softer to me and the colors aren't quite as vibrant with less contrast too.
|
11-05-10 02:04am
|
Reply
1133
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from BadMrFrosty:
(pat362's Reply)
Can't argue with you there, the network is otherwise fantastic. In fact its the only site I maintain a regular membership with. But there is always room for improvement, if the sorted out the membership packages I'm sure I would find something else to complain about :)
|
11-03-10 12:35am
|
Reply
1134
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
from BadMrFrosty:
If they are true to form they will still confuse the hell out of anyone wanting to join the network with their convoluted membership packages. Why in the name of all that is good and holy cant they follow the same pratices as the other big networks? The thing that REALLY pisses me off is the fact that you cant access newly launched sites as a current member. What were they thinking!??!?!?
|
11-02-10 06:56am
|
Reply
1135
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
Yes, I do wish they would produce more porn along the lines of the stuff that was made 20 - 30 years ago, Pat, yet at the same time I could put up with new and flashy if they indeed presented something new and flashy instead of an endless repetition of scenes that look identical except for the faces.
I'm done with DVD sites for a while because I was just as discontent at Videosz and Porn.com, for the same reason. And don't let anyone say I'm becoming jaded from over exposure because good stuff when I come across it now and then still turns me on! :-)
|
11-01-10 07:16pm
|
Reply
1136
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
You put your finger right on it, Pat, in what you wrote. I think my problem is that basically anything 5 - 10 years old is generally done Gonzo style and, as I stated in another reply, this is a way of making Porn that I am indifferent to. I hate it when one moment a model is fully clothed and then the next completely naked and in the middle of action and if basically one DVD after the other starts and ends the same with the same action in each it does tend to get tedious.
|
11-01-10 09:42am
|
Reply
1137
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from hodayathink:
(pat362's Reply)
I honestly can't decide between Julia Ann and India Summer. And Michelle Lay's pretty high up there, too.
|
10-28-10 10:13pm
|
Reply
1138
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
from RustyJ:
Yes, there was mention of some changes in their guestbook too. Hope it's nothing too drastic as I really like the site as it is with the loyalty bonus price and all...
As long as there is a reasonably priced network wide membership, I'll stay. Otherwise I have to consider being member every now and then.
|
10-28-10 09:44pm
|
Reply
1139
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
Yes, I go along with Rayveness. One of my favorites!
|
10-28-10 07:02pm
|
Reply
1140
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
Nope, afraid not, Pat!
|
10-23-10 06:32pm
|
Reply
1141
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from RustyJ:
(pat362's Reply)
No, at least not for those subscribed via 21Sextury main site. I noticed Nude Fight Club, Sex With Kathia Nobili, Cheating Whore Wives and Aletta Ocean Empire.
The first too are kind of uninteresting to me but the other two are nice addition. They are all high def "premium" sites and bring the total scenes just little over 10000. Not bad ;)
|
10-23-10 02:35pm
|
Reply
1142
|
Gianna Michaels Videos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ace of aces:
(pat362's Reply)
all the b***** at theire selvefinding trip...suprised? not really. they probalby earned enough money...and only leaving back the unknown disappointed fans ;)
|
10-21-10 08:14am
|
Reply
1143
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from graymane:
(pat362's Reply)
Thank you for taking the time to look up the word "spiteful."
You're absolutely right in your finding.
Allow, if you will, the creator of this faux pas to correct and rephrase the question:
How about: "Your GF or wife lovingly, and with profound regret, cuts you off only temporarily."
Better?
|
10-20-10 09:55pm
|
Reply
1144
|
Playboy's All Naturals
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(pat362's Reply)
Well, pat362 - did not run into problems earlier when joining that Playboy site with "Fresh Faces", "Busty Babes" ect. - DID in fact get out via net-cancel in some way. (Thanks for the concern, anyway).
BUT they got over 60 sites and some of the 'main' or larger sites seems to have that problem - still. So I was just wondering - and I'd probably never join a site where I go on/pay via net and have to cancel via phone..And THAT is definitely a problem for members (and stupid of that ICS.Inc. Playboy company)
https://www.thebestporn.com/review_company.html?id=17
|
10-19-10 05:46am
|
Reply
1145
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#18
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
500MB x 50 scenes = 25 GB. If that's for 1 month, that would be a tiny download limit.
I joined a Japanese site about a year ago, that had a daily download limit of 12 GB. The photosets and videos only had 1 file size (no low or medium option, just the high quality was offered).
For downloading, my DSL connection maxes out at 150-160 KB/s. That's the best I can hit, and if I download more than 1 file at a time, the total download speed splits the 150 KB/s between the files. So it's no faster to download 2 files at the same time than to download a single file.
Anyway, even with 150-160 KB/s download speed, I could sometimes reach the 12 GB daily limit. Because the video files at that site were large (the photosets are much smaller, of course).
So I downloaded a bunch of videos and photosets, because there are some absolutely gorgeous Japanese porn stars.
But I haven't looked at a single one of those files since downloading them. Lol. And that was over a year ago.
|
10-18-10 08:41pm
|
Reply
1146
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from SteveO:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the suggestion. Sounds like a have a project for this weekend. It definately better than cleaning the house...
|
10-18-10 08:27am
|
Reply
1147
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#16
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
I was never very accurate guessing a person's age from looking at him or her.
A few porn models do have a very young appearance, and can still look like a teenager long after they are into their twenties.
Thanks for the links, but I can't really tell much difference in her appearance between the three scenes. The major difference, to me, is that she has a greenish white skintone in one because of the green paint on the walls:
http://picsgall3.tinseks.com/012/10/001/
I'm pretty sure she is also at the teenmegaworld network. But I don't know if I even bothered to download her material there, because I was signed up to too many different sites, and with a slow DSL connection, it takes a long time to download these large files. And when I download, I usually go for the high quality, so it can take 1-2 hours to download a single video file.
I really need to get a faster Internet connection.
Some of these video files are now over 1 GB, which is ridiculous. Especially when I find I don't even like the file, and delete it, after watching it partway through.
There are a number of videos at this current network, TonyBucks, that are 1 GB or more.
(TonyBucks includes tinseks, not 18xgirls.)
|
10-17-10 06:23pm
|
Reply
1148
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
Sometimes when I mention that a photographer can make a girl look much better, by makeup, lighting, whatever, I get a response that "natural" is better, and that to some PU members, at least, the less makeup, photoshopping, the better: any change from the real model is for the worse.
But I definitely think, as long as it's not overdone (which is a highly personal opinion), makeup and lighting and good skin tone and colorful costume and other factors can make a huge difference in how attractive and erotic a model will be presented.
I think I started seeing this model maybe a year ago. One of the first sets I saw her in she was really cute (because of the lighting and other factors). Since then, I've seen her at many different sites, and she rarely looks as good as she did in that early photoset. It wasn't that she was wearing a lot of makeup: she just looked really cute or pretty.
Some models can look very different from one site to the next. But this model's only been here a very short time, so, if she doesn't age fast, change hair color or hair style, she is easily recognizable at the different sites.
A few porn models can last for 5-10 years or more, and they don't appear to age that much. Most models don't last anywhere near that long, but in a few years, they are already starting to look much older. The porn business can be very hard on some models, I think.
|
10-17-10 11:25am
|
Reply
1149
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
I am assuming that the average woman would have a larger vagina as well. Wouldn't make sense for guys to have relatively large penises (compared to body size) but for women not to have evolved too.
If you want to make your penis look bigger than lose some weight--preferably around your mid section--and it will appear larger even though it's still the same size. Shaving might help as well but that makes it obvious that you really care about its looks.
But if we're simply talking about size then a large bank account gets more women fired up than any pill or any genetic luck of the draw. Look at all the bullshit men spend way too much money on that isn't lurking in their shorts: cars, cologne, clothes, gym memberships, the list is endless. All of it designed to impress the opposite sex or at least impress upon them that we have money.
|
10-16-10 04:39pm
|
Reply
1150
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from SteveO:
(pat362's Reply)
You may be on to something. Maybe they are packaging a certian look for thier brand.
|
10-16-10 12:45pm
|
