| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1026
|
Velvet Ecstasy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Victor:
(mbaya's Reply)
You are right. I guess I was in a bad mood yesterday. I've increased the limit to 5 Gigs for now. If the bandwidth doesn't get abused I may lift it all together. I have to watch closely what the bandwidth cost is compared to the price I charge. It's very hard to compete with big sites that have thousands of videos and no limits when you have a limited budget. Sorry if I came across as sarcastic:)
|
09-25-09 01:23pm
|
Reply
1027
|
Victoria Pink
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(mbaya's Reply)
Read it. Sadly it shows that no effort has been made at all to update the site in well over 2 years.
I suspect she's found a sugar daddy in Las Vegas who has taken her out of the skin biz.
|
08-21-08 12:49pm
|
Reply
1028
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Skip:
(mbaya's Reply)
I have been a member about 7 or 8 times. The only thing bring me back was the low price and the ability to make video clips at any length you want.
That was the big attraction for me, and as for the content, Maybe 1 in 10 videos would to be my liking.
What finally did it for me was the billing fiasco, and lack of customer service when they added the premium channels.
Video Box has lost me as a customer for the time being.
SEE: https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=32958
|
04-02-09 09:11am
|
Reply
1029
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Tree Rodent:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thanks mbaya - yes, and it's not only that they shared my details and VideosZ/Bang password, it's that they also blanked me when I contacted them about the fraudulent charge, like they had never heard of anything like that happening.
From the sound of it this happens a lot, so if they had merely said "yeah this sometimes happens we'll look into it," rather than "only you can authorize a card charge, you must be responsible for the charge, no refund," I'd have been a lot less pissed off.
|
02-08-19 01:10pm
|
Reply
1030
|
Vintage Classic Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jook:
(mbaya's Reply)
I was happy to see that vxsbill did the right thing by refunding my money. They did so a few moments after I emailed them links to 7 broken video downloads, or at least sent a confirmation notice that they were refunding my money.
As I mentioned in the forum, I'm confused with the relationship between billers and sites in the porn industry. In no other industry that I know of does one deal with the biller under any circumstances - all issues are handled by the merchant. I'm guessing that one reason may have to do with the merchant (site) not having the resources to deal with billing issues.
As for CCBill, I've had my issues with them and only yesterday had a problem. Nothing major though, like suffering a monetary loss. Regarding your inability to get a refund under similar circumstances as me, I would probably fight it, though I'm not sure. The concerns with fighting it are first, the hassle and some embarrassment of dealing with my bank for a relatively small amount of money and second, the outside chance of getting blacklisted by the biller. However, knowing myself, I'd probably fight it out of principle -).
|
05-27-17 05:34am
|
Reply
1031
|
VIPissy
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Homegirl:
I found it very interesting that the men and women are treated differently in receiving the pee.
This content does not interest me much but I liked the review.
|
05-25-20 08:10am
|
Reply
1032
|
VIPissy
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Homegirl:
What did you think of the lesbian scenes?
|
05-16-20 09:37am
|
Reply
1033
|
Virtua Guy HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from gaypornolover:
(mbaya's Reply)
I'd like to, but so many of the sites I used to review are no longer on PU and every time I join a new one, it's not listed on PU so I can't review it.
|
03-01-20 04:32pm
|
Reply
1034
|
Vivid
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(mbaya's Reply)
They've got such a big name in the industry because of their stars - they've shelled out to have the hottest contract girls - and wasted the opportunity by churning out crap so they could have a constant stream of stuff out there for business people to rent in hotel rooms - at least that's my theory. It's amazing to think what people with talent could have done with their contract girls. Such a waste.
|
01-11-09 09:24pm
|
Reply
1035
|
Voyeur Realm
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from Khan:
Just as a followup ...
Our editors checked this out and the trial option did not show for us. Therefore, we can't list the trial as being a membership option.
But ...
We have confirmed that mbaya did, in fact, see a trial offered. The only thing we can guess is that there's some kind of geo-targeted marketing going on where the trial is offered to some visitors but not all.
Thx to mbaya for working with us to check this one out.
|
01-16-09 10:24am
|
Reply
1036
|
Voyeur Realm
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from Khan:
I passed this to the TBP Editors and they said they can't find the trial offered. If you'll email me to URL where you're seeing the trial ... or let us know how you get to it from their main page ... they'll take another look.
Thx
|
01-14-09 10:55am
|
Reply
1037
|
Warm Kiss
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from kkman112:
(mbaya's Reply)
Yes, the content is very important. But a decent site is as well. For instance I like to keep up-to-date with sites that I dont even have a membership too. I like XML/ATOM feeds and mailing lists so I can keep up with whats going one, and make sure that if I join the site again I know there are updates.
|
03-02-10 12:34pm
|
Reply
1038
|
Watch My GF
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from clinton:
(mbaya's Reply)
In 10 years of owning my current credit card I have never had an unidentified transaction.
Yet the day after signing up with WATCHMYGF I had 4 fraudulent transactions totally $200.
I dont know if you are affiliated with these guys are not, although I can safely say even without the fake transactions the site is a scam.
Why?
Well within 30 seconds of connecting to the site it was very obvious that the content shown in online advertising was nothing more than bait which leads to a site which is essentially a very sparse imitation of sites like pornhub. The content was not only sparse, but 3 day 'trial' memberships (which I signed up using), were granted access to only perhaps 1/10th of the supposed content.
All in all, a bad experience which is still playing itself out with my bank's fraud department 3 months later.
Does that answer your questions?
|
01-08-10 11:49pm
|
Reply
1039
|
Water Bondage
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Tom D Admin:
(mbaya's Reply)
I must apologize mabaya because I replied to your message the day you posted it without realizing that any replies made from the comments approval window don't get posted, they just disappear into the ether.
Kink has a number of channels with scenes coming from other content producers and these would not be reviewed under their umbrella. Otherwise, there are some channels that aren't actively promoted and these also won't get reviews.
Thank you for altering us to seeing $19.99 advertised other places because this pricing is normally only offered on a limited-time basis - we sometimes have access to it for a flash sale.
We will look into that with Kink, but in the meantime, we needed to activate our TBP discount of $29.99 - Kink.com is ready and the other should follow soon.
|
03-04-20 08:01am
|
Reply
1040
|
Water Bondage
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(mbaya's Reply)
I agree. PU is my go to spot so hopefully they can get access to the same deal.
I just recounted and again came up with 34. I'll have to look into what's missing from PU's list
|
03-02-20 01:38pm
|
Reply
1041
|
WCP Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from CowboyDave:
(mbaya's Reply)
The video quality is very good in my humble opinion.
Obviously the more recent uploads are a lot sharper when compared against the 2012 era.
I will look into this a bit more when I get a chance. Let me know if you need any more information. Speak soon.
|
06-02-19 11:24pm
|
Reply
1042
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(mbaya's Reply)
Hey, mbaya, if you read my previous review you will know that I always thought highly of this site because it was heads and shoulders above the only other hairy site I had subscribed to up till then. I, too, am happy that the webmaster tries so hard to please. It really shows. I am sure there will nevertheless be detractors but then you can't please everyone.
|
12-06-10 08:08am
|
Reply
1043
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Drooler:
Studies that show there are universal standards of beauty notwithstanding, it's true that attractiveness is at least somewhat in the eye of the beholder. I'm more with Mbaya on this. I'd like to see more models that are natural (sans "tats") and frankly healthier looking, if I may say so myself. Girls that are cute, fresh and bubbly like Lena (forgot her name at this site).
And I'm soooooooo, sooooooo, SOOOOOOOO tired of toy play! ENOUGH!! STOP THE INJECTION MOULDS! Fairly slow stripping and inviting Drooler to have some real fun would be a hell of a lot better.
Funny how I can say all of this without having joined the site. That's thanks to the fabulous site tour. You can see thumbs of all the galleries.
And I'm sure I'll join some time, anyway.
|
02-21-10 05:02pm
|
Reply
1044
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Capn:
There is something of a change of direction in the works which may well address some if not all of your concerns.
Well, maybe not as strong as that more a course adjustment! ;0)
New photographers should be coming on stream with more focussed instruction.
I am giving the forum there my best shots, but do need more participants to get some conversation & exchange of views going.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-21-10 12:03pm
|
Reply
1045
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(mbaya's Reply)
Yep, that's how I feel too. If you don't like something speak up. :-)
In any case, well done. It WAS a good review. We did differ in our scores but since I felt the site, as new as it was, surpassed ATK Natural and Hairy because of ATK's lousy video quality I thought it was only fair to give it a high mark for the hairy niche.
|
02-21-10 10:24am
|
Reply
1046
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from messmer:
Nice and fair review, mbaya. I only disagree with the point you made re. unattractive models. I found ninety percent of them gorgeous. But that boils down to personal taste, doesn't it. I do agree about the lack of variety when it comes to race and appearance but am willing to give it time, it is a new site and the webmaster promised us more variety down the road, as he did in connection with more teasing, stripping. I am glad you brought up that point because both cap'n and I have been after him regarding that subject till he must be sick of hearing about it and he promised to cater more to the wishes of those who prefer a bit more of a tease in the future. The addition of your voice will be very helpful.
|
02-21-10 10:00am
|
Reply
1047
|
We Do Blow Jobs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(mbaya's Reply)
I think that is fair comment.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-21-10 09:11am
|
Reply
1048
|
We Do Blow Jobs
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Capn:
The site is not big on photos then! ;0)
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-20-10 02:23pm
|
Reply
1049
|
We Love Bukkake
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from messmer:
Thanks for the detailed review, mbaya. I think your "the sites have a genuine amateur feel" has won me over and I just put the network under favorites so I won't forget it once all my present subscriptions are up. The tour helped as well. I like the true amateur look.
|
06-09-11 03:19pm
|
Reply
1050
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from tangub:
(mbaya's Reply)
I didn't mention anything about the raffle. My point was about the entire review being a copy and paste of a previous review.
Rule 4 for being awarded feedback points towards user rankings states:
4. Review should be unique compared to previously written reviews. No copy/paste material.
So you should not be awarded any feedback points for this review if the rules are followed but I doubt that will be the case.
|
10-08-19 09:23am
|
