| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
651
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
What Pat said. Pee shots are fine when the shot of the cunt is clear and clean and the pee doesn't get misused. But the old saying still applies, "it's better being pissed off than being pissed on."
Seriously, I like pee scenes, like Pat, when the grass is being watered (or the floor washed) but I don't get the scenes where the pee is directed at someone else. How is that a turn on?
But the thing that crosses the line is when the babe pisses in a glass or bowl, then pours it on herself. The really disgusting scenes are when the babe actually pours the pee in her mouth.
|
09-23-12 09:35am
|
Reply
652
|
My Pickup Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from BadMrFrosty:
(pat362's Reply)
I dont know if any such site exists as it's not really my thing but here in the Czech Republic its totally and completely feasible to pick up a girl on the street and film her getting fucked. All you need is a couple of model release forms and a camera to take a picture of her ID card. By law everyone is required to carry their ID card so all it takes is 2 minutes before the girl agrees and the action starts. I dont know how these sites are setup but I assume that if a girl is picked up in the street she is not fucked in the street so the ride in the back of a car to the shoot location allows time for paperwork to be signed and ID copied.
|
09-20-12 07:37pm
|
Reply
653
|
My Pickup Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from johnyk9:
Do you know of any reality sites where the pickups do appear real?
thanks
|
09-19-12 02:47pm
|
Reply
654
|
Faith 69
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks Pat!
|
09-14-12 04:02pm
|
Reply
655
|
Mandingo Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
from hiker:
Same girl, same videos. This girl has had several sites, all with the same videos. Her "updates" consist of moving earlier moves to the top of the list. Notice that none of her updates are dated, makes it easy to recycle that way.
I would like to see a group of us consumers get together a start a class action suite against webmasters like this that are defrauding the public. There are a number of them, including Public Invasion/Busty Adventures to name a big one. Their front page advertises frequent updates, but once you sign up, there are no updates, as in the Public Invasion group, since 2009.
|
09-13-12 12:18pm
|
Reply
656
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from benmar51:
(pat362's Reply)
Pat, I appreciate your explanation, but I`m not sure it holds water. . .The punishment scenes on Brazzers were actually quite tame when compared to a site like KINK, yet VISA is accepted at KINK. . . I suspect new ownership at Brazzers desiring a "classier" sort of porn. . .This is my 2nd go-round at Brazzers, so I DL`ed many scenes before, but missed many newer ones. . . In addition to "punishment" scenes being deleted, there`s a whole slew of other scenes which have also been excised.
|
09-10-12 07:51pm
|
Reply
657
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RustyJ:
(pat362's Reply)
You are probably right. Anyway, this was 6 extra scenes and quite good ones so I'm not really complaining. What I noticed was these were shorter and more to the point, timing at roughly 20 minutes. I don't really see all the extra value on sites like EvilAngel where their scenes can be hour long.
|
09-08-12 01:50am
|
Reply
658
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Marcus:
(pat362's Reply)
To be fair, the downloading content problem was only one of my complaints. I think my membership will be worthwhile as I like Francine and some of the pictures are great, but it's definitely not the kind of site I'd recommend, let alone join again.
|
09-07-12 02:09pm
|
Reply
659
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Marcus:
(pat362's Reply)
I know, I just thought I'd give my initial thoughts here. I probably would have joined anyway as I really like Francine, but it doesn't stop me being disappointed, plus I like to at least give a site the benefit of the doubt.
|
09-07-12 09:10am
|
Reply
660
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Monahan:
Excellent review.
My adds:
A big uptick to VB for its continuing effort to list the cast for most of its material.
A big downtick for its incorrect spelling and/or identification of the cast names which, with the size of their catalogue, makes it impossible to find all of the material for a specific performer.
A big uptick for the quality of member commentary. Many members are true pornophiles who know their stuff and are willing to share.
A big downtick for VB's laziness in making corrections in cast member names that are identified by members in their comments.
I've been a member since 2005 and it's still my favorite source for my stash, especially when they exploded from one update a day to 5 or more a day. But I do agree with the score for all of the reasons cited.
|
09-05-12 09:17am
|
Reply
661
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
I think we're mostly in agreement. I have to have the sound off a lot of times for 'strategic' reasons. But when I am able to listen to the sound too I prefer no music at all. I'm so used to no music in much of what I watch that it seems obtrusive when it is there - even if it is subtle.
One possible exception is the original music that X-Art uses. I don't necessarily like it, but I will admit that it adds to the mood that the site is trying to create.
|
09-05-12 04:11am
|
Reply
662
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
I didn't, but I do watch a lot with the sound off too so I'd be less inclined to notice that.
|
09-04-12 05:15pm
|
Reply
663
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from rearadmiral:
Great review pat. Regarding your comment that you might be in the minority since you don't find VB all that great, I think you're both right and wrong. As you say, VB is an excellent site for someone who is just starting to collect porn so you'd be in the minority among most people. But here at PU, I suspect that you're in the majority. I like VB and I'll keep going back, but I really wish they'd make it a better site and concentrate more on quality than quantity.
I also strong agree with you that it is frustrating that studios on VB don't make more of their catalogue available.
|
09-03-12 05:01pm
|
Reply
664
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Good review, I see you scored it very close to my mark. This place could certainly do with more quality over quantity, but maybe in the current climate, that's all they can do on the budget. Many videos and scenes listed as new, are just old ones which have been repackaged, which is often noted by members.
|
09-03-12 09:06am
|
Reply
665
|
My Hot Wife
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from marcdc1:
(pat362's Reply)
Oh no, I didn't structure my sentences well. I'm still gonna give Jackie a try (she won me over with her twitter and blog). I was more speaking about the totality of your reviews and contributions being so valuable to me.
Thanks for all your help to the community. If you don't hear it often enough I appreciate it!
|
08-31-12 01:43pm
|
Reply
666
|
My Hot Wife
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks again pat. This was very helpful. You save me more money than my accountant! :)
|
08-31-12 12:12pm
|
Reply
667
|
Digital Playground
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from hodayathink:
(pat362's Reply)
It was filmed this year, and she's shot enough scenes this year for a couple more movies as well.
|
08-27-12 10:46am
|
Reply
668
|
Sweet Leah Luv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from marcdc1:
(pat362's Reply)
Well said. The site has a good mix of that beginning mostly BJ stuff as well as some of the later more hardcore stuff.
Thanks Pat.
|
08-26-12 03:41pm
|
Reply
669
|
Digital Playground
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from hodayathink:
(pat362's Reply)
"When was the last time anyone saw a Stoya movie?"
A week or two ago. UnSEXpected. It just got released.
|
08-26-12 10:12am
|
Reply
670
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from elephant:
(pat362's Reply)
Exactly Pat362, it just makes a refreshing change to now and again see a movie with a little more slowed down vibe to it and you can admire the girls more in their beauty. Works for me having a nice wide variety of porn genres and niches.
|
08-26-12 01:15am
|
Reply
671
|
Sweet Leah Luv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the catch Pat!
You are of course right it was 2008 for the last update (I'll try to fix this so the review is more accurate).
I should know better than to look at porn and numbers at the same time :) (On the plus side I did have it right in the comment I posted earlier - then again close only counts in horseshoes)
|
08-25-12 11:19am
|
Reply
672
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from elephant:
(pat362's Reply)
Hi Pat362
Thanks for the kind words bud, Yeah it was one of them sites for me, always wanted to join but thought it might be a little on the soft side for my tastes, I've been thankful I did join now as some of it I'd put to my hottest scenes, I've not been through that many as yet though so hopefully there will be tons more favs scenes also here.
So I don't know how many anal scenes as yet, Up to now I clocked around 6 I think, but there is bound to be more, I'll try and give you an update when I've been through more of them, unless someone else knows for sure. Its something I'd like to see added to their site, some indication of what is what.
Lots of scenes too the guy comes on her back and I'm so used to a facial so it's a little strange on that score, I think I prefer a facial to be honest but as I say I'm more used to seeing this in porn.
Thanks for the link, no hadn't got around to getting all the girls names sorted, so will do that with your link, cheers
|
08-25-12 09:13am
|
Reply
673
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
I was thinking the same thing, and if we are used to reading right to left, top to bottom, then the last thing we will register on screen is the watermark (assuming small size, subdued color, etc.).
And this is one of the great things about higher res videos and pictures--the smaller the watermark. Of course, this is because they assume it's being viewed on a larger display and the watermark should be scaled accordingly. However, watch an older lower res video at full screen on a newer bigger display and those watermarks look ridiculous!
|
08-25-12 12:31am
|
Reply
674
|
Marie McCray
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Yeah, I heard those stories about her later days in the business. She always seemed like a model who had here head screwed on pretty straight. Some girls seem flaky right from the beginning and Micah wasn't like that.
|
08-22-12 05:09pm
|
Reply
675
|
Marie McCray
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from marcdc1:
(pat362's Reply)
That's what I'm afraid of. Thank you as always sir.
|
08-22-12 05:54am
|
